Neuroscience News: Schizophrenia. Maybe some hope with this awful diagnosis, so often, casting people into criminal acts or lives of disarray

Schizophrenia Risk Gene Linked to Hyper-Excitable Neurons

FeaturedGeneticsNeurosciencePsychology

·May 20, 2026

Summary: A precision functional genomics study successfully mapped the biological timing and cellular consequences of a major schizophrenia-associated gene. The research investigates ZNF804A, the very first risk gene identified from human genomic data, and pinpoints its peak activity during a critical early developmental window.

By utilizing CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing to suppress ZNF804A in developing cortical neurons, neuroscientists exposed a direct structural link between localized protein production and hyper-excitable synaptic signaling. This breakthrough bridges a long-standing knowledge gap in psychiatric medicine, translating abstract genetic risk into tangible neurobiological pathways.

Key Facts

  • Bridging the Genetic Chasm: Schizophrenia is among the most heritable psychiatric conditions known, with genomic studies identifying 287 distinct risk loci. However, conventional genetics fails to explain when these genes become active or how they alter physical brain tissue.
  • The Second-Trimester Window: Using functional genomics, researchers confirmed that ZNF804A is sequentially orchestrated to become highly active early in brain development, specifically matching the second trimester of neurodevelopment.
  • Targeting Glutamatergic Neurons: The study discovered that ZNF804A concentrates its expression and regulatory power within glutamatergic neurons during this early phase, allowing scientists to isolate its specific cellular mechanics.
  • The CRISPR Interruption: Investigators deployed CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing to intentionally cut out parts of the ZNF804A DNA in these developing cells. This impaired the gene’s ability to translate its corresponding protein, allowing the team to observe what happens when its function is lost.
  • Localized Translation Overdrive: Neurons with impaired ZNF804A abnormally accelerated local protein translation by transporting excess ribosomes (the cell’s protein-building factories) directly to the tips of their branching dendrites.
  • Electrical Hyper-Excitability: This surge in localized protein production directly increased the density of essential signaling proteins sitting on the synaptic membranes. When chemically stimulated, these ZNF804A-deficient junctions proved to be far more electrically active and excitable than normal neurons.

Source: King’s College London

Researchers at King’s College London have identified the biological nature and timing of changes in human cortical neurons caused by altering activity of a schizophrenia-associated gene in developing human neurons.

This discovery links a genetic risk factor to cellular changes in neurons; an essential step for understanding the neurobiology of this mental illness and developing future treatments. 

This shows a brain and neurons.
Precision functional genomics data published in the journal Science Advances demonstrates that utilizing CRISPR-Cas9 to suppress the schizophrenia risk gene ZNF804A in developing glutamatergic neurons triggers an abnormal rush of local protein translation and hyper-excitable synaptic signaling. Credit: Neuroscience News

Schizophrenia is estimated to be one of the most heritable psychiatric conditions, with a strong developmental aspect. Large scale human genomic studies have identified many genetic variants which are thought to increase the likelihood of schizophrenia.  

However, the link between these genetic risk variants and the underlying neurobiology of schizophrenia is less well understood. Addressing this knowledge gap provides vital information that could ultimately help develop therapies for the disorder.   

This new research, published in Science Advances, from neuroscientists at the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), starts to bridge the knowledge gap between genetics and their neural consequences that lead to symptoms of schizophrenia. 

Professor Deepak Srivastava, Professor of Molecular Neuroscience at IoPPN King’s College London and joint senior author on the paper said: “While previous large-scale genetic studies have identified genetic risk factors for schizophrenia, they don’t tell you when in development that gene is active or which cell type it’s expressed in. To get at this information we needed to use precision functional genomics.”

Relatively little is known about the mechanism of the first schizophrenia-related gene to be identified from genomic data, ZNF804A. The study identifies a specific type of neuron where ZNF804A is most active in an important developmental window. 

The findings also establish a novel link between two previously identified cellular processes associated with the gene: synaptic regulation and protein production regulation. 

Dr Laura Sichlinger, Research Fellow at University of Pennsylvania and first author on the study said: “Schizophrenia is a highly complex disorder. It has both a genetic and environmental component.

“There are 287 loci so far identified by genomic studies in humans. To be able to understand what the genes normally do in neurons is a step forward in understanding the biology of the disorder.” 

Brain development is a carefully coordinated process triggered by sequentially activated genes that choreograph the precise maturation of different types of neurons and support cells in the brain. To understand developmental disorders, it is essential to identfy the timing of gene activation.  

The study confirmed that ZNF804A is most active early in development, consistent with previous studies that showed it to be highly expressed in the brain during the second trimester of neurodevelopment.  

The new research uncovered that ZNF804A was most active in glutamatergic neurons in this developmental period. Crucially, this helped the researchers focus their investigation on this type of neuron, at this particular developmental stage. 

To understand how ZNF804A contributes to the underlying neurobiology and ultimately symptoms of schizophrenia, researchers prevented the gene from functioning as it would normally in these glutamatergic neurons. To do this they employed a gene-editing approach called CRISPR-Cas9.

This method works by cutting out part of the DNA in a specific gene, meaning it will be less able to be translated in its corresponding protein. Essentially, it will be able to do less of its normal function in the cell. 

By looking at the changes that happened after interfering with ZNF804A, researchers could infer what the gene might be doing in development and what types of cellular processes might be altered in neurons with schizophrenia-related mutations. 

Scientists then used a microscope to look at the junctions, called synapses, between neurons with supressed ZNF804A gene activity. These junctions are run by a series of proteins sitting on the neuronal membrane. Some sit on the neuron sending the signal; some on the neuron receiving the signal. Changes in the numbers of these synaptic proteins can impact how the neurons send and receive signals. 

The microscopy images revealed that there were more proteins at the synapses between the glutamatergic neurons, suggesting they might be more electrically excitable than normal. 

This was confirmed by chemically stimulating the neurons causing them to be more electrically active. The neurons which had less ZNF804A gene responded more than normal ones. 

Some of the proteins that sit at the synapse can be created through a process called ‘protein translation’ in which a biological blueprint (called mRNA) of the protein is read in, and the corresponding protein is produced. Normally if more proteins are being made in a neuron, scientists will see evidence of more translation. 

Neurons are cells with distinctive shapes, much like trees with many branching projections. The junctions between neurons can form at many parts of the neuron but often lie on the smallest branches called dendrites. To get proteins to these synapses, neurons must transport ribosomes (the machinery that builds new proteins) to the ends of the dendrite branch.

This provides an ideal way to regulate how much protein is made at specific neuronal junctions: by controlling where the ribosomes are, and how many are available to make new proteins. 

The schizophrenia risk gene ZNF804A has previously been associated with cells’ protein translation machinery. However, it was unknown how this related to links to synapses and signalling between neurons.   

The new study found that the neurons with impaired ZNF804A had more synapses and they had more protein production locally in their dendrites, providing a crucial link between these two cellular functions of ZNF804A. This paves the way towards a comprehensive mechanistic understanding of the role this gene plays in neuronal development. 

Professor Anthony Vernon, Professor of Neuropsychopharmacology at IoPPN, King’s College London and joint senior author on the paper said: “We want to stress that these specific genetic manipulations of developing neurons do not mimic the full complement of genetic risk linked to schizophrenia. Rather, they are a tool that allow us to understand what specific risk genes, in this case, ZNF804A control in a cell and developmental timepoint specific manner.

“This in turn illuminates the biological processes and pathways that may be affected by specific schizophrenia-linked genetic mutations, such as those in ZNF804A. The next step is to use these tools at scale to ask whether and how the diverse array of risk genes linked to schizophrenia may converge on similar pathways and produce similar phenotypes.”

Funding: This research was funded by the UK Medical Research Council (MRC Centre for Neurodevelopmental Disorders, MRC Doctoral Training Partnership), Royal Society UK, Brain and Behavior Foundation and the National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research. 

Key Questions Answered:

Q: If humans have hundreds of genes linked to schizophrenia, why does solving this single gene matter so much?

A: Think of schizophrenia as an incredibly complex jigsaw puzzle with 287 separate edge pieces scattered across the genome. Knowing that a gene causes a risk doesn’t tell a doctor how to treat it. ZNF804A was the very first piece of the puzzle ever discovered, yet its inner workings remained a mystery. By successfully tracking down exactly when it fires and showing that it prevents brain cells from becoming electrical hotheads, King’s College London has given science a concrete blueprint to start linking all the other risk genes together.

Q: How does a tiny error in protein production at a branch tip cause an electrical malfunction in the brain?

A: Neurons are shaped like miniature trees with long, branching arms called dendrites. To communicate, they build communication junctions, synapses, at the very tips of these branches. Normally, ZNF804A acts like a strict traffic warden, controlling how many protein-building factories (ribosomes) make it to those branches. When you break that gene, the factories flood the dendrites, churning out an uncontrolled excess of local proteins. This overcrowded grid makes the synapses far more electrically excitable than they should be, scrambling the brain’s internal signaling.

Q: Does this mean we can use CRISPR gene editing to immediately cure schizophrenia in adults?

A: No, and it is crucial to temper expectations. This study did not use CRISPR as a cure, but rather as an elite research tool to intentionally break a specific mechanism so scientists could watch what went wrong. Because ZNF804A does its critical work during the second trimester of fetal development, an adult’s brain architecture has already been cast. However, by explicitly showing that the target is a hyper-active protein factory in glutamatergic neurons, it gives drug developers a clear bullseye to design future medications that can quiet these hyper-excitable pathways.

Editorial Notes:

  • This article was edited by a Neuroscience News editor.
  • Journal paper reviewed in full.
  • Additional context added by our staff.

About this schizophrenia and genetics research news

Author: Franca Davenport
Source: King’s College London
Contact: Franca Davenport – King’s College London
Image: The image is credited to Neuroscience News

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

GZERO: Trump flips flos on Iran threats : ask ian. Are Trump’s Iran pressure tactics working?

Trump flip flops on Iran threats

In his latest “ask ian,” Ian Bremmer examines US–Iran tensions, as President Trump signals possible military strikes but repeatedly pulls back amid regional pressure and limited strategic options.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Mario Nawfal: A Challenge to the best and the brightest

Mario Nawfal

@MarioNawfal

If you ever wanted to work at SpaceX, here’s your golden opportunity They’re on the hunt for world-class engineers and physicists, even those with absolutely no experience in AI. What’s the application process? A simple email with around 3 bullet points proving you have the exceptional ability to work with the best of the best. The bonus? Elon will personally review all emails “that pass reasonable sanity checks.” What are you waiting for?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Fortune: What Jeff Bezos has to say about income tax and the bottom half of earners

Success Wealth

Jeff Bezos wants the bottom half of earners to pay zero income tax—he says nurses making just $75K should save $12K a year

Preston Fore

By 

Preston Fore

Success Reporter

May 21, 2026, 11:16 AM ET

Add us on

Jeff Bezos

Billionaire Amazon founder, Jeff Bezos, says the bottom 50% of Americans should pay no federal income tax—and he plans to pitch the idea to President Trump.STEFANO RELLANDINI/AFP via Getty Images

For roughly 76 million American households, federal income taxes could eventually disappear—if a proposal by billionaire Amazon founder Jeff Bezos ever becomes reality.

Recommended Video


MacKenzie Scott has donated more than $19 billion

The now Blue Origin owner argued in a recent interview with CNBC that the bottom half of U.S. earners should pay no income tax, saying that working Americans shouldn’t be placed under increased financial pressure, considering they contribute a relatively small share of total tax revenue anyway.

“The bottom half of income earners in this country pay only 3% of the taxes,” Bezos said. “I think it should be zero.”

To make his case, Bezos questioned why a hypothetical healthcare worker as an example: “Why is a nurse in Queens who makes $75,000 a year paying more than $1,000 a month in taxes?”

“To me, it’s kind of absurd that we’re doing this. We shouldn’t be asking this nurse in Queens to send money to Washington,” Bezos added. “They should be sending her an apology. It really makes no sense.”

While Bezos did not elaborate on his exact calculations, workers in the U.S. are generally required to pay federal income, Social Security, Medicare—and in most states, state income—taxes. Combined together, it can stretch into the thousands of dollars.

Because the U.S. tax system is progressive, higher earners generally pay a larger share of their income in federal taxes. In 2023, the bottom half of taxpayers (those making roughly under $54,000) accounted for roughly 12% of total adjusted gross income—but they paid just 3% of all federal income taxes, according to IRS data analyzed by the Tax Foundation. The average household in that group paid about $913 in federal income tax. However, when refundable tax credits are factored in, the bottom 40% of taxpayers already pay effectively no federal income tax on average, reported CNBC.

Bezos, who has maintained a warm relationship with President Donald Trump, said he plans to advocate for the idea with political leaders, arguing that exempting lower earners from federal income taxes would represent only “a small amount of money for the government.” 

“It is part of our job as citizens and as business leaders to share our ideas,” Bezos said. “And this one would actually help people.”

Bezos—with a net worth of $280 billion—says even if his tax bill was doubled, it wouldn’t help

Bezos’s concern for affordability may come as a surprise considering his estimated net worth north of $280 billion—the fourth highest of any person in the world. And while he said he personally pays “billions of dollars” in taxes, his tax history has long drawn scrutiny. 

ProPublica investigation released in 2021 found that Bezos—like several of America’s wealthiest billionaires—used tax strategies that have dramatically reduced his tax burden in certain years. In 2007 and 2011, for example, he paid no federal income tax at all, in part because investment losses outweighed reported income. Analyzing Bezos’ wealth growth alongside his reported income and taxes paid between 2014 and 2018, ProPublica calculated his so-called ‘true tax rate’ at 0.98%.

Still, Bezos said he is open to a policy debate over what constitutes a fair tax burden for the wealthy. The top 1% of taxpayers accounted for nearly 21% of total adjusted gross income in 2023, but paid roughly 38% of all federal income taxes that year.

“We can argue about what the fair share is. That’s a policy debate, that’s okay,” Bezos said. “But the vilification is the thing that’s just the distraction.”

But even after fixing tax loopholes or increasing taxes on the wealthy would not address what Bezos sees as a larger government spending problem. He pointed to inefficiencies in New York City’s public school system as an example. 

“If we ran Amazon the way New York City runs their school system, your packages would take six weeks to arrive. We’d have to charge you a $100 delivery fee. And then when the package did finally arrive, it’d have the wrong item in it anyway.”

“You could double the taxes I pay, and it’s not gonna help that teacher in Queens. I promise you,” he added.

New York City mayor Zohran Mamdani pushed back on Xwriting: “I know a few teachers in Queens who would beg to differ.”

Bezos plans to give away ‘most of his wealth’ in his lifetime—but his ex-wife MacKenzie Scott already has a head start

While Bezos has not signed The Giving Pledge—the philanthropic initiative created by Warren Buffett, Bill Gates, and Melinda French Gates encouraging billionaires to give away a majority of their fortunes in their lifetime or wills—the Amazon founder said he’s committed to giving away most of his wealth in his lifetime.

At the same time, he acknowledged the challenge of doing philanthropy effectively, echoing comments from billionaires including Buffett and Elon Musk, who have said giving away massive sums of money well is often harder than it appears.

But Bezos’ former wife, MacKenzie Scott, already has a sizable head start. Since 2020, she has donated more than $26 billion to organizations focused on DEI, education, and disaster recovery. Meanwhile, Forbes estimates that Bezos and his current wife, Lauren Sánchez Bezos, have donated roughly $4.7 billion over their lifetimes. 

Bezos argued to CNBC that the long-term societal impact of companies like Amazon and Blue Origin may ultimately prove even more valuable than philanthropy alone. Creating products and services that improve people’s lives, he said, is the kind of impact aspiring entrepreneurs should prioritize.

https://fc5b46c5bf63fe6a7084abc8abe201d9.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-45/html/container.html

“Everybody out there who’s a potential entrepreneur make sure you focus on that,” Bezos said. “You will be creating value for society if you’re successful at pleasing your customers.”

The Fortune 500 Innovation Forum will convene Fortune 500 executives, U.S. policy officials, top founders, and thought leaders to help define what’s next for the American economy, Nov. 16-17 in Detroit. Apply here.

About the Author

By Preston ForeSuccess Reporter

Preston Fore is a reporter on Fortune‘s Success team.

See full bio

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Axios: Trump’s personal profits

 Trump’s personal profits
 
Photo illustration of Donald Trump opening his jacket with hundred dollar bills falling out.
Photo illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios. Photo: Ethan Miller/Getty Images
 
Never in 250 years has America witnessed a sitting president shield himself and his family from tax scrutiny, after leveraging policies that benefit his own businesses and personal portfolios, as Donald J. Trump has done, Axios’ Jim VandeHei and Mike Allen write in a “Behind the Curtain” column.

Why it matters: This isn’t a hidden scandal. Trump has done this publicly and proudly. Last year, we called it the “most unprecedented presidency in 250 years.”

In doing so, he has set a precedent — once so unfathomable as to be laughable — that it’s OK for presidents and family members to make billions off deals affected by government decisions, then use the Justice Department to secure lifetime protection from scrutiny of their past tax returns.

Trump’s crypto venture alone has been a windfall unlike anything in the history of presidential business, generating more cash for the Trump family in 16 months than the entire Trump real estate empire produced from 2010 through 2017, according to The Wall Street Journal.

“I let my kids … do business,” Trump said in a January interview with The New York Times. “I prohibited them from doing business in my first term, and I got absolutely no credit for it.

We were debating how to capture just how unprecedented Trump’s actions are, when every week of every year seems filled with unprecedented words and actions. Let’s try this. Imagine America put these questions to a public referendum:

Presidents and their family members, unlike other U.S. citizens, shall be granted lifetime immunity from federal audits and criminal investigations of their past tax returns.

Presidents and their family members can maintain active ownership of global business empires, profiting when government decisions directly benefit those specific businesses.

Presidents, while in office, can maintain massive personal crypto and stock portfolios that buy and sell hundreds of millions of dollars in industries directly regulated by their own administration. 

How would you vote?

It’s hard to imagine more than single-digit support for any of these. Yet Trump is doing all three and paving the way for future presidents to do the same. That’s why precedents by presidents often matter as much as laws themselves.

Between the lines: This is more than just a Trump problem. Look at the astonishing number of lawmakers trading and making money off stocks, often with insider knowledge of looming congressional action.

Pollsters have asked how Americans feel about officials trading stocks while in office, and it’s one of the rare genuinely bipartisan issues in politics today.

Flashback: After Watergate, modern presidents from both parties built elaborate legal and ethical structures designed to separate public office from private enrichment.

Jimmy Carter placed his peanut farm into a blind trust. Ronald Reagan, both Bushes and Bill Clinton followed suit. Barack Obama held only diversified assets like Treasury bonds and index funds. Even wealthy businessmen entering politics generally treated direct entanglements as toxic.

Over the same decades, congressional stock trading and post-Citizens United money normalized self-enrichment around political power. Trump pushed that trajectory into terrain previous presidents viewed as untouchable.

Vice President Vance said during a White House briefing this week: “The president doesn’t sit at the Oval Office on his computer on his, like, Robinhood account, buying and selling stocks — that’s absurd. He has independent wealth advisers who manage his money. … He’s not making these stock trades himself.”

The bottom line: Trump’s net worth today is $6.1 billion, Forbes estimates, up from $5.1 billion last year, $4.3 billion in 2024 and $2.4 billion in 2021.Axios’ Zachary Basu and Shane Savitsky contributed reporting.Go deeper on Trump’s moves while in office … Share this column.
    
 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Chatham House: Trump’s approach to Taiwan could jeopardize its future. Indo-Pacific allies are taking note

–17 June 2026 – Secure your place nowalert Sign in or create account Support us

Chatham House – International Affairs Think Tank

Main navigation

Search

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Topics/Regions

Trump’s approach to Taiwan could jeopardize its future. Indo-Pacific allies are taking note

Trump’s comments on Taiwan after his meeting with Xi and an apparent move towards ‘strategic stability’ with China could have consequences for Taiwan’s future and erode trust among US allies.

Expert comment

Published 19 May 2026 —4 minute READ

Image — A television news programme at a restaurant in Taipei on 14 May 2026 shows the meeting between the US President Donald Trump and China’s President Xi Jinping in Beijing. Photo by I-Hwa Cheng / AFP via Getty Images.

Kanishkh Kanodia

Academy Associate, US and the Americas Programme

When US President Donald Trump met with China’s President Xi Jinping in Beijing last week, there was concern that he might negotiate the future of Taiwan to strike a deal with China. For Beijing, Taiwan is the most important issue in the US-China bilateral relationship. Xi even warned that if the issue is mishandled, it could trigger ‘clashes and even conflicts’.

Reports in the run-up to the meeting suggested that China would seek a change in America’s long-standing position on Taiwanese independence. Rather than merely ‘not support’ it, China wants the US to ‘oppose’ Taiwan’s independence and to endorse Beijing’s goal of unification. Such a shift in US policy might appear symbolic, but it would be disastrous not only for the self-governing island, but also for America’s posture in the Indo-Pacific and the region’s security.

In the end, such a shift did not materialize. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio even asserted that America’s position remains unchanged. But the momentary respite has merely deferred the underlying anxiety.

Endangering Taiwan’s security

A better insight into Trump’s thinking on Taiwan comes from an interview with Fox News, that aired soon after he departed Beijing. Three things stood out. First, Trump said that he will use a $14bn weapons sales package to Taiwan that requires his approval as a ‘very good negotiating chip’ to deal with China. Earlier this year, the president deferred the multi-billion-dollar sale of missiles, anti-drone equipment and air-defence systems until after the summit to avoid derailing it

Trump also said he has consulted with Xi on the matter and seems willing to negotiate a future arms sale to Taiwan with Beijing. This runs against one of the 1982 US Six Assurances to Taiwan, which states that the United States will not consult with China on its arms transfers to Taiwan. The assurances serve to reassure Taipei to restrain it from provocations and bolster its defensive capabilities to deter Beijing. Further delaying arms deliveries could operationally weaken Taiwan’s defensive capabilities, upend the military deterrent – and make Taiwan more jittery.Related workThe Trump-Xi summit: What does the US want from China and will Trump get it? Independent Thinking podcast

With Trump and Xi reportedly set to meet at least three more times this year, the temptation to hold back US arms transfers in order to preserve the summit cadence will only grow. It could also tempt Beijing into asking for more concessions that weaken US security guarantees, such as restrictions on cabinet visits to Taiwan or curtailing US transits by the Taiwanese president.

Second, when asked about whether the United States would come to Taiwan’s aid in case of a conflict, Trump maintained the US line of strategic ambiguity. But he also said that the US was not looking to fight a war 9,500 miles away. Ambiguity only works as deterrence when underwritten by credible resolve – and Trump’s comments cast doubt over that. The statements also come as US military resources have been diverted from the Indo-Pacific to the Middle East and its munitions stockpiles are depleted. Beijing could read this as an opportunity to test American credibility, and slowly chip away at Taiwan’s resolve by ramping up its intimidation tactics.

Third, during the interview Trump parroted Beijing’s view of who is to blame for tensions in the Taiwan Strait. ‘We are not looking to have somebody say let’s go independent because the United States is backing us’, he said. Beijing has framed Taiwan’s desire for independence as the main reason for the deterioration of relations. Trump also failed to mention Beijing’s relentless coercive pressure on Taiwan and actions in the Taiwan Strait. His tacit endorsement could serve to legitimize Beijing’s narrative and tactics.

Taken together, Trump’s comments undercut the precarious balance that has characterized US policy on Taiwan for decades. It would sow doubt among the Taiwanese public about the credibility of the US security guarantee and their own ability to defend the island. They could also embolden Xi, who seeks a fourth term next year and has vowed to not let the Taiwan issue pass onto the next generation.

Implications of US–China ‘strategic stability’

Another concern arising from the summit is Beijing’s new framing of the US-China bilateral relationship as pursuing ‘constructive strategic stability’. Marco Rubio also echoed this phrase in his interview with NBC News during the summit, implying Washington has endorsed this idea, at least rhetorically. What it actually means is unclear. Beijing has long preferred vague formulations because it can change their substance based on its interest. This could have implications for Taiwan. Any US action contrary to Beijing’s core interests on the issue could be framed as a violation of this strategic stability, with Washington cast as the disruptive party. How much the Trump administration cares about the framing is unclear. But if it does, the pattern of withholding assistance to Taiwan as leverage could harden into the new baseline.

Topics

Regions

Departments

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Our flagship email provides a round-up of content, plus the latest on events and how to connect with the institute.Enter emailSubscribe

content

The implications of this send ripples beyond the Taiwan Strait. America’s allies in the region depend on treaty commitments that, however formal, ultimately rest on the willingness of a US president to honour them. There are already growing concerns among allies about US reliability under the Trump administration. Now there is the added worry that a US-China relationship based on strategic stability could see Washington, either explicitly or tacitly, fold the interests of its allies into a bilateral framework with China, rather than deal with them on their own termsRelated workUS Indo-Pacific allies are unhappy about Trump’s defence demands. But they have to comply

If US allies in the region grow more anxious about being managed rather than defended they may begin pursuing more aggressive measures for their own security, including nuclearization. Two key allies, Japan and South Korea, are already ramping up their defence spending and strengthening their domestic defence industries, as well as bolstering security partnerships with other regional partners. Japan also recently overhauled its decades-old ban on defence equipment exports. But nothing can replace American security guarantees.

It also further complicates any discussions of burden-sharing between the Trump administration and Asian allies. The US is already pressing South Korea to allow US Forces Korea to be re-oriented away from North Korea and towards China and should open negotiations with Japan later this year on the renewal of the Special Measures Agreement, due to expire in March 2027, which determines the financial and logistical burdens of the US–Japan alliance. After the Trump–Xi summit, such conversations may sit within a broader discussion about whether American alliances are strategic assets or bargaining chips.

For decades, peace in the Indo-Pacific has rested on the consistency of US policy towards the Taiwan Strait and a belief in America’s willingness to honour its commitments. Absent that, the region would enter uncharted and dangerous waters. Even without a ‘grand bargain’ on Taiwan, Trump’s Beijing visit may have left the US with a weaker hand, Taiwan’s security more precarious, and the region more volatile.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The Harvard Gazette: Who joined the Nazi party?

  • OpenMenu
  • SearchSearch
A composite image featuring an archival photograph of Nazis saluting and a Nazi membership card and photo.
National Archives and Records Administration

Nation & World

Who joined the Nazi Party

‘Ordinary men’ were at the heart of genocidal movement as it grew, research says

Sy Boles

Harvard Staff Writer

May 15, 2026 5 min read

The first Germans to become Nazis during Hitler’s rise to power may have been ideological zealots, but later members were largely “ordinary men” drawn into the movement by propaganda and social pressure.

That’s one of several key findings in a new paper from Harvard researchers affiliated with the Economics Department and the Weatherhead Center for International Affairs. 

The researchers used vision-language artificial intelligence to digitize membership cards for more than 10 million members of the National Socialist German Workers’ Party, expanding on an existing database of 55,000, to illuminate who joined the fascist movement, when, and in what communities. Their findings were published in April by the National Bureau of Economic Research.

Luis Bosshart and Matthias Weigand.
Luis Bosshart (left) and Matthias Weigand.Niles Singer/Harvard Staff Photographer

“What we can do with this new resolution is zoom in much more fine-grained, temporally speaking, but also geographically speaking,” said Luis Bosshart, a co-author of the paper and a researcher at the Harvard Academy for International and Area Studies at the Weatherhead Center. “What we find is that mass entry occurred in discontinuous waves and that representativeness increased over time. By the end of the regime, the joiners looked much more like the population at large.”

Led by Adolph Hitler, the Nazi Party, officially the National Socialist German Workers’ Party, established a totalitarian regime in Germany that triggered World War II and carried out the murder of 6 million Jews in the Holocaust. At its height, one in six German adults was a registered member of the movement.

Nazi functionaries tracked information about members’ ages, occupations, addresses, and dates of party entry. Microfilm images of the cards, many of which were handwritten, are held by the U.S. National Archives and Records Administration and open to researchers — but efforts have been stymied by the laborious task of manual transcription.

“Entries are edited. Someone moves, so an address gets crossed out. Some cards are written all over,” said co-author Matthias Weigand, an econ graduate student and an affiliate at the Harvard Center for International Development. “Thus, people have been taking random samples for their purposes, transcribing them, and trying to work with that. We now observe the near-universe of membership cards, including features such as membership portraits.

The team used Google Gemini’s vision-language AI model to extract and standardize the data. The development of their algorithm occurred over a long process in collaboration with the German Federal Archives. They then conducted manual checks to validate the model’s accuracy. 

After a gradual buildup that ran into the early 1930s, the first sharp wave of entry into the Nazi Party occurred in 1933 after Hitler became chancellor of Germany; the second in 1937 after a nearly four-year membership ban was lifted. Early joiners, the researchers found, were predominantly middle-class, male, and from non-agricultural industries. But those differences narrowed over time. When the party dissolved in 1945, new members closely resembled their county demographics.

https://flo.uri.sh/visualisation/28887631/embed?auto=1

Much of the existing literature, in line with data constraints, has focused on differences between counties. But by linking the millions of membership cards to census data, the researchers have revealed that 95 percent of variation in Nazi Party membership occurred within counties, not between them. 

Even within the same county, municipalities differed drastically in their party membership share, with no clear differences in population density, demographic composition, or dominant industries. 

Municipalities that were early Nazi strongholds remained so — and municipalities with no early membership were unlikely to develop it later on. In fact, they found that 40 percent of municipalities recorded no Nazi Party members at all. 

The findings suggest that those who joined the party before 1933 were more committed ideologically, but those who joined later were likely responding to social pressures and to changes in the political winds. 

“Historical research suggests this is working through social pressure, social norms, local spearheads flipping,” Weigand said, noting parallels in sociological models of riots. “The first person throwing the stone is always the radical, but the last person maybe not.”

The research does not explore joiners’ ideological beliefs, Bosshart said, but sets out parameters for future explanations.

“Any explanation needs to be able to explain the very different trajectories among neighboring and seemingly similar municipalities,” he said, “and it needs to be able to explain the nonlinear mass entry dynamics.” 

An analysis of hundreds of first-person accounts, collected in 1934 by U.S. sociologist Theodore Abel, shows that “national renewal/order” and “social belonging” were the top two reasons given for joining the Nazis, ranking above anti-communism, economic hardship, and antisemitism. 

https://flo.uri.sh/visualisation/28838059/embed?auto=1

“Our research points to coordination as a central force in institutional change,” Bosshart said. “Regime transitions are moments of fundamental political uncertainty, and what people believe about the new equilibrium matters. We see this in the cascade dynamics around 1933. One might also say that similar dynamics were at play after 1945, when former party members rapidly accommodated the new democratic order. There’s a cost of not being aligned. You don’t want to be in favor of the old regime in a stable new democratic equilibrium, just as you don’t want to be the big democrat in a new autocratic equilibrium. 

“These patterns are consistent with an Arendtian point of view,” Bosshart continued, referencing philosopher Hannah Arendt’s argument that mass political violence can be sustained by ordinary people conforming to a dominant order. “If that view is right, the mechanism is general and might not be limited to interwar Germany.”

Share this article

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Massimo: While the United States continues to lead the world in oil production with a record 13.6 million barrels per day in 2025, China is making significant advances in deepwater exploration. China National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC) has announced a major discovery: the Huizhou 19-6 oil field, located approximately 106 miles off the coast of Shenzhen.

Massimo

@Rainmaker1973

·

While the United States continues to lead the world in oil production with a record 13.6 million barrels per day in 2025, China is making significant advances in deepwater exploration. China National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC) has announced a major discovery: the Huizhou 19-6 oil field, located approximately 106 miles off the coast of Shenzhen. The reservoir is estimated to hold about 110 million tons of oil, marking China’s first large-scale integrated clastic oilfield in ultra-deep geological formations.

Initial testing has already produced hundreds of barrels of crude oil and tens of thousands of cubic meters of natural gas per day, demonstrating the field’s strong potential. This breakthrough reflects a broader global shift toward extreme-depth drilling as conventional shallow-water reserves continue to decline.

Experts estimate that up to 60% of the world’s remaining oil and gas resources lie in deep and ultra-deep layers. China has been particularly aggressive in this frontier, recently surpassing the United States in the number of wells drilled deeper than 26,000 feet.

However, developing these resources remains a formidable technical challenge due to extreme temperatures and high pressure thousands of feet below the seafloor. As countries compete for long-term energy security, mastery of ultra-deep drilling technology is likely to play a defining role in the future of the global energy industry.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Massimo on X: In Finland, a new generation of energy-efficient data centers is transforming how cities manage heat …

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Judging Freedom Podcast: Professor Jeffrey Sachs : Israel On the Brink

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment