A bequest. Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience. A bequest and the reasons why? 8 years in Trinity College Dublin, 1st year Trinity Horizon programme, Dr Peggy Fine-Davis, Trinity College Dublin; Professor McKeon, Aware St Patrick’s Hospital. Therein BESS but never completed final exam … a long story why. Meandering all to do with neuroscience and psychiatry complicated by traumatic brain injury, manic depression, anxiety, and what seemed to be endless in years that health issue that never gains recognition, chronic fatigue diagnosed by an eminent physician. I have had ECT also. 2018 diagnosed with breast cancer so now am a survivor as I move to elderly with the fear of dementia.

Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience bequest. I want to cover Psychiatric; Traumatic Brain Injury, Anxiety, Cognitive deficits, Dementia

Thought for 38s

Trinity College Dublin’s Institute of Neuroscience (TCIN) is an excellent place to direct a bequest supporting research into psychiatric disorders and anxiety following traumatic brain injury (TBI). TCIN is Trinity’s dedicated interdisciplinary neuroscience research institute, bringing together

~50 principal investigators and

~250 researchers from psychology, psychiatry, physiology, pharmacology, medicine, biochemistry, engineering, genetics, and related fields.

tcd.ie It focuses on basic and translational research (from molecules to mind and patient care), with strengths in neuropsychiatry/neurodevelopmental disorders, synapses/cognition/behaviour, neurodegeneration, neuroprotection/neurorepair, imaging, and clinical collaborations. Clinical principal investigators are based at hospitals including St Patrick’s (psychiatry), St James’s, and Tallaght, providing access to patient populations, biosamples, and facilities like advanced MRI (human and small animal) and clinical neuroimaging/trials infrastructure.

tcd.ie TCIN’s work aligns well with psychiatric conditions and post-TBI anxiety through its neuropsychiatry focus, translational/clinical links, neuroimaging capabilities (relevant for studying brain changes after injury), and broader themes in brain injury, inflammation, and neurorepair. While it does not appear to have a single named “TBI anxiety” program, its interdisciplinary and patient-oriented approach positions it strongly to advance understanding and potential interventions in these areas (e.g., via mechanisms linking injury, inflammation, and psychiatric outcomes). Making a Bequest (Legacy Gift) to TCINBequests are a powerful, tax-efficient way to support this work.

In Ireland, legacies to Trinity College Dublin (charity number CHY10898) are generally exempt from Capital Acquisitions Tax (CAT/inheritance tax), so 100% of the gift can go to the intended purpose. Similar benefits or structures apply in the UK (via the UK Trust, charity number 280693) and other jurisdictions.Important: This is general information only—not legal, tax, or financial advice. Wills are legal documents, and requirements vary by country/jurisdiction. Always consult a qualified solicitor (and possibly a tax advisor or estate planner) to draft or amend your will properly. They can ensure the wording is valid, tax-efficient, and reflects your exact wishes.

Recommended Steps

  1. Consult your solicitor early. Discuss your overall estate plan and how to include a gift to Trinity.
  2. Decide on the type of gift:
    • Residuary (a percentage or share of the remainder of your estate after other gifts/debts)—often flexible and recommended.
    • Pecuniary (a fixed sum of money).
    • Specific (e.g., shares, property, or another asset).
  3. Specify the purpose clearly so the gift supports TCIN and your priority areas (psychiatric disorders and TBI-related anxiety). Trinity allows donors to direct gifts to particular areas where possible.
  4. Optionally inform Trinity in advance (non-binding and confidential). This helps them plan, confirm the gift can be directed as you wish, and welcome you into the 1592 Circle (their society recognizing legacy pledgers, with optional recognition, updates on impact, and events).

Sample Wording (Ireland-focused; adapt as needed). These are illustrative examples only—your solicitor must customize them. A common structure is:

“I give [the whole / a % share of] the residue of my estate / the sum of €__ (in figures and words) to Trinity College Dublin (Charity Number CHY10898) to be used for the Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience (TCIN), with a preference for supporting research into psychiatric disorders and anxiety associated with traumatic brain injury. I direct that the receipt of the Treasurer of Trinity College shall be a sufficient discharge to my Executor(s).”

For UK donors, gifts are typically routed through the UK Trust for Trinity College Dublin (charity number 280693) with adapted wording. US donors can gift directly to Trinity College Dublin. Your solicitor can provide jurisdiction-specific versions and handle any codicil (amendment) to an existing will.Trinity’s legacy materials emphasize flexibility and that you can indicate preferences for specific areas (e.g., an institute or research theme).

tcd.ie Key Contacts

  • For TCIN/research discussion (e.g., current priorities, how funds could support psychiatric/TBI-anxiety work, or impact updates):
    neuroscience@tcd.ie (mailto:neuroscience@tcd.ie)
    Tel: +353 1 896 8484
    Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Room 3.05, Lloyd Building, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
    Director: Professor Rhodri Cusack; Deputy Director: Professor Andrew Harkin.
  • For legacies/bequests and the 1592 Circle (Trinity Development & Alumni):
    alumni@tcd.ie (mailto:alumni@tcd.ie) or specific legacy team members (they can connect you).
    Tel: +353 1 896 2088
    Trinity Development & Alumni, East Chapel, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
    Legacy information and resources: Search “leave a legacy” or visit tcd.ie/alumni (or tcd.ie/campaign/leave-a-legacy).

You can request suggested wording tailored to your situation or discuss directing the gift precisely. Informing them of your intentions (even early-stage) is welcomed and helps ensure smooth administration. Leaving a legacy in this area can have lasting impact—advancing understanding of complex conditions like post-TBI anxiety and psychiatric disorders through world-class interdisciplinary neuroscience at Trinity. If you share more details (e.g., your location for jurisdiction-specific info or specific aspects you’d like clarified), I can help refine this further or point to additional resources. Please consult professionals for personalized guidance.

2 web pages

Explore neuroinflammation links to TBI anxiety

Investigate Trinity’s St Patrick’s Hospital psychiatry

Investigate Trinity’s St Patrick’s Hospital psychiatry

Thought for 34s

Trinity College Dublin (TCD) has a deep, longstanding, and active affiliation with St Patrick’s Mental Health Services (SPMHS), particularly its flagship St Patrick’s University Hospital (SPUH) in Dublin. This partnership integrates clinical care, teaching, and research in psychiatry, with strong ties to TCD’s Discipline of Psychiatry (also referred to as the Department or School of Psychiatry) and the Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience (TCIN).

tcd.ie Historical Background

St Patrick’s traces its roots to 1746, when it was founded as one of the world’s earliest dedicated psychiatric hospitals through a bequest from Jonathan Swift (a Trinity-linked figure). It has evolved into Ireland’s largest independent not-for-profit mental health provider. The modern academic partnership strengthened significantly around 2009 via a Memorandum of Understanding with TCD, formalizing its status as St Patrick’s University Hospital and deepening collaboration on research, training, and clinical services.

stpatricks.ie TCD’s Discipline of Psychiatry has a long tradition dating back to the 19th century, with key figures contributing to Irish and international psychiatry. The hospital serves as a primary clinical and teaching site. Clinical Services SPMHS operates multiple sites:

  • St Patrick’s University Hospital (Dublin 8, ~241 beds) — Main adult inpatient and day services.
  • St Patrick’s, Lucan (formerly St Edmundsbury, ~52 beds) — Additional adult services.
  • Willow Grove Adolescent Unit — Specialist adolescent care.

It provides comprehensive inpatient, day patient, outpatient (including Dean Clinics), homecare, and community services for moderate to severe mental health difficulties. Specialties include:

  • General adult psychiatry.
  • Psychiatry of later life (old age).
  • Anxiety disorders (dedicated programme).
  • Mood disorders (including treatment-resistant depression).
  • Psychosis recovery.
  • Eating disorders.
  • Addictions and dual diagnosis.
  • Adolescent mental health.
  • Psychotherapy and ECT (one of Ireland’s largest ECT services).

Care is delivered by multidisciplinary teams (psychiatrists, nurses, psychologists, CBT therapists, occupational therapists, social workers, pharmacists). The hospital emphasizes recovery-oriented, human rights-based approaches and has consistently high compliance in Mental Health Commission inspections.

stpatricks.ie Anxiety Disorders Programme (highly relevant to your prior interest in anxiety): Established in 2005, this is Ireland’s only specialized anxiety service of its kind. Led by Dr Michael McDonough (Consultant Psychiatrist and Associate Clinical Professor of Psychiatry at TCD), it offers a structured, CBT-focused multidisciplinary programme (group and individual therapy, psychoeducation, mindfulness, occupational therapy elements) across three levels of intensity, plus aftercare. It covers GAD, panic disorder/agoraphobia, social anxiety, specific phobias, OCD, and related conditions. Assessments occur at Dean Clinics; treatment can be inpatient, day patient, or outpatient. Referrals come via GPs or psychiatrists.

stpatricks.ie Teaching and Training SPMHS is a core teaching hospital for TCD. It supports:

  • Undergraduate medical education in psychiatry.
  • Postgraduate psychiatry training (part of the TCD Deanery for Basic Specialist Training, alongside sites like St James’s and Tallaght).
  • Clinical placements for nursing, occupational therapy (recent formal MoU expansion in 2025), psychology, and other disciplines.

Many consultants hold TCD academic titles (e.g., lecturers, senior lecturers, associate professors, clinical professors).

tcd.ie Research and Academic Activities

Research is a major focus through SPMHS’s Academic Institute, which promotes a strong research culture, oversees projects, ensures ethical standards and service-user involvement, and has developed a Research Strategy for 2023–2027. A new SPIRE (St Patrick’s Institutional Research Repository) launched in late 2024/early 2025 as Ireland’s first dedicated mental health research repository (500+ items, including TCD collaborations).

stpatricks.ie Key partnerships include TCD’s School/Discipline of Psychiatry, with additional links to UCD Psychology and UCC Pharmacy. TCD’s Department of Psychiatry collaborates closely with TCIN (neuroimaging, molecular neuroscience, genomics, brain health/ageing) and other Trinity institutes (TTMI, TBSI). This creates a translational pipeline from basic neuroscience to clinical application.

tcd.ie Notable research themes and projects:

  • Treatment-resistant/severe depression — including randomized trials of ketamine (KARMA-Dep series, led by Prof Declan McLoughlin) and ECT (EFFECT-Dep, CARE-Dep studies on mechanisms and optimization).
  • Molecular biomarkers, mechanisms of action (e.g., ECT effects on microglia/neurogenesis, kynurenine pathway), and neuroimaging/genomics overlaps via TCIN.
  • Eating disorders and biological ageing.
  • Psychosis, mood disorders, nursing practice/implementation science, and service evaluation.
  • Broader work on inflammation, brain stimulation, and recovery.

Key researchers with dual SPMHS/TCD roles:

  • Prof Declan McLoughlin — Research Professor of Psychiatry (SPMHS & TCD); also affiliated with TCIN. Leads major depression trials (ketamine and ECT). Expertise in molecular neuroscience, biomarkers, and neuromodulation. His work bridges clinical psychiatry and TCIN neuroscience. tcd.ie
  • Prof Paul Fearon — Medical Director (SPMHS) and Clinical Professor of Psychiatry (TCD). Interests in epidemiology, social psychiatry, psychosis, and service quality.
  • Dr Michael McDonough — Leads the Anxiety Disorders Programme; Associate Clinical Professor at TCD. Focus on CBT and anxiety disorders.
  • Others contribute to mood disorders, psychosis, adolescent psychiatry, and related areas.

International collaborations and funding (e.g., Health Research Board) support this work. Relevance to Psychiatric Conditions and TBI-Related Anxiety

  • Anxiety: Direct match via the specialized programme and CBT expertise.
  • Broader psychiatry: Strong focus on depression, psychosis, mood disorders, and neurobiological mechanisms (inflammation, brain changes) that overlap with post-TBI psychiatric sequelae (anxiety and depression are common after TBI).
  • Neuroscience links: Through TCD/TCIN collaborations (neuroimaging, molecular work), the setup supports research into brain mechanisms underlying psychiatric illness, which has clear relevance to traumatic brain injury effects.
  • While not a dedicated TBI centre, the high clinical volume, research infrastructure, and academic-clinical integration make it well-positioned for studies or interventions addressing psychiatric aspects of brain injury.

How This Fits with Trinity/TCIN Bequests (from your prior query)The integrated model (TCD academic oversight + SPMHS clinical base) means bequests supporting TCD’s Institute of Neuroscience, Department of Psychiatry, or specific researchers (e.g., McLoughlin’s depression/neuroscience work) can directly advance psychiatric research with real-world clinical application at St Patrick’s. You could specify interest in anxiety, mood disorders, or neurobiological mechanisms relevant to TBI. Contact TCD Development & Alumni or TCIN/Department of Psychiatry leads to discuss directing funds.Contacts for further information:

  • SPMHS general: info@stpatsmail.com or +353 1 249 3200; website stpatricks.ie (research, services, referrals).
  • TCD Discipline of Psychiatry: Via tcd.ie/medicine/psychiatry.
  • Anxiety Programme specifics or research: Through SPMHS or Dr McDonough’s team.
  • Academic Institute/SPMHS research: Check stpatricks.ie/research or SPIRE repository.

This affiliation represents a robust ecosystem for advancing psychiatric care and neuroscience-informed research in Ireland. If you’d like deeper dives into specific researchers, projects, how to engage for a bequest, or related topics (e.g., recent publications), let me know!

7 web pages

Explore the KARMA-Dep ketamine trials

Investigate Trinity’s neuroscience institute

Thought for 31s

Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience (TCIN) is Trinity College Dublin’s dedicated Trinity Research Institute (TRI) and Ireland’s only national neuroscience research institute. It serves as a hub for interdisciplinary basic and translational neuroscience, bridging fundamental science with clinical applications.

tcd.ie Overview and ScaleTCIN brings together approximately 50 Principal Investigators (PIs) and 250 researchers from diverse fields, including Psychology, Psychiatry, Physiology, Pharmacology, Medicine, Biochemistry, Engineering, Genetics, and others. Its core mission is to promote and support interdisciplinary basic and translational research, teaching, public engagement, and national leadership in neuroscience. It addresses questions from molecular processes to complex cognitive systems using preclinical models (cell and animal) alongside human studies.

tcd.ie The institute emphasizes connectivity between basic and applied neuroscience, with a strong focus on translational work that involves patient populations. History and DevelopmentTCIN was founded in 2002 (with an official opening in 2005) to consolidate neuroscience strengths across Trinity and build collaborative teams in translational areas. Neuroscience has been identified as a strategic strength at Trinity. In 2016, it launched the Global Brain Health Institute (GBHI) in partnership with the University of California, San Francisco, supported by a major $170 million+ investment from Atlantic Philanthropies. This significantly boosted focus on cognitive ageing, dementia prevention, and brain health, while recruiting new PIs.

tcd.ie TCIN is celebrating its 25th anniversary around 2025–2026, with plans for an updated strategic plan later in 2025 (following Trinity’s own plan). It has grown substantially in PIs, students, and impact since inception.

Leadership

  • Director: Professor Rhodri Cusack (Thomas Mitchell Professor of Cognitive Neuroscience, School of Psychology). His work focuses on neuroimaging, infant cognition development, and clinical applications using brain imaging and AI. tcd.ie
  • Deputy Director: Professor Andrew Harkin (Professor in Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences). He leads the Neuropsychopharmacology Research Group, with interests in stress/inflammation in mental illness, bi-directional nervous-immune interactions, glutamate transmission, and potential anti-inflammatory treatments for psychiatric/neurological disorders. tcd.ie
  • GBHI Connections at TCIN: Includes Professor Brian Lawlor (Site Director of GBHI at TCIN and Conolly Norman Professor of Old Age Psychiatry) and founding co-director Professor Ian Robertson.

Facilities and InfrastructureThe administrative and scientific hub is in the Lloyd Building on Trinity’s main campus. It houses advanced TCIN-managed technologies, including:

  • Two high-field human and small animal MRI systems.
  • A newer Cerca OPM MEG (magnetoencephalography) facility (added around 2025).

Researchers also use preclinical cell/animal models and a wide range of molecular, cellular, biochemical, behavioral, physiological, and genetic technologies. Clinical neuroimaging is supported via the CAMI facility at St James’s Hospital, along with the Wellcome-Trust HRB Clinical Research Facility for trials.

tcd.ie Research Focus and ThemesTCIN supports research across multiple interconnected themes, with a strong emphasis on translation:

  • Synapses, Cognition and Behaviour — Brain systems underlying attention, memory, reasoning, and psychological functions; links to neurological conditions from age, injury, or disease.
  • Neuropsychiatry and Neurodevelopmental Disorders — Mechanisms of psychiatric and developmental conditions (e.g., psychosis, autism, ADHD, depression); translation to diagnosis and treatment. Includes children’s brain health research on genetics/biology of childhood psychosis, autism, ADHD, depression, and substance abuse.
  • Neurodegeneration, Neuroprotection and Neurorepair — Fundamental mechanisms of brain development, response to insult/injury, and targets for prevention/treatment of neurodegenerative diseases and injury-related conditions.
  • Other areas: Neural development and plasticity, brain ageing, psychiatric diseases and drug abuse, inflammation/stress in mental illness, and platform technologies (imaging and neural engineering).

Platform strengths include advanced neuroimaging and computational approaches. Research is funded by Science Foundation Ireland (SFI), Wellcome Trust, Health Research Board (HRB), EU/Horizon programmes, philanthropic sources, and industry. Output is high (e.g., 376 papers in 2023, with many interdisciplinary collaborations).

tcd.ie Clinical and Translational Partnerships

TCIN excels at bridging basic science and clinical application. It provides access to patient populations, biosamples, and genotyping through clinical PIs based at:

  • St Patrick’s Mental Health Services (psychiatry — strong ties to TCD’s Discipline of Psychiatry).
  • St James’s Hospital (including CAMI neuroimaging and clinical trials facility).
  • Tallaght University Hospital.

This setup supports translational neuroscience with real-world patient data, directly relevant to psychiatric conditions.

tcd.ie Education, Training, and Public Engagement

  • Undergraduate: Interdisciplinary B.A. (Mod.) in Neuroscience.
  • Postgraduate: MSc in Neuroscience (Ireland’s only dedicated programme); supports over 80 PhD students.
  • Public engagement includes an annual public lecture series, Science Gallery exhibitions, and initiatives with humanities/social sciences (supported by Wellcome Trust funding).
  • TCIN fosters early-career development through symposia and events.

Relevance to Psychiatric Conditions, Anxiety, and TBITCIN’s neuropsychiatry theme, clinical links (especially to St Patrick’s psychiatry), and neuroprotection/neurorepair focus align closely with psychiatric disorders and post-traumatic brain injury (TBI) anxiety:

  • Neuropsychiatry and neurodevelopmental work covers mechanisms of anxiety, depression, psychosis, and related conditions.
  • Inflammation, stress, and molecular mechanisms (e.g., via Deputy Director Andrew Harkin’s group) are relevant to mental illness and TBI sequelae.
  • Neuroimaging (MRI/MEG) and translational approaches enable study of brain changes in psychiatric conditions or after injury.
  • Neurorepair/neuroprotection themes directly address injury responses and recovery.
  • Collaborations with St Patrick’s (including researchers like Prof Declan McLoughlin on depression treatments such as ketamine/ECT) provide clinical depth.
  • Broader work on cognition, brain development, and ageing intersects with long-term psychiatric outcomes post-TBI.

While there is no single dedicated “TBI anxiety” programme, the institute’s structure and themes provide an excellent foundation for such research through its interdisciplinary and translational model.

Recent Developments and Impact

  • 25th Anniversary activities and upcoming new strategic plan.
  • New MEG facility (2025).
  • Regular events like Neuroscience Research Days, Young Investigator Symposia, and specialized meetings (e.g., Computational Psychiatry, MEG UKI).
  • Strong publication record and funding successes (e.g., major Wellcome Trust awards).
  • TCIN has elevated Trinity and Ireland’s international neuroscience reputation to one of Europe’s leading centres.

Engagement and BequestsTCIN is well-positioned for philanthropic support (including bequests) due to its translational impact, clinical partnerships, and interdisciplinary strengths. Bequests to Trinity can be directed specifically to TCIN or priority areas (e.g., neuropsychiatry, neuroprotection, or anxiety-related mechanisms) via Trinity Development & Alumni.

Key contacts:

  • TCIN: neuroscience@tcd.ie or +353 1 896 8484 (Lloyd Building).
  • Director: Rhodri Cusack (cusackrh@tcd.ie).
  • Deputy Director: Andrew Harkin (aharkin@tcd.ie).
  • For legacies/donations: alumni@tcd.ie or tcd.ie/alumni (mention TCIN or specific research interests).

TCIN represents a dynamic, collaborative environment where basic neuroscience meets clinical psychiatry and brain injury research, making it a strong candidate for targeted support in areas like psychiatric conditions and post-TBI anxiety. If you need deeper details on specific PIs, projects, publications, or assistance with bequest wording/contacts, provide more details!

4 web pages

Explore Global Brain Health Institute

Investigate Trinity’s School of Psychology

Thought for 26s

The Global Brain Health Institute (GBHI) is a pioneering international initiative dedicated to reducing the scale and impact of dementia while advancing brain health equity worldwide. It emphasizes a life-course approach to brain health—viewing it as shaped by lifelong social, environmental, and biological factors rather than solely the absence of disease.

Founding and History

GBHI was established in 2015 through a landmark gift from The Atlantic Philanthropies (its largest-ever program grant, approximately $177 million / €138.4 million). This funded a groundbreaking partnership between the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) and Trinity College Dublin (Trinity).

atlanticphilanthropies.org The initiative was one of Chuck Feeney’s (Atlantic’s founder) final major “bets,” reflecting his commitment to bold, long-term solutions for global challenges. It launched formally around 2016 with the goal of training at least 600 global leaders over 15 years in research, healthcare delivery, policy, and advocacy to combat the dementia epidemic. By 2050, dementia cases are projected to triple to 152 million, with enormous costs to individuals, families, and economies.

gbhi.org GBHI is one of seven Atlantic Fellows programs focused on equity and social change. It marked its 10-year milestone in 2025–2026 with events at Trinity, including the inaugural Chuck Feeney Lecture on “Brain health, equity, and our shared planet.”

Mission and Core Approach

GBHI works to protect aging populations from threats to brain health, with a strong emphasis on equity—particularly for medically, economically, and educationally disadvantaged communities. It operates through three interconnected pillars:

  1. Training and connecting leaders via the Atlantic Fellows for Equity in Brain Health program.
  2. Expanding evidence-based preventions and interventions.
  3. Sharing knowledge through advocacy, education, and global networks.

It adopts an interdisciplinary, values-based model drawing from neuroscience, public health, policy, economics, arts/humanities, and more. The focus includes social determinants of health, prevention across the lifespan, and addressing inequities in dementia care and brain health outcomes.

gbhi.org Leadership

  • Trinity Site:
    • Founding Director: Professor Brian Lawlor (Conolly Norman Professor of Old Age Psychiatry at Trinity; remains active in strategy, training, and mentorship).
    • Site Director (effective January 2025): Professor Iracema Leroi (Professor in Geriatric Psychiatry at Trinity; Consultant Psychiatrist at St James’s Hospital; leads HRB-CTN Dementia Trials Ireland). She advances a life-course, interdisciplinary vision.
  • Previous: Professor Ian Robertson served as a founding co-director (stepped down in 2024).
  • UCSF side includes complementary leadership (e.g., Victor Valcour as Site Director in recent reports).

Faculty expertise spans neurodegeneration, mental health, aging, dementia prevention, health economics, policy, technology, and arts in health.

gbhi.org Key Programs and Activities

Atlantic Fellows for Equity in Brain Health (flagship program):

  • 12-month residential fellowship based at either UCSF or Trinity.
  • Open to diverse professionals (clinicians, researchers, policymakers, artists, journalists, etc.) from around the world.
  • Curriculum covers neurology, epidemiology, health economics, law/ethics, leadership, policy, creativity, and research methods.
  • Includes mentorship, networking, and opportunities for pilot projects.
  • Over 300 fellows from 65+ countries; strong alumni network.
  • Pilot Awards for Global Brain Health Leaders: Competitive small grants (~$25,000) for fellows’ innovative projects. These have leveraged tens of millions in additional funding and supported work in 45+ countries.

Research and Interventions:

  • Projects like PREVENT-Dementia (early detection and prevention; multi-center study with Trinity leadership).
  • Focus areas include caregiver burden, end-of-life care in dementia, social determinants of healthy aging (e.g., Latin America studies), sensory-cognitive links (hearing/vision), and emerging threats like climate change.
  • GBHI Projects: Larger faculty-led initiatives for training and scalable impact.

Advocacy and Knowledge Sharing:

  • Regional convenings, publications, media engagement, and policy influence (e.g., supporting national dementia plans).
  • Emphasis on creativity (e.g., arts in brain health) and global equity.

Trinity Connection and Integration

GBHI is housed within Trinity’s Institute of Neuroscience (TCIN), creating strong synergies with broader neuroscience research. It links closely to clinical psychiatry via leaders like Professors Lawlor and Leroi (St James’s Hospital) and aligns with Trinity’s strengths in geriatric psychiatry, cognitive neuroscience, and translational work. This builds on Trinity’s historical ties to psychiatric care (e.g., St Patrick’s) and complements TCIN’s focus on neuropsychiatry, neuroprotection, and brain health.Impact and Scale

  • Global network spanning 65+ countries.
  • Pilot projects have secured significant leveraged funding (tens of millions) and produced publications, media coverage, and real-world interventions.
  • Fellows and projects address prevention, care models, equity, and policy in diverse contexts.
  • High-profile support and events, including recent 10-year celebrations with Irish leaders and international figures.

Relevance to Broader Context (Psychiatry, Anxiety, TBI)

GBHI’s dementia/brain health focus overlaps with psychiatric conditions (e.g., late-life depression, anxiety in aging or neurodegenerative disease, caregiver mental health). Its life-course and equity lens could extend to prevention or mitigation of psychiatric sequelae after traumatic brain injury (TBI), inflammation/stress pathways, or cognitive/mental health resilience. The institute’s clinical ties (via St James’s and Trinity psychiatry) and interdisciplinary model make it relevant for translational work bridging neuroscience, psychiatry, and brain injury recovery.

Engagement and Opportunities

  • Fellowship applications: Annual cycles; details at gbhi.org/apply (Trinity or UCSF tracks).
  • Explore fellows, projects, and impact at gbhi.org.
  • Philanthropic support: As a major Atlantic-funded initiative, GBHI exemplifies how targeted giving advances brain health research and leadership. Bequests or donations to Trinity/TCIN can support related efforts (contact Trinity Development & Alumni).

GBHI represents a transformative, equity-driven model for addressing one of the 21st century’s biggest health challenges through leadership development and global collaboration. It strengthens Trinity’s position as a neuroscience and brain health hub.If you’d like deeper details on specific programs, fellows’ work, research projects (e.g., PREVENT), leadership transitions, or how it connects to bequests/TCIN/St Patrick’s psychiatry, let me know!

Explore PREVENT-Dementia study details

Learn about Atlantic Philanthropies history

Explore PREVENT-Dementia study details

Thought for 36s

PREVENT-Dementia (also styled as the PREVENT dementia programme) is a major multi-centre prospective cohort study focused on identifying midlife risk factors for dementia (particularly Alzheimer’s disease) and detecting the earliest preclinical indices of neurodegenerative disease—often decades before clinical symptoms appear. It targets midlife (roughly ages 40–59) as a critical “window of opportunity” for prevention and early intervention.

tcd.ie Aims and Rationale

The core goals are to:

  • Profile modifiable and non-modifiable midlife risk factors for later-life neurodegeneration.
  • Identify and describe the earliest brain changes (biomarkers) heralding dementia, especially Alzheimer’s.
  • Enable early detection, risk stratification, timely interventions (pharmacological and non-pharmacological), and development of novel treatments.
  • Advance understanding of how and when to intervene to reduce risk, support early diagnosis, and inform population-level prevention strategies.

It is one of the pioneering epidemiological initiatives emphasizing midlife intervention in neurodegenerative conditions, with a strong emphasis on deep phenotyping (detailed biological, imaging, cognitive, and lifestyle profiling) in cognitively healthy but at-risk individuals.

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

History, Sites, and Collaborations

  • Initiated: 2014 as a single-site study in West London (led by Craig Ritchie and colleagues).
  • Expansion: Grew into a multi-centre study with sites in Edinburgh (2015), Oxford (2017), Cambridge (2017), and Dublin (2018).
  • Dublin/Trinity Site: Led by GBHI faculty members Professor Lorina Naci (Dublin co-lead; Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience and Global Brain Health Institute) and Professor Brian Lawlor (Founding Director, GBHI at Trinity; Conolly Norman Professor of Old Age Psychiatry). It operates in close collaboration with St James’s Hospital.
  • Broader Network: Involves researchers from Cambridge, Oxford, Edinburgh, Imperial College London, and INSERM Neuroscience (France). It serves as a research, training, and education platform for Atlantic Fellows in the Global Brain Health Institute (GBHI), with 15+ fellows involved.
  • Recent activity includes hosting the PREVENT General Assembly in Dublin, bringing together global experts. tcd.ie

Study Design and Methodology

PREVENT is a longitudinal prospective cohort study. Participants are cognitively healthy adults (screened via Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-III) aged 40–59, often with elevated risk (e.g., parental family history of dementia or APOE ε4 genotype).Core Assessments (baseline and follow-ups):

  • Demographic, Lifestyle, and Psychological Data: Questionnaires on physical activity, diet, sleep, depression/anxiety (e.g., CES-D, STAI), resilience, stressful events, and traumatic brain injury history.
  • Cognitive Testing: Comprehensive battery including computerized tasks (COGNITO for attention/memory/visuospatial/language), virtual reality/spatial navigation tasks (e.g., Four Mountains Test, Virtual Supermarket Trolley for path integration), and global screening (ACE-III).
  • Neuroimaging: Multi-modal 3T MRI (structural: T1/T2/FLAIR/SWI; functional: resting-state and task-based fMRI; diffusion tensor imaging; arterial spin labelling; spectroscopy). Processed for volumetrics (e.g., hippocampus), cortical thickness, white matter hyperintensities, and more.
  • Biological Samples: Blood, saliva (including stress-response), urine; optional cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) via lumbar puncture. Genetic analysis (APOE genotyping and genome-wide).
  • Sub-Studies: Amyloid/tau PET imaging, virtual reality assessments, eye/hearing/dental evaluations, and others.

Recruitment: Via memory clinic relatives, dementia research registers (e.g., Join Dementia Research), word-of-mouth, and the study website (preventdementia.co.uk). Family/friends often invited. No geographic restrictions for some sites.Timeline: Baseline (2014–2020 across sites); follow-ups (e.g., ~2 years, then 5–8 years). Dublin site is in its later phases (first follow-ups concluding; plans for continued assessment).

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov Participants and Baseline Characteristics

  • Cohort Size: ~700 deeply phenotyped participants across sites (with substantial data from Dublin).
  • Demographics (baseline summary): Mean age ~51 years; ~62% female; highly educated (mean ~16.7 years); predominantly European ancestry.
  • Risk Profiling: Roughly equal split with/without parental dementia history. ~38% APOE ε4 carriers (including homozygotes). Categorized into low/medium/high risk groups. High prevalence of modifiable risks (e.g., overweight/obesity, physical inactivity, poor sleep, head injury history, hypertension).
  • Baseline data (published 2024 in Brain Communications) describe the cohort in detail and are openly shared via platforms like the Alzheimer’s Disease Data Initiative (ADDI). pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Funding and Support

  • Core Funding: Alzheimer’s Society (UK) from 2014.
  • Dublin/Trinity: GBHI provided a €250,000 project grant in 2017 (to Naci and Lawlor) to initiate the site. Naci has since secured ~€1 million in additional competitive funding. In 2024, she received an HRB Individual Led Project award (€450,000) to extend the Dublin study into its eighth year (Trinity/St James’s).
  • Additional/Sub-Studies: UK Medical Research Council, US Alzheimer’s Association, industrial partners (~£2.9 million leveraged). The programme has enabled related work (e.g., sports head injury cohorts funded by English Football Association/FIFA).
  • Overall, PREVENT has attracted substantial investment and serves as a platform for further grants. tcd.ie

Key Findings and Outputs

  • Baseline Data (2024): Comprehensive description of the midlife cohort; subtle brain changes detectable in middle age among at-risk individuals. Data shared openly to accelerate research.
  • Recent Trinity-Led Insights (part of PREVENT): Engaging in physically, socially, and intellectually stimulating midlife activities (e.g., playing piano, foreign travel, socializing with friends) significantly boosts cognition—even in those with genetic or familial Alzheimer’s risk. This highlights modifiable lifestyle factors as powerful protective elements decades before typical onset.
  • Other outputs: Novel insights into early biomarkers (imaging, cognition, navigation/spatial tasks via VR), risk factor interactions, and preclinical Alzheimer’s changes. Over 40 publications; high-impact contributions to the field.
  • Broader Context: Aligns with global efforts (e.g., Lancet Commission on dementia prevention) emphasizing modifiable risks like traumatic brain injury (TBI), hypertension, and lifestyle. tcd.ie

Current Status and Future Directions

  • Ongoing: Longitudinal follow-ups continue; Dublin site actively building its dataset with preclinical biomarker assessments. Sub-studies (e.g., PET imaging, sensory assessments, athlete cohorts) are active or expanding.
  • Data Sharing: Baseline data available via ADDI and other platforms; imaging and code increasingly shared to support wider research.
  • Impact: Platform for GBHI Atlantic Fellows training; awareness-raising in Ireland; contributions to early-detection tools and prevention strategies. Expected to inform when and how to intervene (e.g., lifestyle or emerging therapies).
  • Challenges noted in publications include cohort demographics (highly educated, less ethnic diversity than general population) and the value of longer-term follow-up for symptomatic outcomes.

Relevance to Broader Brain Health Context

PREVENT complements GBHI’s focus on dementia prevention, equity, and life-course brain health. Its Trinity leadership (Naci in neuroscience/psychology; Lawlor in old age psychiatry) links directly to TCIN (imaging, cognition, neurodegeneration) and clinical psychiatry (St James’s). It addresses modifiable risks relevant to psychiatric conditions (e.g., depression, anxiety as risk factors) and post-TBI outcomes (TBI is a recognized dementia risk factor; lifestyle interventions may support resilience). The emphasis on early biomarkers and prevention aligns with translational neuroscience goals.For the latest details, visit preventdementia.co.uk or search recent publications (e.g., the 2024 Brain Communications baseline paper). Data requests are possible via the study’s steering processes.If you need specifics on a sub-study, particular findings, how it relates to bequests/TCIN/GBHI, or comparisons to other prevention trials, let me know!

3 web pages

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Fortune: ‘Social Security is on a collision course toward insolvency,’ watchdog says. It hasn’t been this bad since 1983

Personal FinanceSocial Security

‘Social Security is on a collision course toward insolvency,’ watchdog says. It hasn’t been this bad since 1983

Nick Lichtenberg

By 

Nick Lichtenberg

Business Editor

June 17, 2026, 3:04 AM ET

sb

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent during a Senate Finance Committee hearing, June 3, 2026. Eric Lee—Bloomberg/Getty Images

Social Security is hurtling toward a fiscal cliff that, if left unaddressed, will force an automatic 22% benefit cut for tens of millions of retirees, survivors, and their dependents in just six years.

That’s the stark warning from the release last week of the 2026 Social Security Trustees’ Report. A nonpartisan fiscal watchdog, the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB), found the program’s financial imbalance has reached its most severe point in nearly 50 years—and that inaction by lawmakers is making a bad situation measurably worse.

“Social Security is on a collision course toward insolvency,” the CRFB wrote in its analysis. “If policymakers fail to act, they will effectively be supporting a 22% benefit cut for all retirees, survivors, and their dependents in just six years.” The watchdog noted that the program hasn’t been so close to insolvency since 1983, when President Ronald Reagan and Speaker Tip O’Neill famously put partisanship aside to safeguard the program—until now.

The numbers are getting harder to ignore

The Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) Trust Fund—the primary fund that pays retirement benefits—is now projected to run dry in 2032, one year sooner than last year’s estimate. If disability insurance reserves are folded in, the theoretically combined trust funds exhaust in 2034, triggering a 17% across-the-board cut.

The 75-year actuarial shortfall has ballooned to 4.42% of taxable payroll, the largest since 1977, and equivalent to $31 trillion in present value—roughly the size of the entire U.S. economy. This is owing to lower fertility rates, a decline in immigration, and the unfunded spending in the One Big Beautiful Bill, and the gap has grown 16% in a single year, jumping from the 3.82% shortfall projected in last year’s report.

For context, the program’s deficit is now 2.3x as large as it was in 2010.

Over the next decade alone, Social Security will spend $3.8 trillion more than it collects. Annual deficits are projected to grow from 2.7% of taxable payroll today to 6.6% by 2100, driven by an aging population, growing benefit generosity, and revenues that simply won’t keep pace.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has repeatedly insisted the administration will not touch benefits or raise taxes to address the shortfall.

“The senior citizen does not pay more taxes, and the senior citizen does not get less benefits,” Bessent told Congress earlier this month, framing faster economic growth—not structural reform—as the White House’s answer to a looming $31 trillion gap. His “3-3-3” framework—targeting 3% real GDP growth, 3% deficit-to-GDP, and 3 million additional barrels of daily energy production—has become the administration’s default response when pressed on specifics. Critics note the plan offers no direct mechanism to shore up the trust funds before the 2032 deadline.

Prominent economists and fiscal voices aren’t buying it. In a column published in Fortune, Johns Hopkins economist Steve Hanke and former U.S. Comptroller General David Walker (a former Social Security trustee himself) called for an emergency bipartisan fiscal commission—modeled on historical precedents—to generate binding, up-or-down reform votes in Congress, arguing the two programs together represent 36% of all federal spending and can no longer be deferred.

Paid Content

Why integrated technology is health care’s greatest advantage

From Stryker

Writing in the New York Times, Harvard economist Jason Furman was equally blunt, having previously argued that reforms to Social Security and Medicare to eliminate their actuarial deficits must be a central pillar of any serious deficit-reduction framework, not an afterthought.

“I worked in the White House,” he wrote. “We never imagined the problem would get this bad.”

Meanwhile, Brookings researchers noted the troubling irony that the trustees’ report arrived more than two months late and without the sign-off of two public trustee positions that have sat vacant for over a decade—a sign, they wrote, that Washington is moving backward on reform.

A policy own goal

Deteriorating demographics explain most of the worsening outlook—but not all of it.

The trustees lowered their projected fertility rate from 1.9 to 1.75 children per woman, reflecting the ongoing decline in U.S. births, which alone accounts for 0.35 percentage points of the widened shortfall. Reduced immigration assumptions—the model now projects 1.2 million temporary or unlawfully present immigrants annually instead of 1.35 million—added another 0.21 percentage points.

But the third-largest contributor is a policy choice: the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed into law earlier this year, which cut taxes on Social Security benefits. The CRFB estimates the law reduced the actuarial balance by 0.16% of payroll, accounting for roughly a quarter of the year-over-year deterioration. The law also worsened Medicare’s Hospital Insurance trust fund shortfall by an additional 0.09% of payroll.

“A quarter of the increase was due to the enactment of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which reduced revenue from the income taxation of Social Security benefits,” the CRFB noted—a finding that puts the legislation in direct tension with the retirement security of the very voters it was designed to benefit.

The window is closing

Lawmakers still have options, but the menu is shrinking fast.

Acting today, Congress could restore long-term solvency through a 34% payroll tax increase (about 4.25 percentage points), a 25% cut in total benefits, or a 30% reduction for new beneficiaries. Wait until 2034, and those numbers jump: a 40% tax increase or a 29% benefit cut for everyone; at that point it would become mathematically impossible to close the gap by cutting benefits for new beneficiaries alone—even if those benefits were eliminated entirely.

Reforms that once seemed like silver bullets have lost their potency. Eliminating the payroll tax cap—currently set at $184,500 in wages—would now close only about half of the solvency gap, the CRFB found.

“Many options that would have once restored solvency are no longer available,” the watchdog wrote. “Continued inaction has the potential to take even more reforms off the table.”

A typical couple retiring in 2033 would face an $18,400 annual reduction in benefits if no action is taken before the trust fund runs out, which would be a life-altering income loss for households that have spent decades planning around those payments.

No state is spared

The impact won’t be evenly distributed, but it will be universal.

“No state will be spared from these cuts,” the CRFB warned, pointing to its own state-by-state analysis of what benefit reductions would mean on the ground.

The trustees themselves urged lawmakers to act, recommending they “address the projected trust fund shortfalls in a timely way in order to phase in necessary changes gradually and give workers and beneficiaries time to adjust.”

Solutions proposed by the CRFB’s Trust Fund Solutions Initiative include a “Six Figure Limit” on high earners’ benefits, a COLA (cost-of-living adjustment) cap, and a new Employer Compensation Tax—ideas designed to restore solvency while preserving retirement security and promoting economic growth.

“By failing to reform Social Security and Medicare,” the CRFB concluded, “policymakers are implicitly endorsing deep benefit and service cuts for most current and future beneficiaries.”

The clock, the report makes clear, is ticking—and it’s now just six years from midnight.

The Fortune 500 Innovation Forum will convene Fortune 500 executives, U.S. policy officials, top founders, and thought leaders to help define what’s next for the American economy, Nov. 16-17 in Detroit. Apply here.

About the Author

Nick Lichtenberg

By Nick LichtenbergBusiness Editor

Nick Lichtenberg is business editor and was formerly Fortune‘s executive editor of global news.

See full bio

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Shining Science: A robot guided by an AI just performed surgery with near-perfect accuracy and no human intervention.

A robot guided by an AI just performed surgery with near-perfect accuracy and no human intervention.

In a major step toward autonomous surgical systems, researchers at Johns Hopkins University have successfully trained an AI-guided robot to perform gall bladder removal on a dead pig with near-complete autonomy.

The dual-layer AI model—trained on 17 hours of human surgery footage—translated video input into verbal commands like “clip the second duct,” which were then converted into precise tool movements.

The robot completed all 17 surgical tasks across eight procedures with 100% task success, demonstrating real-time self-correction and only limited human intervention.

While full autonomy in live human surgeries remains years away, the milestone marks a significant advance in surgical robotics.

Experts emphasize that while the robot occasionally needed tool changes or adjusted missed grabs, its ability to detect and fix its own mistakes shows the growing reliability of AI-assisted procedures. With regulators expected to weigh in heavily before human applications, researchers plan to move next toward testing in live animals. The long-term goal? Safer, more precise surgeries that reduce complication rates and ease strain on surgical teams.
source

Journal reference: Ji Woong (Brian) Kim. Science Robotics. 10 (4). SRT-H: A hierarchical framework for autonomous surgery via language-conditioned imitation learning

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Futurism: OpenAI Is Taking the “Crack Cocaine” Approach to Pricing

OpenAI Is Taking the “Crack Cocaine” Approach to Pricing

“They’ve kind of taken the crack approach to AI. Give it to people for free, get them hooked, then jack up prices.”

By Victor Tangermann

Published Jun 16, 2026 3:04 PM EDT

Add Futurism(opens in a new tab)More information

A comic photo illustration of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman appearing to hand the viewer a crack pipe.
Illustration by Tag Hartman-Simkins / Futurism. Source: Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images; Shutterstock

Sign up to see the future, today

Can’t-miss innovations from the bleeding edge of science and tech Email address Sign Up

OpenAI burned through a staggering amount of money in 2025.

According to audited financial figures obtained by AI skeptic Ed Zitron, who shared them with The Financial Times, the net loss attributed to the ChatGPT maker soared from $5 billion in 2024 to a stunning $39 billion in 2025.

You can relitigate the numbers all day — a source familiar with situation told the FT that a lot of those 2025 losses are a “non-cash accounting charge linked to the company’s previous structure rather than its underlying operations — but the financial pressure does seem to be taking a toll. After years of giving users largely unfettered access to its models for a monthly fee, OpenAI and many of its competitors are now debating whether to boost prices dramatically by transitioning to a token-based billing system, charging users more directly for the amount of computing power they consume instead of an open-ended monthly subscription.

OpenAI currently offers both pay-as-you-go API access and monthly ChatGPT subscriptions. But how long the latter will stick around is looking increasingly uncertain. Earlier this month, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman argued that “we see a future where intelligence is a utility, like electricity or water, and people buy it from us on a meter.”

In other words, OpenAI’s behavior sounds an awful lot like a drug dealer who floods the market with addictive drugs, then jacks up the prices once users are dependent on them.

“They’ve kind of taken the crack approach to AI,” one Reddit user argued. “Give it to people for free, get them hooked, then jack up prices.”

It’s an insightful metaphor, considering where the majority of the AI industry’s biggest players appear to be headed. And as the costs of building out data centers and maintaining access to cloud compute come due, it’s likely we’ll see even more similar behavior.

The real costs behind AI subscriptions are staggering. According to a recent report by research company SemiAnalaysis, a $200 ChatGPT Pro subscription costs OpenAI as much as $14,000 if used to its maximum potential.

Spiking API prices have caught some power users off guard. According to Axios, an unnamed firm’s CFO accidentally racked up half a billion dollars in Claude usage fees in a single month.

The financial reality is hard to ignore, with CEOs starting to reverse course on AI adoption as prices for access to the tools spiral out of control.

“Fundamentally all of these AI providers are massively subsidizing token usage on these flat rate plans,” another Reddit user wrote. “It’s simply unsustainable.”

Even with soaring token-based API pricing, AI companies’ balance sheets are firmly in the red. And they could stay there, especially considering the burgeoning AI price war that could force them to lower — not raise — prices just to stay competitive.

More on OpenAI: OpenAI Execs Are Panicking

Victor Tangermann Avatar

Victor Tangermann

Senior Editor

I’m a senior editor at Futurism, where I edit and write about NASA and the private space sector, as well as topics ranging from SETI and artificial intelligence to tech and medical policy.

Most Popular

Future Society

Scientists Have Detected Something Deeply Alarming at the Bottom of the Ocean

By Joe Wilkins

SpaceX

SpaceX Stock Has Now Started to Fall

By Victor Tangermann

SpaceX

Wall Street Terrified That SpaceX Investors Will Dump Their Stocks

By Frank Landymore

Developments

MAHA Furious as Kennedy Moves to Ban Their Medicine: Gas Station Heroin

By Frank Landymore

SpaceX

SpaceX Stock Continues Decline After Initial Spike

By Victor Tangermann

Read More

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Axios: Trump’s Iran climbdown

Trump’s Iran climbdown
 
President Trump signs the Iran memorandum of understanding at Versailles. Screenshot: White House via X

President Trump made the case for his deal with Iran during an hourlong press conference yesterday, while seeming to lower his own bar for success and warning he could bomb Iran again if nuclear talks fail, Axios’ Barak Ravid writes.

Why it matters: For two months, Trump has been seeking a deal to end the war, reopen the Strait of Hormuz and stabilize global energy markets.

This deal should achieve that. But some of Trump’s critics argue that making concessions just to return to status quo ante shows the war itself was a costly mistake.

🖼️ The big picture: Before the war and as it got underway, Trump laid out highly ambitious parameters for any successful resolution with Iran.

That included “total surrender” and the full dismantlement of Iran’s nuclear program. No enrichment, no ballistic missiles, no funding for proxies. Trump even wanted a say in picking the supreme leader.

The memorandum of understanding (MOU) — which Trump signed yesterday and senior administration officials finally unveiled on a call with reporters — is a much more modest agreement.

Breaking it down: Iran gets sanctions relief to sell oil, the strait reopens, the blockade lifts.

The parties also give themselves 60 days to negotiate a nuclear deal. Iran could see all sanctions lifted and receive billions in frozen funds and investments, if it agrees to limit its nuclear program and “dispose of” its stockpile.

Trump and his team acknowledge a final deal may never happen. But he claimed yesterday that “if it doesn’t get done in 60 days, we go back to bombing.” (He later said the deadline could shift.)

Uncharacteristically, Trump downplayed the deal somewhat, noting that it was just a memorandum. He further enraged hawks by expressing sympathy for Iran’s desire to possess missiles and pursue nuclear energy.World leaders at the G7 summit in Évian-les-Bains, France, on Tuesday. Photo: Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images
💥 Friction point: There’s plenty in the deal for critics to sink their teeth into.

It only calls on Iran to open the strait without restrictions for 60 days, leaving open the possibility of tolls after that. A senior U.S. official told reporters that wouldn’t happen, because Gulf countries wouldn’t sign up to any deal that allowed it.

The MOU calls for a plan to establish a $300 billion fund to rebuild Iran. Trump denied that the U.S. would contribute money to such a fund.

The text makes clear that Iran will receive sanctions waivers to sell oil freely as long as negotiations are ongoing.

The MOU says nothing about Iran’s ballistic missiles or support for terrorist organizations and militias in the region, despite Trump’s insistence — dating back to his first term — that any deal with Iran would have to cover those issues.

📱 Watch the White House’s 35-second video of Trump signing the Iran memo of understanding at Versailles.Share this story.
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Fortune: The G7 just pledged to break China’s rare earth grip – ….

Search

Subscribe

Sign in

EconomyChina

The G7 just pledged to break China’s rare earth grip — there’s a lot of work to do

By 

Mia Osmonbekov

News Fellow

June 17, 2026, 6:30 PM ET

Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer, US President Donald Trump and France's President Emmanuel Macron attend a morning work meeting at G7 summit.

Germany’s Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Britain’s Prime Minister Keir Starmer, US President Donald Trump and France’s President Emmanuel Macron attend a morning work meeting at G7 summit.Ludovic MARIN / AFP via Getty Images

The U.S. and six of its allies are tackling their dependence on China and its effective chokehold on rare earth minerals. At the Group of Seven summit in France on Wednesday, the countries pledged to ensure that no single nation can supply more than 60% of rare earth imports by 2030.


Issued by the G7 in a joint statement, the pledge looks to reduce the countries’ dependence on China for the raw materials behind military technology. The leaders of the U.K., Canada, France, Germany, Japan, Italy and the U.S. said they plan to get to 50% “as soon as possible,” according to the statement. As of last year, China accounted for nearly 70% of rare earth production. 

“It’s definitely a bold target,” said Cirba Solutions CEO David Klanecky, an expert with more than 30 years of experience in critical minerals. “If you don’t set a goal on a target for people to achieve, then nothing will happen,” he told Fortune.

The urgency stems from the fact that China is set to reinstate its initially postponed export controls on rare earths critical to defense systems on Nov. 10 – put in place in a yearlong truce with the Trump administration after his worldwide reciprocal tariffs set off a global trade war. Since another moment of global trade being reshaped in 1973, the G7 group of liberal democracies has met annually to set policy, and this year clearly has China on the agenda. 

G7 summit participants Japan, the EU and the U.S. account for over half of global rare earth magnet imports, with China acting as the main supplier, according to a United Nations critical minerals trade report published in June. While rare earths themselves are just a group of 17 naturally occurring chemicals, rare earth permanent magnets–what the G7 explicitly named because China accounts for 95% of permanent magnet production–are made from separating and then recombining specific elements that let manufacturers build lighter and stronger motors and electronics. 

These magnets are then embedded in drones and precision weapons, making them a national security chokepoint, according to Goldman Sachs. They’re also vital for the electric vehicles and wind turbines powering Europe’s energy transition goals

The UN’s critical minerals report found that China has issued 16 trade restrictions on those critical energy transition materials since 2020, cutting off the supply to the United States and some of its allies. Most famously, this happened last year in response to U.S. tariffs. If China’s export controls were “fully implemented,” up to $6.5 trillion of economic activity outside China could be at risk annually, an 2026 International Energy Agency report found.

“The worst-case scenario would be that no new supply from China comes online within the next four years—we’re looking at a China that is increasingly aggressive in the Taiwan Strait—and that we continue to be dependent for building military technologies on Chinese imports,” Meredith Schwartz, an associate fellow for the Critical Minerals Security Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told Fortune. “China can continue to use that economic chokepoint to cut off our industries from those necessary materials.”

Opportunity for the United States to help

China dominates rare earth refining, creating a “critical bottleneck” and “high barriers to entry for new players” because of how energy and capital intensive the process is, per the UN report.  

Paid Content

KAFD, the beating heart of Riyadh

From The Buzz

But some of the few non-Chinese rare earth refiners are based in the United States and are specifically targeting the G7’s magnet needs. 

For instance, USA Rare Earth extracts, processes and manufactures rare earth elements and permanent magnets in an attempt to make the country’s first “mine to magnet” supply chain. The CHIPS and Science Act gave the company $277 million in federal incentives to build production capability for up to 10,000 tons per annum of rare earth metal alloy. 

A spokesperson for USA Rare Earth told Fortune that the company is “pleased to see the continued focus of the G7 on creating a Western value chain of rare earth elements” and wants to be the “partner of choice” in the endeavor. 

“We believe USA Rare Earth is well positioned to produce sintered neodymium-iron-boron (NdFeB) permanent magnets commercially and is actively building a value chain to scale production,” the spokesperson said over email. 

Another company, MP Materials, has rare earths processing facilities in Fort Worth, Texas and Mountain Pass, California. Mountain Pass is the only commercial-scale rare earths mine in the country, and MP recently received a $150 million loan from the Department of Defense to enhance Mountain Pass’s rare earths separation capabilities. 

When reached for comment by Fortune for the company’s reaction to the G7 pledge, spokesperson Matt Sloustcher confirmed that MP Materials “is playing, and will continue to play, a leading role in the rapid diversification of the global supply chain.”

MP is also building a second Texas-based facility that, combined with the Fort Worth one, can produce 10,000 metric tons of rare earth magnets, Sloustcher stated. 

But critical minerals expert Schwartz cautioned against getting too excited about developments in the U.S. space because China still dominates heavy rare-earth mining, while the U.S. is mostly dealing with light rare-earths. She pointed to Japan, where “it’s taken over 15 years” for it to “make a significant dent in its dependence on Chinese rare earth materials”.

“There isn’t really large-scale production of those heavy rare earths currently, and we will need to increase production of those materials specifically in order to have a rare earth magnet supply chain that is really cutting dependence on China,” Schwartz said.

Subscribe to Fortune Gulf Brief. Every Tuesday, this new newsletter delivers clear-eyed, authoritative intelligence on the deals, decisions, policies, and power shifts shaping one of the world’s most consequential regions, written for the people who need to act on it. Sign up here.

About the Author

By Mia OsmonbekovNews Fellow

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Axios: Writing with AI

Writing with AI
Animated illustration of a block of text being highlighted to reveal a highlighted portion resembling a pink brain, followed by an arrow clicking and selecting
Illustration: Annelise Capossela/Axios
 
Jim writes: Few AI use cases elicit more outrage than writing: Using AI makes writing duller … dumber … robotic. It kills thinking … creativity … originality. It produces sameness and slop!

Why it matters: All that’s true — if you, as the teacher or writer, allow it to be true. Lazy AI outsourcing means lazy thinking and writing. Used with persistence and skill, AI can enhance both your thoughts and expression.

I’m thinking and writing more and better than ever. But I want to be frank and useful about what I’ve learned about writing and the limits I’ve hit since turning myself into an AI lab rat:

🚨 Caution 1: I’m 55, a writer by training, went in aware of AI dangers, and am a prolific writer with or without it. Anyone lazily letting AI do their thinking or writing is playing with fire: You’re destined to create a mushy, “blah brain.” Hope the tips that follow help you build a bionic brain instead.

🚨 Caution 2, from Autumn, my wife, who’s more of an AI skeptic: “Don’t conflate the way you write and the utility of AI to convey information with soul writing that many of us need to live, breathe and understand the world around us. Living without that is like trying to live without air for many of us — it needs to be said somehow.

Between the lines: As AI tools get more powerful, Axios will stay transparent with you about how we use them. (Our website includes a detailed explanation of how we use AI in our journalism.) This column captures my latest thinking on best practices

.👀 So here’s the nitty-gritty of how I use AI for writing:

Set rules based on your standards, not AI’s. I write into the model’s memoryMy writing flows from my thinking. So challenge me, never flatter me; press me with wise skepticism. Then write like me — always in Smart Brevity — to match my style.

Be very precise about the writing and editing style.

I have mine wired into the AI memory (just tell it to commit style to memory) and in a skills document for my AI agents. My rules: short, sharp sentences … clinical, fact-based emphasis … context flagged as “Why it matters” … and supporting points stacked in bullet form in order of importance.

Pour in examples. You need to feed in the original work you’re most proud of. It can be as simple as diary entries, memos or a school project. Make sure your writing and editing priorities are reflected in it. I’ve dumped in every Axios column, memo and strategic document, as well as four books (two unreleased).

Let’s pause for a second. Those are very clear parameters for writing and editing with AI. That will suffice for most people in most instances.

I’ve taken my own AI journey much further. I’m doing this to test limits and capabilities.

Advanced writing with AI:

Create specific advanced skills. I use both projects (mainly in Claude, but increasingly in ChatGPT) and agents (in ChatGPT’s Codex). Inside projects and agents, my thinking, writing and editing files are much more specific and richer. They’re called skills or instructions, depending on the platform or use case. I detail a fact-checking skill to double-check data points, then move outside the agent for another fact-check with a safety-net skill.

Interact with projects and agents a lot. You need to create a conversation loop, where you get better at fine-tuning the writing output, and the AI gets better at understanding your style. It definitely gets better with time. You want to find a mind meld that serves and betters you.

Put it to the test. My laboratory is my Axios C-Suite newsletter, which I publish Saturdays for CEOs and other executives. I’m testing and using two main things: I have a project inside of Claude that knows everything I’ve written for this audience, plus my thinking about business and leadership, and the high standards I have for ideas and data.

I have a similar agent that operates autonomously, powered by Codex, that constantly scans high-quality publications, data projects and research for relevant information. It writes up ideas in my style and delivers them via email before I wake up.

The items are good, smart starters or enhancers — but they’re never camera-ready, at least by my standards.

Push and pull — a lot. Funny thing: I write naturally in an AI kind of way — direct, sparse, lots of dashes. And AI naturally writes a lot like me (and naturally loves Smart Brevity). So I find the output often excellent, well-documented and edited better than my favorite human editor, Mike Allen. It still does weird stuff, but rarely. It’s wordier and less direct than I am. Increasingly, I find myself using its edits or proposed Jim-like phrases as naturally as the notes from Mike or any other human editor.

Fun new test: I’m preparing to hike Kilimanjaro, so I’m doing a lot of rucking. I’ve been using Claude in voice mode to have long conversations about things I want to write. I have Claude keep detailed notes, pull out my best phrases and ideas, challenge my assumptions, help organize my thinking. Then we go back and forth by voice before producing a draft column. That’s how I got both the idea and the output for my “Confessions of an AI lab rat” column. The end product was a hybrid of my thinking and my best phrases alongside Claude’s real-time editing and editor-like pushback.

The bottom line: I hope this inspires you to try some of these discoveries yourself .Share this column

.📈 If you’re a CEO or on a CEO’s team: Ask to join Jim’s new weekly Axios C-Suite newsletter.
Share on Facebook Tweet this Story

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Speaking out for the people of Palestine

https://twitter.com/DLk__34/status/2067193687621210492/video/1

Quotation

We have a personal responsibility to TRUTH

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

GZERO: US Arctic strategy: Greenland still matters. The growing strategic importance of the Arctic

The growing strategic importance of the Arctic

GZERO Staff

June 17, 2026

Make us preferred on Google

As global competition intensifies in the Arctic, Greenland has reemerged as a strategic focal point for the United States and its allies. From the sidelines 2026 US-Canada Summit, hosted by Eurasia Group and RBC in Toronto, Tony Maciulis sits down with Thomas Dans, chairman of the US Arctic Research Commission, to discuss why the Arctic is increasingly central to national security, energy development, critical minerals, and geopolitical competition.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

DD Politics: BREAKING!!!! The White House has released the full text of 14-point MoU

BREAKING!!!! The White House has released the full text of 14-point MoU The points summarised are as follows:

1. The U.S. and Iran, and their allies in the current war, by signing this MoU, declare the immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon, and undertake from now on not to initiate any war or any military operation against each other, and to refrain from the threat or use of force against each other, and ensuring the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Lebanon.

2. The U.S. and Iran will respect each other’s sovereignty and territorial integrity and refrain from interfering in each other’s internal affairs.

3. The U.S. and Iran commit to achieving a final deal in a maximum of 60 days, extendable with mutual consent.

4. The U.S. will immediately begin the removal of its naval blockade and any disturbances or impediments against Iran, and will fully end the naval blockade within 30 days. During this period, the traffic will be in proportion to the number of pre-war traffic being restored by Iran. The U.S. further undertakes to remove its military forces from the proximity of Iran within 30 days after the final deal.

5. Iran will make arrangements for the safe passage of commercial vessels with no charge for 60 days from the Persian Gulf to the Sea of Oman, and vice versa. The traffic of commercial vessels will immediately start, considering the need for removing the technical and military obstacles and demining, within 30 days. Iran will conduct a dialogue with Oman to define the future administration and maritime services in the Strait of Hormuz in discussion with other Persian Gulf littoral states in line with international law and the sovereign rights of coastal states of the Strait of Hormuz.

6. The U.S. undertakes with its regional partners to develop a definitive, mutually agreed plan with at least USD 300 billion for the reconstruction and economic development of Iran, as part of the final deal after 60 days. All required licenses, waivers, and permissions will be granted.

7. The U.S. will terminate all types of sanctions against the Islamic Republic of Iran, including the UNSC resolutions, IAEA Board of Governors resolutions, and all unilateral US sanctions, primary and secondary, in an agreed-upon schedule as part of the final deal.

8. Iran reaffirms that it shall not procure or develop nuclear weapons. The U.S. and Iran have agreed to resolve the disposition of stockpile enriched materials, pursuant to a mechanism that will be mutually agreed upon in accordance with the schedule mentioned in paragraph seven, with at a minimum a downblending on site under the supervision of the IAEA. The two parties also agreed to discuss the issue of enrichment and other mutually agreed matters related to Iran’s nuclear needs.

9. Pending the final deal, the U.S. and Iran agree to maintain the status quo. Iran will maintain the current status quo of its nuclear program, and the U.S. will not impose any new sanctions and will not deploy additional forces in the region.

10. The U.S. undertakes that immediately upon the signing of this MoU, waivers will be issued for the export of Iranian crude oil, petroleum products, and derivatives, and all associated services, including banking transactions, insurances, transportation, etc.

11. The U.S. undertakes to make fully available for use the frozen or restricted funds of the Islamic Republic of Iran upon the implementation of this MoU. The U.S. and Iran will mutually agree on the procedures related to the release of these funds during the negotiations.

12. A monitoring mechanism will be established to supervise the implementation of this MoU and the subsequent deal.

13. After signing this MoU and subject to the beginning of the implementation of paragraphs 1, 4, 5, 10, and 11, and the continuing implementation of these measures, the U.S. and Iran will start negotiations regarding the final deal.

14. The final deal will be endorsed by a UNSC Resolution.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment