Axios: Train your nose. Comment: Post TBI I lost sense of smell, it counts, it makes life difficult when you cannot smell. It excludes you from conversations


 
 
1 big thing: Train your nose
Illustration of squiggly arrows pointing at a nose.
Illustration: Shoshana Gordon/Axios
 
Exercising your sense of smell may help preserve brain health as you age.

Why it matters: Smell is arguably the least valued of the five senses. American students say they’d rather lose their sense of smell than their hair, phone or even a pinky toe. But researchers see this sense as both an early indicator of cognitive health and a potential way to keep the brain sharp, Richard Sima writes for The Washington Post (gift link).

👃 Zoom in: Losing your sense of smell is often one of the earliest signs of Alzheimer’s or Parkinson’s disease, sometimes appearing a decade before other symptoms, Sima writes.

But it’s not just a sign. Training your nose can boost cognitive function by improving neuroplasticity, or how well the brain can change itself, according to early research in Neuropsychology Review.

🍋 How it works: Try sniffing a range of different scents for about 20 seconds at a time, once or twice a day. You can buy smell training kits, but you can also just take in all the wonderful smells you encounter every day.

Common smell training scents are lemon, rose, eucalyptus and clove, Sima notes. But you could also pay closer attention to the smells of your morning cup of coffee, your lawn after a fresh mow or your favorite dessert in the oven.

Grab blindfolds and turn smell training into a game to play with kids or grandkids.

The bottom line: As Sima puts it, “stopping to smell the roses is good life advice.”
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Axios: AI godfathers converge

AI godfathers converge
 
Photo illustration of Demis Hassabis, Sam Altman, and Dario Amodei with abstract colorful shapes in the foreground and background
Photo illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios. Photos via Getty Images
 
The three men racing hardest to build superhuman AI — Demis Hassabis, Sam Altman and Dario Amodei — all agree the frontier needs to be regulated ASAP, Jim VandeHei and Mike Allen write in a “Behind the Curtain” column.

Why it matters: For the first time, the CEOs of Google DeepMind, OpenAI and Anthropic are on the record, in writing, converging on the same diagnosis and remarkably similar prescriptions.

The three rivals each published a detailed distillation of their views in the past five weeks — the same extraordinary stretch in which Washington twice intervened to restrict or delay access to frontier models.
We hear Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg is working on his own memo, too.

🔬 Zoom in: Hassabis’ proposal, published Tuesday, drew rare praise across the bitterly competitive AI industry, including from Altman, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and even longtime rival Elon Musk.

Anthropic co-founder Jack Clark called the framework “excellent,” writing: “At this point, everyone at the frontier of AI agrees that third parties should test out AI systems and use these to develop standards to feed into policy.

“The Trump administration itself is torn: Publicly, it has championed deregulation and resisted anything resembling “an FDA for AI,” determined not to choke off U.S. innovation in the race against China.

Privately, officials admit a total hands-off approach is untenable: Cyber fears have already forced them into improvised regulation twice this summer — first over Anthropic’s Fable and Mythos models, then over OpenAI’s GPT-5.6.

🖼️ The big picture: Amodei, Altman and Hassabis (plus countless CEOs and investors) basically agree on a rough regulatory framework.

Independent testing: All three want frontier models subject to outside scrutiny before reaching the public — a break from the industry’s old self-reporting standard.

One governing system: All three cite legacy regulatory models, proposing bodies that set standards, certify compliance and can limit access to frontier systems deemed too dangerous.

America First: All three want the U.S. — not a fragmented patchwork of states or rival national regimes — setting the terms for a body with international reach.

Threat awareness: All three cite imminent national security vulnerabilities, including dangerous cyber and bioweapon capabilities.

Innovation protection: None of them is calling for a broad crackdown on AI. The shared target is the small class of frontier models powerful enough to create catastrophic or strategic risk.

Where they disagree: The AI godfathers part ways on whether the government itself should be the sole final referee.

Amodei wants an FAA for AI: a federal agency with the power to block a model’s release immediately, from Day

1.Hassabis wants a FINRA for AI: an industry-funded, federally overseen standards body that starts with voluntary pre-release reviews and could harden into mandatory market-access rules.

Altman, writing in the Financial Times ($), pushes an IAEA for AI: a U.S.-led international forum that certifies countries, companies and safety standards, using access to frontier models and markets as leverage for compliance.

👓 Between the lines: OpenAI, Google and Anthropic already have the lawyers, security teams, government relationships and technical staff to navigate a complex certification process. Startups and open-source developers would face a much steeper climb.

Critics fear this could lead to regulatory capture: Rules written to make AI safer may wind up entrenching the biggest AI companies.

The bottom line: The Wild West era of AI development is officially over. The people with the most money, the most compute and the most to lose from an AI slowdown are the ones lobbying hardest for regulation.

Zachary Basu contributed … Share this column.📝 Read the manifestos: Demis Hassabis … Sam Altman (April preview) … Dario Amodei.
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Hindustan Times: Sachs Live: ‘Don’t Provoke Russia’ Jeffrey Sachs’ Chilling Prediction Goes Viral | Ukraine War. Comment: Ireland hosts the EU for six months; now is time for Ireland to contribute. We need to listen to Professor Jeffrey Sachs advice to the People of Europe, it is pure common sense. Why are we shooting ourselves in the FOOT.

Jul 15, 2026 #JeffreySachs#Russia#Ukraine

As the Russia-Ukraine conflict continues to reshape global politics, economist Jeffrey Sachs’ 2025 speech at the European Parliament has resurfaced and is once again drawing international attention. In this address, Sachs warned Western leaders against provoking Russia, criticized NATO’s eastward expansion, and argued that decades of Western foreign policy had increased tensions with Moscow. He also discussed the concept of “Finlandization,” using Finland as an example of how neutrality once helped maintain stability. This is archival footage from 2025. The views expressed are those of Jeffrey Sachs at the time.

#JeffreySachs#Russia#Ukraine#NATO#EuropeanParliament#RussiaUkraineWar#Geopolitics#ForeignPolicy#jeffreysachs#russia#putin#ukrainewar#nato#europeanparliament#geopolitics#breakingnews#europe#news#ukrainecrisis#Moscow Download the Hindustan Times App from Playstore/App Store for all the latest news & updates. google app store : https://play.google.com/store/apps/de… Apple Store : https://play.google.com/store/apps/de… Add Hindustan Times as your preferred source on Google. Click here: https://www.google.com/preferences/so… Hindustan Times Videos brings all the News for the Global Indian under one umbrella. We break down news from across the globe from the unique lens of a Rising India. Tune in for Explainers, Opinions, Analysis and a 360 degree view of big events in India and the World which impact your present and future.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Professor Jeffrey D. Sachs: Von der Leyen will go down in history as the one who did most damage of any European leaders in history of Self Destruction.

Erik Magnethi

@ErikMagnethi

·

Professor Jeffrey D. Sachs: Von der Leyen will go down in history as the one who did most damage of any European leaders in history of Self Destruction.

https://twitter.com/ErikMagnethi/status/2077525681714442467/video/1

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

History: On July 16, 1945, at 5:29:45 a.m., the Manhattan Project yields explosive results as the first atom bomb is successfully tested in Alamogordo, New Mexico.

The first atomic bomb test is successfully exploded

HISTORY.com Editors

MPI/Getty Images

Published: July 15, 2010Last Updated: May 28, 2025

On July 16, 1945, at 5:29:45 a.m., the Manhattan Project yields explosive results as the first atom bomb is successfully tested in Alamogordo, New Mexico.

Plans for the creation of a uranium bomb by the Allies were established as early as 1939, when Italian emigre physicist Enrico Fermi met with U.S. Navy department officials at Columbia University to discuss the use of fissionable materials for military purposes. That same year, Albert Einstein drafted a letter with the Hungarian-born physicist Leo Szilard and sent it to President Franklin Roosevelt supporting the theory that an uncontrolled nuclear chain reaction had great potential as a basis for a weapon of mass destruction.

In February 1940, the federal government granted a total of $6,000 for research. But in early 1942, with the United States now at war with the Axis powers, and fear mounting that Germany was working on its own uranium bomb, the War Department took a more active interest, and limits on resources for the project were removed.

The Spirit That Built America: The Black Scientists Who Fueled the Manhattan Project

Some of the brightest American minds were called to work on the Manhattan Project, including a number of Black scientists and engineers.

Stream Now

1:01m watch

Brigadier-General Leslie R. Groves, himself an engineer, was now in complete charge of a project to assemble the greatest minds in science and discover how to harness the power of the atom as a means of bringing the war to a decisive end. The Manhattan Project (so-called because of where the research began) would wind its way through many locations during the early period of theoretical exploration, most importantly, the University of Chicago, where Enrico Fermi successfully set off the first fission chain reaction. But the Project took final form in the desert of New Mexico, where, in 1943, J. Robert Oppenheimer began directing Project Y at a laboratory at Los Alamos, along with such minds as Hans Bethe, Edward Teller, and Fermi. Here theory and practice came together, as the problems of achieving critical mass—a nuclear explosion—and the construction of a deliverable bomb were worked out.

Finally, on the morning of July 16, in the New Mexico desert 120 miles south of Santa Fe, the first atomic bomb was detonated. The scientists and a few dignitaries had removed themselves 10,000 yards away to observe as the first mushroom cloud of searing light stretched 40,000 feet into the air and generated the destructive power of 15,000 to 20,000 tons of TNT. The tower on which the bomb sat when detonated was vaporized.

The question now became—on whom was the bomb to be dropped? Germany was the original target, but the Germans had already surrendered. The only belligerent remaining was Japan.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Diary of a CEO:He Risked Everything To Warn You: No One Is Ready For What’s Coming, And The AI Companies Know It! Quote: “OpenAI researcher Daniel Kokotajlo walked away from $2 million rather than stay silent, and now reveals why he believes there’s a 70% chance AI leads to human extinction, why superintelligence could arrive before the end of the decade, and the one plan he thinks could still save us all!”

Jul 13, 2026 New EpisodesEx-

OpenAI researcher Daniel Kokotajlo walked away from $2 million rather than stay silent, and now reveals why he believes there’s a 70% chance AI leads to human extinction, why superintelligence could arrive before the end of the decade, and the one plan he thinks could still save us all! Daniel Kokotajlo is a former OpenAI researcher and one of the world’s leading AI forecasters. He is the founder of the AI Futures Project and the lead author of ‘AI 2027,’ the widely-read scenario mapping the trajectory of artificial intelligence. His follow-up, ‘AI 2040: Plan A,’ sets out how the world could still navigate superintelligence safely. He explains: ■ What he saw inside OpenAI that made him walk away ■ Why the people building AI privately believe it’s coming even sooner than the public is being told ■ What happens if AI becomes powerful enough that humans can no longer control it, and why he puts the odds of catastrophe as high as 70% ■ Why almost every job could be automated, and what that means for the next generation ■ The plan he believes could still lead to abundance and a future worth living in

00:00:00 Intro 00:02:34 Why This AI Mission Could Affect Everyone 00:04:21 Why the Average Person Should Care About AI 00:08:29 Are AI Experts Overreacting or Sounding the Alarm? 00:10:06 Why He Joined OpenAI—and What He Saw Inside 00:13:24 Why He Left OpenAI 00:15:53 What It Was Like Inside OpenAI During ChatGPT’s Launch 00:17:16 The $2 Million NDA Controversy Explained 00:19:30 Is Full AI Automation Coming Faster Than We Think? 00:24:19 The AI 2027 Forecast That Changed the Conversation 00:26:33 AGI vs. Superintelligence: The Difference That Matters 00:27:17 How Robots Could Soon Become Part of Everyday Life 00:30:23 Why AI Works More Like the Human Brain Than You Think 00:36:14 Can AI Ever Be Truly Creative? 00:41:15 What Are the Real Odds of Human Extinction From AI? 00:47:58 What AI Will Do to Jobs 00:54:45 The Skills That Will Still Matter in an AI World 01:00:21 AI 2040: What the Future Could Look Like 01:04:36 The Different Futures AI Could Create 01:09:33 Will AI Become Earth’s Apex Species? 01:13:18 How AI CEOs Really Make Decisions 01:15:37 Will AI Decide the 2028 Election? 01:18:58 Is There a Safe Path to Accelerating AI? 01:22:11 By 2031, AI Could Do 20% of Cognitive Work 01:25:15 Should Everyone Receive AI Dividends? 01:32:41 What It Will Feel Like to Live Through the AI Revolution 01:34:11 How People Find Purpose After AI Replaces Jobs 01:46:12 Would He Shut Down AI Forever If He Could? 01:49:56 What Can We Actually Do About AI? 01:57:25 Is It Already Too Late to Change Course? Follow Daniel: X – https://link.thediaryofaceo.com/47vmwiA Substack – https://link.thediaryofaceo.com/5alnhzB  Read Daniel’s AI predictions: ‘AI 2027’: https://link.thediaryofaceo.com/7W2L8di ‘AI 2040: Plan A’: https://link.thediaryofaceo.com/EFjbRzP AI risk reading list: https://blog.redwoodresearch.org/p/ai… The Diary Of A CEO: ■ Join DOAC circle here – https://doaccircle.com/ ■ Buy The Diary Of A CEO book here – https://smarturl.it/DOACbook ■ The 1% Diary is back – limited time only: https://bit.ly/3YFbJbt ■ The Diary Of A CEO Conversation Cards: https://linkly.link/2hm7r ■ Get email updates – https://bit.ly/diary-of-a-ceo-yt ■ Follow Steven – https://g2ul0.app.link/gnGqL4IsKKb

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Chatham House: NATO in Ankara: Is Europe ready for a Russian attack?

NATO in Ankara: Is Europe ready for a Russian attack?

In this week’s episode of the Independent Thinking podcast, our experts discuss the outcomes of this year’s NATO summit and what it means for the future of the transatlantic relationship.

Audio

Published 10 July 2026 —35 minute listen

Bronwen Maddox

Director and Chief Executive, Chatham House

Galip Dalay

Senior Research Fellow, Middle East and North Africa, Europe and Russia & Eurasia Programmes, Chatham HouseView more authorshttps://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/2356985051&visual=&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=false&show_user=false&show_reposts=false&color=%23ff5500

This year’s NATO summit brought together the leaders of all 32 member states in Ankara. President Donald Trump’s return to the summit brought renewed controversy, with remarks on Greenland and Iran underscoring the geopolitical tensions that continue to test the unity and purpose of the transatlantic alliance. What happened in Ankara and what does it mean for NATO’s future? If the Ukraine conflict winds down, will Russia pivot to test Article Five? And is Britain doing enough to prepare for a potential conflict?

Bronwen Maddox looks at the summit and NATO’s future with special guest General Sir Richard Barrons – former Commander of Joint Forces Command in the UK, now a senior consulting fellow at Chatham House – plus Dr Marion Messmer, director of our International Security Programme, and Galip Dalay who runs Chatham House’s Turkey Initiative.

About Independent Thinking

Independent Thinking is a weekly international affairs podcast hosted by our director Bronwen Maddox, in conversation with leading policymakers, journalists and Chatham House experts providing insight on the latest international issues.

More ways to listen: Apple Podcasts and Spotify.

Explore our other Chatham House podcasts.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Pete Hegseth Ministry of War, U.S. Latest is the acknowledgement of the falling levels of testosterone in males over the age 30. Annual medical test will now include a test for testosterone. Result: Now the fighters and military people will receive steroids … what does this really mean? Men fighting battles with hormones via steroids capable of gaining maximum effect.

https://twitter.com/HatsOffff/status/2077583614640783360/video/1

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Pancjenko on X: Wake up time “The luxurious life of Ukraine’s new Prime Minister Koretsky. Europe and the United States better start opening new credit lines and firing up the printing presses. – Average annual income: 28 MILLION dollars.” Quote: “While the West is “fighting Putin,” in Kyiv the only real battle is who can stuff their suitcases first before the next aid tranche arrives. Get your wallets ready, dear “partners.””

@Panchenko_X

The luxurious life of Ukraine’s new Prime Minister Koretsky. Europe and the United States better start opening new credit lines and firing up the printing presses.

– Average annual income: 28 MILLION dollars.

– 17 land plots, elite apartments and mansions.

– Millions of dollars in cash, accounts in European banks: Cite Gestion, Banco Santander and Caixa Banc.

– Premium cars: Maserati Levante, Range Rover, Mercedes, BMW. – Dozens of luxury watches: Rolex, Patek Philippe, Breguet, Ulysse Nardin.

– Jewelry from Cartier, Tiffany, Van Cleef & Arpels.

– Bags from Hermes, Chanel, Chopard.

While the West is “fighting Putin,” in Kyiv the only real battle is who can stuff their suitcases first before the next aid tranche arrives. Get your wallets ready, dear “partners.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Massimo: Music rewires the Brain. Quote: Clinics now test its power: seizures quiet in epilepsy, gait steadies in Parkinson’s, memories flicker back in Alzheimer’s, mood lifts in depression.

Massimo

@Rainmaker1973

·

Your brain responds to music like it’s a survival tool.

When music plays, almost the entire brain ignites. The motor cortex drives your body to the beat. The hippocampus ties melodies to memories. The amygdala unleashes waves of feeling. And in the orbitofrontal cortex—the brain’s reward and decision hub—the same circuitry that flares in OCD lights up with music’s cycles of tension and release.

This overlap is no coincidence. It reveals how music hijacks our predictive wiring: we anticipate, we tense, we resolve, and dopamine floods in with relief and joy. The roots run deep. Early mammals survived by parsing every rustle; today that vigilance fuels standing ovations, film scores, and sing-alongs.

In a crowd, heartbeats lock step. Strangers become kin. Music binds. Clinics now test its power: seizures quiet in epilepsy, gait steadies in Parkinson’s, memories flicker back in Alzheimer’s, mood lifts in depression. Even patients who no longer recognize a tune can still feel its pull.We aren’t merely equipped to hear music—we’re hardwired to crave it.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment