Hair and paternity : Analysing Thomas Jefferson’s Own DNA

Jefferson & Hemings

 

Analyzing Thomas Jefferson’s Own DNA 

If Thomas Jefferson’s own DNA could be analyzed, rather than the DNA from his relatives as was done in the 1998 Foster DNA Study (5 male line descendants of 2 sons of Field Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson’s paternal uncle), the paternity answer would be clear-cut and final: Thomas Jefferson either did or did not father children with Sally Hemings.

Locks of Thomas Jefferson’s hair have been preserved in at least 3 places: the Library of Congress in Washington, DC; the Academy of Natural Sciences in Philadelphia, PA; and Monticello, Charlottesville, VA. The Library of Congress has 3 locks, snipped at the request of Jefferson’s daughter, Martha Randolph, as he died. The hair’s provenance is strong: When it was donated to the library, she wrote on one envelope: “My dear father Thomas Jefferson”.

The Academy of Natural Sciences obtained its locks from a donation from a 19th century lawyer, Peter Arvell Browne, who had the eccentric but fortuitous hobby of collecting hair from famous people, including Napoleon, George Washington, John Adams, Andrew Jackson, and Thomas Jefferson. According to the Thomas Jefferson (Memorial) Foundation, Monticello has “15 samples of hair purported to be Thomas Jefferson’s, from various family provenances, though it is impossible for us to know if these are what they purport to be.” See Hair’s Breadth: Locks Could be Keys to Jefferson Mystery, Colonial Williamsburg Journal, Vol 10, Autumn 2010. Note that at least as to 2 of these locks, they were clipped from Jefferson’s head on 4 July 1826 by Mrs Cornelia Lee Burke, Gordon Trist Burke’s widow—”Mrs Burke’s gift was clipped from the old patriarch’s head sometime in the afternoon of the day of his death by Nicholas Philip Trist, who according to our research was the only member of the household to wield the scissors on this melancholy occasion.

This accession substantiates the fact that Jefferson’s hair as an older gentleman was ‘strawberry blond’”. See Report of the Curator, 1968, at p 11 (James A Bear Jr). Nicholas Philip Trist’s grandmother, Elizabeth House Trist, was an acquaintance of Thomas Jefferson. Trist studied law under Thomas Jefferson and served as Jefferson’s personal secretary in the 1820s and became an executor of his estate. Gordon Trist Burke is a descendant of Thomas Jefferson through his mother’s Trist line. If the current owners of this hair gave permission to test these locks, and if the hair yielded DNA, conclusive proof, or disproof, of a Jefferson-Hemings relationship would be possible.

Genomic Analyses of Hair from Ludwig van Beethoven

(see also attached PDF)

In the 24 April 2023 scientific article, Genomic Analyses of Hair from Ludwig van Beethoven, appearing in Current Biology, Volume 33, Issue 8, p 1431-47, researchers at Cambridge University in the United Kingdom along with scientists at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany were able to recover DNA from rootless hair from Ludwig van Beethoven (1770–1827), one of the world’s most influential and popular classical music composers.

Health problems significantly impacted his career as a composer and pianist, including progressive hearing loss, recurring gastrointestinal complaints, and liver disease. The authors conducted a genomic analysis of Beethoven in order to elucidate potential underlying genetic and infectious causes of his illnesses. They analyzed 8 independently sourced locks of hair attributed to Beethoven and sequenced Beethoven’s genome to 24-fold genomic coverage. Not only did they find that Beethoven had a genetic predisposition for liver disease, they also unexpectedly discovered the occurrence of an extra-pair paternity event in Ludwig van Beethoven’s patrilineal ancestry. Since Beethoven lived approximately at the same time as Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), if the DNA from rootless hair of Thomas Jefferson could be analyzed, the determination of a Jefferson Hemings relationship would be possible.

Why This Scientist Keeps Receiving Packages of Serial Killers Hair

Getting sufficient DNA out of a rootless hair has long been considered impossible. A scientist, better known for work with ancient fossils, has figured it out. It’s a game-changer for crime and surveillance. But recently Ed Green, a paleogeneticist at the University of California, Santa Cruz known in the scientific community for his work for on the Neanderthan genome, has developed a technique that makes it possible to recover and sequence DNA from hair without its roots.

Hair’s Breadth: Locks could be Keys to Jefferson Mystery

Even though Thomas Jefferson (Memorial) Foundation relies on the DNA tests as “proof” that Thomas Jefferson fathered the children of Sally Hemings, there was no DNA of Thomas Jefferson. The DNA used in these tests came from the descendants of Field Jefferson, Thomas Jefferson’s uncle. It has been suggested that locks from Jefferson’s hair maybe a source of DNA. James Breig, in the Colonial Williamsburg Journal, examines the possibilities of this technology.


2/29/2008
A Civil Action: Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings

by William G. Hyland, Jr. and William G. Hyland

Allegations that Thomas Jefferson had an affair and fathered at least one child with slave Sally Hemings have been discussed for two centuries. In this article, published by American Journal of Trial Advocacy, the authors summarize a “mock” trial defense of Jefferson, and conclude that the allegations are unproved by the greater weight of the evidence.

2007
Anatomy of a Mystery

The University of Virginia Magazine

In no other place is the presence of Thomas Jefferson more alive than the University he founded. Whether he fathered slave children with Sally Hemings is an issue that has divided the alumni community. In the Fall 2007 issue of The University of Virginia Magazine, writer Maura Singleton arranges the evidence in “Anatomy of a Mystery.” 

4/12/2004
Biohistory Analysis Unearths Debate

Richmond Times Dispatch

The curious are applying DNA testing and related lab tools to the study of historical figures without guidelines specific to this kind of analysis–“Biohistory”. As medical technology reveals more about the intimate details of our lives, those who would uncover them grapple with increasingly complex ethical issues.

 

4/9/2004
Constructing Ethical Guidelines for Biohistory

Science

Should technologies of bioanalysis, such as DNA testing, be used to try to answer questions about historical figures? If so, what social, legal, and scientific standards should be used? Currently there are no professional guidelines specifically addressing biohistorical analysis. Often, investigators fail to pose an investigative question capable of resolution by genetic testing. For example, Eugene Foster’s 1998 comparative Y-chromosomal study of the descendants of Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings was intended to establish whether Thomas Jefferson had fathered Sally Hemings’ children. Yet the study protocol was inappropriate for determining the paternity of Hemings’ children–the only possible conclusion was that some of Jefferson and Hemings male-line descendants had common relatives.

5/5/2003
Who’s Your Daddy?

Richmond Times-Dispatch

1/8/1999
Which Jefferson Was the Father? 

Science

The authors of the original DNA report in Nature say the evidence for Thomas Jefferson’s paternity is less than conclusive. In responding to letters to Nature, the authors make it clear that the data establish only that Thomas Jefferson was one of several candidates for the paternity of Eston Hemings, Sally Hemings’ 5th child. 

Genealogists look inside their cells for clues to their ancestors. 

1/13/2003
Ownership and Identity

The Scientist 

The drive to manipulate DNA has changed the economy and the law. Daniel J. Kevles examines the history of the use of DNA.

11/15/1998

Paternity Hype Visits Monticello

Washington Post

An Innocent Man

This article examines the widely held belief that Thomas Jefferson fathered a child with his slave, Sally Hemings. It provides a history of the politically motivated allegation and presents evidence for an alternate paternity candidate. It discusses Jefferson’s health, the Foster 1998 DNA Study, the Jefferson Hemings Scholars Commission Report, Jefferson and Hemings in Paris, Madison Hemings, and Jefferson’s overseer Edmund Bacon. To request a higher resolution copy of this video, please go to lightandliberty.org.

Much of the original DNA coverage demonstrated a remarkable flight from careful and skeptical reporting. All too often the news stories, commentary, and analysis transformed an intriguing but inconclusive scientific finding into a dead certainty. Several journalists went on to turn the DNA results into some sort of referendum on the current state of race relations and presidential politics. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A Primer on Jefferson DNA
Frontline

“Primer on Jefferson DNA” was written by John Works and is featured prominently on Frontline’s website. Mr. Works is a direct lineal descendant of Thomas Jefferson, a former Monticello Association president, and a Monticello Association life member.

The DNA tests indicated that any one of two dozen Jeffersons , 8 of whom were within a day’s drive of Monticello, could have been the father of one of Sally Heming’s children, and there was nothing to indicate it was Thomas. The same Y-chromosome existed in Mr. Jefferson’s brother Randolph, who lived 20 miles from Monticello , and in 5 of Randolph ‘s sons, who were in their teens or 20s when Sally Hemings was having children.

The current members of The Monticello Association were acknowledged by Thomas Jefferson as his offspring (and by their subsequent offspring) as descendants of Thomas Jefferson so no acknowledged descendant of Thomas Jefferson need be tested for a DNA match under currently acknowledged paternity standards. If the acknowledged descendants of Thomas Jefferson submitted to DNA testing the test would be futile because the only genetic test would be of the Y-chromosome. The acknowledged descendants of Thomas Jefferson are all descended through Thomas Jefferson’s daughters, not the male line. Thus they would have the Y-chromosome from their male lines, not the same Y-chromosome as any Jefferson . Since all of the descendants of Thomas Jefferson’s daughters had Y-chromosomes from male lines other than the Jeffersons , nothing could be more futile than to test the acknowledged descendants of Thomas Jefferson.

If Thomas Jefferson were exhumed for Y chromosome DNA testing it would only confirm that he carried the same Y chromosome as the other 8 Jeffersons in question. The only way this would not be true is if Thomas Jefferson were illegitimate. Besides being futile, it is very unlikely that there would be usable DNA that could be tested after so many years.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Smart Science on X: Elon Musk warns that artificial general intelligence could pose a far greater threat to humanity than nuclear weapons, backing calls for a global slowdown in AI development.

@SmartScience

Elon Musk warns that artificial general intelligence could pose a far greater threat to humanity than nuclear weapons, backing calls for a global slowdown in AI development. The warning comes at a critical juncture as the race for superintelligence triggers unprecedented friction in Silicon Valley. Musk, who has expressed deep concern over machine learning capabilities for more than a decade, recently supported calls from rival tech executives and defecting researchers to pause and evaluate the potential impacts of frontier models. In doing so, he aligns with an escalating narrative that the headlong rush to build artificial general intelligence (AGI) is outpacing our ability to establish safety guardrails, threatening to unleash digital systems that could evade human control.

The debate has quickly spilled out of tech circles and into the mainstream following a wave of high-profile warnings from researchers who fear developers are ‘gambling with our lives.’ Following high-level discussions in Washington and warning letters regarding AI’s potential to compromise critical infrastructure, industry leaders like OpenAI’s Sam Altman and Anthropic’s Dario Amodei have signaled an openness to decelerating growth and inviting independent experts to audit their systems. As Musk and others advocate for severe caution, the pressure on global governments to step in with firm regulatory boundaries continues to mount, turning AGI into one of the most pressing policy crises of our era. source: Jordan News. (2026). Musk: AI Could Be More Dangerous Than Nuclear Weapons.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Fortune: ‘A huge problem’: Trump has traded more stocks than all of Congress combined. A Bush-era ethics lawyer explains why you should worry. Quote: “Then the annual disclosure, released June 30 at nearly a thousand pages, showed more than 21,000 trades in 2025, worth between $600 million and $1.86 billion, at 85 per market day. Trump lists eight separate investment accounts but doesn’t give any indication of which institutions manage them.”

By

Eva Roytburg

Fellow, News

Follow

September 19, 2026, 6:00 AM ET

President Donald Trump looks at his phone during a roundtable at the State Dining Room of the White House June 18, 2020.

President Donald Trump looks at his phone during a roundtable at the State Dining Room of the White House June 18, 2020.Alex Wong/Getty Images

Add Fortune on Google for similar content.Add us on Google

President Donald Trump has made more securities trades since returning to office than every member of Congress combined.

Recommended Video


Trump promises a $5,000 “Trump dividend” to Americans if Republicans win in the midterm elections

According to a Bloomberg analysis published this week, he has made roughly 28,700 in 17 months, or about 80 trades every market day,

It’s a new habit of Trump’s. In his first term, Trump’s financial disclosures consisted mostly of his real estate and privately held businesses. 

For his second term, the periodic reports he filed through early 2026 showed an account buying municipal and corporate bonds—more than $100 million by August 2025 and more than $337 million in all—along with bank preferred securities and bond ETFs.

The stock trading surfaced in May of this year, when a first-quarter filing listed roughly 3,600 transactions in 90 days. Then the annual disclosure, released June 30 at nearly a thousand pages, showed more than 21,000 trades in 2025, worth between $600 million and $1.86 billion, at 85 per market day. Trump lists eight separate investment accounts but doesn’t give any indication of which institutions manage them.

“I believe that that is a huge problem,” Richard Painter, who served as chief White House ethics lawyer under President George W. Bush and now teaches securities law at the University of Minnesota, told Fortune. “I’ve gone through every president. I don’t think we’ve had any president trade in the stock market.”

Since Lyndon Johnson, essentially every president has used a blind trust, held index funds, or just owned Treasuries. Jimmy Carter, for example, put the family peanut business in a blind trust that eventually sold it.

However, Trump’s portfolio is handled differently. In May, after the stock trades appeared, White House spokesman Davis Ingle told Fortune the assets are held in a trust managed by the president’s children. Eric Trump posted that any suggestion a family member was buying individual stocks “would be a lie and blatantly false.” 

“There’s a financial conflict of interest if he has an ownership interest in the account,” Painter said. “It doesn’t matter who manages it.”

In a statement, the White House’s Ingle told Fortune that third-party financial institutions independently manage the portfolio through “computer-based model portfolios that automatically replicate recognized indexes, such as the Schwab 1000.”

He did not answer questions about which institutions manage the portfolio or why the White House described a family trust in May. “There are no conflicts of interest,” the statement said.

Paid Content

AI is rewriting search and redefining brand visibility

From Monks.

Fortune’s review of the president’s first-quarter filing in May found the account bought up to $1.38 million of DoorDash stock; in April, Trump had DoorDash deliver a McDonald’s order to the White House for a tipped-worker tax event.

The account sold hyperscaler stocks in the $5 million-$25 million range on Feb. 10, the day after a chip-tariff carveout leaked. It bought energy stocks in the weeks after the Iran war began, as Trump was downplaying the conflict as a short-term conflagration. It bought Cal-Maine, the country’s largest egg producer, during the egg shortage and sold it two months later for two to five times more.

Every executive branch official except the president and vice president has to abide by 18 U.S.C. 208, a criminal statute that bars participation in government matters that affect one’s own holdings. “If he were Treasury Secretary, he’d have a big, big problem with that account,” Painter said.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Axios: Trump plans AI Force

 🦾 Trump plans AI Force
 
White card with black text on a purple background showing a long post about AI, forming an AI Force and an AI Czar, referencing Space Force, high IQ applicants, GDP impact, and President Donald J. Trump, with date and likes.
Via Truth Social
 
President Trump said he’s creating an “AI Force” modeled on the Space Force and will soon name a new AI czar.

Why it matters: Trump is doubling down on accelerating AI development with limited regulation, even as the industry’s biggest leaders call for stronger safety rules and as public fears grow, Axios’ Andrew Pantazi writes.

The latest: Trump offered few details on what this AI Force would actually do, what budget it would have or where it would be placed in the federal government.

His Truth Social post said the government would “not in any way hinder or stifle” AI’s growth but would look for “BAD” behavior using “our already existing Criminal and Civil Justice System.

The intrigue: The AI czar position would revive a role that the White House didn’t plan to fill six months ago.

David Sacks left the formal AI and crypto czar job in March, though he remains influential as co-chair of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. Read on.
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

“The Hottest Ticket in Town”. Elon got an invite from Trump to attend the White House state dinner with Xi on Thursday

Elon got an invite from Trump to attend the White House state dinner with Xi on Thursday. Also invited: -Jeff Bezos -Jensen Huang -Sam Altman -Sundar Pichai -Michael Dell -Tim Cook Many of these same names were with Trump when he went to Beijing in May. Who needs ambassadors when you have a guest list worth ten trillion dollars? Writer: Michael

https://x.com/EricLDaugh/status/2101651146196525287/video/1

https://twitter.com/EricLDaugh/status/2101651146196525287/video/1

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Eurasia Review: Testosterone Screening For 2M Troops Comes With No Cost Estimate

An aerial view of the Pentagon building, Washington, D.C. Photo Credit: Navy Petty Officer 2nd Class Alexander Kubitza, DOD

An aerial view of the Pentagon building, Washington, D.C. Photo Credit: Navy Petty Officer 2nd Class Alexander Kubitza, DOD

Testosterone Screening For 2M Troops Comes With No Cost Estimate

By The Center Square

FacebookTwitterEmailFlipboardMastodonLinkedInShare

Video Muted

By Brett Rowland

Key Takeaways:

  • No price tag. Screening is ordered for ~2 million troops age 30-plus. DHA guidance says how many will be tested or treated is “not currently known.” The Center Square got no cost estimate from DHA or the Pentagon press office.
  • Not a performance drug. Hegseth’s 15 July memo and Parnell (17 Sept) call it readiness and “Operator Syndrome.” The clinical note: testosterone is not a performance enhancer; treat a confirmed deficiency only.
  • Questionnaire, then blood. Despite a July claim of annual tests for everyone over 30, providers screen symptoms first. Auchus and Frueh called that evidence-based. Therapy may help sex, body composition, and bone—not energy or cognition. Congress had no cost figure Friday.

(The Center Square) – The Pentagon is ordering testosterone screening for some 2 million troops without saying what it will cost, and its own clinical guidance says it does not know how many service members it will test or treat.

The screening applies to every active-duty and reserve service member age 30 and older, a population of about 2 million. But the guidance the Defense Health Agency issued this week says the numbers to be screened, tested, diagnosed and treated “are not currently known,” and no prior guidance projected them.

The department has not said what any of this will cost. The Center Square asked for a cost estimate in July, when the mandate was announced, and again this week. The Defense Health Agency, which issued the guidance, declined to answer questions about it and referred them to the Pentagon press office, which did not respond to a request for comment this week and did not provide a cost estimate in July. Neither the July memo nor the clinical guidance carries a price tag, or says whether the screening and any resulting treatment will be funded through the existing Military Health System budget or a new request.

The department has framed the program as a readiness measure. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth’s July 15 memo ordering the screening said that “applying lessons learned from treating Operator Syndrome across the Total Force including targeted testosterone therapy directly optimizes Warfighter readiness,” and Chief Pentagon Spokesman Sean Parnell said in a Sept. 17 statement that the effort would help sustain “a healthy, capable, and decisively dominant fighting force.”

The guidance issued under that memo does not support using testosterone to boost performance in healthy troops. It states that testosterone “is not a performance enhancer” and that “guidance premised on performance enhancement rather than on treatment of a diagnosed deficiency is not supportable on the current evidence.” The guidance treats testosterone deficiency as a diagnosis to be confirmed and treated, not a fitness edge to be issued across the force.

Dr. Richard Auchus, an endocrinologist at the University of Michigan, told The Center Square the guidance is “largely evidence-based,” screening for symptoms before ordering blood tests, an approach “consistent with society guidelines and good clinical practice.” He said he was “relieved” the document was “not recommending broadly blood-test based screening everyone over 30.”

The guidance also differs from how the program has been described. In July, a Pentagon official told The Center Square that “everyone over 30 years old will be tested annually.” But the guidance does not call for testing everyone. It directs providers to screen with a symptom and risk-factor questionnaire and to order a blood test only when that screen is positive or a risk factor is present.

https://9a9305b1b4ce87b475c01ae044df4515.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-45/html/container.html

The program’s clinical premise traces to “Operator Syndrome,” a term coined in 2020 by psychologist Chris Frueh to describe a cluster of health problems, including brain injury, sleep disruption and hormonal dysfunction, in special operations forces. Hegseth’s memo cited it as justification for testing across the force. Frueh, who reviewed the new guidance, told The Center Square it was “very good.”

The guidance is candid about the limits of what testosterone does. It says the therapy helps sexual function, body composition and bone density, but that the evidence “does not support its use to improve energy, vitality, physical function, or cognition.” It notes that the American College of Physicians recommends against prescribing it for those reasons, and that in a major trial, testosterone did no better than a placebo at improving men’s energy or how far they could walk.

The House Armed Services Committee’s majority and minority offices did not immediately respond to questions Friday about whether they received a cost estimate for the program.

About The Center Square

The Center Square was launched in May 2019 to fulfill the need for high-quality statehouse and statewide news across the United States. The focus of their work is state- and local-level government and economic reporting.

View all posts by The Center Square →

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Saudi Arabia’s East-West oil pipeline has been damaged by drone attacks. The strait of Hormuz is restricted, Houthi bandits threaten shipping routes into the Red Sea. Another oil shock is coming. Yet our Prime Minister and his Cabinet are behaving like a flock of ostriches, heads buried so deep in the sand they could strike oil themselves. The answer is simple: DRILL OUR OWN OIL AND GAS IN THE NORTH SEA. Comment: Agenda needs to include Oil on the table in Ireland, we are a totally reliant country on foreign supplies, check out David Horgan, Irish Independent circa 2023

Saudi Arabia’s East-West oil pipeline has been damaged by drone attacks. The strait of Hormuz is restricted, Houthi bandits threaten shipping routes into the Red Sea. Another oil shock is coming. Yet our Prime Minister and his Cabinet are behaving like a flock of ostriches, heads buried so deep in the sand they could strike oil themselves. The answer is simple: DRILL OUR OWN OIL AND GAS IN THE NORTH SEA.

Kemi Badenoch

@KemiBadenoch

·

Saudi Arabia’s East-West oil pipeline has been damaged by drone attacks. The strait of Hormuz is restricted, Houthi bandits threaten shipping routes into the Red Sea. Another oil shock is coming. Yet our Prime Minister and his Cabinet are behaving like a flock of ostriches, heads buried so deep in the sand they could strike oil themselves. The answer is simple: DRILL OUR OWN OIL AND GAS IN THE NORTH SEA.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Mario Nawfal on X: Interview with Steve Hanke

https://twitter.com/MarioNawfal/status/2101502993673675172/video/1

A Johns Hopkins economist says Saudi Arabia should raise the white flag to the Houthis now, before the kingdom itself is on the table Steve Hanke has watched Riyadh fight this enemy before, with full American backing and every advantage short of ground troops, and lose. The Houthis are stronger now than they were at the 2022 peace, their friends are more numerous, and the crown prince has been turned down by Washington twice, waved off by Cairo and left waiting on Beijing. Saudi Arabia, an oil state, is borrowing from the World Bank. So his advice is blunt: surrender early, accept terms, and expect the bill to include the three provinces the kingdom took from Yemen in 1934. Wait, and the serious conversation moves from Saudi losses to Saudi survival. Meanwhile Europe is crossing from deficit to shortage, the point where a station has nothing in the tank, and the markets, in his words, are sleepwalking through all of it.

@steve_hanke

@WeTheBrandon

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Clash Report on X: Iran’s Security Council Secretary Rezaei:

https://twitter.com/clashreport/status/2101596376844980351/video/1

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

ALJAZEERA: Ed Sheeran … Gaza situation

News|Gaza

Ed Sheeran calls Gaza situation ‘unjustifiable’ after Palestine controversy

The British singer addresses fans at his concert in Philadelphia as his US Loop Tour resumes. Listen (2 mins)

Save

Share Ed Sheeran calls Gaza situation ‘unjustifiable’ after Palestine controversy on social media

Share

Add Al Jazeera on Google

Pro-Palestinian protesters hold flags and signs outside Lincoln Financial Field in Philadelphia
Pro-Palestinian protesters demonstrate near Lincoln Financial Field ahead of Ed Sheeran’s concert in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on September 19, 2026 [Matthew Hatcher/AFP]

By AFP, AP and Reuters

Published On 20 Sep 202620

British pop star Ed Sheeran has made his first comments on the controversy that plunged his North America Loop Tour into turmoil, saying that the situation in Gaza is “catastrophic”, “unjustifiable” and “disproportionate”.

Sheeran made the remarks as he opened his show at the Lincoln Financial Field stadium in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, where his tour resumed on Saturday night.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 items

end of list

The pop singer has faced a wave of criticism after his opening act, American rapper Macklemore, was dropped from the lineup over his pro-Palestine comments at a concert in New Jersey earlier this month.

Macklemore’s comments drew backlash from owners of stadiums hosting Sheeran’s future tour dates. Sheeran has denied being behind the decision, blaming the tour promoter.

Recording artist Macklemore, left, and Ed Sheeran
Recording artist Macklemore, left, and Ed Sheeran [File: AP]

According to US media reports, the start time for the concert was pushed back two and a half hours because there were no opening acts and Sheeran performed solo.

All of Sheeran’s four supporting acts, including American singer Billie Eilish’s brother and musical collaborator, Finneas, walked out on Sheeran, issuing public statements citing their support for Palestinians.

Finneas and his sister have been outspoken about their support for Palestine before.

“Artists must not be silenced when they speak up for the oppressed,” he said on Instagram last Tuesday, adding: “I stand with Palestine and its people.”

Pro-Palestinian protesters gather near Lincoln Financial Field, the venue of pop star Ed Sheeran’s concert, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on September 19, 2026
Pro-Palestinian protesters gather near Lincoln Financial Field, the venue of pop star Ed Sheeran’s concert, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on September 19, 2026 [Eduardo Munoz/Reuters]

A group of about 50 pro-Palestinian demonstrators rallied outside the stadium before the show on Saturday, waving Palestinian flags and chanting “Free, free Palestine.”

Hillary Steinberg, 34, of Philadelphia, said she got tickets a year ago but got a refund and attended the demonstration instead, disappointed that Sheeran did not take a stand.

Want to come back to this article? Save it for later.Save

“I was, until this week, a big Ed Sheeran fan,” Steinberg told the Associated Press news agency. “I think all art is political, and all music is political, and so this choice, even though he was saying that he wasn’t complicit, is a political choice.”

The controversy did not matter to concertgoers who spoke to the Reuters news agency on Saturday before Sheeran took to the stage.

Joy VanRuler, 55, of Pottstown, Pennsylvania, said she supports both Sheeran and Macklemore.

“It doesn’t need to be political,” VanRuler said. “It’s about the music, and we support both of them and it’s all good.”


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment