The Conversation. Last week, artificial intelligence company ElevenLabs announced Caine has licensed his voice to the company. It will be available on their ElevenReader app, which allows you to listen to any text in a voice of your choosing, as well as being available on their licensing platform, Iconic Marketplace.


Become an author

Sign up as a reader

Sign in

Academic rigour, journalistic flair

Arts + CultureBusiness + EconomyEducationEnvironmentHealthPolitics + SocietyScience + TechWorldPodcastsInsights

Author

  1. Amy Hume Lecturer In Theatre (Voice), Victorian College of the Arts, The University of Melbourne

Disclosure statement

Amy Hume does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Partners

University of Melbourne provides funding as a founding partner of The Conversation AU.

The Conversation UK receives funding from these organisations

View the full list

DOI

CC BY ND

We believe in the free flow of information

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under Creative Commons licence.Republish this article

Share article

Print article

Few actors are imitated as often as Michael Caine. Even Michael Caine has imitated Michael Caine.

His voice has been used in birthday card greetings and been the source of jokes in various comedy sketches. It is synonymous with a certain type of Britishness.

Last week, artificial intelligence company ElevenLabs announced Caine has licensed his voice to the company. It will be available on their ElevenReader app, which allows you to listen to any text in a voice of your choosing, as well as being available on their licensing platform, Iconic Marketplace.

To understand why Caine’s voice is so iconic (and wanted by AI) we need to look deeper at what people actually hear in it.

Why do people love listening to Michael Caine?

Caine was born in London in 1933. His mother was a cook and a cleaner, and his father worked in a fish market. Caine speaks with a Cockney accent, setting him aside from most other actors of his generation.

Cockney hails from London’s East End and is often associated with London’s working class – think Eliza Doolittle from My Fair Lady, the Artful Dodger from Oliver!, or Bert the Chimney Sweep from Mary Poppins (although Dick van Dyke’s accent is not the most accurate, it’s still recognisably Cockney).

Our mission is to share knowledge and inform decisions.

About us

Traditionally, you were said to be a true Cockney if you were born within earshot of the Bow Bells – the bells of St. Mary-le-Bow church on Cheapside.

That distinctiveness matters because the accent carried heavy class meaning in mid-20th century Britain.

We don’t hear many contemporary examples of Cockney. Accents change and evolve over time and it has gradually been replaced by a new dialect called Multicultural London English (MLE).

While most actors of his age acquired a “stage accent” – known as Received Pronunciation (RP) – Caine made a conscious decision to hold onto his working-class roots and not change his accent. Instead, he built his career on it.

He once said,

I could’ve gone to voice lessons, but I always thought if I had any use […] I could fight the class system in England.

His accent became cultural capital and helped him land roles in Alfie (1966), The Italian Job (1969) and Jack Carter (1971). By the 1970s, he was a British cultural icon.

What do we hear when we hear celebrity voices?

Hearing a person’s voice is never just about acoustics. We hear social meaning: culture, identity, character and story.

Sociolinguist Asif Agha coined the term “enregisterment” to describe how a way of speaking becomes publicly recognised as signalling particular social types and values.

Over time, Caine’s voice has become enregistered as a recognisable Cockney accent associated with East London and historically linked to a working-class identity. Hearing his voice activates a socially shared register of meanings attached to Cockney.

This contrasts with, say, Queen Elizabeth II, whose accent was enregistered with royalty, prestige and wealth.

Another useful concept here is what sociolinguists sometimes call “dialectal memes”: the images and character types that circulate around particular accents. These memes are transmitted through books, television, film, and even celebrity figures themselves.

Caine has been a carrier of Cockney dialectal memes in popular culture.

When you look at it this way, AI voice licensing commodifies not just the acoustic properties of Caine’s voice, but the enregistered social meanings audiences recognise in it.

What AI licensing means for Caine

ElevenLabs describes its Iconic Marketplace platform as “the performer-first approach the entertainment industry has been calling for”. Through licensing, actors maintain ownership of their voices in a digital, AI landscape.

Caine licensing his voice theoretically ensures he receives credit and compensation, and prevents unauthorised clones appearing elsewhere.

It is possible this is exactly the direction actors want AI to go in – for use of their voice to be controlled by themselves, with clear credit and payment.

However, this model is not without risk to the actor or the listener. We should ask: do we need to hear something in Caine’s voice? Will we process information differently or hear it with more authority if it’s delivered in the voice of a cultural icon like Caine?

Giving power over to machines

People who admire Caine may want him to read to them. Some will be willing to pay for it. We need to remain conscious of the decisions we are making here.

In the 1960s, computer scientist Joseph Weizenbaum, creator of the world’s first chatbot, Eliza, warned about the dangers of forming relationships with machines. He was alarmed to see users confiding in Eliza and responding to the chatbot as if it actually understood them, even when they knew it did not.

What happens if an AI voice is not actually generic, but recognisably tied to a real human?

An actor’s likeness and voice may be protected with licensing, but their human self is not. That creates a pathway to attachment or even infatuation.

Caine is not just licensing his voice, but also the Cockney persona audiences recognise in it. Suddenly, a machine speaks with the authority of a real human behind it.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Anthropic defies Pentagon over AI guardrails

Anthropic defies Pentagon over AI guardrails
Amid pressure from the Pentagon to give in to its demands to loosen its safeguards, Anthropic continues to stand firm.
In a statement on Thursday afternoon, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei made it clear that the company cannot accede to the Department of War’s demand to roll back its safeguards that prevent its AI models from being used in two key areas: mass surveillance of U.S. citizens and fully autonomous weapons. 
Amodei noted that AI’s use in mass surveillance posed “serious, novel risks to our fundamental liberties.” And while the tech may someday be helpful in fully autonomous weaponry, the guardrails simply don’t exist today to deploy this safely.  
“In a narrow set of cases, we believe AI can undermine, rather than defend, democratic values,” Amodei said in his statement. “Some uses are also simply outside the bounds of what today’s technology can safely and reliably do.”
Amodei said that its Claude models are widely deployed throughout the defense and intelligence community, including in the government’s classified networks, in national laboratories, and in mission-critical applications such as intelligence analysis, modeling and simulation, operational planning, and cybersecurity operations. Thus far, its safeguards haven’t presented an issue in these cases, he said. 
Though Anthropic’s “strong preference” is to continue to support military action, it will only do so with its safeguards in place. Otherwise, it cannot “in good conscience” submit to their requests and continue its relationship. 
Amodei’s response is the latest move in the fight between the company and the Pentagon. Earlier this week, the agency took its first steps in blacklisting Anthropic by labelling it a “supply chain risk,” a label generally reserved for companies from adversarial countries. 
The unprecedented move would not only threaten Anthropic’s contract with the military but also force all defense vendors to cut ties with Anthropic. And after his meeting with Amodei, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth contradicted himself by threatening to invoke the Defense Protection Act, forcing Anthropic to tailor its models to military desires regardless.Additionally, the Pentagon struck a deal with xAI on Monday to use its Grok models in classified systems, including weapons development and battlefield operations.
Policymakers, however, have started to warn that the sparring match between Anthropic and the Pentagon will only sour future relationships between the government and Silicon Valley AI firms, with Dean Ball, former AI adviser to the Trump Administration, calling Hegseth’s contradictory threats “incoherent.” 
Anthropic standing firm in its decision not to give in to the Pentagon’s threats was its only option, given that the company has built its reputation around AI safety and only deploying AI with guidelines that ensure it does no harm. Though the company is confronting its moral and ethical standards with recent changes to its Responsible Scaling Policy, backing down would have been a sharp about-face, betraying its core principles. Though the fallout could cost Anthropic a large chunk of its revenue from government agencies and vendors, there may be a silver lining: Gaining further trust with its primary audience of risk-averse but AI-hungry enterprises.
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

10,000 drones released for Chinese New Year

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Chay Bowes on X: Biden administration the horrors of people in Afghanistan clinging to the wings of the planes and falling to their deaths. US$ 8 billion thrown aside but now it is back in use by the Taliban in their fight with Pakistan

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Iran News: Propaganda from their perspective!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Dr Gabor Mate. Clarification a number of mental health issues are not determined by the genes … Sensitivity can be a driver

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Futurism: Burger King Adding AI to Employees’ Headsets to Constantly Monitor Whether They’re Being Friendly Enough

Burger King Adding AI to Employees’ Headsets to Constantly Monitor Whether They’re Being Friendly Enough

This is just inhumane.

By Victor Tangermann

Published Feb 26, 2026 3:01 PM EST

Instead of infuriating customers at drive-thrus, Burger King is looking to exasperate its existing employees with AI instead.
Getty / Futurism

Sign up to see the future, today

Can’t-miss innovations from the bleeding edge of science and techEmail addressSign Up

Fast food franchises have struggled to reliably replace drive-thru employees with AI chatbots, resulting in abundant corporate frustration. Not only are customers being driven mad by the bots getting orders completely wrong, but even some company executives are also being worn down by the flailing effort.

Some major players in the space, like McDonald’s, have given up on their AI-powered drive-thru efforts entirely, signaling that perhaps employing human workers may be a wiser long-term investment. Taco Bell soon followed suit, announcing it was rethinking the idea after a clip of a customer crashing the system by ordering 18,000 cups of water went viral.

Burger King, though, isn’t quite ready to give up on AI just yet. Instead of infuriating customers at drive-thrus, the company is looking to exasperate its existing employees with the tech instead. As The Verge reports, the franchise is launching an OpenAI-powered chatbot, dubbed “Patty,” that will speak to the staffers through the headsets they’re required to wear.

Worst of all, the company is using the AI to monitor words and phrases, such as “welcome to Burger King,” “please,” and ‘thank you.” Managers can then use that data to gauge the friendliness of their staff.

“This is all meant to be a coaching tool,” Burger King’s chief digital officer Thibault Roux told The Verge in a statement, arguing that the company is “iterating” on having its AI police the tone of its employees in the future.

The overarching “BK Assistant” platform that Patty will serve as the voice for will have access to a wide variety of data points, such as the state of its kitchen equipment or available inventory. For instance, as Roux explained, an item could be listed as out of stock “within 15 minutes,” and be reflected on digital menu boards throughout a restaurant.

Meanwhile, an AI-powered drive-thru isn’t quite in the cards for Burger King just yet.

“We’re tinkering with it, we’re playing around with it, but it’s still a risky bet,” Roux told The Verge. “Not every guest is ready for this.”

More on AI drive-thrus: Taco Bell’s Attempt to Replace Drive-Thru Employees With AI Is Not Going Well

Victor Tangermann

Senior Editor

I’m a senior editor at Futurism, where I edit and write about NASA and the private space sector, as well as topics ranging from SETI and artificial intelligence to tech and medical policy.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Chay Bowes on X: Peter Thiel on who is most likely to lose job to AI … if like me and you are poor at Maths, you will be surprised

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Conservatives: New Deal for Young People. Student loan disaster system in the U.K. is to be tackled.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

OCCRP: The Cat and the Stock-Footage CEO

The Cat and the Stock-Footage CEO: How a Digital Trail Helped Unmask an Iranian Money Machine

Investigation

A woman named Elizabeth Newman supposedly runs two U.K.-registered crypto exchanges. But she appears to be a corporate fiction used as a front for a convicted embezzler whom the United States has accused of moving billions of dollars’ worth of digital assets on behalf of Iran’s repressive regime.

Banner: James O’Brien/OCCRP

Episode 3: There You Are, Carmelo

A secret recording from a clandestine sting operation reveals the plans of financial experts enlisted to help former Venezuelan oil ministry official Carmelo Urdaneta move the illicit money and bypass international banking controls.

Reported by

OCCRP

February 27, 2026

On paper, Elizabeth Newman is a financial titan behind two U.K.-based cryptocurrency exchanges that claim to process more than a billion dollars’ worth of digital assets every day.

To believe U.K. corporate records and a promotional video, the short-haired Dominican in her 40s maintains a global footprint, listing correspondence addresses ranging from a beachfront Caribbean property to London’s charming Covent Garden and a 68-story skyscraper in Dubai.

But in reality, this person doesn’t seem to exist at all. 

An OCCRP investigation has discovered that the woman presented to the world as the director of these two major crypto firms is actually a stock-footage model. While the U.K.’s business registry accepted her as a “person with significant control” over the companies, reporters found no evidence of a physical person corresponding to the Elizabeth Newman described in filings. 

Newman’s companies were listed as “dormant” in official corporate filings. But U.S. authorities allege they were active engines for Babak Zanjani, a notorious Iranian financier sanctioned last month for providing financial backing for major projects that support the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and the Iranian regime more broadly. 

By allowing Newman to front these entities, the U.K. provided a veneer of Western legitimacy to a crypto network alleged to have helped bypass global financial blockades.

Iran had sentenced Zanjani to death for embezzlement of state oil funds in 2016, but he has bounced back into favor with the country’s hardline Islamist authorities; his sentence was commuted in 2024 and he was formally released last year.

Credit: Ali Shirband/Mizan News Agency

Babak Zanjani at the Revolutionary Court of Tehran, Iran on November 1, 2015.

The U.S. Treasury claims he was freed to launder money for the very regime that had imprisoned him. It describes his two exchanges, Zedcex and Zedxion, both registered as U.K. companies, as part of an operation helping the IRGC bypass sanctions, moving billions of dollars’ worth of funds through a global financial hub with total anonymity.

The exchanges are among the latest in a sophisticated toolkit Tehran uses to make and receive payments. TRM Labs, a blockchain analytics company, said in a January report that cryptocurrencies appear to play an increasingly prominent role in the financing of the IRCG, a military organization that doubles as a multi-billion-dollar business empire and enforces the agenda of Iran’s theocratic regime.

In January the IRGC played a leading role in violently quashing nationwide protests in which thousands were killed, rights groups reported.

TRM Labs reported that the Zedcex and Zedxion crypto exchanges also handled millions of dollars in transfers from the IRGC to a man the U.S. accuses of financing a Yemeni armed group responsible for attacking commercial shipping in the Red Sea.

Credit: Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto/NurPhoto via AFP

The burned East Tehran General Directorate of Tax Affairs headquarters in the aftermath of protests in Tehran, Iran, on January 21, 2026.

Zedcex and Zedxion have processed approximately $1 billion in funds linked to the IRGC, according to TRM Labs’ analysis of crypto wallets attributable to the exchanges’ operations. 

In the weeks following the mass protests, Western governments have scrambled to choke off funding for the IRGC and other Iranian state bodies.

“Treasury will continue to target Iranian networks and corrupt elites that enrich themselves at the expense of the Iranian people,” said U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in a January 30 statement where his department applied sanctions on Zanjani and the two U.K. crypto exchanges.

“This includes the regime’s attempts to exploit digital assets to evade sanctions and finance cybercriminal operations.”

In response, Zanjani said on the social media site X that the U.S. accusations were “merely a pretext for seizing 660 million Tether [U.S. dollar-pegged stablecoin crypto assets], and extortion.” He has not directly confirmed or denied having a connection to the firms. 

Zanjani did not respond to questions about his role in the crypto exchanges. OCCRP sent questions addressed to Elizabeth Newman to both Zedcex and Zedxion, but received no response.

The Stock-Footage CEO

Both exchanges have said on their websites they are directed by a woman named “Elizabeth Newman,” but despite a months-long search, OCCRP was unable to find any real-life individual matching the “Elizabeth Newman” persona.

An official Zedxion marketing video from March 2022 featured an image of a woman called “Elizabeth” — identified as the platform’s “executive director.”

That woman, in fact, was a stock-footage model from a video titled “Pretty black woman talking to camera” available on Shutterstock.

The same video named the firm’s supposed finance administrator as “Smith” and team leader as “Muhammad,” but their images were also stock footage.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment