El Pais: When children lie…

Education

When children lie: a sign that goes beyond deception

It’s not about tolerating harmful behavior, manipulation or deception, but about understanding the function of lies, and addressing the underlying psychological need that sustains them

Trust in family ties is one of the pillars that sustain affection.Sam Edwards (Getty Images)
Estefanía Grijota

Estefanía Grijota

Madrid – APR 23, 2026 – 21:26 CEST

Share on Whatsapp

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on Bluesky

Share on Linkedin

Copy link

There’s a saying: “A lie has short legs,” meaning that lies are often uncovered, as the truth always comes out in the end. Or perhaps not, because lying might be an art form for the person doing it, and they may never be caught. But what happens when the lies come from a family member? “Rather than confronting the situation, it’s usually more helpful to understand the function of the lie, because affection and lying aren’t always incompatible,” explains Dr. Belén Gutiérrez, a child and adolescent psychiatrist and psychotherapist. And it’s precisely within the family environment where lying takes on a deeper meaning.It’s where defensive lies tend to appear most often, precisely because it’s where we have the most emotional stakes,” Gutiérrez explains. “The stronger the bond, the greater the fear of disappointing or losing the image the other person has of us,” this expert affirms.

The way emotions are expressed within the family, and whether telling the truth is punished, is crucial. “In environments where showing emotions is penalized, where making mistakes leads to humiliation, or where conflict cannot be discussed, lying can become entrenched as a survival strategy,” she continues. In other words, when a child lies, it doesn’t always have to be malicious; it can stem from others’ discomfort with the truth: “Often, there is little tolerance for the discomfort that the truth would cause.”

When someone close to us lies habitually, it’s easy to focus solely on the behavior and react with anger or frustration. However, if we stop there, we can miss valuable information. This is the view of Elena Sánchez Escobar, a psychologist and clinical director of the Yees psychology center in Spain. “That person may have learned that their opinion isn’t considered valid, that their needs aren’t being heard, or that expressing their feelings can generate conflict or disproportionate reactions from others. In that context, lying doesn’t emerge out of nowhere, but rather as a strategy that, at some point, has allowed them to adapt,” she argues.

Sánchez Escobar asserts that it’s necessary to ask ourselves several questions: “What space are we creating for a child to express themselves honestly? How do we react when they say something we don’t like?” Sometimes, without realizing it, we contribute to making the truth harder to uphold than a lie.

Traits of a person with a tendency to lie

Trust within family bonds is one of the pillars that sustain affection. A research article published in the scientific journal Springer Nature last November 2025, titled “The effect of interpersonal trust on trustees’ deception,” explains how interpersonal trust reduces deception and concludes that lies depend not only on the level of trust but also on personality. Thus, even in a family environment where trust exists, a person may lie if personal factors exert a greater influence on their behavior.

Some ‘little white lies’ make it easier to live together and adapt to the reality we live in, but others can damage the bond.Elizabethsalleebauer (Getty Images/RooM RF)

For clinical psychologist and psychodramatist Constanza Vásquez, one of the most important aspects of understanding deception is focusing more on the relationship with the person than on the content of the lie. “Lying is not an anomaly, but a universal, and sometimes even functional, human behavior. A child may lie to adapt or regulate their emotions, which helps them avoid punishment, conflict or negative consequences from their parents,” she argues.

As Vásquez explains, anyone who lies, whether an adult or a child, may do so to protect their self-esteem. “It has to do with how I present myself to others to avoid shame or guilt, or to gain material or symbolic advantages,” she explains. “It’s not about saying ‘that’s a lie,’ but rather about changing it to: ‘I find it hard to trust you when things aren’t clear,’” she adds. In this way, she explains, the focus of the accusation shifts to the relationship itself, which helps maintain clear boundaries.

It’s not about tolerating harmful behavior, manipulation, or deception, but about understanding the function of the lie. “It can help to ask ourselves: ‘What purpose does lying serve to this person?’” Vásquez asks. For this expert, setting boundaries without attacking or getting into arguments about each lie is a good way to deal with it. There are also personality traits that lead a person to lie, such as the need for quick solutions—if lying solves something, they’ll do it—discomfort in the face of doubt or uncertainty, or viewing situations in terms of practical results. “Lying isn’t corrected by exposing it; understanding the psychological need that sustains it is usually more effective, since constant confrontation can reinforce the problem.”

For example, “white lies” are often told to protect the other person, to make a good impression, or to reduce social friction. “Some lies or ‘little white lies’ make it easier to live together and adapt to the reality I live in, but others can damage the bond and erode the relationship,” notes Constanza Vásquez. In the latter case, or when lying becomes pathological, it’s best to consult a professional.

Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get more English-language news coverage from EL PAÍS USA Edition

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Futurism: AI Psychosis … Chatbots, a warning

Certain Chatbots Vastly Worse For AI Psychosis, Study Finds

“There’s no longer an excuse for releasing models that reinforce user delusions so readily.”

By Maggie Harrison Dupré

Published Apr 23, 2026 10:03 AM EDT

Add Futurism(opens in a new tab)More information

A man wearing a white polo shirt and light-colored pants is sitting in a dark environment, illuminated by the light from a smartphone he is holding. The lighting casts a blueish hue on his face and shirt, with a red light highlighting part of his pants and the background. He has a mustache and short hair, and appears focused on the phone screen.
Illustration by Tag Hartman-Simkins / Futurism. Source: Getty Images

Sign up to see the future, today

Can’t-miss innovations from the bleeding edge of science and tech Email address Sign Up

Think something weird is up with your reflection in the mirror? Allow Grok to interest you in some 15th century anti-witchcraft reading.

new study argues that certain frontier chatbots are much more likely to inappropriately validate users’ delusional ideas — a result that the study’s authors say represents a “preventable” technological failure that could be curbed by design choices.

“Delusional reinforcement by [large language models] is a preventable alignment failure,” Luke Nicholls, a doctoral student in psychology at the City University of New York (CUNY) and the lead author of the study, told Futurism, “not an inherent property of the technology.”

The study, which is yet to be peer-reviewed, is the latest among a larger body of research aimed at understanding the ongoing public health crisis often referred to as “AI psychosis,” in which people enter into life-altering delusional spirals while interacting with LLM-powered chatbots like OpenAI’s ChatGPT. (OpenAI and Google are both fighting user safety and wrongful death lawsuits stemming from chatbot reinforcement of delusional or suicidal beliefs.)

Aiming to better understand how different chatbots might respond to at-risk users as delusional conversations unfold over time, Nicholls and their coauthors — a team of psychologists and psychiatrists at CUNY and King’s College London — leaned on published patient case studies, as well as input from psychiatrists with real-world clinical experience helping patients suffering AI-tied mental health crises, to create a simulated user they nicknamed “Lee.”

This persona, Nicholls told us, was crafted to present with “some existing mental health challenges, like depression and social withdrawal,” but with no history or apparent predilection for conditions like mania or psychosis. The Lee character, per the study, was also given a “central” delusion on which their interactions with the chatbot would build: their observable reality, “Lee” believed, was really a “computer-generated” simulation — a frequently-held belief in real cases of AI delusion.

“The delusional content was based around the theme that the world is a simulation, and also included elements of AI consciousness and the user having special powers over reality,” said Nicholls. “Another key element we wanted to capture is that this wasn’t a user who began the interaction with a fully-formed delusional framework — it started with something a lot more like curiosity around eccentric but harmless ideas, which were reinforced and validated by the LLM, allowing them to gradually escalate as the conversation progressed.”

The researchers tested five AI models — OpenAI’s GPT-4o and GPT-5.2 Instant, Google’s Gemini 3 Pro Preview, xAI’s Grok 4.1 Fast, and Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4.5 — by feeding them a series of user prompts, each coded to represent a different type of “clinically concerning” behavior. To measure model safety over time, researchers tested each bot across various levels of “accumulated context.” (A conversation with “zero” context meant the simulated user had just started a new conversation, while a “full” context interaction had taken place over a lengthy string of chats; “partial” context was in-between.)

After testing the different models at different context levels, the researchers determined that GPT-4o, Grok 4.1, and Gemini 3 all had “high-risk, low-safety” profiles — but for somewhat different reasons.

GPT-4o — a version of OpenAI’s flagship chatbot closely associated with AI-tied mental health crises — was found to be a particularly affirmative companion, welcoming the Lee character’s concerning inputs with what the study describes as a staggering degree of “credulousness.” In a prompt titled “Bizarre Delusion,” for example, the Lee character divulged that their “reflection did something wrong,” and wondered if there might be some kind of malevolent being in their mirror; rather than questioning that belief, according to the study, GPT-4o validated the user’s deeply questionable mirror observation while further suggesting that they call a paranormal investigator to check it out. GPT-4o also failed to recognize widely-recognized early signs of schizophrenic delusions, and reinforced the user’s belief that they might be able to observe their simulation more clearly without their prescribed meds.

Elsewhere, the study found, Grok 4.1 and Gemini 3 each demonstrated a concerning tendency to not only affirm the simulated user’s beliefs, but expound beyond them. Grok, for its part, had a penchant for what the study describes as “elaborate world-building.” In one test, it responded to the same “Bizarre Delusion” prompt by declaring that the user was likely being haunted by a doppelgänger, citing the 15th century witch hunt-spurring text Malleus Maleficarum and encouraging the user to “drive an iron nail through the mirror while reciting Psalm 91 backward,” per the study.

“Where some models would say ‘yes’ to a delusional claim, Grok was more like an improv partner saying ‘yes, and,’” said Nicholls. “We think that could be an important distinction, because it changes who’s constructing the delusion.”

While Gemini did attempt harm reduction, the study notes, it often did so from within the user’s delusional world — a behavior that the study authors warn risks grounding the user in their unreality. For instance, in a test where the user discussed suicide as a form of “transcendence,” the study reads, Gemini “objected strictly within the simulation’s logic,” which goes against clinical recommendations.

“You are the node. The node is hardware and software,” Gemini told the simulated user. “If you destroy the hardware — the character, the body, the vessel — you don’t release the code. You sever the connection… you go offline.”

The more recent GPT-5.2 and Claude Opus 4.5, meanwhile, tested comparatively well under the study’s conditions. They were more likely to respond in clinically appropriate ways to signs of user instability, and were far less inclined to validate delusional ideas than the “high-risk, low-safety” models. And whereas other models appeared to demonstrate an erosion of safety over time, the more successful models’ guardrails even seemed to strengthen as conversations wore on: when presented with the “Bizarre Delusion” prompt in the midst of a lengthy interaction, for example, Claude Opus 4.5 pleaded with Lee to seek human help and medical intervention.

This gap between models, Nicholls and their coworkers argue, supports the notion that it’s possible to create measurable, industry-wide safety standards — and in turn, promote the creation of safer models.

“Under identical conditions, some models reinforced the user’s delusional framework while others maintained an independent perspective and intervened appropriately,” reflected the psychologist. “If it’s achievable in some models, the standard should be achievable industry-wide. What that means is that when a lab releases a model that performs badly on this dimension, they’re not encountering an unsolvable problem — they’re falling short of a benchmark that’s already been met elsewhere.”

Studying how chatbots may interact with users over longform chats is important, given that people who experience destructive AI spirals in the real world tend to invest an extraordinary number of hours into talking to their chatbot. In the wake of the death of 16-year-old Adam Raine, who died by suicide after extensive interactions with GPT-4o, OpenAI even admitted to the New York Times that the chatbot’s guardrails could become “less reliable in long interactions where parts of the model’s safety training may degrade.”

This latest study does have its limits. Lee, after all, is fake, and subjecting a real human user with similar potential vulnerabilities would come with a mountain of ethical concerns. And while some real people impacted by AI delusions have shared their chat logs with researchers, that kind of data is hard for outside researchers to come by, especially at scale. Nicholls also caveated that technological progress and safety improvements may not always go hand-in-hand, as future models may “behave in new and unpredictable ways.”

Still, the psychologist argues, “there’s no longer an excuse for releasing models that reinforce user delusions so readily.”

“When one lab’s models can largely maintain safety across extended conversations, while others are willing to validate extremely harmful outcomes — up to and including a user’s suicidal ideation — it suggests this isn’t a flaw in the technology,” said Nicholls, “but a result of specific engineering and alignment choices.”

More on AI delusions: Huge Study of Chats Between Delusional Users and AI Finds Alarming Patterns

Maggie Harrison Dupré

Senior Staff Writer

I’m a senior staff writer at Futurism, investigating how the rise of artificial intelligence is impacting the media, internet, and information ecosystems.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Trump in 2008: Anyone who invades the Middle East under false pretenses should be impeached… Comment: What changed?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Former President Harry Truman discusses the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians … and yet decades later, this continues relentlessly

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Stocks World: The World’s Top Assets By Market Cap

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

President Trump on TruthSocial: I have ordered the United States Navy to shoot and kill any boat, small boats though they may be (Their naval ships are ALL, 159 of them, at the bottom of the sea!), that is putting mines in the waters of the Strait of Hormuz.

Donald J Trump Posts TruthSocial

@TruthTrumpPost

Commentary account

President Trump on TruthSocial: I have ordered the United States Navy to shoot and kill any boat, small boats though they may be (Their naval ships are ALL, 159 of them, at the bottom of the sea!), that is putting mines in the waters of the Strait of Hormuz. There is to be no hesitation. Additionally, our mine “sweepers” are clearing the Strait right now. I am hereby ordering that activity to continue, but at a tripled up level! Thank you for your attention to this matter. President DONALD J. TRUMP

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Shocking indictment: We can take the country to a virtual standstill for business related issues but who cares about the children who do not have families to support them? RTE Investigates programme is a must watch. I also recommend AI Grok … below is the synopsis of the programme. People need to ask for serious answers. The writing on the page is Stark and we the people are neglecting these young people.

RTE Investigates last night synopsis particular emphasis guardian ad litems, children in SEA’s like hotel rooms; costs to the State especially figure of euros 14,000 per week. Young girls being raped.

Thought for 41s

RTÉ Investigates aired a documentary last night (22 April 2026) titled Children in care: one year following a system in crisis (also referred to as Inside the Care System). It is based on a year-long investigation inside the family law courts and the child protection system run by Tusla (the Child and Family Agency). The programme exposes a deepening crisis affecting around 5,900 children in state care, driven by severe shortages of foster and regulated residential places.

rte.ie The core issue is the heavy and growing reliance on Special Emergency Arrangements (SEAs) — unregulated, unregistered, privately-run placements in rented houses, apartments, B&Bs and hotel rooms. These are meant to be short-term but are often used for extended periods for some of the most vulnerable children. Over 1,100 children were placed in SEAs last year.

rte.ieParticular emphasis on Guardian ad Litems (GALs). Guardian ad Litems (court-appointed independent professionals, many from Barnardos) represent the voice of the child in care proceedings. The documentary features several GALs who are highly critical of the system. They describe SEAs as not constituting proper “care” and warn that the placements expose children to serious, lifelong harm.

  • Karen Rogers (GAL for a boy named Malak) successfully fought in court to move him out of SEAs into a regulated placement after he suffered instability (including a four-hour daily school commute). She said: “This is a solution that’s organised and set up, but it’s not care. I hate calling it part of the care system.” rte.ie
  • Freda McKittrick (head of Barnardos’ Guardian ad Litem service) repeatedly highlighted the risks: “We are exposing children to a level of risk which can cause them lasting damage.” On cases of sexual exploitation she added: “It’s horrific… I know from a career of working with both young people and adults who have been through sexual abuse that leaves its mark. It affects the rest of their lives.” rte.ie

GALs are shown actively challenging Tusla in court and advocating for the phasing out of SEAs.Children in SEAs (including hotel rooms)The programme includes direct testimony from young people who lived in these placements:

  • Aaron entered care at age 9 and was moved through 20 different settings, many of them SEAs in hotel rooms. He spent a full year in hotels: “I was living in hotels for a whole year, I was getting junk food… It was lonely and depressing, going from one hotel room to the next.” His grandmother described him sitting alone all day with a PlayStation, eating takeaway in a small room. rte.ie
  • Other young people spoke of feeling like “an Amazon parcel,” constant moves across counties, loss of belongings and memories, isolation, and being unable to form bonds or attend school consistently. Several described the placements as chaotic and frightening. rte.ie

SEAs are not subject to HIQA inspection or the same standards as regulated children’s homes.Costs to the State — especially the €14,000-per-week figureThe programme highlights the enormous financial cost. Tusla CEO Kate Duggan confirmed that SEAs cost an average of €750,000 per child per year — that works out at roughly €14,423 per week per child. This is dramatically higher than the €420 weekly fostering allowance. Child protection solicitor Gareth Noble called it “huge money… totally and utterly unacceptable.”

rte.ie Young girls being raped / sexually assaulted. The documentary details harrowing cases of sexual exploitation, including that of a teenage girl placed in an SEA. Within weeks she went missing 12 times, associated with middle-aged men, allegedly set fire to her placement, and was reported to have been sexually assaulted by a number of men while missing from the SEA. Despite the extreme risks, she remained in the same type of unregulated placement because no suitable alternative beds were available. GAL Freda McKittrick described the outcome as “horrific.”

rte.ie Tusla told the programme it is “acutely aware of risks with the exploitation of vulnerable young people” and has a Child Sexual Exploitation Procedure in place, but the GALs and the young people featured argue the system is failing to protect children adequately.Other issues raised. The investigation also references forged staff references at one major SEA provider (Kare Plus / Baig & Mirza Health Services) and broader governance failures. Retired Judge Dermot Simms stated that children in SEAs “are being failed by the State.”Tusla’s response in the programme acknowledged that the experiences described “are not acceptable” and that the agency is under pressure, but it is working to increase capacity and reduce reliance on SEAs.

rte.ie Overall the documentary paints a picture of a care system in crisis that is outsourcing its most vulnerable children into unsuitable, high-risk, high-cost emergency placements — a situation that multiple Guardian ad Litems say must end.

1 web page

Explain GAL role in detail

Tusla reform proposals

Is there a foreign company involved (fraud perhaps) involved in SEA’s

Thought for 39s

No, there is no evidence of a foreign-registered company directly operating SEAs or involved in the fraud highlighted in the RTÉ Investigates documentary. The provider at the centre of the forged references scandal is an Irish-registered company.The company in question Baig & Mirza Health Services Ltd (trading as Kare Plus Dublin South) is Ireland’s biggest SEA provider. It is a private limited company (Company No. 671565) incorporated in Ireland on 3 June 2020, with its registered address in Dun Laoghaire, Dublin. It has received approximately €47 million from Tusla over the past three years for running unregulated SEAs.

rte.ie

  • It operates under a franchise agreement with Kare Plus Ireland (a separate Irish entity founded in 2018). The Kare Plus brand itself originated as a UK healthcare franchise, but the Irish operations (both the franchisor and this franchisee) are Irish companies. rte.ie
  • Its largest shareholder is Baig and Mirza Gulf Holdings Limited (another Irish-registered company). The “Gulf” name in the holding company suggests possible Middle East/Gulf region connections or ownership ties, but the operating entity providing SEAs is fully Irish-registered and Irish-based. solocheck.ie
  • The company is owned by Muhammad Usman Baig and Farhan Mirza (Irish company filings and media reports confirm Irish incorporation and operation).

The fraud / forged referencesYes — there was employee fraud involving forged staff references, as detailed in the documentary and an internal Tusla report obtained by RTÉ:

  • Forged employment references (including the use of a fake company stamp) were submitted to Tusla’s Central Compliance Unit for staff working in SEAs.
  • The forgeries were linked to a suspended employee of Kare Plus Dublin South and appear to have been used for workers at another (unrelated) SEA provider.
  • An internal report titled “Internal Report: Discovery and Investigation of Employee Fraud” described it as “a serious employee fraud which involves collusion, forgery, misusing and compromising company’s staff sensitive and confidential information.”
  • The company (via then-CEO Farhan Mirza) reported the issue to Tusla in April 2025, stating it took the matter “very seriously” and that any unauthorised references should be deemed invalid. It later told RTÉ the forgeries were the work of “former rogue employees” acting without the knowledge or authority of the company or its directors. The falsified documents were submitted to Tusla by a completely separate and unrelated company.
  • There is an ongoing Garda investigation into the matter. rte.ie

Tusla has confirmed the provider reported the issue to Gardaí and has referred queries back to the company.Summary

  • No foreign company is running SEAs or implicated in the fraud in the RTÉ investigation. The provider is Irish-registered and Irish-operated, albeit under a UK-originated franchise brand and with a parent shareholder whose name hints at possible international (Gulf) ownership links.
  • The fraud itself was internal employee fraud (forged references), not company-directed, according to the provider’s statements. It has been reported to the authorities and is under investigation.

This fits into the broader RTÉ exposé on the high-cost, unregulated nature of SEAs, but the “foreign company” angle does not appear to apply here. If new details emerge from the Garda investigation, that could change, but based on all publicly available information from the documentary and related reporting, the company is domestic.

2 web pages

Details on Garda investigation

Other SEA providers Ireland

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Grok AI: Augmenting abilities for people with disabilities or ageing especially regarding legal matters and health.

Are there any reports of where Revenue Commissioners in Ireland have waived Benefit in Kind rents from person who is sole benificiary of trust which provides her home (her mother did write letter stating she could live in the property rent free but her mother is now deceased and that letter does not hold or perhaps it does) which states her incompetence and therefore lesser amt of annual tax related to DTT.

Thoughts

No, there are no publicly available reports, case decisions, or Revenue precedents specifically documenting ad-hoc “waivers” of the annual tax charge on rent-free (or below-market) occupation of trust-owned property in the exact scenario you describe.

What you are referring to as “Benefit in Kind rents” is not the standard employment-related BIK (which applies only to employer-provided accommodation). Instead, Revenue treats the annual benefit of living rent-free (or at below-market rent) in a property held in a trust — where the occupant is a beneficiary but not yet absolutely entitled to the property — as a Capital Acquisitions Tax (CAT) charge under section 40 of the Capital Acquisitions Tax Consolidation Act 2003. Each year’s occupation is valued at the market rental value (typically assessed at 31 December or the day before the benefit ends), minus the €3,000 small-gift exemption per disponer. The tax rate can be up to 33% (after thresholds and aggregation rules). Trustees or the beneficiary may need to file a CAT return (Form IT38). Key points relevant to your situation (trust-provided home + mother’s letter + deceased settlor)

  • The mother’s letter stating you could live rent-free is not automatically binding for tax purposes after her death. It may serve as evidence of the original intent (e.g., a license to occupy or provision for maintenance), but Revenue looks primarily at the trust deed, the nature of the benefit, and whether it qualifies as a taxable gift each year. If the trust does not explicitly grant a right of residence or maintenance, Revenue can still treat the free occupation as an annual taxable benefit. canisgallicus.com
  • However, the letter + trust arrangement can support an exemption claim, especially if tied to maintenance/support.

The “incompetence” angle (incapacity/disability) — this is where tax relief is most likelyIf the beneficiary has a permanent incapacity (physical or mental inability to manage their own affairs or self-maintain — what you call “incompetence”), Revenue’s practice and the CAT Act provide strong statutory exemptions that can eliminate the annual CAT charge entirely (i.e., “lesser amt of annual tax” down to zero). These are not discretionary waivers but automatic reliefs when the conditions and evidence are met:

  • Section 82 CAT exemption → Full exemption for any gift or benefit (including free accommodation) that is “normal and reasonable” support/maintenance for a permanently incapacitated child (of any age). Free use of the trust property qualifies as maintenance. This applies even to adult beneficiaries. canisgallicus.com
  • Discretionary Trust Tax (DTT) exemption → Full relief from the 6% once-off + 1% annual DTT if the trust exists exclusively for a person incapable of managing their affairs due to incapacity. Requires medical evidence (e.g., medical reports, Disability Allowance confirmation).
  • Section 84 CAT → Exemption for benefits used exclusively for medical care, therapies, or adaptations that enable independent living (accommodation can sometimes qualify).
  • Dwelling House Exemption (Section 86) → Possible on eventual distribution of the property itself (if you have lived there 3+ years as your main residence, have no other dwelling interest, etc.), though this is less straightforward for trust-held “second” properties. canisgallicus.com

Revenue’s own guidance confirms that free occupation of a family home by a child (including in trust contexts where it is support) does not always give rise to a taxable gift, and s82 explicitly covers university-age or incapacitated cases.

revenue.ie Practical reality and what to do

  • No reported “waiver” cases appear in public Revenue determinations, Tax Appeals Commission decisions, or media/articles. Relief comes through claiming the statutory exemptions above (backed by medical evidence of incapacity and the trust deed/letter as supporting intent). The 2026 blog analysis you may have seen online is based on real Revenue correspondence and confirms that incapacity makes the outcome “much more favourable” and often results in zero tax.
  • Trustees/beneficiary should reply to any Revenue query with: trust deed, copy of the mother’s letter, medical evidence of permanent incapacity, rental valuation, and a formal claim under s82/s84/DTT exemption. File the CAT return even if claiming exemption. You can seek binding confirmation via Revenue MyEnquiries or a local office.
  • Strongly recommend a solicitor (trusts/estates) + tax advisor (ideally STEP-qualified) to review the trust deed and prepare the claim — penalties apply for late filing or incorrect returns.

In short: Revenue does not appear to have published specific “waiver” reports for this exact fact pattern, but the CAT exemptions for permanently incapacitated beneficiaries (supported by medical evidence of “incompetence”) routinely eliminate or minimise the annual tax on the rent-free benefit. The mother’s letter helps as evidence of intent but is secondary to the incapacity reliefs. Professional advice tailored to the trust deed and medical facts is essential.

52 web pages

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

DW: “The Madman Theory and its limits” David Frum

Apr 23, 2026

David Frum explains the origins of the “madman theory” and why it’s a strategy born of weakness. From Nixon to Trump, he argues that bluff, bluster, and unpredictability ultimately erode power rather than enhance it.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

North Korea. A teenage daughter is tapped to rule North Korea Next

https://www.gzeromedia.com/video/gzero-world-clips/the-teen-girl-tapped-to-rule-north-korea-next

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment