Nov 5, 2026 The Diary Of A CEOAre we secretly sleepwalking into the most dangerous 8 weeks of our lifetimes? Professor Robert Pape reveals why the coming months could trigger unprecedented political violence and war escalation, and what it means for the future of global stability. Robert Pape is a renowned political scientist who has spent the last 30 years studying global political violence and advising every US White House since 9/11. He is the author of several definitive books on military strategy and political instability, including his most recent work, Our Own Worst Enemies. His extensive research seeks to understand the root causes of violent populism and provide actionable frameworks to prevent geopolitical escalation traps.
This episode was recorded on October 29, 2026.
In this episode, he explains: ■ The Escalation Trap: Why international conflict is less like a strategic game of chess and more like a desperate gambler playing roulette to chase their mounting losses. ■ The “Instant Thunder” Threat: How a seemingly brief three-day aerial bombing plan could rapidly spiral into a prolonged war that paralyzes global infrastructure. ■ The Wildfire of Violent Populism: Why tens of millions of politically divided citizens currently act as combustible material waiting for a single structural spark to ignite widespread violence. ■ Invoking the Insurrection Act: The terrifying sequence of events that could legally place military troops on domestic streets to suppress protests during a transfer of power. ■ The Three Core Firebreaks: The specific demands ordinary citizens and global politicians must make to de-escalate tensions and prevent regional proxy battles from turning into World War Three
00:00:00 Intro 00:02:03 Why Political Violence Is on the Rise 00:02:03 How Did the Current Geopolitical Crisis Begin? 00:08:36 What Happens If Democrats Win the Midterms? 00:12:34 What Could Happen Week by Week? 00:14:48 How Will the Iran War End? 00:23:51 How the Midterm Elections Could Shake Up Crypto 00:27:24 What Is the Three-Day Plan and Why Does It Matter? 00:34:59 What Is an Inspired Attack and How Dangerous Is It? 00:40:59 Ads 00:45:59 What Does Putin Really Want From Ukraine? 00:49:19 What Happens to Ukraine After the US Midterms? 00:50:03 What Is Number 7 and Why Does It Matter? 00:52:11 How Could Both Wars End? 00:52:46 What Is Violent Populism and Why Is It Rising? 00:58:58 Why Is the UK Urging People to Stock Up on Cash, Water, and Batteries? 01:02:46 Ads 01:03:51 Did US Intelligence Tell Reporters to Ignore a Cyberattack? 01:08:10 Has the US Military Ever Been Deployed on American Streets? 01:11:28 Could US Ground Troops Be Sent Into Iran? 01:11:44 What Is the Insurrection Act and When Could It Be Used? 01:15:32 Are We Already Fighting Proxy Wars? 01:16:32 How Likely Is World War 3? 01:17:10 What Can We Do to Prevent World War 3? 01:20:08 What Should the Public Be Doing to Prepare? 01:24:58 Has the White House Made Direct Contact?
An American political operator contacted me last week, before the blue tidal wave swept aside Donald Trump’s Republicans in Congress, with his favourite quote from the 1997 movie Wag the Dog, about an American president starting a war to distract from domestic difficulties: ‘Change the story, change the lead,’ Robert De Niro’s character declares. The politico, who once ran an abortive Democrat campaign for president, then predicted: ‘The bigger the defeat, the bigger the bombs Trump drops on Iran.’ At that point, the results of the Israeli elections had already eroded Benjamin Netanyahu’s chances of remaining Prime Minister and left two of the most dominant leaders of the last decade with their backs to the wall. Tim Shipman Article | http://spectator.com/article/will-trump-and-netanyahu-launch-another-round-of-strikes-on-iran |
New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani joins CNN to discuss what the election outcomes mean for everyday Americans. Mamdani emphasizes that working-class voters are frustrated by unaddressed daily struggles and outlines his practical approach to delivering results for New Yorkers, even if it means working with President Trump.
Also, Sen. Bernie Sanders urges decisive congressional action on popular economic measures and foreign policy, while Pennsylvania Representative-elect Chris Rabb asserts that Congress can balance delivering economic progress with enforcing legal and ethical accountability. 0:00 Zohran Mamdani on voters’ priorities and working with Trump 3:40 Mamdani on delivering results for all New Yorkers 7:32 Bernie Sanders reacts to progressive election wins 9:00 Sanders outlines an agenda for working families and peace 11:32 Chris Rabb on economic relief and accountability in Congress Watch 24/7 live news with CNN Headlines: https://bit.ly/4eIvlTr Stream more on CNN with an All Access subscription: https://cnn.it/4AZMu54
“If a Western tech giant can host the machinery powering apartheid in Ireland, inside the EU, and face no consequences, every other company will learn it can do the same,” Al-Haddad told EUobserver.
Protestors installed a mock Israeli checkpoint outside Microsoft’s Irish data centre to protest its involvement in Israeli control of Palestinians in occupied territories (Source: Bryan Meade)
Microsoft software plays a key part in running an app used by Israel to control Palestinian mobility in the occupied territories, a new report found.
Al Munasseq, meaning ‘The Coordinator’ in Arabic, is an app launched by Israel’s Coordination of Government Activities in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (COGAT) unit in 2019 to manage the movement of Palestinians for work, healthcare, prayer, and everyday tasks.
A report published on Tuesday (3 November) by global consumer group Ekō found Microsoft to be hosting key components of Al Munasseq in data centres in Ireland, effectively enabling what is feared to be mass surveillance.
The app runs on Microsoft’s Azure cloud and uses its cloud storage and database services. When someone uses the app, it’s Microsoft’s servers that process their request, and Microsoft that keeps those servers running so the app stays available.
“For Palestinians, Al Munasseq is the gatekeeper to ordinary life. A cancer patient who needs radiotherapy in Jerusalem, a worker who needs to feed his family, a daughter who wants to sit beside her mother in hospital – all of them must ask Israel’s military for a permit to move across their own stolen land, and that permission runs through the Al Munasseq app,” said Ekō senior campaign director, Rewan Al-Haddad.
“If a Western tech giant can host the machinery powering apartheid in Ireland, inside the EU, and face no consequences, every other company will learn it can do the same,” Al-Haddad told EUobserver.
Deputy Sinead Gibney, who serves on the Irish parliament’s AI committee, called for an investigation in light of the report findings.
To read this story, log in or subscribe
Enjoy access to all articles and 25 years of archives, comment and gift articles. Become a subscriber for as low as €1,75 per week.
OpenAI’s massive data dump of more than 300 solved math problemstriggered a wave of despair about the end of human supremacy.
But one mathematician has found reasons to push back against the doom loop.
Why it matters: As AI capabilities continue to advance across disciplines, beating humans at one task after another, every new feat requires important contemplation. What problems remain to be solved? Where can humans still have an impact? What does it all mean?
For Vanderbilt University’s Dan Margalit, the answer within mathematics is that the machines aren’t replacing human intellect. They are deeply reliant on it.
He sees AI as a tireless finisher of human-led ideas and imagines a future where mathematicians can thrive.
Catch up quick:The academic world has been reeling since OpenAI released hundreds of AI-generated math papers, offering solutions to major open challenges just a few weeks after also claiming to solve the legendary Navier-Stokes Millennium Prize Problem.
The intrigue escalated last week when OpenAI announced its models had disproved the exponential time hypothesis, upending a foundational assumption in computer science.
The new findings have triggered more shock and awe in academia. Yet in all that frenzy, here are five ways Margalit, who chairs Vanderbilt’s math department, says mathematicians are finding hope in the age of AI.
1. AI is a finisher, not an originator.
The hope: AI didn’t solve these problems in a vacuum. It succeeded where humans had brought ideas close enough to a breakthrough.
The context: “The problems solved were the ones humans were closest to solving,” says Margalit. The AI failed on thousands of other problems where human literature hadn’t already pointed the way.
2. The machines still make mistakes.
The hope: Mathematicians and others reviewing the AI solutions have found flaws.
The context: As mathematicians read the proofs, a number of the released papers are facing retraction because AI made the same logic errors as humans, Margalit said.
3. It’s brute force, not brilliant intuition.
The hope: AI approaches math the way machines approach chess.
The context: OpenAI deployed tens of thousands of agents to tirelessly smash together known theorems in millions of configurations. “That’s amazing, but like chess, it’s about trying all possibilities to get from where we are to where we want to go,” Margalit notes. The AI isn’t asking interesting questions.
4. AI acts as an ultimate calculator.
The hope: Humans used to write entire books of integrals until software came along and automated the process. AI can also be a tool for acceleration.
The context: This didn’t kill math; it freed humans to explore harder concepts. “When an integral appears in a sophisticated problem, I no longer devote my research to it,” Margalit says.
5. Math is about understanding, not just correct answers.
The hope: The ancient Greek word “mathematika” translates to “the study of learning,” he says. Margalit credited mathematician Bill Thurston, the author of a landmark 1994 essay that has taken on new life, with this observation: If a computer spits out a list of 10,000 prime numbers, it can’t tell us about why they exist or the patterns they form.
The context: The universe already knows the answers. Math is the process of the human mind grasping them. “If a computer tells me an answer, that doesn’t give me insight or satisfaction,” Margalit says. “Mathematics is the human endeavor of understanding.”Share this story.
More informationAdding us as a Preferred Source in Google by using this link indicates that you would like to see more of our content in Google News results.
Shutterstock / YES Market Media
Sign up to see the future, today
Can’t-miss innovations from the bleeding edge of science and tech Email address Sign Up
Celebrities are shilling AI companies. Lionel Messi, probably among the top five most famous people on Earth right now, just did a World Cup ad campaign for OpenAI. Some genuinely seem to be hooked on the beguiling guidance of the tech. Others just seem to be chasing another big payday. But why does it keep happening, even in the face of massive public backlash?
There are fewer better places to start than with Charles Porch, a man who was recently profiled in New York Magazine, which christened him “OpenAI’s Hollywood Whisperer.”
Porch worked at Instagram for 15 years, where his job was basically convincing cool famous people to use the platform, turning it into the cultural powerhouse that it is today. In 2025, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman hired Porch to do the same thing for ChatGPT. Among his list of A-list stars he’s brought into the AI fold is actress Gwyneth Paltrow, whom he arranged a dinner with Altman in September (after a public freakout about rumors of the dinner caused it to be postponed).
A self-styled “tech optimist,” Porch described himself as “not a business-development guy or the brand guy,” but the “relationships person that’s bringing everyone along on new tech” — with that “everyone” all being in a certain tax bracket and with a certain number of Instagram followers.
So one side of the reason why celebrities are falling for AI? Because there’s a very concerted, moneyed, effort to do that by AI companies. Famous people are often targeted this way. It’s why so many of them end up hiring quack doctors, fall into bizarre cultish beliefs if not join actual cults, or throw away their credibility by siding with a person or brand that is decidedly, overwhelmingly, uncool, or goes against everything they appeared to stand for. (A prime example in Hollywood recently: Martin Scorsese’s endorsement of an AI-storyboarding startup.)
But there’s a darker side to this that an anonymously quoted media executive shines a light on. And that’s the fact that celebrities — actors, especially — are more broke and desperate than ever.
“Right now in Hollywood, only the top people are working,” the executive told NYMag. “It’s why Robert Pattinson is in every project or why Nicole Kidman is literally in everything you watch on TV. The next tier down is not getting jobs.”
You can’t overlook the reason why. The tech industry has helped debilitate the movie industry, in a not dissimilar manner to how platforms like Spotify are a parasite sucking money away from artists. Now AI, another tech industry innovation, is coming along and threatening to be the final nail in the coffin by automating tons of creative work. AI can’t replace human creativity, but it can provide a serviceable substitute. Meanwhile, the very uncertainty that AI casts over the industry is enough to spook the bosses running it and cause them to start pinching pennies. Ergo, less work for all.
Then AI, with its immense wealth and unchecked spending, comes marching into the ruins of what it helped destroyed. An obscene amount of capital is being poured into it, and its shining opulence is enough to blind almost anyone.
I’m a tech and science correspondent for Futurism, where I’m particularly interested in astrophysics, the business and ethics of artificial intelligence and automation, and the environment.
BREAKING: JD Vance says the Iran war cost Republicans the midterm elections!
He just put out a long tweet about the thrashing Republicans took last night, and according to him, the problem wasn’t that Republican voters stayed home. They actually showed up in strong numbers, but many who backed Trump and Vance in 2024 ended up voting for Democrats.
Vance says his team had spotted something strange before the election. Turnout looked good, but one of his analysts warned that plenty of those voters were angry enough to switch sides. And a pollster later found out what was driving that anger.
When former Trump voters were asked what would bring them back, four answers stood out:
1. End the war
2. Bring down inflation and living costs
3. Put America First
4. Change America’s relationship with Israel
That’s a pretty striking list coming from voters who helped put Trump back in the White House just two years ago.Vance admitted Republicans could have done a better job talking about the economy, but he says the war was the real reason they lost. He even pointed out that Trump himself had said so.
And he pushed back at Republicans offering immigration amnesty as the solution, warning that anyone selling that idea was lying. He also had a message for voters who had warned Republicans this would happen: “You’re right, you did tell us so.” Vance is openly acknowledging that many of Trump’s own voters turned against Republicans over the war, inflation, and foreign policy. HUGE!!! Source:
Catch up quick: The academic world has been reeling since OpenAI released hundreds of AI-generated math papers, offering solutions to major open challenges just a few weeks after also 
AI is a finisher, not an originator.
The machines still make mistakes.
It’s brute force, not brilliant intuition.
AI acts as an ultimate calculator.
Math is about understanding, not just correct answers.
