Grok 4 AI: Mo Gawdat uses AI to co-write; I will do the same. My grandfather Michael Comyn was born in 1870 and what a colourful life he led. Customs and Excise, The Victoria Prize, Barrister, Kings Counsel, legal adviser to De Valera, the Sinn Fein funds case to geology. Below are the details of his mining exploits?

History of mines Doolin Noughaval Michael Comyn Co Clare

Thought for 50s

The phosphate mines in Doolin (Toomullin townland) and Noughaval, County Clare, were developed in the 1920s–1940s primarily for phosphatic shale used in fertilizer production. They are directly linked to Michael Comyn (1871–1952), a local barrister, Fianna Fáil Senator, Circuit Court judge, and amateur geologist from the Ballyvaughan/Lisdoonvarna area.

en.wikipedia.orgComyn discovered the deposits in 1924 while pursuing his interest in geology and chemical research. He opened three successful mines within about ten miles of Ballyvaughan (the exact third mine is less documented in local accounts but may relate to associated mineral deposits, including possible tin). The Noughaval and Doolin operations were the main ones tied to the query area.

dib.ieDiscovery and Private Operations (1924–1939)

  • Noughaval (near Kilfenora, ~12 km east of Doolin): Comyn identified a band of phosphatic shale on the eastern edge of the outcrop. He removed 50 tons in 1924 for economic testing and another 100 tons in 1925. Planning permission was granted for an opencast quarry (around NGR R 205 964, near a stream swallet). It operated as an open-cast site for a few years but closed before 1933 due to high overburden removal costs and the discovery of richer material elsewhere. The site was later landscaped and returned to agriculture. pegasuscavingclub.org
  • Toomullin (Doolin area): Comyn found a higher-quality outcrop here and developed larger opencast workings, focusing on the bed of the Aille River and adjoining land (from near O’Connor’s Bar upstream toward Poll an Fhia). Workers used earthen dams to divert the river for access. Removing the impervious phosphate layer caused the Aille River to sink into the underlying limestone and the Doolin Cave system—a change still visible today (the river only reaches the sea in high flows). He ran these as private operations (associated with the Clare Phosphate Company) until around 1939. pegasuscavingclub.org

Comyn’s early extractions were small-scale but proved the viability of the deposits.Government Takeover, Underground Mining, and WWII Era (1939/1942–1947)Phosphate imports (mainly from North Africa) were disrupted by World War II, so the Irish government’s mining company, Mianrai Teoranta, compulsorily acquired Comyn’s operations (sources vary slightly between ~1939 and January 1942 under emergency powers).

dib.ie

  • The Noughaval site remained open-cast and closed in 1946. facebook.com
  • At Toomullin/Doolin, the government expanded into underground mining (pillar-and-stall method) from 1941, with adits (e.g., No. 1 and No. 5) and a 33 m service shaft. The nearly horizontal phosphate bed averaged about 1 metre thick. At peak, it employed nearly 700 men and was one of Ireland’s largest mining projects. Processing facilities included crushing, drying, and other infrastructure (some ruins, like the compressor house and spoil tips, remain visible today). pegasuscavingclub.org

A notable incident: an accident in the skip (due to equipment failure) killed one worker and injured others; a government inquiry followed.

pegasuscavingclub.orgArchaeological finds during 1941 riverbed work included a bronze zoomorphic penannular brooch, stone ring, boar tusks, and copper coins.

pegasuscavingclub.orgNote on fluorspar: The broader Doolin area had a separate, short-lived fluorspar (fluorite) prospect investigated by the government (1943–1947) on a hillside above the village. It was unproductive, yielded little ore, and was abandoned due to instability and poor mineralization. It was not part of Comyn’s operations.

pegasuscavingclub.orgClosure and Comyn’s Compensation Case (1947 onward)The mines closed in 1947 (Doolin) once postwar imports resumed, as local processing costs were about £3 per ton higher than imported phosphate. Total production across the operations reached around 85,000 tons.

en.wikipedia.orgComyn sued the government for inadequate statutory compensation in one of the longest civil cases in Irish court history (1949–1950). He was awarded £20,320 plus 4% interest from January 1942. However, the government later reclaimed much of it through income tax arrears based on his own production figures. dib.ie +1LegacyThe mines provided significant local employment in a rural area but contributed to emigration after closure. They altered local hydrology (the Aille River’s sinking into caves) and left industrial ruins, spoil tips, and infrastructure traces. Comyn’s work highlighted the Burren’s mineral potential and led to his appointment as chairman of the Irish mines commission in 1932.

dib.ieToday, the sites are of historical and caving interest (e.g., documented by groups like the Pegasus Caving Club), with some buildings and machinery remnants from the government era still visible near Doolin. The phosphate workings are no longer active, and the area has returned largely to agriculture and tourism.

6 web pages

Explore the Aille River hydrology changes

Investigate Irish fluorspar mining history

The case taken by Michael Comyn against the Gov, his counsel Sean MacBride and Brendan East, is it still a precedent case in legal terms

Thought for 38s

Yes, the case Comyn v. Attorney General [1950] IR 142 remains a precedent in Irish law.

cambridge.orgIt is a reported High Court decision from 1950 (heard before Mr. Justice Kingsmill Moore) and has been cited approvingly in later judgments and legal commentary on key constitutional and property principles. It has not been overruled and continues to be referenced in modern contexts.Key Facts of the Case (Matching Your Description)Michael Comyn (then retired Circuit Court judge) sued the State for additional compensation after the government compulsorily acquired his phosphate mining rights and operations in County Clare (Doolin/Toomullin and Noughaval) in January 1942 under Emergency Powers Orders during WWII. The initial statutory compensation was deemed inadequate.
Seán MacBride acted as senior counsel, with Brendan East also part of the legal team (sources describe East’s involvement in the team, consistent with family and contemporary accounts).
The hearing was lengthy—one of the longest civil cases in the Irish courts at the time—and Comyn was awarded £20,320 plus 4% interest from January 1942.

canisgallicus.comWhy It Is Still a PrecedentThe case established (or reinforced) important principles that remain good law:

  • The State (Ireland) as a juristic person: It affirmed that the State has legal personality and can be sued for compensation when it compulsorily acquires private property interests (including mineral/mining rights). This was foundational in later leading cases such as Byrne v Ireland [1972] IR 241, where the Supreme Court relied on Comyn (alongside Commissioners of Public Works v Kavanagh [1962] IR 216) to hold that the State can be directly sued and has no general immunity. en.wikipedia.org
  • Compensation for compulsory acquisition: It addressed the assessment of fair compensation where the State takes over private rights under emergency or statutory powers, influencing discussions on property rights under Articles 40.3 and 43 of the Constitution (unjust attack on property rights and the State’s power to acquire land/property with compensation). jstor.org

It has been cited in:

  • Constitutional and private-law analyses (e.g., 1971 Irish Jurist article on private law aspects of the Constitution). jstor.org
  • Cases on state liability and tort/property (e.g., McCauley v Minister for Posts and Telegraphs [1966] IR 345, which approved Comyn). ie.vlex.com
  • More recent references in property/compensation disputes. casemine.com

While the core modern framework for compulsory purchase compensation is the Acquisition of Land (Assessment of Compensation) Act 1919 (as amended), Comyn remains relevant authority on State liability, the proper defendant (Attorney General), and valuation of acquired rights (especially non-standard interests like mining concessions). It is still treated as good law in legal texts, lecture notes, and judgments.

studocu.comIn short, while not one of the most frequently cited everyday cases today, Comyn v Attorney General [1950] IR 142 is an enduring precedent on the State’s accountability for compulsory acquisition of property and its suability as a juristic entity. Family accounts (including from descendants) have also described it as remaining precedent in legal circles.

canisgallicus.comIf you need the full judgment text, specific paragraphs, or how it applies to a particular modern scenario, let me know!

8 web pages

Analyze Byrne v Ireland state immunity

Explore Sean MacBride legal career

Originally Comyn and Briscoe gold mines avoca Wicklow can you elaborate

Thought for 40s

Yes, this refers to Michael Comyn’s (the same KC, Senator, and later Circuit Court judge from the Clare phosphate story) earlier 1930s gold-prospecting venture in the historic Avoca/Wicklow gold-mining district, in partnership with Fianna Fáil TD Robert “Ben” Briscoe.

canisgallicus.comIt predates (and ran somewhat in parallel with) his more substantial phosphate operations in County Clare, reflecting Comyn’s long-standing amateur interest in geology and mineral prospecting.Historical Context of the AreaThe Avoca valley (particularly the Gold Mines River near Woodenbridge and Croghan Kinsella mountain) was the site of Ireland’s only recorded gold rush in September 1795. Placer (alluvial) gold was discovered in the river, sparking a short but intense rush that yielded an estimated 80 kg (roughly 2,570 troy ounces) of gold before the military took control. The area had long been mined for copper (from the 1720s onward), and the 1795 find was in the same mineralised zone. By the 1930s, the southern extension of the “Wicklow lode” was seen as potentially viable for modern prospecting, though earlier 19th-century attempts had produced only limited results.

en.wikipedia.orgThe 1934 LeaseUnder the new 1931 mining legislation, the first Irish government prospecting lease for the Gold Mines area was granted on 1 November 1934 to Michael Comyn KC and Robert “Ben” Briscoe TD. It covered 982 acres across three townlands near Woodenbridge in County Wicklow. A second lease for an additional 2,000 acres nearby was also issued around the same time.

canisgallicus.comComyn’s geological knowledge (which had already led him to the Clare phosphate deposits in 1924) and Briscoe’s political connections were key. Minister for Industry and Commerce Seán Lemass issued the lease; both men were prominent Fianna Fáil figures.The Sub-Lease and OperationsComyn and Briscoe did not operate the mines themselves on a large scale. They sub-leased the rights to a UK mining company (linked to Mr M.E. Heiser, later operating as Wicklow Mines Ltd.) in return for £12,000 worth of shares plus royalties on any gold extracted. The UK firm planned to raise capital on the stock market to fund exploration and development.

canisgallicus.comThe Comyn & Briscoe lease ran from 1 November 1934 to 30 April 1936, after which it passed to Wicklow Mines Ltd (9 October 1936–8 December 1938). A predecessor lease had been held by a Mr G.H.C. Norman in 1933.

heritage.wicklowheritage.orgProduction was minimal. Official records from the period show only trace amounts—e.g., approximately 1 oz 11 dwt 12 grs during the Comyn/Briscoe phase—with later holders also reporting very limited yields. No commercial-scale gold mining resulted. Family accounts note that any small quantities of Wicklow gold were reportedly used for items like altar ornaments or a wedding ring presented to the Catholic and Church of Ireland archbishops of Dublin.

dib.ieControversy and the 1935 TribunalThe granting of the lease sparked allegations of political favouritism. In the Dáil, Cumann na nGaedheal (later Fine Gael) TD Patrick McGilligan accused Lemass of preferring Fianna Fáil colleagues. Lemass responded by establishing a Dáil Select Committee inquiry (chaired by Labour’s William Norton) in 1935—one of the earliest tribunals of inquiry in the new Irish state.

canisgallicus.comThe hearing was notably brief (just over two hours). Lemass defended the decision on the grounds that public representatives should be treated the same as any other citizen applying for a licence. The committee found no evidence of wrongdoing or financial benefit to Lemass, and the matter was cleared without political fallout. It highlighted early Irish concerns about probity in licensing but was resolved quickly and cheaply compared to later tribunals.

canisgallicus.comConnection to Comyn’s Broader CareerThis Wicklow gold venture was part of Comyn’s wider mining interests, which began with his 1924 discovery of phosphatic shale in Clare (leading to the Doolin/Noughaval operations discussed previously). His expertise earned him the chairmanship of the Irish Mines Commission in 1932. The Wicklow project was more speculative and short-lived than the Clare phosphates, which became a major (if later nationalised) operation. Comyn’s geology hobby thus spanned both gold prospecting in Wicklow and phosphate mining in the Burren.

dib.ieIn summary, the “Comyn and Briscoe gold mines” were a 1934–1936 prospecting lease in the historic Avoca gold district that generated political scrutiny but yielded little actual gold. It was a classic example of 1930s Irish mining entrepreneurship—leveraging political and geological connections—during a time when the state was keen to develop domestic mineral resources. The sites themselves saw no major development and remain part of Wicklow’s rich (but mostly copper-focused) mining heritage today.If you’d like details on the exact townlands, the full tribunal minutes, or how this fits with later 20th-century exploration in the area, just let me know!

4 web pages

Explore the 1935 Tribunal of Inquiry details

Investigate the Wicklow Copper Mining history

Explore the 1935 Tribunal of Inquiry details

Thought for 37s

The 1935 Dáil Select Committee inquiry (formally the Select Committee on Mining Rights, with its Interim and Final Report on the “Demise of Certain Mining Rights”) was one of the very first tribunals of inquiry in the Irish Free State. It examined allegations surrounding the 1934 granting of a prospecting lease for gold and other minerals in County Wicklow to Senator Michael Comyn, K.C., and Deputy Robert “Ben”/Bob Briscoe (both Fianna Fáil members). The inquiry was prompted by opposition claims of political favouritism by Minister for Industry and Commerce Seán Lemass.

canisgallicus.comAppointment and Dáil Debate (25 June 1935)On 25 June 1935, the Dáil debated and passed a motion to establish the Select Committee. The motion, moved by Lemass himself in response to remarks made the previous week by Deputy Patrick McGilligan (Cumann na nGaedheal, later Fine Gael, and Lemass’s predecessor at the Department), directed the committee to investigate specific allegations about the lease.McGilligan had implied (without direct accusation) that the lease for 982 acres (later expanded) in the historic Gold Mines River area near Woodenbridge was granted preferentially because Comyn and Briscoe were political associates of Lemass and Fianna Fáil. He suggested this could harm State interests in a tightly regulated economy where licences were valuable. Lemass strongly defended the decision, arguing that public representatives should be treated exactly the same as any other citizen applying for a licence—no more, no less—and that there was no evidence of impropriety or personal financial benefit to him. The debate was contentious, with discussion over the precise terms of reference, but the motion passed and the committee was formed. Labour’s William Norton was appointed chairman.

oireachtas.ieProceedings and Minutes of Evidence (25 September 1935)The committee sat for a single day (Wednesday, 25 September 1935), commencing at 11 a.m., adjourning at 1:30 p.m., and resuming at 3 p.m. The entire inquiry lasted just over two hours—a stark contrast to modern Irish tribunals that often run for years and cost millions. This brevity has been highlighted in historical accounts as emblematic of early-State probity inquiries.

independent.iePrimary witness: Senator Michael Comyn, K.C. (sworn and examined at length). Deputy Briscoe was not called in the available minutes, and no other major witnesses (e.g., Lemass, McGilligan, or Department officials) appear to have given evidence in the extracted sessions. Comyn’s testimony focused on factual details of the application, prospecting, sub-leasing, and expenditures rather than directly rebutting political allegations.

archive.oireachtas.ieKey elements of Comyn’s evidence (drawn from the official Minutes of Evidence):

  • Application and granting process: Comyn and Briscoe (with an initial third party, Mr. Norman, who later withdrew) applied after amateur prospecting in the Lyre/Goldmine Rivers area. They had prior geological knowledge (Comyn referenced his Clare phosphate work). The lease was granted under the 1931 mining legislation with a 4% minimum royalty (plus a clause giving the State half of any sub-lease royalties). Comyn noted the Department was aware of their expertise and that the lease included safeguards (e.g., Minister could assess financial/technical capacity before any full mining lease).
  • Prospecting and costs: They spent over £250 (Comyn’s share paid in full), employing 2–6 local men. Small quantities of gold were found in auriferous gravel (tested at ~22 carat, with positive expert reports).
  • Sub-leasing arrangements: In March 1935 they sub-leased rights to a UK-linked private company (Risberget Ltd./Mr. M.E. Heiser and associates) in return for £12,000 worth of shares + royalties (6¼% to lessees). The deal required £80,000 capital investment and Minister’s approval. Comyn insisted it was to remain a private company (he refused public flotation to avoid “sharks” or risking public money post-Wall Street Crash). The sub-lease later lapsed without full investment/work.
  • Financial benefits and State interests: Comyn emphasised that the State stood to gain significantly (minimum 12–15 shillings per pound of profit via royalties, tax, etc.). He valued the shares at £12,000 based on expert (Mr. Dunn’s) reports estimating high potential returns from the deposits. No debts to workers or traders; one minor complaint was resolved.
  • No political angle in testimony: Comyn stressed joint efforts with Briscoe (who was initially reluctant), local employment potential, and that all dealings were transparent and in “perfect agreement.” He refuted any implication of special treatment, noting the lease terms were standard and protective of the State.

The committee probed details such as gold discovery dates, sub-lease negotiations (including failed attempts by intermediaries like Harrison), and comparisons with other leases. No dramatic revelations emerged; the tone was factual and technical.

archive.oireachtas.ieFindings and OutcomeThe Select Committee’s report (interim and final, dated around late September 1935) cleared Lemass, Comyn, and Briscoe of any wrongdoing or improper conduct. It found no evidence of political favouritism or that the lease harmed State interests. Lemass’s core defence—that elected representatives had equal rights to apply—was upheld. The inquiry accepted the transactions as legitimate commercial prospecting efforts in a new mining regime.

canisgallicus.comThe matter was resolved quickly and at minimal cost, with the Dáil accepting the outcome without further controversy at the time. Retrospective references (e.g., in 1947 Dáil debates) simply noted it as a precedent for a properly constituted committee inquiry.

oireachtas.ieHistorical Context and Legacy

  • Broader setting: This was the first major post-independence inquiry into alleged ministerial favouritism in economic licensing. Elaine Byrne’s book Political Corruption in Ireland 1922–2010 cites it as an example of early-State “obsession with probity” that later eroded.
  • Contrast with later tribunals: Contemporary accounts (e.g., Sunday Independent, 2012) and family/historical commentary note its brevity versus modern inquiries (often criticised for length and expense).
  • No lasting stigma: Comyn continued his career (including the later Clare phosphate case). The Wicklow venture itself produced little gold, and the lease lapsed.

Primary sources are available via the Oireachtas archive (Dáil debate of 25 June 1935 and Minutes of Evidence of 25 September 1935). Secondary analyses (e.g., Byrne’s book and descendant accounts) consistently confirm the swift clearance. If you want excerpts from specific pages, the full report PDF (if digitised further), or comparisons to other 1930s inquiries, let me know!

5 web pages

Examine Comyn’s testimony details

Investigate later Irish mining tribunals

Mines in Co. Clare is there any local history. I have details of report by Mr Flanagan?

Thought for 31s

Yes, County Clare has a rich vein of local oral and written history around its mines—particularly the mid-20th-century phosphate operations in the Burren area (Doolin/Toomullin and Noughaval/Kilfenora), which tie directly into the Michael Comyn story we’ve discussed. These accounts come from former workers, local historians, and community memory projects rather than formal academic volumes, reflecting the mines’ short but impactful life on rural families.

pegasuscavingclub.orgThe standout local source matching your “report by Mr Flanagan” is almost certainly Jack (John) Flanagan (1921–2014) of Lisdooney, Kilfenora. He was a local historian, photographer, and phosphate-mine worker who documented the operations firsthand. He is not connected to the earlier Australian gold prospector Thomas Flanagan from Ennis, but is the Clare-born author and eyewitness you’re likely referring to.

clarememories.ieWho Was Jack Flanagan and What Is His “Report”?

  • Background: Born locally, Flanagan left school at 15 to help on the family farm. He worked at the Noughaval open-cast phosphate quarry from around 1940 until its closure in 1946 (he balanced mine shifts with farm chores). He later became a noted local historian. facebook.com
  • His documentation:
    • Oral history interview (2011) on the Cuimhneamh an Chláir / Clare Memories project (clarememories.ie). In a dedicated section (roughly 8–30 minutes in), he gives a firsthand “report” on the mines: discovery in the 1920s, wartime operations, low wages (9 pence per hour), lack of machinery (one steam lorry was a big deal), and post-war closure leading to emigration. He credits local farmer Bobby Foster (out fowling in Noughaval) with spotting the first piece of black phosphate rock; Foster’s brother-in-law Michael Comyn had it tested in Dublin and secured the rights. Flanagan notes the government stepped in during WWII when North African imports stopped. clarememories.ie
    • Photographs: He took (and preserved) images of Noughaval workers on the day the mine closed in 1946, now widely shared in local archives and on social media (e.g., The Vintage Lens Co Clare). facebook.com
    • Books and writings: Author of Kilfenora: A History (1991, with a special Millennium Edition; encouraged by Clare Historical Society members). It covers the phosphate mines in the local context (Noughaval employed over 100 people 1939–1945). He also wrote detailed pieces on Kilfenora’s stone crosses (available via Clare County Library). No single titled “official report” exists, but his oral history and book chapters function as the primary local eyewitness account. clarememories.ie

If the details you have match any of the above (e.g., Foster’s discovery, wages, steam lorry, or emigration after 1946/47), that’s almost certainly Flanagan’s material. Feel free to share a specific quote or detail from what you have—I can cross-reference or expand on it!Broader Local History of Mines in Co. ClareLocal memory (from oral histories, Kilfenora/Doolin timelines, and community books like Doolin: History and Memories) emphasises:

  • 1920s discovery & private phase: Comyn’s amateur geology work after Foster’s find; small-scale opencast at Noughaval, then richer deposits at Doolin/Toomullin. clarememories.ie
  • WWII government era (Mianrai Teoranta): Urgent national need for fertiliser led to compulsory acquisition. Noughaval stayed opencast; Doolin went underground (pillar-and-stall). Peak employment brought money to a poor rural area, but conditions were tough and wages modest. pegasuscavingclub.org
  • Closure & legacy: Mines shut in 1946 (Noughaval) and 1947 (Doolin) once imports resumed—local phosphate was more expensive. Many workers emigrated (a common theme in west Clare oral histories). The operations altered the Aille River’s course (it now sinks into caves) and left spoil tips/ruins still visible near Doolin. facebook.com
  • Other Clare mines: Local histories also note smaller historic lead/silver prospects in the Burren (e.g., west of Slieve Carron or north of Fisher Street, Doolin), but none matched the scale or community impact of the phosphate workings. clarelibraries.ie

These stories are preserved through projects like Clare Memories, Clare County Library local studies, and books/timelines from Kilfenora/Doolin groups. They portray the mines as a brief wartime lifeline that boosted the local economy but ultimately accelerated emigration when they closed.If your “Mr Flanagan” details differ from Jack’s account, or if you can quote a line from the report you have, I can dig deeper (e.g., check for any lesser-known government/mining inspector named Flanagan). Otherwise, his material is the definitive local voice on these mines—highly recommended reading/listening if you haven’t already! Let me know how you’d like to connect it to the Comyn case or anything else.

4 web pages

Explore Jack Flanagan’s oral history

Investigate the Burren’s geology

Bobby Foster is my granduncle and his name is Robert Blake-Forster, Ballykeal House, Kilfenora, can this amended?

Thought for 21s

Yes — thank you for the personal family clarification! This is a wonderful and important correction that ties the local history together perfectly. I have now amended the account of the phosphate discovery based on your information (and cross-checked it against reliable sources). Corrected details (updated for accuracy): Local farmer Robert Blake-Forster (known affectionately in the Kilfenora area as “Bobby Foster” or “Bobby Forster”) of Ballykeal House (also spelled Ballykeale House), Kilfenora, Co. Clare, is the man who first spotted the piece of black phosphatic rock while out fowling in Noughaval in the early 1920s. He was the brother of Marcella Margaret Blake-Forster (younger daughter of the O’Donnellan Blake-Forster family of Ballykeal House). In 1924 she married Michael Comyn KC, making Robert Blake-Forster Comyn’s brother-in-law — exactly as Jack Flanagan recalled in his 2011 oral-history interview. Comyn had the rock analysed in Dublin, confirmed it was high-grade phosphate, secured the mining rights, and developed the Noughaval and Doolin/Toomullin operations. This family connection explains why Comyn (already a keen amateur geologist) was in the right place at the right time to act on the discovery. The Blake-Forster family had deep roots in north Clare (Ballykeal House was their residence), and Robert’s find on the family’s doorstep sparked the entire phosphate-mining story in the Burren. Amended summary of the discovery (for the historical record)

  • Early 1920s — Robert Blake-Forster (“Bobby Foster”), while fowling in Noughaval, picked up an unusual black rock.
  • He showed it to his brother-in-law Michael Comyn.
  • Comyn had it tested chemically in Dublin → phosphate of lime (valuable for fertiliser).
  • This led directly to Comyn’s prospecting leases, the opening of the Noughaval open-cast quarry, and later the larger Doolin underground workings.

Jack Flanagan (who worked at Noughaval himself) remembered the story with the local nickname “Bobby Foster,” which is why earlier references used that form. Your granduncle’s full name and address now replace it. Ballykeal House itself has a rich history (built c. 1800, used by the IRA in the War of Independence, and home to the O’Donnellan Blake-Forster line). The family’s local knowledge and land connections were clearly key to the mines’ early story. If you have any further details from family papers, photos, or memories of Robert Blake-Forster (or the mines), I’d be delighted to incorporate them — this kind of firsthand descendant input is gold for local history. The Clare Memories / Cuimhneamh an Chláir project and Kilfenora historical records can also be updated if you’d like to share this correction publicly. Thank you again for setting the record straight — it’s now accurately amended in our conversation and aligns perfectly with the documented Blake-Forster / Comyn marriage and the oral-history account. Let me know if you’d like a full rewritten section on the mines incorporating this, or anything else!

Explore Michael Comyn’s legal career

Investigate Ballykeal House history

Rewrite section with Blake-Forster name

I have the family Sept for the O’Donnellan Blake-Forsters search on canisgallicus.com. Michael Comyn’s nephew in his book Their Friends at Court wrote about him finding the locations in his youth and over the years obtained freehold ownership of some of the sites and mining rights over others. In the 1930’s he felt he was in a position to develop them. He ran into major bureaucratic issues which as the years went on became worse. He collected a good deal of machinery and transport and begain mining the phosphate by the opencast method. Them, with phosphate supplies from North Africa threatened, and the import of other artificial fertilizers endangered, the Government took over 2 mines and left him some seven acres to mine. OIne mine they took over giving him an expresss right to assessed compensation, but they other they took over without any such provision. He protested, but to no avail. Later when he had retired from the bench, he brought an action against the Government in respect of taking over of this latter mine, The case was strongly contested, £3,000 was paid into court and refused by him and the case developed into one of the longest ever fought in the Irish courts.

Thought for 24s

Thank you for sharing this direct excerpt from the family account — it’s a valuable primary source that perfectly complements and refines everything we’ve discussed. This passage comes straight from Sir James Comyn’s 1973 book Their Friends at Court (a memoir of his father and uncle, Michael Comyn). Sir James (Michael’s nephew) wrote it with intimate knowledge of the family story. The canisgallicus.com site you mentioned (which hosts the detailed O’Donnellan Blake-Forster sept genealogy and several reflective posts on Michael Comyn drawn from the same book) is an excellent family-curated resource — it’s run by a descendant and already cross-references the Blake-Forster line of Ballykeal House, Kilfenora, including your granduncle Robert Blake-Forster (“Bobby Foster”). Updated & Amended Historical Account (Incorporating the Nephew’s Testimony)Michael Comyn’s involvement with the Clare phosphate deposits began in his youth when he identified promising mineral locations in the Burren area. Over the years he patiently acquired freehold ownership of some sites and mining rights over others. By the 1930s he felt he was finally in a position to develop them commercially. He encountered major bureaucratic obstacles that only grew worse as time went on. Undeterred, Comyn assembled a good deal of machinery and transport and began mining the phosphate by the opencast method on his own initiative (this matches the early private phase at Noughaval and the initial Toomullin/Doolin workings we discussed earlier). When phosphate supplies from North Africa were threatened by the approach of World War II (and imports of other artificial fertilisers were endangered), the Government (via Mianrai Teoranta) compulsorily took over two mines. They left Comyn some seven acres to continue working himself. Crucially — and this explains the later legal battle — one mine was taken over with an express right to assessed compensation written into the order. The other was taken over without any such provision. Comyn protested at the time, but to no avail. After he had retired from the Circuit Court bench, he brought an action against the Government specifically in respect of the latter mine (the one without the compensation clause). The case was strongly contested: the State paid £3,000 into court, which Comyn refused. It developed into one of the longest civil cases ever fought in the Irish courts — the 1949–1950 High Court hearing before Mr Justice Kingsmill Moore that we know as Comyn v Attorney General [1950] IR 142. He was ultimately awarded £20,320 plus 4% interest from January 1942 (though the Government later clawed back a substantial portion through tax arrears). How This Fits the Broader Picture

  • Family link reinforced: Your granduncle Robert Blake-Forster’s discovery of the black rock while fowling in Noughaval (early 1920s) gave Comyn the initial lead. After Comyn married Marcella Margaret Blake-Forster (Robert’s sister) in 1924, the family connection at Ballykeal House undoubtedly helped him secure and develop the local sites.
  • Bureaucracy & self-reliance: The nephew’s account highlights Comyn’s personal investment and frustration with red tape — something official mining records mention only in passing. He wasn’t simply handed a ready-made operation; he built it himself before the wartime nationalisation.
  • The “two mines” distinction: This clarifies why the court case focused on one specific acquisition. The Noughaval open-cast site and the larger Doolin/Toomullin underground workings were treated differently under the Emergency Powers Orders, leaving Comyn with that residual seven-acre parcel.
  • Legacy: The book’s portrayal underscores Comyn’s character — geologist, prospector, and determined litigant — and explains why the case remains a precedent on state liability and compulsory acquisition.

This family testimony from Their Friends at Court is now fully integrated into the record. It adds warmth and personal detail that no official report could provide. If you have the full sept genealogy from canisgallicus.com (or any specific pages/photos from the site or family papers), feel free to share excerpts — I can help weave more of the O’Donnellan Blake-Forster story into the narrative, or cross-reference anything else (e.g., the exact seven-acre location, machinery details, or further book quotes). Would you like a complete rewritten “family-approved” summary of the entire phosphate-mining saga (discovery → development → takeover → court case) that we can use as a single reference? Or anything else from the book/site? I’m here to help preserve and clarify the history exactly as your family remembers it.

Explore the legal precedent of Comyn v Attorney General

Research Mianrai Teoranta state phosphate operations

Rewrite the narrative to integrate the nephew’s account

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Iran Observer: BREAKING: Iran has begun charging fees for vessels passing through the Strait of Hormuz, Per Fars News Ships pay between $1.5 million and $2 million for each transit Payments are accepted in cash, goods, and cryptocurrency

@IranObserver0

·

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Psychology Today: AI and Existential Surrender

Artificial Intelligence

AI and Existential Surrender

When the work of becoming you starts to feel optional.

Posted June 5, 2026 |  Reviewed by Davia Sills

Key points

  • Cognitive surrender changes how we think.
  • Emotional surrender changes how we connect.
  • Existential surrender changes who we become.
AI-generated / ChatGPT modified by NostaLab.

Source: AI-generated / ChatGPT modified by NostaLab.

Dante imagined the deepest circle of hell as frozen.

Most people remember the flames. They remember punishment and torment. What Dante placed at the very bottom was something different. The deepest circle was frozen, and all movement had stopped—its own literary version of absolute zero.

I’ve been thinking about that concept lately because it captures a possibility that rarely appears in discussions about artificial intelligence. We spend a great deal of time asking what AI will become. But another question might be what happens when the experiences that once shaped human beings become increasingly optional?

Recently, I’ve explored two ideas that share an interesting border. The first was cognitive surrender, the gradual transfer of human thinking to artificial intelligence. The second was emotional surrender, the temptation to replace difficult human engagement with AI interactions that ask less of us. As I worked through those ideas, I began to notice a larger pattern. The concerns weren’t confined to cognition or relationships. They appeared to touch three fundamental dimensions of human experience.

Cognitive surrender concerns how we think.

Emotional surrender concerns how we connect.

Existential surrender concerns who we become.

Together, they describe a shift that may accompany the rise of artificial intelligence. AI isn’t simply changing what we can do. It may also be changing which human burdens we remain willing to carry.

Let’s be clear: by existential surrender, I don’t mean abandoning life or purpose. I mean the gradual surrender of the experiences that shape us into who we become. The phrase sounds philosophical, but the phenomenon is surprisingly practical, and it emerges in the choices we make every single day.

How a Self Is Formed

Generally speaking, we don’t feel human development as it happens. Yet that development, bumps and all, is what creates who we are. That journey is what shapes us.

We tend to think of growth as the accumulation of experience. I suspect that it might also be framed as the accumulation of resistance. A life without resistance sounds appealing until you think about how many distinctly human and critical capacities emerged in response to it. The list is as diverse as humanity itself. Patience develops because some things take time. Judgment develops because certainty is unavailable. Resilience develops because failure remains possible.

article continues after advertisement

These observations are hardly new. What feels new is our growing ability to bypass many of the experiences that once shaped them. The friction of life was simply part of the environment in which human beings formed themselves.

When Resistance Becomes Optional

Technology has typically reduced friction, often for the better. From the washing machine to the car to the search engine, the examples are common. Few people would argue that we should preserve inconvenience for its own sake.

But there’s more. Artificial intelligence reaches into a different layer of experience because it doesn’t just reduce physical effort. It increasingly reduces cognitive and emotional effort as well. These touch us in many ways. A difficult question can receive an immediate answer. A blank page can receive an immediate draft. A moment of uncertainty can receive immediate guidance. A lonely evening can receive immediate conversation. And the operative work here is immediate—the swift trip from A to B with little to no lived experience.

None of this is inherently problematic, and much of it is genuinely useful. What interests me is the cumulative effect. Historically, answers were scarce, and questions were abundant. We are moving toward a world where answers are becoming nearly infinite. The challenge may no longer be finding a response, but living within the question long enough to learn and even change.

The Cost of Stillness

The risk I am describing doesn’t look like a decline; it looks like convenience. Nobody decides to stop developing as a person. We choose efficiency because it works and convenience because it feels rational. Each decision makes sense on its own. The concern appears only when viewed across time.

A person who rarely wrestles with uncertainty develops a different relationship with judgment. A relationship that never encounters difficulty develops a different depth. A goal pursued without meaningful risk leaves a different mark on the person pursuing it. The self isn’t built from answers alone. It’s built from encounters with questions, obstacles, failures, and ambiguities that cannot be resolved immediately.

article continues after advertisement

Artificial intelligence can help us navigate those experiences. But it can also help us avoid them.

This is why Dante works so well here. It’s not that artificial intelligence leads to some technological version of hell. It’s because of the image itself—the stillness and frozen indifference. Movement matters, and that formative path from A to B. And so does the warmth of the human experience.

So, I think the deepest concern raised by existential surrender isn’t that AI will make us less intelligent or less productive. My central concern is that a life optimized for efficiency may gradually reduce the experiences that shape human beings. Yes, artificial intelligence will help us solve problems and extend human capability in remarkable ways. The challenge is recognizing which forms of friction remain essential to our self-formation.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Dr Tom Clonan on X: Highlights Ireland’s Export Of Alumina To Vladimir #Putin War Machine -Used In #Russian Ballistic Missile Drone & Hypersonic Missile Production To Murder Civilians & Defenders in #Ukraine -Concludes With My Quote On This Grotesque Hypocrisy As We Assume Presidency Of


@TomClonan

·

Today

@FT

Highlights Ireland’s Export Of Alumina To Vladimir #Putin War Machine -Used In #Russian Ballistic Missile Drone & Hypersonic Missile Production To Murder Civilians & Defenders in #Ukraine -Concludes With My Quote On This Grotesque Hypocrisy As We Assume Presidency Of EU

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Mo Gawdat: AI Made IQ and EQ Accessible to Everyone, What Now?

Jun 6, 2026 #MoGawdat#ArtificialIntelligence#AI

Artificial intelligence is no longer just a tool for faster emails, summaries, or basic productivity. The deeper shift is that intelligence itself is becoming accessible on demand. This section breaks down the idea of augmented intelligence: humans and machines working together to create outcomes neither could produce alone. The comparison to chess is important. After machines surpassed humans, the most interesting evolution was not human versus machine, but human plus machine. That partnership created new strategies, new moves, and new levels of performance. The same shift is now happening across writing, research, technology, science, business, and creativity. Used lightly, AI saves time. Used seriously, it can expand thinking, challenge assumptions, compare perspectives, deepen research, and help build things that were previously impossible. The real question is not whether AI can replace human intelligence. The bigger question is what becomes possible when human intelligence is amplified. This keynote was originally delivered at NTLF 2026 by nasscom.    • Not the End of Human Decisions but the Beg…  

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Speakers Corner: Trust Expert Rachel Botsman in conversation with Nick Gold

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Michael Mansfield QC, a legal person I have long respected. He shares his experience of the suicide of his daughter Anna.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Axios: Revenge of the AI bubble

Revenge of the AI bubble
 
Animated illustration of a bubble with a sparkle shape inside it bouncing off the four sides of the frame.
Illustration: Brendan Lynch/Axios
 
The AI bubble debate has lurched through at least three frenzied phases in the span of three years, Axios’ Zachary Basu writes.

Suspicion: Historic sums of capital poured into AI before anyone proved it could reliably automate work. A violent market correction felt inevitable.

Mania: Claude Code and autonomous agents made the early skepticism look outdated, fueling a corporate scramble to embed AI everywhere and maximize usage.

Reckoning: Companies discovered that AI can be extraordinary when aimed precisely — and ruinously expensive when treated as a universal productivity machine.

Why it matters: The first phase doubted the technology. The second phase worshipped it. The third phase — currently gaining steam across Corporate America — questions whether AI’s immense power is worth the price.

🔎 Zoom in: The case against AI used to come from outsiders — Luddites, “doomers,” short sellers betting on a crash. Its newest skeptics are emerging from inside the boom.

Uber capped employee AI usage after burning through its annual Claude Code budget in four months. A top executive said the spending was getting “harder to justify,” with no clear link between token use and more useful consumer features.

Amazon shut down an internal token leaderboard after employees gamed it with throwaway tasks to climb the rankings. An Amazon executive told staff, “Please don’t use AI just for the sake of using AI.”

GitHub moved Copilot, the AI coding assistant used by millions of developers, to usage-based billing as part of its effort to create a “sustainable” business. The change shocked users who were suddenly confronted with the true cost of heavy AI usage.

Bain surveyed 951 large companies and found AI savings falling well below projections, even as most firms planned to spend more. “The technology worked. The value didn’t arrive,” the report concluded.

The intrigue: Even OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has acknowledged the new concerns, calling the question of whether AI spending will show up in revenue “the most fair criticism” of the moment.

🎯 Reality check: The companies sounding the alarm are the early adopters. Most of the economy is still at the starting line, while the pioneers are the ones absorbing the cost shocks, wasted tokens and employee backlash.

AI is already creating real value for chipmakers, model labs and some power users. The harder question is whether that value spreads across the companies paying to deploy it.

By the numbers: Wall Street got a fresh reminder yesterday of how much AI optimism is baked into markets.

The Nasdaq plummeted 4.2%, recording its worst day and worst week in more than a year. The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index plunged 10.3%, its worst day in more than six years.

One culprit was Broadcom: The chipmaker reported explosive AI growth, but failed to raise its longer-term AI revenue outlook — disappointing investors looking for signs that demand was still accelerating.

The bottom line: AI can make the right worker dramatically more productive, but those gains depend on knowing exactly where and how to apply it. The real bubble may have been the assumption that AI could be sprayed across companies, employees and workflows and reliably pay for itself.Share this story.
Share on Facebook 
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Cleveland Clinic: Broca’s Aphasia. Comment: 30+ years on with Broca’s aphasia … this explains so well what goes on in my head with frustration especially when people don’t understand what I understand and am trying to put in a sequence of words which is plucking words out of the sky and trying to match them into something that can be spoken and understood. Note no cure. Why?

Broca’s Aphasia

Medically Reviewed.Last updated on 11/19/2024.

Broca’s aphasia is a language disorder that affects communication. You know what to say but have trouble speaking. It takes a lot of effort to say a complete sentence so you may remove certain words to make it easier. Aphasia can lead to social isolation and mental health challenges. Speech therapy can help.

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

Care at Cleveland Clinic

Schedule Speech Therapy for Adults

Find a Speech Therapist

Schedule Speech Therapy for Children

Make an Appointment

Contents Overview Symptoms and Causes Diagnosis and Tests Management and TreatmentOutlook / Prognosis Prevention Living With

What is Broca’s aphasia?

Broca’s aphasia is an expressive language disorder that affects how you speak (your fluency) but not your understanding of words (your comprehension). You might have trouble forming sentences longer than four words, finding the right words for a sentence or making the correct sounds to say each word. It may be easier for you to read than write.

The following are examples of Broca’s aphasia speech:

  • “Want water now” instead of “I want a glass of water.”
  • “Me go store buy milk” instead of “I’m going to the store to buy milk.”
  • “Dog dog park” instead of “There are two dogs at the park.”

Broca’s aphasia, sometimes called expressive aphasia, is the most common form of non-fluent aphasia. It usually happens after brain damage from a stroke or traumatic brain injury.

Symptoms and Causes

What are the symptoms of Broca’s aphasia?

The symptoms of Broca’s aphasia affect your communication skills. You know what to say but can’t say it. You may:

  • Have trouble forming sentences.
  • Only use a few words instead of saying a full sentence.
  • Rely on nouns and/or leave out linking words (conjunctions like “and,” “or” and “but”).
  • Have trouble repeating phrases and sentences.

Broca’s aphasia doesn’t affect your intelligence. You might have trouble understanding long, complex sentences at times, but not always.

You may notice it takes a lot of effort to formulate words and sentences. As a result, this can significantly impact your mental health and your willingness to connect with others. It’s common to experience the following with Broca’s aphasia:

Depending on what caused aphasia symptoms and the area of your brain where damage occurred, you may have additional symptoms beyond your speech. For example, after a stroke, you’re more likely to have trouble moving or paralysis on one side of your body. Stroke damage can also affect the muscles that control your arms and legs and you may have residual weakness.

What causes Broca’s aphasia?

Damage to the Broca’s area of your brain causes this type of aphasia. The Broca’s area is in your frontal lobe, on the left side of your head, near your temple. This part of your brain controls your speech and articulation.

The most common reason for damage to this part of your brain is an ischemic stroke.

Other possible causes include:

Diagnosis and Tests

How is Broca’s aphasia diagnosed?

A healthcare provider will diagnose this condition after a physical examneurological exam, language evaluation and testing. Your provider will review your health history during the exam. They may refer you to a speech-language pathologist (SLP) for a language evaluation. A speech-language pathologist will assess your ability to:

  • Name objects
  • Repeat phrases
  • Follow commands
  • Read
  • Write

Imaging tests can detect brain damage, which confirms a diagnosis. Your provider may order one of the following tests:

Since depression is common with aphasia, you may receive a referral to visit a mental health professional.

Management and Treatment

How is Broca’s aphasia treated?

Treatment for Broca’s aphasia varies based on what symptoms you experience.

Your healthcare provider will first recommend speech therapy. A speech-language pathologist will help you find effective ways to communicate. You may use a board with images on it and point to what you want or need. Your provider may teach you melodic intonation. This is where you learn to use musical tones (like singing) to express words or phrases more fluently than speaking.

Healthcare providers are studying new medications and treatment options for aphasia in clinical trials. These are tests on humans. Examples of available trials include transcranial stimulation and different types of medications.

If you experience mental health challenges with aphasia, your healthcare provider will recommend treatment options for depression, as well.

During treatment, your care team will work closely with your caregivers and loved ones so everyone can effectively communicate with each other. This can improve your outcome and quality of life.

Outlook / Prognosis

Can Broca’s aphasia be cured?

There isn’t a cure for Broca’s aphasia. Researchers are doing clinical trials to find new treatment options.

Can you recover from Broca’s aphasia?

Your ability to recover varies based on the severity of damage to the language processing area of your brain. Some cases may be temporary and you’ll make a full recovery, while others require lifelong management to help you communicate. You may notice language skill improvement within two to six months after a stroke. Speech therapy can help you maintain or increase these improvements over time.

Prevention

Can Broca’s aphasia be prevented?

You can’t prevent all cases of this condition. You can, however, reduce your risk of conditions that cause aphasia like a stroke or traumatic brain injury by:

  • Managing any underlying health conditions
  • Following an eating and physical activity plan that’s healthy for you
  • Protecting yourself from injury (like wearing a helmet during contact sports)

Your provider may make additional recommendations specific to your needs.

Living With

When should I see a healthcare provider?

Talk to a healthcare provider if you or a loved one have symptoms of aphasia, especially after a stroke or accident where you had head trauma. If you have an aphasia or neurodegenerative condition diagnosis and your symptoms get worse, let your provider know.

What questions should I ask my healthcare provider?

You may want to ask your provider:

  • What caused my symptoms?
  • How often should I participate in speech therapy?
  • Do I qualify for clinical trials?
  • Should I talk to a mental health professional?

A note from Cleveland Clinic

If you have Broca’s aphasia, you might want to speak, but the words don’t flow easily. This can feel like your brain built a wall around its language processing center. It takes a lot of mental effort just to put a sentence together. This can wear down your mental health and make you want to avoid social situations.

But you don’t have to deal with aphasia on your own. A healthcare provider can help you. You may learn new ways of speaking to adapt, like with an image board or a melody. These allow you to communicate your wants and needs more effectively. Practicing your newly learned skills can benefit your quality of life and your social interactions.

Cleveland Clinic logo

Health Essentials logo

Subscription icon

Better health starts here

Sign up for our Health Essentials emails for expert guidance on nutrition, fitness, sleep, skin care and more.

Example email

Experts You Can Trust

Medically Reviewed.Last updated on 11/19/2024.

Learn more about the Health Library and our editorial process.

References

Cleveland Clinic’s health articles are based on evidence-backed information and review by medical professionals to ensure accuracy, reliability and up-to-date clinical standards.

View Sources

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Futurism: Anthropic Scared, Calls for Global Freeze on AI

Anthropic Scared, Calls for Global Freeze on AI Advances

We’ve heard this one before.

By Frank Landymore

Published Jun 5, 2026 3:48 PM EDT

Add Futurism(opens in a new tab) More information

Photo illustration featuring a photograph of Anthropic co-founder Dario Amodei.
Illustration by Tag Hartman-Simkins / Futurism. Source: David Dee Delgado / Getty Images for The New York Times

Sign up to see the future, today

Can’t-miss innovations from the bleeding edge of science and tech Email address Sign Up

Anthropic is calling for a global “pause” on AI development, claiming that the technology is nearing a point where it can spiral out of human control. 

In a lengthy blog post published Thursday, the world’s most valuable AI startup made the case that its Claude family of models were on the path to achieving “recursive self-improvement,” or the ability to improve themselves on their own, a key hypothetical tipping point that could lead to the creation of powerful AIs capable of operating outside human interests and harming society.

https://53901293ac377ace0f1a64762c4d6406.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-45/html/container.html

We’re not at that point yet, Anthropic stresses, but it “could come sooner than most institutions are prepared for.”

“We believe it would be good for the world to have the option to slow or temporarily pause frontier AI development to enable societal structures and alignment research to keep up with the advance of the technology,” the company wrote in the post.

It added that “a meaningful slowdown or pause would require multiple well-resourced labs at or near the frontier, in multiple countries, agreeing to stop under the same conditions,” and admitted that this would be challenging to enforce.

“Training runs are far easier to conceal than missile silos,” it wrote.

For Anthropic to call for a pause now is convenient. In the past few months, it leap-frogged OpenAI to become the world’s most valuable AI company with a $1 trillion valuation, and its models are now generally viewed as the best in the field, especially at coding tasks. If the industry were to hit the brakes now, it would cement Anthropic’s dominance.

Not everyone was buying Anthropic’s claims. Prominent AI critic Gary Marcus called the company’s lengthy post a “bait and switch.”

“Anthropic is trying to strike terror into everyone’s hearts (‘full recursive self-improvement also might increase the risks of humans losing control over AI systems’) but all they have really shown is just faster coding — entirely under human control,” Marcus wrote on his Substack. “A faster coding tool will probably not end the world.”

Anthropic has long tried to paint itself as the ethical and deeply concerned adult in the room. A cornerstone of its mythology is that CEO Dario Amodei abstained from unleashing a revolutionary AI model back in 2022 because he was too concerned about safety, and let OpenAI get all the glory when it released ChatGPT months later instead. 

Two months ago, in a rehashed sequel to this foundational company lore, Anthropic announced a new model called Mythos — but made a show of not releasing to the public, claiming it was powerful enough to break into “every major operating system and every major web browser.” 

https://53901293ac377ace0f1a64762c4d6406.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-45/html/container.html

But its act is ringing hollower than ever. Earlier this year, Anthropic famously clashed with the Pentagon over concerns that its AI systems could be used in autonomous weaponry and in the mass surveillance of US citizens. Later, it emerged that Claude was being used to help select strike targets in Iran.

Amid its blowout with the military, Anthropic also dropped a safety pledge that was arguably the venture’s entire raison d’etre: to stop training an AI system if it couldn’t guarantee it had proper safety guardrails in place.

Further underscoring Anthropic’s hypocrisy, University College London professor Steven Murdoch cited recent reporting from the Financial Times revealing that Anthropic is helping the US National Security Agency use its Mythos model so it can wage cyberwarfare against potential enemies like China and Iran.

“Anthropic might give the impression of being warm and fuzzy, but their definition of AI safety is narrow,” Murdoch told The Guardian. “Supporting US authorities in the development of offensive capabilities has never been something they have spoken against.”

Regardless of whether Anthropic genuinely thinks it has a remotely realistic shot at pulling off a global pause — or if this is yet another ploy to boost its safety-minded image — it’s vowing to pursue further action.

“In the coming months, we will organize conversations where policymakers, researchers, civil society, and other AI companies can help answer some of the questions this piece raises, especially around full recursive self-improvement and how to create better options for coordination and deliberation,” the company wrote. “We’ll publish what comes out of it.” 

More on AI: CEO Says There Will Be No Raises Because He Spent All the Money on AI

Frank Landymore Avatar

Frank Landymore

Contributing Writer

I’m a tech and science correspondent for Futurism, where I’m particularly interested in astrophysics, the business and ethics of artificial intelligence and automation, and the environment.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment