Search
Breadcrumb
Scientists Create First-Ever ‘Smell Map’
A detailed diagram of smell receptors in the nose fills in missing details of how olfaction works
Research 4 min read
By CATHERINE CARUSO April 28, 2026
At a glance
- Scientists have created the first detailed map of smell receptors in the nose, catching up with similar achievements in sight, hearing, and touch.
- The map reveals that smell receptors are highly organized into tight bands based on type.
- The findings provide foundational knowledge needed to develop better therapies for loss of smell.
The future of federally funded research at Harvard Medical School — supported by taxpayers and done in service to humanity — remains uncertain. Learn more.
For most of us, the sense of smell is an integral part of everyday life; it plays a critical role in providing information about our surroundings, alerting us to potential dangers, enhancing our sense of taste, and evoking emotions and memories.
Yet from a scientific perspective, “olfaction is super-mysterious,” said Sandeep (Robert) Datta, professor of neurobiology in the Blavatnik Institute at Harvard Medical School, with basic biological understanding lagging behind that of vision, hearing, and touch.
Working in mice, Datta and his team have now created the first detailed map of how the thousand-plus types of smell receptors in the nose are organized.
They discovered that unlike what scientists had long believed, the neurons expressing these receptors have a high degree of spatial organization: They form horizontal stripes based on receptor type from the top of the nose to the bottom.
“Our results bring order to a system that was previously thought to lack order, which changes conceptually how we think this works,” said Datta, senior author of the study.
Moreover, the researchers established that the receptor map in the nose matches up with smell maps in the olfactory bulb of the brain, providing clues about how information moves from the nose to the brain.
While the smell map is an exciting discovery in its own right, Datta said, it also provides foundational information that could help scientists develop therapies for loss of smell, which are currently lacking.
“We cannot fix smell without understanding how it works on a basic level,” he said.
The findings published April 28 in Cell.
A missing map
Maps have long existed that describe how receptors in the eye, ear, and skin are organized to capture and interpret auditory, visual, and touch information — and scientists have figured how these maps correspond with those inside the brain.
However, “olfaction has been the one exception; it’s the sense that has been missing a map for the longest time,” Datta said.
This is in part because it is more complicated than the other senses. Mice, for example, have around 20 million olfactory neurons that express more than a thousand types of smell receptors, compared with only three main types of visual receptors for color vision. Each type of smell receptor detects a unique subset of odor molecules.
Scientists first began identifying smell receptor types in 1991. Over the next 35 years, researchers investigated whether there was a smell map in the nose. However, they could only observe that receptors tended to be expressed in one of a handful of zones in olfactory tissue. This led to the prevailing theory that receptor expression was largely random, meaning that smell was unlike the other senses.
Datta had been studying various aspects of olfaction, including what causes loss of smell in COVID-19 and how the brain organizes information about odors. As genetic techniques became more powerful, he and colleagues decided to revisit the idea of building a smell map.
An organizational structure, unveiled
In their new study, the researchers combined single-cell sequencing and spatial transcriptomics techniques to examine around 5.5 million neurons in more than 300 individual mice. The first technique allowed them to identify which smell receptors were expressed by neurons in the nose, and the second let them determine the locations of those receptors.
“This is now arguably the most sequenced neural tissue ever, but we needed that scale of data in order to understand the system,” Datta said.
They discovered that the neurons are organized into tight, overlapping, horizontal stripes from the top of the nose to the bottom based on the type of smell receptor they express. This highly organized receptor map was consistent across the mice and mirrored the organization of smell maps in the brain, just like researchers have observed in vision, hearing, and touch.
The researchers then investigated how the smell map in the nose forms and identified retinoic acid — a molecule that helps control gene activity — as a key driver. They found that a gradient of retinoic acid in the nose guided each neuron to express the correct type of smell receptor based on its spatial location. Adding or removing retinoic acid caused the receptor map to shift up or down.
“We show that development can achieve this feat of organizing a thousand different smell receptors into an incredibly precise map that’s consistent across animals,” Datta said.
A separate study led by the lab of Catherine Dulac, the Xander University Professor in the Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology at Harvard University, that published in the same issue of Cell had consistent findings.
Much-needed knowledge
Now, the researchers are exploring why the receptor stripes are in this specific order.
The team is also studying smell receptors in human tissue to understand to what degree the smell map is consistent across species. Such understanding will inform efforts to develop treatments — such as stem cell therapies or brain-computer interfaces — for loss of smell and its consequences, which include an increased risk of depression.
“Smell has a really profound and pervasive effect on human health, so restoring it is not just for pleasure and safety but also for psychological well-being,” Datta said. “Without understanding this map, we’re doomed to fail in developing new treatments.”
Authorship, funding, disclosures
Additional authors on the paper include David Brann, Tatsuya Tsukahara, Cyrus Tau, Dennis Kalloor, Rylin Lubash, Lakshanyaa Kannan, Nell Klimpert, Mihaly Kollo, Martin Escamilla-Del-Arenal, Bogdan Bintu, Andreas Schaefer, Alexander Fleischmann, and Thomas Bozza.
Funding for the research was provided by the National Institutes of Health (grants R01DC021669, R01DC021422, R01DC021965, and F31DC019017), the Yang Tan Collective at Harvard, and a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship.
canisgallicus 