John Hopkins University: Apes Share Human Ability to Imagine. Comment: so interesting for me. I have aphantasia ie no mind’s eye. Search this site for TBI Aphantasia


America’s First Research University

    Hub
    Kanzi, a bonobo, was part of the study

    Image caption:Kanzi, a bonobo, was part of the study

    Credit:Ape Initiative

    Animal cognition

    Apes share human ability to imagine

    A Johns Hopkins study is the first to show that the capacity to pretend is not uniquely human

    By Jill Rosen / Published 2 days ago Media Inquiries

    In a series of tea party-like experiments, Johns Hopkins University researchers demonstrated for the first time that apes can use their imagination and play pretend, an ability thought to be uniquely human.

    Consistently and robustly across three experiments, one bonobo engaged with cups of imaginary juice and bowls of pretend grapes, challenging long-held assumptions about the abilities of animals.

    The findings suggest that the capacity to understand pretend objects is within the cognitive potential of, at least, an enculturated ape, and likely dates back 6 to 9 million years, to our common evolutionary ancestors.

    Video credit: Johns Hopkins University see above

    “It really is game-changing that their mental lives go beyond the here and now,” said co-author Christopher Krupenye, a Johns Hopkins assistant professor in the Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences who studies how animals think. “Imagination has long been seen as a critical element of what it is to be human, but the idea that it may not be exclusive to our species is really transformative.

    “Jane Goodall discovered that chimps make tools, and that led to a change in the definition of what it means to be human. And this, too, really invites us to reconsider what makes us special and what mental life is out there among other creatures.”

    The findings are published today in Science.

    By age 2, human children can engage in pretend scenarios, like tea parties. Even at 15-months-old, infants show measures of surprise when they see a person “drinking” from a cup after pretending to empty it.

    “It really is game-changing that their mental lives go beyond the here and now.”

    Christopher Krupenye

    Assistant professor, Psychological and Brain Sciences

    There had been no controlled studies of pretense in nonhuman animals, despite several anecdotal reports of animals seemingly engaging in pretending behavior from both the wild and captivity.

    For example, in the wild, young female chimpanzees have been observed carrying and playing with sticks, holding them like mothers would hold their infants. And a chimpanzee in captivity seemed to drag imaginary blocks along the floor after playing with real wooden blocks.

    Krupenye and co-author Amalia Bastos, a former Johns Hopkins postdoctoral fellow who is now a lecturer at Scotland’s University of St. Andrews, wondered if they could test this capacity to pretend in a controlled environment.

    They created experiments very similar to a child’s tea party to test Kanzi, a 43-year-old bonobo living at Ape Initiative, who had been anecdotally reported to engage in pretense and could respond to verbal prompts by pointing.

    In each test, an experimenter and Kanzi faced one another, tea party-style, across a table set with either empty pitchers and cups or bowls and jars.

    In the first task there were two transparent cups on the table, both empty, alongside an empty transparent pitcher. The experimenter tipped the pitcher to “pour” a little pretend juice into each cup, then pretended to dump the juice out of one cup, shaking it a bit to really get it out. They then asked Kanzi, “Where’s the juice?”

    Kanzi pointed to the correct cup that still contained pretend juice most of the time, even when the experimenter changed the location of the cup filled with pretend juice.

    In case Kanzi thought there was real juice in the cup, even if he couldn’t see it, the team ran a second experiment. This time there was a cup of real juice alongside the cup of pretend juice. When Kanzi was asked what he wanted, he pointed toward the real juice almost every time.

    A third experiment repeated the same concept, except with grapes. An experimenter pretended to sample a grape from an empty container, then placed it inside one of the two jars. They pretended to empty one of the containers and asked Kanzi, “Where’s the grape?” Kanzi again indicated the location of the pretend object.

    Kanzi was never perfect, but he was consistently correct.

    “It’s extremely striking and very exciting that the data seem to suggest that apes, in their minds, can conceive of things that are not there,” Bastos said. “Kanzi is able to generate an idea of this pretend object and at the same time know it’s not real.”

    The findings inspire continued study, especially trying to test whether other apes and other animals can engage in pretend play or track pretend objects. The team also hopes to explore other facets of imagination in apes, perhaps their ability to think about the future or to think about what’s going on in the minds of others.

    “Imagination is one of those things that in humans gives us a rich mental life. And if some roots of imagination are shared with apes, that should make people question their assumption that other animals are just living robotic lifestyles constrained to the present,” Krupenye said. “We should be compelled by these findings to care for these creatures with rich and beautiful minds and ensure they continue to exist.”

    The work was supported by the Johns Hopkins Provost’s Postdoctoral Fellowship Program; Templeton World Charity Foundation (TWCF-2021-20647); CIFAR Azrieli Global Scholars; and an Early Career Collaboration Enhancement Award from the Diverse Intelligences Summer Institute.

    Posted in Science+Technology

    Tagged cognitive psychology

    Share on X

    Share on Facebook15

    Pin it on PinterestEmailMore social media options

    Share on LinkedIn

    Share on Reddit

    Share on Tumblr

    Related Content
    Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

    Axios: EV losses pile up

     EV losses pile up
     
    Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios

    The price of misjudging the switch to electric vehicles swelled again yesterday, as Jeep maker Stellantis announced $26.2 billion in charges — the largest yet by any automaker, Axios’ Joann Muller reports.

    That amount reflects the cost of canceling EVs and compensating suppliers — plus what CEO Antonio Filosa called “poor operational execution” by predecessor Carlos Tavares. 

    The automaker’s shares fell nearly 25% yesterday on the news. Stellantis’ move is the latest in a series of write-offs amid slower-than-expected EV demand:

    GM took $7.6 billion in charges for 2025, with more likely in 2026.

    Ford announced $19.5 billion in EV write-downs

    VW took a $6 billion hit, mostly from scaling back its EV plans for Porsche.Go deeper.
    Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

    Futurism: As Crash Deepens, Investors Say Bitcoin Is Headed for Zero Dollars

    Futurism Logo

    https://f28183ab76b0a507bd726c523530b584.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-45/html/container.html Future Society

    Zero Point Zero

    As Crash Deepens, Investors Say Bitcoin Is Headed for Zero Dollars

    “That’s not just for shock factor. It’s where the math takes us.”

    By Victor Tangermann

    Published Feb 6, 2026 11:01 AM EST

    Text on red background of declining chart that reads "$0.00."
    Getty / Futurism

    Mainstream cryptocurrency Bitcoin is being eviscerated this week. The token tanked to a historic low, coming eerily close to as little as $60,000 on Thursday evening. That’s well under 50 percent down from its all-time high a mere four months ago.

    While the crypto has since bounced back to around the $68,000 mark, it comes at a grim cost: it’s now wiped out all of its gains since president Donald Trump won the presidential election in late 2025.

    Analysts aren’t presumably hopeful about an imminent recovery, with some expecting the absolute worst.

    “Our BTC price target is 0.0,” Pivotus Partners chief market strategist and partner Richard Farr tweeted. “That’s not just for shock factor. It’s where the math takes us.”

    Farr said he concurred with Michael Burry, who famously shorted the US housing market before its collapse in 2008, and recently warned in a Substack post that further losses for Bitcoin could result in a “death spiral.”

    Farr pointed to Bitcoin following similar trends to a larger US stock downturn, suggesting it’s no longer the safe haven it was once claimed to be, arguing that it operates as a “speculative instrument correlated to the Nasdaq” instead.

    The crypto bear argued that “no serious central bank will ever own something where Michael Saylor controls the float,” referring to the CEO of Strategy, the largest corporate Bitcoin treasury.

    Farr also criticized the token for being damaging to the environment, as mining it requires copious amounts of energy and water.

    “Nothing ‘green’ about this ‘coin,’” Farr wrote mockingly. “We think it’s a zero.”

    In a follow-up post on LinkedIn, Farr argued that worsening US jobs numbers could cause even more money to “come out of speculative assets, than in,” which led him to feel “increasingly emboldened” about his zero-dollar call.

    He also pointed to crypto miners, who were already squeezed by winter storms driving up electricity prices, being forced to close up shop amid the crash.

    “We think we are only in the early innings of the crypto correction,” Farr wrote.

    In his Substack post, Burry noted that a recent crash in gold prices — following a historic surge — appeared to be linked to Bitcoin’s ongoing demise.

    As people continue to gamble on gold futures, Burry argued that “physical metals may break from the trend on safe haven demand,” triggering a “death spiral”-like collapse.

    Considering Bitcoin’s enormous swings over the last couple of months, it’s likely not the end of the ride for the infamously volatile digital token.

    Farr clearly isn’t alone in predicting further losses.

    “This steady selling in our view signals that traditional investors are losing interest, and overall pessimism about crypto is growing,” Deutsche Bank analyst Marion Laboure wrote in a note to clients, as quoted by CNBC.

    “Bitcoin isn’t trading on hype anymore, the story has lost a bit of that plot, it is trading on pure liquidity and capital flows,” FG Nexus CEO of digital assets Maja Vujinovic added.

    More on Bitcoin: Bitcoin Is Crashing So Hard That Miners Are Unplugging Their Equipment

    Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

    Courage.Media – The Future Surveillance Dystopia

    Commentary

    The Future Surveillance Dystopia

    “The eyes of the state can be on you at all times”

    4 Feb 2026

    Josh Ferme

    View articles

    The United Kingdom is currently overseeing the testing and gradual deployment of a suite of technologies designed to monitor, analyse, and predict the behaviour of its citizens in ways that were previously confined to dystopian fiction. The scale of these systems, and more importantly the philosophy underpinning their use, should concern anyone regardless of political persuasion or criminal intent.

    These technologies will not remain confined to the UK. There is a long and well-established precedent of individual states operating as de facto pilot studies, trialling new forms of surveillance and control before they are adopted elsewhere. Controversial technologies trialled in one country today often become conventional practice globally tomorrow.

    Become a Free Member

    Enjoy independent, ad-free journalism – delivered to your inbox each week

    Join Today

    The UK itself provides clear historical examples. In the 1990s, Britain became the most surveilled democracy on earth, with the highest density of CCTV cameras anywhere in the world. This set a template that other Western nations soon followed. Britain remains one of the most surveilled nations on earth, but has since been surpassed by both China and the United States. The same pattern can be seen with Automatic Number Plate Recognition technology, which uses optical character recognition to read vehicle registration plates. It was first extensively deployed in the UK and is now embedded across policing, border control, and private security throughout the Western world. This suggests that technological innovations deemed successful are likely to expand far beyond the borders of their country of origin.

    The most concerning recent development in UK surveillance is the use of AI to predict crime before it happens. According to reporting in The Telegraph, police chiefs in the UK are currently evaluating around 100 separate AI projects, with the Government investing £4 million in the creation of an interactive, AI-powered map of England and Wales intended to be fully operational by 2030. Its stated purpose is to identify areas likely to experience criminal activity and to recommend police intervention before any criminal activity actually takes place. Sir Andy Marsh, head of the College of Policing, has described plans to identify the 1,000 most “dangerous predatory men” believed to pose the highest risk to women and girls. These individuals would be flagged for crimes they are statistically likely to commit based on data and case histories. Marsh has stated openly that the aim is to make such men “frightened because the police are coming after them”.

    There are several problems with this approach. The first is epistemic. Men willing to engage in highly taboo, predatory behaviour are already demonstrating a willingness to defy social norms and legal constraints. They are, by definition, less predictable than average citizens. Treating them as stable data points risks giving police a false sense of control over individuals who do not conform to statistical regularities to the same degree as the average citizen. Equally, if they are aware they are being observed it would make sense for them to alter their behavioural patterns to render the AI’s predictive abilities far less effective. This could lead to a situation in which, because they are being monitored by artificial intelligence rather than human police officers, they are able to commit crimes so long as they do not adhere to the prior patterns of criminality used by the AI to predict their behaviour in the first place.

    The second problem is that monitoring these 1,000 predatory men is not as effective as other interventions. Predictive systems may create an illusion of containment while diverting attention from the reality that the most reliable way to prevent certain crimes is the physical removal of genuinely dangerous individuals from society. This could be either through imprisonment or, in more serious cases, capital punishment. The return of the latter is still supported by a majority of Britons. In the context of the current shortage of prison space in Britain, this will incentivise subsequent governments to release dangerous criminals into society, free to commit further crimes, but with the illusion of preventative measures in place.

    This approach also further erodes the boundary between what is a crime and what is not. How do you deal with someone who is predicted to commit a crime but has yet to do so? Do you still treat them as a criminal? Until very recently, the police recorded “non-crime hate incidents”, which resulted in police intervention despite, by definition, no crime being committed. Being “guilty” of such an incident could result in police visiting one’s home or even a trip to the police station. These incidents also appeared on enhanced background checks despite no criminal conviction taking place. Non-crime hate incidents were only scrapped following a considerable campaign against them. Nevertheless, they support the view that individuals can be effectively criminalised for behaviour deemed problematic by the state despite no actual crime having occurred.

    While efforts to protect women and girls are undeniably admirable, it would be naïve to assume these tools will remain narrowly confined to this domain if they are deemed successful. There are powerful institutional incentives to expand their application. Once a system exists to identify high-risk individuals, the definition of risk inevitably broadens. Political dissidents, protest movements, journalists, and activists all generate behavioural patterns that can be framed as disruptive. Within the increasingly dominant technocratic, data-driven governance model, it seems inevitable that such technology would eventually be employed in this manner.

    If this were not concerning enough, it comes alongside plans to implement live facial recognition technology in every town centre across the country. Such systems allow police to identify individuals in real time, track their movements, and retrospectively reconstruct their behaviour. When combined with predictive analytics, this creates the technical foundations for continuous population monitoring regardless of criminality.

    The political architect of much of this vision is the Home Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, who has described her ideal system as a “panopticon” in which “the eyes of the state can be on you at all times”. She recently articulated this vision to Tony Blair, a figure synonymous with the expansion of technocratic governance and surveillance powers, and received his stamp of approval.

    The panopticon is a prison design that originated with the 18th-century philosopher Jeremy Bentham. It consists of a rotunda with cells arranged along the outer circumference across multiple levels. The side of each cell facing the centre of the circle has iron bars, while the outer side has a window, allowing light to pass through the cell and silhouette the prisoner, making them easily visible. At the centre is a watchtower from which a single guard can observe all prisoners without being seen himself. Although one guard cannot physically monitor every prisoner at once, prisoners can never know when they are being watched and are therefore compelled to behave as though they always are. It is effectively a prison designed to induce self-regulation through uncertainty.

    Applied at the level of an entire population, the implications are deeply sinister. A panoptic surveillance state goes far beyond punishing dissent. It prevents it from forming in the first place. People moderate their behaviour, speech, and associations long before the state needs to intervene. From the perspective of a potentially tyrannical government, this is the most effective technique for maximising obedience among its subjects.

    Functionally, a future surveillance dystopia emerges incrementally through pilot projects such as these, using the framing that they are well-intentioned attempts to target criminals. Much like a parasite, by the time it is recognised as a problem in the body politic, it is already deeply embedded and difficult to remove. Unless current trends are disrupted we may well find ourselves living inside our very own panopticon, forever watched by unseen authorities, despite doing nothing wrong.

    Donate today

    Help Ensure our Survival

    Make a One-Off Donation

    Comments (0)

    Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

    @EricLDaugh: BREAKING: President Trump just PUMMELED the “experts” “The “Experts” said that if I hit 50,000 on the Dow by the end of my Term, I would have done a great job, but I hit 50,000 today, three years ahead of schedule — Remember that for the Midterms, because the Democrats will CRASH the Economy!” He’s right!

    Eric Daugherty

    @EricLDaugh

    BREAKING: President Trump just PUMMELED the “experts” “The “Experts” said that if I hit 50,000 on the Dow by the end of my Term, I would have done a great job, but I hit 50,000 today, three years ahead of schedule — Remember that for the Midterms, because the Democrats will CRASH the Economy!” He’s right!

    Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

    A step into the human side of President Ronald Reagan. A letter to his son on his wedding day. The importance of Love.

    Crazy Vibes

    @CrazyVibes_1

    Ronald Reagan was the first U.S. president who had been divorced. His first marriage, to actress Jane Wyman, ended because she chose to walk away. By all accounts, she wasn’t the easiest person to be married to — she filed for divorce from her second husband just a month after marrying him, and her third marriage didn’t last long either.

    But Reagan’s second marriage, to Nancy, was a different story. They were together for 52 years, and their relationship was widely seen as a model of love and partnership. In 1971, when Reagan was Governor of California, his eldest son Michael was getting married. Reagan couldn’t be there in person, so he sent him a letter. What he wrote wasn’t just a note of congratulations — it was honest advice from a father who had lived, learned, and deeply valued his own marriage:

    Dear Mike, You’ve probably heard all the jokes from people who are bitter or cynical about marriage. But here’s the truth: you’re about to start the most important relationship in your life. And it will become whatever you choose to make it. Some men try to act tough by living like the guys in locker room stories — thinking that what their wife doesn’t know won’t hurt her. But believe me, even without lipstick on your collar or shady excuses about where you were at 3 a.m., a wife always knows. And when that trust starts to break, the magic in the relationship starts to fade. More often than people realize, the ones who say marriage doesn’t work are the same ones who put the least into it. It’s like physics — you get out exactly what you put in. If you only give half, you’ll only get half back. Sure, there’ll be moments when you’re tempted — when you notice another woman or miss your old single life. But I’ll tell you something: real strength, real masculinity, is sticking with one woman your whole life. Anyone can cheat — that’s easy. But to stay interesting and loving to the same woman, through all the normal, messy, everyday stuff — that takes real character. If you love her, really love her, you’ll never embarrass her by flirting with others or making her question where you’ve been. And you’ll never put her in a position where another woman could give her a knowing smile — like she knows a secret your wife doesn’t. Even for one second. You, more than most, understand what it’s like to grow up in an unhappy home. Now, you have the chance to build something better.

    There’s no greater feeling than coming home after a long day and knowing someone’s waiting just to hear the sound of your footsteps. With love, Dad P.S. Say “I love you” at least once a day. It really does help.

    Those words came from more than just a father — they came from someone who knew what marriage meant and how important it is to nurture love and loyalty every day.

    Reagan made sure Nancy never had to doubt she mattered. He made sure she always waited for him with love. As people say, you reap what you sow. And Nancy — graceful, strong, and loyal — chose him just as much as he chose her. She wasn’t just the First Lady of the United States. She was, first and always, the First Lady of his heart. And Ronald Reagan — the strong, determined leader known to the world — never forgot who he was at home: a husband, a father, and a man who truly loved his family. Like many good men in this world.

    Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

    Mosab Hassan Yousef: His father was a senior member of Hamas … He says “Palestine is NOT a cool thing. It’s Jihad….

    Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

    Leitrim Live: New documentary from RTÉ Investigates reveals the psychiatric care scandal in Ireland

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Advertise with Leitrim Live

    New documentary from RTÉ Investigates reveals the psychiatric care scandal in Ireland

    Families from all over Ireland tell their heartbreaking stories

    New documentary from RTÉ Investigates reveals the psychiatric care scandal in Ireland

    Lili Lonergan

    05 Feb 2026 8:07 AM

       

    In a special two-part TV series, RTÉ Investigates examines Ireland’s mental health system and uncovers how the criminalisation of mental illness leaves families and individuals impacted and abandoned by the State.

    Two decades after the Government’s landmark policy “A Vision for Change” promised a shift from large psychiatric institutions to modern, community-based care, RTÉ Investigates asks whether that transformation has truly taken place.

    READ NEXT: RTÉ issue update on new series of Home of the Year following death of presenter Hugh Wallace

    Twenty years ago the State unveiled big plans for psychiatric care in Ireland. Many old wards were shut, with a plan to open specialist services instead.

    “Which should have meant opening up lots of facilities, healthcare facilities. It could have been assisted living, nurses, care.

    It didn’t happen.”

    Without acute beds – patients with mental illness are being sent to prison.

    To investigate the true extent of this, reporter Conor Ryan and producer Frank Shouldice travelled to court hearings and inquests across the country.

    They spoke to the families of inmates and those working at the coal face. They pored over hundreds of first hand accounts, investigation reports and post-mortems. And they visited the prison landings that are struggling to cope.

    READ NEXT: Witnesses urged to come forward following tragic death of pedestrian in his 70s

    In the first programme this Monday night at 9.35pm, RTÉ Investigates lays bare how the criminalisation of mental illness continues to affect individuals and their families.

    “These people need to be in hospital, not in jail.”

    Key to the promised reform was the establishment of a brand new Central Mental Hospital in Portrane in north Dublin.

    In Tuesday night’s programme, RTÉ Investigates questions whether this service has delivered the change that was promised in the face of growing waiting lists and ongoing concerns about the community services people are being discharged to.

    READ NEXT: RIP: ‘Beautiful soul ‘- Shock and heartbreak after young woman passes away at home

    “He killed our son three years ago and now he’s allowed out, what’s going on?”

    Watch RTÉ Investigates: The Psychiatric Care Scandal this Monday, February 9 and Tuesday 10 at 9.35pm on RTÉ One and RTÉ Player.

    Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

    Carl Jung’s Answer About God That Religion Doesn’t Want You to Hear

    Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

    The Chris Hedges YouTube Channel: Interview with Professor Mearsheimer “What will the Future Look Like in the New World Order”. Left or Right?

    Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment