France24: Opus Dei: Spain under influence of ultra-conservative Catholic …. Opus Dei have a strong influential presence in Ireland, search annulments on this site. Also a writer called Gore from the Financial Times has just published his book on OPUS. Time to get behind the hidden net that covers Opus Dei. Alsoi included is Unveiling Opus Dei: Irishwoman from FT investigation speaks out 30th March 2024

=================================================

Unveiling Opus Dei: Irishwoman from FT investigation speaks out

Updated / Saturday, 30 Mar 2024 15:42

Ann Marie Allen's story was central to a major investigation published by the Financial Times two weeks ago.
Ann Marie Allen’s story was central to a major investigation published by the Financial Times two weeks ago.

The Upfront Team

By The Upfront Team

Ann Marie Allen was 15 when she joined training course at an Opus Dei-run catering school. By 16 she had become an ‘assistant numerary’ within the organisation. During her years with Opus Dei, she worked from early morning until late evening in places like the organisation’s students’ residence in Galway, cooking and serving meals, doing laundry and cleaning rooms.

While not working she lived in an Opus Dei centre. There, she says, she was pressured to attend mass, deprive herself at meals, sleep on the floor one night a week, and tie a ‘cilice’ – “a barbed wire with the sharp bits on the inside” – around her leg for two hours daily.

She says she was isolated from her family, that her post was monitored, and her phone calls listened in to.

Eventually, with the help of her father, she says she “escaped” and rebuilt her life. Now, decades later, she has become a key part of a global effort by former assistant numeraries to unveil what happened within Opus Dei, and demand reparation.

Ms Allen’s story was central to a major investigation published by the Financial Times two weeks ago. In her first interview with Irish broadcast media, she told Katie Hannon on ‘Upfront: The Podcast’ further remarkable details about what she experienced within the organisation.


Listen: Katie Hannon speaks to Ann Marie Allen on Upfront: The Podcast


Opus Dei is a conservative Catholic institution which was founded by Saint Josemaría Escrivá in 1928. It now has a presence in over 60 countries. It consists of lay members and clerical members.

Upfront asked Opus Dei to respond to the details of Ann Marie’s story. In a statement, it said “we reject the accusation of exploitation,” adding “we are very sorry and deeply regret that Anne Marie Allen was hurt by her time in Opus Dei.”

Ms Allen says she was not paid during the seven years she was working in Opus Dei in the late 70s and early 80s. She wants the organisation to abolish the assistant numerary grade itself.

The Opus Dei statement says “Assistant numeraries are women in Opus Dei who, like all the other members, aim to love God and others through their work and daily life. In their case, their chosen work is caring for the people and centres in the family setting of Opus Dei.”

“This work is paid in accordance with the employment legislation of the countries in which they live.”

Ms Allen said she initially came into contact with Opus Dei when she looked at starting a course in a residential catering training school which was run by the organisation.

“We went for the interview. I remember both of my parents were taken away separately and I was taken away separately to be interviewed. We got the royal treatment… there was tea and coffee in beautiful surroundings,” she told Katie Hannon.

Love-bombing

Having started the course, she found the college lacked the structure typical of conventional educational institutions.

“There were no textbooks, there was no timetable. The classes were ad hoc. There were some outside teachers who came in and did some classes with us, but I now realise that they were trying to recruit them as well,” Ms Allen said.

“We got up every morning, we had to go to Mass. Even though they had said we had a choice, there was pressure put on us if we did not go to Mass. Then we had our breakfast very quickly and we got into a green bus. We drove into Salthill, and arrived there about 8.30am, and we worked until 8pm, seven days a week.”

A painting of Saint Josemaría Escrivá (Image: Getty)

In Salthill, she says she worked in an Opus Dei student residence and conference centre.

“I was sent there maybe a week after I started in the college… We cooked all of the meals. We did house-keeping and waitressed, and we did the laundry.”

Ms Allen says she was ‘love-bombed,’ by more senior members of Opus Dei, and told she had a vocation to be an assistant numerary. Once she accepted the vocation, she says the love-bombing stopped and she was pressured to comply with conversative religious orthodoxies and behaviours.

She says she was told “of you don’t follow your vocation, you won’t have happy relationships… you’ll go to hell.”

“It was very gradual. The manipulation…” she said. “By the time you get to join Opus Dei, you’re frightened and you’re completely isolated.”

Mortification

She said members used the cilice on their legs for two hours a day.

“I was always extremely uncomfortable about it. I was 16 years of age, and it was just given to me and said this is what you do. I had never heard of it; I’d never seen anything like this. And you did it.”

“Then the discipline was kind of a small whip that you had to whip yourself on a Saturday as a mortification,” she added.

“It wasn’t the worst part, believe it or not,” she said, before explaining ‘fraternal corrections’ were issued, a form of verbal admonishment.

“[It] was behaviour control… And you had to take it. At the end of it, you’d have to say, ‘oh, thank you very much for saying that to me.’ You couldn’t challenge anyone. That was constant. That was every day.”

“We were told at the end of a shower to take a cold water blast. You had to deprive yourself of something for every meal. You had to sleep on the floor one night a week without a mattress. You had to sleep one night in the bed without a pillow.”

“My contact with my family and with any friends was closely monitored,” Ms Allen told Katie Hannon.

“All of my letters that I wrote out, were read. You left the envelope open, and you handed it in, then anything they got back – or that you got back – was opened. You may or you may not get those letters… if they felt they weren’t suitable,” she said.

Ms Allen said she felt the purpose was to force conformity and servitude.

“Suppressing sexuality, suppressing your own values, your own opinions, it was constant. It was like Catholicism on cocaine.”

Leaving Opus Dei

After several years, Ms Allen’s father became concerned about her treatment, having read media reports about Opus Dei, and he tried to get her to leave.

When Ms Allen sought to visit home, she says Opus Dei insisted that her father write a letter “saying that he wouldn’t keep me.”

“Whenever my father was on the phone, they would sometimes be standing around me praying. If somebody came to see me, they’d be in the oratory praying.”

She was accompanied by more senior members of the organisation on the visit home.

“Dad said, ‘she’s staying, she’s going nowhere.’ And they said, ‘but you wrote a letter to say you wouldn’t keep her.’ And he said, what I wrote was, ‘I won’t try to keep her,’ but I am keeping her.”

After several difficult years, Ms Allen went back into education and studied at night to obtain her leaving certificate, and eventually a degree and masters.

She became a senior prison officer, retiring from the Irish Prison Service as part of the management team in some of Ireland’s best-known prisons.

In more recent years, she says she has connected with other former members of Opus Dei, after being introduced to one by a prison chaplin.

“She put me in contact with an ex-numerary. We met for lunch, and I was flabbergasted at the amount of people that had left. I found speaking to her was hugely therapeutic. I found it very, very healing. I went on my own journey of trying to find former members,” Ms Allen said.

Ms Allen has since joined 43 other former assistant numeraries – most from South America – who have made a complaint to the Vatican about their treatment from Opus Dei.

“All of the people that worked, that were unpaid, they need to be paid their wages, they need to get compensation, they need to have their pension entitlements restored and they need to be reimbursed for all of the counselling that they had to get from their treatment,” she told Katie Hannon.


Listen to Ann Marie Allen speaking to Katie Hannon on Upfront: The Podcast here, on Apple Podcasts and on Spotify.

In response to the allegations raised in this podcast, Opus Dei issued the following statement to RTÉ.

We are very sorry and deeply regret that Anne Marie Allen was hurt by her time in Opus Dei. She got in touch with us some months back and we replied and invited her to get in touch again. We have also approached her through an independent person to suggest we meet but so far she has not taken up the offer.

We hope she will do so in the future.

Anne Marie describes two different periods. The first was when she was a student at Ballabbert School. The second, when she chose a vocation within the Catholic Church.

With regard to her experience in the late 70s, we reject the accusation of exploitation. Ballabbert School was a non-profit socio-educational initiative supervised by the competent authorities. At that time the school leaving age in Ireland was 15 and many girls left school and went directly into employment with no qualifications which limited their opportunities to progress in life. Schools like Ballabbert provided an opportunity to acquire an internationally recognised qualification rather than going directly into employment. In the case of Ballabbert the girls took the National Council for Home Economics Education (later City and Guilds) exams.

Assistant numeraries are women in Opus Dei who, like all the other members, aim to love God and others through their work and daily life. In their case, their chosen work is caring for the people and centres in the family setting of Opus Dei. This work is paid in accordance with the employment legislation of the countries in which they live.

The vocation of assistant numerary is being followed by thousands of women around the world with freedom, love and commitment, and has the same dignity as any other life choice. In fact, many women who joyfully live out this vocational call made a public plea a few months ago for their free and conscious choice to be respected and not demeaned.

In cases in the past where there may have been irregularities in social security contributions, or bad experiences within the organisation, Opus Dei recognises that these things can have happened, but needs the people concerned to make a formal complaint. They can do so here.

For more information: https://opusdei.org/en-ie/article/q-a-about-the-financial-times-article/

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Understanding Hypervigilance: The Hidden Childhood Trauma Dr Gabor Mate

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Iran time: … up to people to assess

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Professor Robert A. Pape: The US is paying for this war Iran is gaining from it Day 28

Robert A. Pape

@ProfessorPape

·

The US is paying for this war Iran is gaining from it Day 28:

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Will Iran Break Trumpism? The Ezra Klein Show. Christopher Caldwell thinks so

Mar 27, 2026 The Ezra Klein Show

Is Trumpism crashing on the shoals of the Iran war? That is what Christopher Caldwell thinks. Caldwell is a prominent thinker on the right. He’s a contributing editor at the conservative publication the Claremont Review of Books,and he’s one of the people who’ve been trying to define, and even craft, a coherent Trumpism. So his recent article in The Spectator, “The End of Trumpism,” sparked a lot of debate on the right. At the core of this debate are some fundamental questions that I think remain unresolved, despite Trump’s decade-long dominance of the Republican Party: What is Trumpism? Is there Trumpism, or is there just Donald Trump? Caldwell is a contributing writer for Times Opinion and the author of “The Age of Entitlement: America Since the Sixties.” In this conversation, he explains how he understood Trumpism as a movement of “democratic restoration” — and why he believes the Iran war betrays that. And I ask him why he sees the seams of Trump’s base fraying, despite polling that suggests otherwise.

00:00 Intro 02:09 What is Trumpism? 04:20 Is Trumpism an agenda or just Trump himself? 06:20 Trumpism as democratic restoration 11:20 Trump’s self-enrichment and donors 14:10 Populism: liberalism vs. democracy 19:00 Why the Iran war threatens Trumpism 26:00 Trump as “the decider” 31:00 Is Trump an agent of democracy? 41:00 The administrative state’s virtues 45:00 Trumpism vs. European populism 51:00 Procedural vs. goal-oriented politics 56:00 Trump as a normative inversion 01:01:00 Why Trump’s transgressions don’t cost support 01:09:22 Book recommendations Read the full transcript here: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/27/op… Watch more on ‪@EzraKleinShow‬

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Bernie Sanders: “make human labor obsolete” ie replacing workers with robots and AI

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

OCCRP: The story traced the origins of Russian aluminum, a critical input for the country’s war factories. As it turns out, much of a key raw material, alumina, is supplied by an Irish refinery.

This Monday, we published an investigation showing how European know-how, labor, and resources feed into the supply chains that keep Russia’s military production humming.The story traced the origins of Russian aluminum, a critical input for the country’s war factories. As it turns out, much of a key raw material, alumina, is supplied by an Irish refinery. And it’s not just another market: Reporters found that a majority of the facility’s exports go to Russian smelters. Those smelters sell to a Moscow-based trader which has supplied hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of aluminum to Russian arms manufacturers.The findings quickly became an international scandal. Within hours, they were being discussed in the Irish parliament, while Belgium’s foreign minister said his country would push the EU to toughen its sanctions regime. But while such cases are often described as “sanctions evasion,” that’s not really what’s happening: In this case, there’s nothing to evade. Exporting alumina to Russia is legal, and though the Irish plant is owned by Russian aluminum giant Rusal, the company is not under any blacklist.
The economic interest is obvious. In parliament, Ireland’s prime minister began his remarks by stressing the plant’s importance as an employer. Much the same argument was made when scrutiny first fell on the facility in 2022. But this story also demonstrates how these arguments are sustained by a measure of plausible deniability. The United States did briefly sanction Rusal in 2018 because its founder, oligarch Oleg Deripaska, is a close Putin ally. But the sanctions were removed after prices spiked — and Deripaska cut his stake to a minority position. (He now owns 45 percent of Rusal’s parent company, and is still its largest shareholder.) The situation in the EU is similar: Deripaska is sanctioned; Rusal is not.As European member states negotiate the EU’s upcoming sanctions package on Russia, some have argued for sanctions on mineral exports to be sharpened. But the case made by policymakers opposed to sanctions is strengthened because Rusal’s aluminum reaches Russian weapons manufacturers through an intermediary, not by direct sale. That, says Alex Prezanti, a co-founder of the State Capture Accountability Project, is a “classic way” of protecting Rusal — not because it’s sanctions evasion, but because it weakens the consensus for sanctions in the first place.“If Rusal was selling directly to weapons companies, it would be easier to coalesce 27 member states to sanction it,” Prezanti says.Meanwhile, Russian strikes on Ukrainian cities, and a renewed Spring offensive in the east, will grind on.
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Charlie Rose: WHAT’S HAPPENING IN IRAN. Foreign Policy Professor John J. Mearsheimer

For more than four decades, Professor John J. Mearsheimer, from his position at the University of Chicago, has examined global power and America’s role in the world—often challenging traditional assumptions and language, and creating debate about the aspirations of great powers.

He has suggested that nuclear weapons can enhance stability among nations and that the power of international institutions is limited. He has used the term “offensive realism” to argue that power is the critical factor in relationships among nations, largely setting aside moral considerations.

Mearsheimer has written articles and books that have provoked controversy, especially The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy.

Other books include: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, The Great Delusion: Liberal Dreams and International Realities, Why Leaders Lie, Conventional Deterrence, Nuclear Deterrence, and Liddell Hart and the Weight of History.

This is an important moment to consider the exercise of power—both militarily and economically—as war continues in Iran and Ukraine, and threats to sovereignty emerge elsewhere.

We will consider many issues, including the status of the war in Iran, the possibilities of regime change, how to end the war, the strategies of the United States, Israel, and Iran, the competition between the U.S. and China, the U.S. and Russia, Europe and Russia, what might happen in Cuba and Latin America, and the nature of war itself as drones increasingly dominate warfare in Ukraine and Iran.

Professor John Mearsheimer joins us from the University of Chicago.

Subscribed

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Rundown AI: Wikipedia bans AI from writing its articles

Wikipedia bans AI from writing its articlesImage source: Wikipedia

The Rundown: Wikipedia’s volunteer editors banned the use of AI to write articles on the foundation’s English-language site, a move the policy’s author called a “pushback against enshittification and forceful push of AI by so many companies”.

The details:Prior attempts at broad AI rules failed to reach consensus, but mounting AI-generated errors pushed editors to a near-unanimous 40-2 vote.The ban covers writing or rewriting articles with LLMs, with editors still allowed to use AI for grammar fixes and translations with human review.The policy’s author said the change could “spark a broader change” and “empower communities on other platforms” to set AI rules on their own terms.

StackOverflow and German Wikipedia have enacted similar bans, with Spanish Wikipedia going further to fully ban the use of AI, even for editing purposes.

Why it matters: AI text reportedly surpassed human output for the first time in 2025, and Wikipedia is trying to hold the human line, all while Elon pushes Grokipedia (an AI-created version of Wikipedia) in the exact opposite direction. The internet’s most-used knowledge base bet against the current, but how long that holds is anyone’s guess.

Terms of Service
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Axios: China threatens U.S. pharma (there will be implications to manufacturing basis of phara drugs in Ireland too) Watch this trajectory of change

China threatens U.S. pharma
 
Illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios. Photo: Peng Bin/VCG via Getty Images

China’s emergence as a second hub of pharmaceutical innovation could trigger massive changes to the global drug market, including how treatments are regulated and priced in the U.S., Axios’ Caitlin Owens reports.

Why it matters: More cutting-edge therapies are generally a good thing for patients, regardless of where they come from. But the new world order could spark questions over who’ll access those therapies and where money flows. 

By the numbers: China went from being the country of origin for just 8% of the world’s drug development in 2015 to 32.3% in 2024, according to a new study published yesterday in JAMA. 

The U.S., on the other hand, lost ground. In 2015, 48.2% of new programs originated here. By 2024, that number dropped to 37.4%.

During that time, the number of U.S. drug development programs grew from around 5,000 to around 7,000 — but the Chinese programs skyrocketed from fewer than a thousand to more than 6,000. 

Between the lines: The more China succeeds at getting drugs beyond early stages of development, the more likely it is that U.S. regulators will have to make tough decisions about how to evaluate the products.

And Chinese companies could eventually compete with Western ones on price, undercutting today’s lucrative financial model.Read more.
    
 
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment