AI medical scribe consent raises patient rights concerns
August 04, 2026
An AI transcription tool listens in as a doctor consults with a patient, promising easier notes while raising questions about privacy and consent
View 3 Images View gallery – 3 images
At a recent doctor’s appointment, I was asked to consent to an artificial intelligence assistant listening to my consultation. The assistant was Heidi, one of a growing number of AI medical scribes. It listens to the conversation, produces a transcript and turns it into structured clinical notes for the doctor to review, which, on the face of it, is exactly the sort of work we should give to an AI. Doctors spend time typing notes, referral letters and reports. A machine that handles the paperwork while the doctor concentrates on the patient offers an obvious human benefit: less administration, better attention and, potentially, better care.
I politely declined. He said he’d used Heidi for more than a year, understood the technology and had previously worked with blockchains. More importantly, he said he wouldn’t conduct the consultation without it. That rather changed the nature of the consent being requested.
In the past week, Digital Rights Watch launched a campaign calling for patients to have a legally protected right to refuse AI scribes without losing access to healthcare. The group says people are already being refused care for precisely that reason, something to which I can personally attest.
My concern wasn’t that an AI had entered the consulting room. I use AI constantly. It was that I was being asked to approve a system whose operation the person introducing it couldn’t clearly explain. Where would the conversation be processed? What would be retained? Which other companies provided the infrastructure? Who owned the service, and who had funded it? I’d followed Heidi’s funding trail through global venture capital firms and institutional investors, including the Australian superannuation fund HESTA.
My doctor had little to say about that. Instead, he assured me that nothing was recorded, which was a technical impossibility.
An AI scribe can’t transcribe a sound it hasn’t captured. The conversation must enter a microphone, become digital data and be processed before a transcript or clinical note can exist. The real distinction is not between “recorded” and “not recorded,” it’s between processed and retained.
Tom Sulston, Head of Policy at Digital Rights Watch, suggested that “retained” was probably the word my doctor was reaching for.
“The audio does have to be recorded in order to be transmitted to the AI scribe,” Sulston told me. “Most services then delete the audio after completing the transcription.”
That sounds like a sensible privacy safeguard. But Sulston raised an uncomfortable trade-off: if the original recording is destroyed, how can anyone later verify that the transcript is correct? AI systems can mishear words, omit details and even invent information. Deleting the audio may protect the patient from one risk while exposing them to another.
The more immediate problem was whether I’d really been offered a choice. When I asked Sulston whether consent could be meaningful if refusing the AI affected access to the consultation, his answer was direct. “No, in short. Consent gathered under duress, such as threatening withdrawal of treatment, does not constitute valid consent.” Meaningful consent requires more than asking a question and receiving a yes. People need enough information to understand what they are agreeing to, and they must be able to decline without unreasonable consequences. Privacy guidance generally treats consent as meaningful only when it’s informed and voluntary.
This can be challenging in a consulting room. A patient may be ill, worried or in pain. Few are going to pause the appointment to investigate hosting locations, retention policies, third-party processors and pages of privacy legalese … except patients like me of course.
They’ll get a much simpler explanation: “It just writes my notes.”
This isn’t merely a healthcare problem. It reflects a wider bargain running through modern technology.
As we previously reported, patients are broadly open to medical AI when it assists clinicians rather than replaces them, but they place a high value on transparency and explainability.
Convenience removes friction, but it can also remove understanding. Streaming gives us instant access while weakening ownership. Smart devices eliminate manual effort while making ordinary objects dependent on distant servers. AI produces answers, summaries and decisions without necessarily revealing where the information went or how the result was reached. Technology becomes most interesting when it stops being a gadget and becomes part of daily life. At that point, the important question is no longer simply whether it works, it’s on what have we become dependent?
My own response has been a gradual move toward self-hosting. It began because I wanted my music back. Streaming had made almost everything available, while turning a collection I once owned into access granted by subscription. Rebuilding it on local storage eventually led to hosting my documents, home automation and AI.
The services I run at home aren’t curiosities I occasionally tinker with; they have become part of the plumbing of daily life. A password manager like Vaultwarden can hold the keys to everything. Document archives like Paperless-ngx can contain everything from AI-tagged medical letters, invoices and records. Home Assistant runs the lights, sensors, routines and small acts of automation that make the house feel responsive rather than merely connected. My personal media libraries in Plex, Jellyfin, Audiobookshelf and Immich remain available because I hold the files, not because a subscription remains active. And local AI lets me work with private material on a machine whose location, network access and storage I can inspect.
That’s why self-hosting feels less like owning gadgets and more like reclaiming agency. These systems save time, reduce friction and make the house work better, but they also remove a collection of opaque dependencies from services I now consider essential.
That doesn’t make local technology automatically safer.
Sulston pointed out that a clinic running its own AI would inherit responsibility for patching, backups and security. A specialist cloud provider may do those jobs far better than a small medical practice. He suggested a possible middle ground: shared “community AI” infrastructure operated for groups of clinics.
That wider perspective matters, because sovereignty isn’t achieved simply by dragging every service into the spare room. Nor is cloud computing inherently careless or exploitative. The human benefit is choice backed by understanding.
Heidi may handle medical information responsibly. It may save doctors time and improve the experience of consultations. The problem in that room wasn’t that an AI was listening. It was that convenience had moved ahead of comprehension.
In an AI-first world, the most important question may no longer be whether a machine can help us. It may be whether we understand whose machine is listening, whose machine is thinking about us, and what happens when we say no.
Howard Armitage is a British writer, musician and technology enthusiast with a background spanning media production, I.T. management and music composition. His interests include A.I., home automation, digital sovereignty, futurism and the intersection between humans and technology. He currently lives in Australia with an unused collection of scuba gear and an increasingly self-aware server rack.
Sign up for our FREE daily New Atlas newsletter!
More stories like this:
Midjourney’s ambitious full-body ‘scan spa’ sounds almost too good to be true
A company known for its AI image generation has made a surprise pivot – to healthcare. Midjourney says it will deliver a “new form of medical imaging” to map the body, in a day-spa setting, with the first center due to open to the public in 2027.
First ‘co-scientist’ agent set to rapidly accelerate biomedical discoveries
In the early hours of Friday, July 10, a team of researchers dropped the world’s first general-purpose biomedical AI agent, which has the power to autonomously complete complex tasks that would take a team of scientists days, if not weeks, to do.
Memory loss isn’t caused by age: Just stop doing this in your sleepConsumer Times
The Common Item Older Women Are Using to Thicken HairHair-Experts
The Surprising Cause Of Memory LossConsumer Times
Do This Once Daily And Watch How Your Hair Can Sprout like WildflowersHair-Experts
Space-saving tiny house packs big living into just 23 ftThe Artista is a 23 ft tiny house with clever layout, loft bedroom, underfloor storage, and optional off-grid solar, perfect for small-space living.New Atlas
CapCut Video Studio Brings More Control to AI Video ProductionCapCut Video Studio introduces Director Mode to help creators manage characters, scenes, props, and visual direction in one workflow—making AI video production more consistent, controllable, and ready for serialized storytelling.New Atlas
This towable tiny house is actually suited to full-time livingEscape’s 26-ft eOne Limited – Special Edition combines towability with a thoughtfully designed interior that’s well-suited to comfortable full-time living.New Atlas
6 comments
Sign in to post a comment.
Please keep comments to less than 150 words. No abusive material or spam will be published.
Oirinth August 5, 2026 01:46 AM
This seems to be one of those rare cases where AI could be a benefit, but the downsides are privacy and incorrect transcoding, but the alternate that is already in use ( at least in the UK ) is outsourced transcription services which are even worse from a privacy standpoint.
We’ve had non-AI speech to text for nearly 30 years (dragon naturally speaking was released in 1997) if we can just have the transcription done locally without sending the information to a server on the internet that sounds like a better solution.
s0nicfreak August 5, 2026 07:11 AM
@Oirinth Interestingly, in the US I’ve been seeing more and more doctors with a transcriptionist working with them in real time.
Bokon Agbi August 5, 2026 08:48 AM
Your local hosting server, even a communty server, is unlikely to have the hard security that a commercial cloud service offers. Wherever your data is held, I strongly recommend frequent backups maintained behind an air gap (at least unplugged when not in use).
-kitrobaskin August 5, 2026 09:29 AM
Not trying to be an expert, but my cousin worked at home transcribing doctor info. Who’s to say that process is always private. Perhaps someone can put a price on the manual method cost compared to AI assist, then have the AI-refusing patient charged, say US$1700 more for a wellness visit.
Humans will continue our bold experiment onward, yes?
paul314 August 5, 2026 12:38 PM
This will proceed until the first disastrous occurrence involving a celebrity or a very rich person. One of the issues, of course, is that once you start using patient data as part of a training set, it can come back out of the tools even if the original raw data has been scrubbed.
Yaffle August 5, 2026 03:03 PM
@Oirinth – It feels like ‘privacy’ has a lot of catching up to do.
@s0nicfreak – it’s happening. The question is how long will it take out policy makers to notice?
@Bokon Agbi- Agreed, it’s a massive undertaking, and perhaps not pheasable today … But someday maybe. “Frequent backup”, good advice, always!
@-kitrobaskin – Cat’s out of the bag. Genie’s out of the bottle. Pandora’s box. Take your pick. Yes I think the bold experiment will continue until. I want to see it cure cancer. I’m surprised it hasn’t done it already.
Solar companies finally reveal that solar is only worthwhile if your roof…Activ8 Energies
How many years does solar really take to pay off? New data may surprise youThe Eco Experts
No Joke: Here’s The Actual Cost Of A New Hearing AidHear Clear IE
The real cause of sagging. It’s not gravityFemillie.
FREE NEWSLETTER
More than 60,000 highly-engaged subscribers receive our email newsletter. Get your daily dose of extraordinary ideas!
© 2026 New AtlasYour consent preferences for tracking technologies
Axios AM: Singularity arriving
Happy Thursday! Smart Brevity™ count: 1,625 words … 6 mins. Thanks to Noah Bressner for orchestrating. Edited by Andrew Pantazi and Bill Kole.
Driving the day: A Senate panel is expected to vote this morning on whether to 
Illustration: Brendan Lynch/Axios 
The big picture: The industry has yet to achieve full 
Reality check: Even a rapid intelligence explosion inside the labs could take far longer to transform daily life.
canisgallicus 