-
Archives
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
-
Meta
Col. Douglas Macgregor: IRAN WAR U.S. Losing Position in the World.
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
ICAN: ICAN condemns U.S. & Israeli attacks on Iran
photo credit: Hosein Charbaghi
February 28, 2026 Updates
ICAN condemns U.S. & Israeli attacks on Iran
SHARE
28 February 2026
– The Trump and Netanyahu administrations have launched a massive attack on Iran, using the alleged Iranian nuclear weapons programme as a partial justification. This attack takes place despite claims that the nuclear programme was “obliterated” during the Israeli and U.S. attacks last June and amidst repeated calls from President Donald Trump for a regime change in Iran. ICAN condemns the illegal attack by two nuclear-armed states, the United States and Israel, on Iran.
U.S. President Trump announced “major combat operations in Iran” and Israel indicated it was launching a pre-emptive attack on the country earlier today. In a statement shared on social media, President Trump indicated that this attack is taking place in part to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, though he also indicated that the nuclear programme was “obliterated” last June.
ICAN’s Executive Director, Melissa Parke condemned the attacks saying “These attacks are totally irresponsible and risk provoking further escalation as well as increasing the danger of nuclear proliferation and the use of nuclear weapons. Military action is not a viable or long-term solution to prevent nuclear proliferation. All military action must stop immediately.”
Negotiations were ongoing just this past week to address Iran’s nuclear programme. Iran is not currently assessed by international agencies or even the United States to have an ongoing nuclear weapons programme.
This dangerous escalation has undermined the prospects for success and risks a broader war further threatening civilian lives throughout the region.
International treaties such as the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW), which have provisions for verifiable nuclear disarmament and non-diversion of nuclear material for weapons, are essential and sustainable tools to prevent nuclear proliferation.
Ms. Parke continued “The solution to ending both the risk of nuclear proliferation and the use of nuclear weapons is for all countries, including the nuclear-armed states, such as the United States and Israel, to join the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons – the TPNW is the best way to ensure nuclear weapons are never used and to remove any incentive for more countries to develop them.”
The US, Israel and Iran should join the TPNW without delay. For the US and Israel, the TPNW allows for nuclear-armed states to join and then verifiably dismantle their nuclear weapons within an initial period of 10 years. For Iran, it requires all states to uphold their current level of nuclear safeguards.
Reports indicate that these attacks will not be limited in scope and are already spreading through the region. The humanitarian consequences of wide-scale military action are as yet unknown, but likely to be significant.
Further reading:
Doomsday Clock moves closer to midnight
How ICAN celebrated five years of the treatyWhat You Need to Know About the Iran Nuclear DealWashington DC joins ICAN Cities AppealMajority of millennials support banning nuclear weapons
Iran International: Iran sleeper cell fears rise after Austin shooting, Canada gym attack
Iran sleeper cell fears rise after Austin shooting, Canada gym attack
Mar 2, 2026, 01:45 GMTListen to this article

Concerns over the activation of Iran’s sleeper cells in America have increased after a deadly shooting in Austin involving a suspect with alleged ties to Iran and a separate gun attack on an Iranian dissident’s gym in Canada.
A flag of the Islamic Republic and photographs of Iranian regime leaders were discovered inside the apartment of the suspect in the deadly Austin bar shooting, CBS News reported citing sources.
Authorities identified the suspect as 53-year-old Ndiaga Diagne, a naturalized US citizen originally from Senegal, the Associated Press reported, citing law enforcement officials.
He opened fire early Sunday at a bar in Austin’s West Sixth Street district, killing two people and injuring about 14 others before being shot and killed by police.
The suspect was wearing clothing bearing Islamic references, including a sweatshirt reading “Property of Allah” and a shirt featuring the flag emblem of the Islamic Republic of Iran, and a Quran was found in his vehicle, the report said.
The FBI and the Joint Terrorism Task Force are assisting in the investigation, and officials said there were indicators that could suggest a possible terrorism nexus, according to the Associated Press.
The suspect’s alleged X account shows a reply last year to a post by Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, who wrote that any strike on Iran would be “immediately reciprocated.” In response, the account identified as Ndiaga Diagne wrote that the “Islamic Revolution is eternal and here to stay until the end of time.”
Canada gym attack
Separately, hours after the announced death of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei following US-Israeli strikes on Tehran, a boxing gym in Richmond Hill, Ontario, run by Iranian-Canadian dissident activist and cruiserweight champion Salar Gholami, was struck by gunfire overnight.
Video shared by Gholami showed multiple bullet holes across the front windows of Saliwan Boxing Club on Yonge Street, some displaying pro-Iranian liberation flags and images. At least two panes were shattered, and an evidence marker was visible above one of the bullet holes.
“Seventeen live rounds were fired randomly at the gym, and it was sprayed with bullets,” Gholami told Iran International, describing the shooting as intimidation directed at critics of the Islamic Republic.
“This is the result of shaking hands with the mullahs and delaying action. When the Canadian government leaves the door open for them to enter, this will no longer be a safe place even for Canadians themselves. Seventeen bullets means it could have left behind 17 Canadian bodies.”

Concerns over sleeper cells
Following the US-Israeli strikes on Iran and the killing of Ali Khamenei, retaliatory measures including by Iranian sleeper cells cannot be ruled out, a senior German lawmaker said on Sunday.
“The Iranian regime has repeatedly demonstrated in the past that it carries out its terror beyond its own borders,” Marc Henrichmann told the Sueddeutsche Zeitung newspaper.
Last June, US law enforcement stepped up its monitoring of potential Iran-backed operatives within the United States amid the 12-day Israeli war on Iran which was later joined by the US.
In the days after Israel launched its attacks on Iran, the FBI under its director Kash Patel boosted surveillance over what sources cited by CBS described as Hezbollah-linked sleeper cells.

Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists: The Bulletin’s Alexandra Bell will lead the conversation, joined by Kelsey Davenport, Director for Nonproliferation Policy at the Arms Control Association, and Jeffrey Lewis, Professor and Director of the East Asia Nonproliferation Project at Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterrey.
| VIRTUAL EVENT TODAY 3:15 PM CST Conflict in Iran Join us for a live discussion at 3:15 pm CST on the impacts of the conflict, what may happen to existing Iranian nuclear material in the chaos of war, and what diplomatic off-ramps are still available. The Bulletin’s Alexandra Bell will lead the conversation, joined by Kelsey Davenport, Director for Nonproliferation Policy at the Arms Control Association, and Jeffrey Lewis, Professor and Director of the East Asia Nonproliferation Project at Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterrey. |
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Neuroscience News: High-Speed Eye Tests Detect “Invisible” Brain Injuries
High-Speed Eye Tests Detect “Invisible” Brain Injuries
·March 2, 2026
Summary: Can a single concussion from your youth still affect your brain ten or twenty years later? A new study suggests the answer is yes.
Researchers used advanced eye-tracking technology to show that people who suffered concussions more than a decade ago still exhibit significant “neurological “lag” in how their eyes track moving objects. These subtle deficits, invisible to the naked eye or standard clinical exams, indicate that the brain’s “internal map” for movement and timing may never fully reset after a traumatic brain injury (TBI).
Key Facts
- The “Lag” Discovery: Participants with a history of concussions showed a delayed reaction in “pursuit eye movements”—the ability to smoothly follow a moving target.
- Decades of Impact: The neurological deficits were present in individuals whose last head injury occurred over 10 to 15 years ago, suggesting that some post-concussion changes are permanent.
- Beyond Standard Tests: These patients often passed traditional cognitive and physical exams, but the high-speed eye-tracking revealed “micro-stutters” in brain-to-eye communication.
- Brainstem & Cerebellum: The researchers believe the trauma affects long-term signaling in the brainstem and cerebellum, regions responsible for fine motor control and predictive timing.
- Predictive Tool: This study positions eye-tracking as a powerful, non-invasive biomarker for “hidden” brain trauma and could help identify those at higher risk for neurodegenerative diseases later in life.
Source: University of Colorado
A study from researchers at the CU Anschutz Marcus Institute for Brain Health suggests that veterans with concussions may continue to show subtle but measurable brain function differences more than a decade after their injury.
Researchers found these differences can be detected through specialized eye movement testing.

The findings were recently published in the Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology.
Mild traumatic brain injuries are common among military service members and occur in athletes and civilians through sports impacts, car accidents and falls. While most individuals recover within weeks or months, the new research indicates that some may experience lingering changes in attention, processing speed and impulse control long after symptoms appear to resolve.
Eye Movements Reveal Subtle Brain Changes
“The eyes are directly connected to brain networks that control attention, information processing and decision-making,” said the study’s lead investigator Jeffrey Hebert, PhD, PT, associate professor at the CU Anschutz School of Medicine and director of research for the CU Anschutz Marcus Institute for Brain Health.
“By studying how someone’s eyes move during a cognitively demanding task, we can detect subtle brain changes that might not appear on a standard bedside exam or brain scan.”
The study evaluated 78 military veterans, including 38 with a history of mild traumatic brain injury and 40 without. Participants completed a series of eye movement tasks and cognitive tests designed to measure executive function of attention, processing speed and self-control.
Researchers found that veterans with prior concussions were more likely to demonstrate slower and less accurate eye movements along with reduced performance on certain attention-based tasks. Some of these differences were still measurable more than 10 years after the original injury.
Hebert said eye movements rely on complex networks across multiple regions of the brain. Tasks that require individuals to quickly look away from a visual target and tasks that require rapid visual recognition and verbalization of a viewed object test not only visual function but also cognitive control.
This includes the ability to focus, suppress impulses and respond quickly and accurately. Because these processes depend on widespread neural connections, several mild injuries may leave lasting but difficult to detect effects.
“Even when someone feels recovered, their brain may still be working differently behind the scenes, especially during visually demanding tasks and in busy environments” Hebert said. “Objective eye movement testing gives us a measurable way to assess these often covert problems.”
Implications for Concussion Care
The findings could have important implications for long term concussion care.
“Standard imaging tools such as MRI scans often appear normal after mild brain injury, making persistent symptoms difficult to verify objectively,” Hebert said. “Cognitively challenging eye movement assessments may provide clinicians with an additional tool to better understand ongoing cognitive concerns and more precisely tailor rehabilitation strategies.
Although the study focused on military veterans, the results may apply more broadly to athletes, first responders and civilians who have experienced concussions.
The team emphasizes that most individuals recover well from mild traumatic brain injury. However, identifying those who continue to experience subtle effects could improve follow up care, long term monitoring and treatment planning optimizing healthier brain adaptation.
Future studies will explore whether incorporating cognitively challenging eye movement testing into routine concussion evaluations could help clinicians better identify traumatic brain injury, track recovery and guide treatment decisions.
Funding: The research was funded by the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs, U.S. Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity, Department of Defense, Vision Research Program Award.
Key Questions Answered:
Q: I had a concussion 10 years ago but I feel fine. Should I be worried?
A: Not necessarily. The “lag” found in this study is often imperceptible in daily life because the brain is incredibly good at compensating. However, it shows that the injury left a permanent “fingerprint” on your neural wiring. It’s a reminder to be extra protective of your head health as you age.
Q: Why use eye tests to check the brain?
A: Tracking a moving object is one of the most complex tasks the brain performs. it requires perfect synchronization between your vision, your balance (vestibular system), and your motor control. If there is a “hitch” in the brain’s wiring anywhere, an eye test will catch it before almost any other exam.
Q: Could this lead to a better way to diagnose concussions?
A: Absolutely. Current “sideline” tests are often subjective. High-speed eye-tracking provides objective, mathematical data. If we know your “baseline” eye speed, we can tell instantly if a new hit has caused a disruption in your neural pathways.
Editorial Notes:
- This article was edited by a Neuroscience News editor.
- Journal paper reviewed in full.
- Additional context added by our staff.
About this eye tracking and TBI research news
Author: Laura Kelley
Source: University of Colorado
Contact: Laura Kelley – University of Colorado
Image: The image is credited to Neuroscience News
Most Dangerous Terrorist Organisations
Is it just coincidence that the most dangerous terrorist organizations in the world are ALL Islamic?

Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
The Harvard Gazette: Audiobooks … is this same as reading
Audiobooks don’t really count as reading? Think again.
Education scholars say rigor, learning same as paper, stigma an unnecessary hurdle
Liz Mineo
Harvard Staff Writer
March 2, 2026 4 min read
More than 40 percent of Americans think that listening to audiobooks is less rigorous and really doesn’t count as reading.
Cognitive neuroscientist Nadine Gaab disagrees, and she and other education scholars say the view is counterproductive when it comes to learning and development.
Not only does the brain operate the same when reading print books or listening to audiobooks, Gaab said, but the learning process is also the same.
“The theory of learning styles has been debunked,” said Gaab, the Silvana and Chris Pascucci Professor in Learning Differences at Harvard Graduate School of Education. “It’s not the case that someone learns better by listening or by reading. You may have a preference, but learning is sort of the same regardless of the modality. ”
Reading is a complex skill that involves the early development of brain regions that support sound and language processing, the essential milestone skills for learning to read, said Gaab. The neural networks that process written and oral language are deeply intertwined and largely overlap when reading print books or listening to audiobooks.
“There isn’t much of a difference between the brain network for reading and the brain network for language comprehension,” said Gaab. “The brain area we call the ‘letter box,’ which processes print, is not as engaged when you listen, but it has been shown that when some people listen to words, they visualize them, so the letter box gets activated as well.”
“There isn’t much of a difference between the brain network for reading and the brain network for language comprehension.”Nadine Gaab
Listening to audiobooks meets derision in some circles, where it may be seen as “cheating,” but Gaab rejects that notion. Both print books and audiobooks offer advantages to readers, she said. While readers can review and go back to print books easily, audiobooks offer voices and sounds that make the story compelling and attractive.
Librarians wholeheartedly agree.
Readers should reflect on their choices by focusing on the purpose of their reading, said Alessandra Seiter, community engagement librarian at the Harvard Kennedy School. Some might favor print text because it helps them absorb information better, and others might prefer audiobooks because they allow them to multitask and save time.
“There is nothing wrong with audiobooks,” Seiter said. “There is no purity about reading words on a page.”
There are clear practical implications, said Alex Hodges, director of the Monroe C. Gutman Library at the Graduate School of Education. Print texts offer readers the chance to highlight passages or write notes that might help them retain information better, Hodges said. Audiobooks, on the other hand, may impart a more relaxed experience.
Laura Sheriff, librarian for the Cabot Science, Fine Arts, and Lamont libraries, would like to remove the stigma around audiobooks. In her former life working at a bookstore, she saw kids starting out with “Harry Potter” audiobooks and coming back to buy the print books. “It was their gateway to reading,” she said.
Regardless of their form, either print or audio, books introduce readers to new knowledge, imagined worlds, and complex language, said educational linguist Paola Uccelli, John H. and Elisabeth A. Hobbs Professor of Cognition and Education at the Graduate School of Education.
“In both formats, readers encounter not only new information but also text-specific linguistic patterns — and new possibilities for making meaning through language — well beyond what they are likely to experience in casual conversations,” said Uccelli.
“Audiobooks, particularly when students find them engaging and have opportunities to participate in book discussions, can be a powerful tool for helping developing readers expand not only their background knowledge but language resources essential for making meaning from text.”
Gaab’s lab examines how people learn from infancy through adulthood, with an emphasis on language and reading. She often recommends that parents of children with reading difficulties try audiobooks, along with print books, and reminds them that “the most important thing is that children are motivated to learn and excited to read.”
And adults, she said, should be less critical of audiobooks because that’s essentially how we all started.
“If you’re a good reader as an adult, it does not matter whether you read it or you listen to an audiobook,” said Gaab. “We all start as listeners to audiobooks. As children, we were sitting in our parents’ laps while they read books to us. So, we all have been audiobook lovers at some point in our lives.”