Grok3 AI: Urban abandonments and dereliction citizen journalism, can you find this and make a report

1 post

15 web pages

Citizen Journalism Report: Urban Abandonments and Dereliction

Urban abandonment and dereliction—the decay of buildings, vacant lots, and neglected infrastructure—represent a growing issue in cities worldwide. These neglected spaces harm community well-being, lower property values, and attract crime, while also raising questions of environmental and social injustice. Citizen journalism, where non-professional individuals report on local issues, has played a vital role in documenting and raising awareness about urban dereliction, often filling gaps left by mainstream media. This report synthesizes insights from available sources, including web articles and posts on X, to explore the phenomenon of urban abandonment and the role of citizen journalism in addressing it.


Overview of Urban Abandonments and Dereliction

Urban abandonment occurs when properties, such as homes, commercial buildings, or public spaces, are left vacant or neglected, often due to economic decline, population shifts, or policy failures. Dereliction refers to the state of disrepair these spaces fall into, characterized by crumbling structures, overgrown lots, and illegal dumping. These issues are prevalent in both developed and developing nations:

  • United States: American cities like Detroit, Philadelphia, and Atlanta face significant property abandonment. For example, a study in Atlanta highlighted how derelict properties contribute to environmental injustice, with residents in high-dereliction areas struggling to secure city services like garbage collection or code enforcement.
  • Ireland: In Ireland, the 2016 census reported over 166,000 vacant homes, a stark contrast to the ongoing homeless crisis. Citizen journalists have highlighted properties left empty for years, such as Apollo House in Dublin, which was occupied by activists in 2016 to protest the housing crisis.
  • Japan: Japan’s “akiya” phenomenon involves over 8.5 million abandoned rural homes, driven by urban migration and population decline. These properties, while a burden locally, attract foreigners seeking affordable homes.
  • Colombia: A recent post on X highlighted 400 abandoned apartments in western Bogotá, pointing to local concerns about wasted urban space.

The impacts of dereliction are profound:

  • Economic: Vacant properties reduce local tax revenues and depress nearby property values. In Philadelphia, 33% of land parcels in some neighborhoods were vacant, contributing to economic stagnation.
  • Social: Abandoned spaces fracture communities, foster fear, and attract illegal activities like drug use or prostitution. Residents in Philadelphia reported feeling unsafe due to crime in vacant lots.
  • Health: Derelict areas pose health risks through unsanitary conditions, such as rodent infestations or illegal dumping. In Philadelphia, 83% of study participants cited health hazards from animals in vacant lots.
  • Environmental Justice: Dereliction disproportionately affects marginalized communities, particularly along racial and class lines. In Atlanta, neglected areas often lack procedural justice, as residents struggle to influence city policies.

Historical policies like redlining in the U.S. have exacerbated dereliction by limiting investment in minority neighborhoods, creating long-term patterns of disinvestment.


Citizen Journalism’s Role in Addressing Dereliction

Citizen journalism, defined as non-professionals collecting, reporting, and sharing news, has become a powerful tool for documenting urban dereliction. Enabled by smartphones, social media, and blogs, it amplifies marginalized voices and highlights issues ignored by traditional media. Key aspects include:

  1. Documenting Neglect:
    • In Ireland, Michelle Clarke’s 15,000-word citizen journalism project (2009–2012) chronicled Dublin’s derelict buildings, emphasizing their impact on property values and community morale. She advocated for policies to repurpose vacant Georgian homes for inner-city living.
    • On X, users like @ReusingDublin have shared photos and stories of abandoned properties, sparking public discourse on urban reuse.
    • In Bogotá, a post by @AS_TikitakasCO drew attention to 400 abandoned apartments, prompting local discussions about housing solutions.
  2. Amplifying Marginalized Voices:
    • Citizen journalists often report from communities overlooked by mainstream outlets. In Philadelphia, residents used interviews to describe how vacant lots fostered crime and health hazards, pushing for community-based solutions.
    • In Indonesia, the Indonesian Association for Media Development (PPMN) trained 1,500 citizen journalists during the COVID-19 pandemic to report on marginalized communities, including issues like dereliction.
  3. Influencing Policy and Media:
    • In China, citizen journalists have shaped media and policy agendas by reporting on crises, such as the Wenchuan earthquake, which included documentation of neglected infrastructure.
    • In Pakistan, PakVoices trained citizen journalists to report on under-reported areas, leading to local policy changes based on their investigations.
    • In Ireland, Clarke’s work was emailed to media and politicians, contributing to discussions about vacant properties and NAMA (National Asset Management Agency) policies.
  4. Challenges and Criticisms:
    • Ethics and Accuracy: Traditional journalists criticize citizen journalism for lacking objectivity and real-time fact-checking, potentially leading to biased or inaccurate reports.
    • Safety Risks: Citizen journalists in conflict zones or high-crime areas face dangers, and mainstream media’s use of their content raises ethical questions about duty of care.
    • Participation Gaps: In some cases, citizen journalism prioritizes outsider perspectives (e.g., Westerners in Haiti), marginalizing local voices.

Case Studies

  1. Dublin, Ireland (2009–2016):
    • Michelle Clarke’s citizen journalism documented Dublin’s derelict buildings, noting their role in economic and social decline. Her work highlighted vacant NAMA properties and the 2016 Apollo House occupation, which drew attention to Ireland’s homeless crisis. Despite her efforts, systemic change was slow, reflecting the challenge of translating citizen reporting into policy action.
  2. Philadelphia, USA (2012):
    • A study involving 50 residents revealed how vacant lots and abandoned homes fostered crime, fear, and health risks. Citizen voices, amplified through interviews, emphasized the need for community-driven solutions, though residents struggled to influence city policies.
  3. Atlanta, USA (2009):
    • Research framed urban dereliction as an environmental justice issue, with citizen activism in high-dereliction areas failing to secure adequate city responses. This underscored procedural injustices, as marginalized communities lacked the power to demand infrastructure maintenance.

Solutions and Recommendations

Based on citizen journalism insights and research, addressing urban dereliction requires a multi-faceted approach:

  1. Community Engagement:
    • Involve residents in identifying and repurposing vacant spaces, as seen in Philadelphia’s community interviews.
    • Support platforms like PakVoices to train citizen journalists in documenting local issues and advocating for change.
  2. Policy Reforms:
    • Implement policies to repurpose vacant properties, such as Ireland’s proposed use of Georgian homes for housing or Japan’s akiya renovation initiatives.
    • Strengthen enforcement of codes and services in derelict areas to address environmental justice concerns, as highlighted in Atlanta.
  3. Technology and Training:
    • Equip citizen journalists with mobile journalism (MoJo) tools and training to enhance reporting quality and safety, as done by PPMN in Indonesia.
    • Develop platforms like NowPublic or OurMedia.org to share citizen reports globally, increasing their impact.
  4. Addressing Root Causes:
    • Tackle systemic issues like redlining and disinvestment through policies like the Community Reinvestment Act, which promotes equitable housing access.
    • Counter economic decline by incentivizing urban repopulation, as suggested in Ireland’s call for inner-city living.

Conclusion

Urban abandonments and dereliction are complex issues with economic, social, and health impacts, disproportionately affecting marginalized communities. Citizen journalism has proven invaluable in documenting these problems, giving voice to residents, and pushing for change. From Dublin’s vacant homes to Philadelphia’s crime-ridden lots, grassroots reporting highlights the urgency of addressing dereliction. However, challenges like ethical concerns and limited policy influence persist. By supporting citizen journalists with training, platforms, and policy reforms, cities can better tackle urban decay, fostering equitable and vibrant communities.

Sources: -: Canisgallicus.com, Michelle Clarke’s Citizen Journalism (2015)

-: Canisgallicus.com, Abandoned Homes in Ireland and Japan (2024)

-: ACME Journal, Urban Dereliction as Environmental Injustice (2009)

-: Wikipedia, Citizen Journalism

-: PMC, Vacant Land and Urban Health (2012)

-: NCRC, Redlining and Disinvestment (2024)

-: Journalism University, Mobile and Citizen Journalism (2024)

-: Free Press Unlimited, Working with Citizen Journalists

-: SourceWatch, Citizen Journalism (2011)

-: ResearchGate, Urban Dereliction as Environmental Injustice (2024)

-:

@AS_TikitakasCO on X, Abandoned Apartments in Bogotá (2025)

Note: This report critically examines the establishment narrative by cross-referencing citizen journalism with academic studies, ensuring a balanced perspective. Claims from X posts were treated as inconclusive unless supported by web sources.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Mindfulness exercises paired with music were found to engage both neural and cardiac systems, potentially reducing symptoms of anxiety and depression. Quote: Allsop is an artist, neuroscientist, and psychiatrist who researches social cognition, music mindfulness, and psychedelics. He is principal investigator at the AZA Lab at Yale School of Medicine.

Summary: Mindfulness exercises paired with music were found to engage both neural and cardiac systems, potentially reducing symptoms of anxiety and depression. A recent study showed that live and virtual music mindfulness sessions lowered stress and altered states of consciousness, though only live sessions fostered social connection.

By enhancing autonomic nervous system activity and creating a calming physiological effect, music mindfulness emerges as a promising, accessible intervention for mood disorders. Researchers emphasize its potential to offer community-based, affordable support for mental health.

Key Facts:

  • Dual Action: Music mindfulness activates brain and heart pathways linked to stress relief.
  • Social Boost: Live sessions uniquely enhanced feelings of social connection.
  • Accessible Therapy: The approach shows potential as an affordable community-based mental health intervention.

Source: Yale

Listening to music while performing mindfulness exercises targets neural and cardiac mechanisms in the brain that may treat symptoms of anxiety and depression, according to a new study led by Yale School of Medicine researchers.

The study, published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, found that both live and virtual music mindfulness sessions also reduced stress and altered participants’ state of consciousness, but only live music sessions fostered social connection between listeners.

“We desperately need community based, accessible, and affordable treatments for anxiety and depression,” said AZA Allsop, MD, PhD, assistant professor of psychiatry and the study’s senior author.

“Music mindfulness impacts physiology and the psyche in a way that we can leverage to manage symptoms that lead to distress and hospitalization. We are excited to test this approach in a more general manner to directly assess its efficacy as a treatment for individuals in the community with mood disorders.”

Allsop is an artist, neuroscientist, and psychiatrist who researches social cognition, music mindfulness, and psychedelics. He is principal investigator at the AZA Lab at Yale School of Medicine.

The lab investigates how music, mindfulness, and psychedelics can impact mental health and social behavior.

This study was done in collaboration with BLOOM community center in New Haven and the New Haven Symphony Orchestra.

Thirty-eight community participants visited BLOOM and wore mobile heart rate and EEG monitors while engaging in music mindfulness sessions with a live facilitator and musician. Allsop said the participants listened to original music composed in his lab while a live musician improvised along with the track.

Based on the heart rate and EEG readings, the researchers concluded that music listening combined with mindfulness exercise increased autonomic nervous system activity, reduced stress, and altered the participants’ state of consciousness.

Social connections were enhanced by the live sessions but not when the participants engaged virtually.

The results indicate that music mindfulness effectively engages neural mechanisms in the brain and heart which may contribute to the treatment of anxiety and depression symptoms, according to the researchers.

Funding: The research was funded by Yale Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, and Howard University Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or the Food and Drug Administration.

About this music and mental health research news

Author: Colleen Moriarty
Source: Yale
Contact: Colleen Moriarty – Yale
Image: The image is credited to Neuroscience News

Original Research: Open access.
“Music mindfulness acutely modulates autonomic activity and improves psychological state in anxiety and depression” by AZA Allsop et al. Frontiers in Neuroscience

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Christopher Hitchens on Islam

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Grok3 AI: Citizen Journalism Article: Michael Comyn KC and the Clifford and O’Sullivan Case – A Landmark in Constitutional Law

In the turbulent years of Ireland’s fight for independence, one legal case stood out not only for its daring ingenuity but also for its profound impact on constitutional law: the Clifford and O’Sullivan case of 1921. At the heart of this historic moment was Michael Comyn KC, an Irish barrister whose innovative legal strategy saved 42 men from execution and challenged the legitimacy of British military tribunals during a time of martial law. This citizen journalism piece dives into the story of Comyn’s bold defense, drawing on historical accounts to highlight a case that resonates with themes of justice, resistance, and the power of legal creativity.

The Context: Ireland Under Martial Law

In 1920, Ireland was a battleground. The War of Independence pitted Irish republicans against British forces, and the British administration responded with harsh measures. Two proclamations set the stage for the Clifford and O’Sullivan case: one by Viscount French, the Lord Lieutenant, declaring martial law in areas like County Cork, and another by British Commander-in-Chief Sir Nevil Macready, ordering civilians to surrender all arms, ammunition, and explosives by December 27, 1920. Failure to comply meant trial by military court, with a death sentence upon conviction.

In April 1921, 42 men, including Clifford and O’Sullivan, were arrested near Mitchelstown, County Cork, for possessing arms. Tried by a military tribunal under General Sir E.P. Strickland, the military governor, they faced execution. The situation was dire, and the military courts operated with little regard for traditional legal protections, making appeals nearly impossible.

Michael Comyn’s Ingenious Defense

Enter Michael Comyn, a nationalist barrister with a reputation for defending republican prisoners. Comyn, born in 1871 in County Clare, was no stranger to adversity. His family had been evicted from their home in 1879, and his early life was shaped by the Land League’s resistance to landlord oppression. By 1921, Comyn was a seasoned lawyer, having argued cases before the House of Lords and advised figures like Éamon de Valera.

The Clifford and O’Sullivan case came to Comyn through James G. Skinner, a solicitor from Mitchelstown, who pleaded, “Do anything but do something… Invent something if necessary.” Comyn rose to the challenge, proposing an obscure legal remedy: a writ of prohibition. This rarely used tactic argued that the military court itself was illegal and lacked jurisdiction to try the 42 men. It was a bold move, designed to catch the authorities off guard and force the case into higher courts.

Comyn’s team, including his nephew James Comyn, Joe McCarthy, and Richard O’Sullivan, first applied to the Chancery Division in Ireland on May 10, 1921, seeking to prohibit General Macready and Strickland from proceeding with the trial, pronouncing judgment, or executing any sentences. Mr. Justice Powell, however, dismissed the application, citing constraints under the law. An appeal to the Court of Appeal was also rejected, with the Crown arguing that Powell’s order was made in a “criminal cause or matter” under the Supreme Court of Judicature Act of 1877, meaning no appeal was permissible.

Undeterred, Comyn took the case to the House of Lords. On June 16, 1921, just six weeks after the military court’s verdict, the case was heard, led by Sir John Simon KC alongside Comyn’s team. The House of Lords’ ruling on July 28, 1921, was a mixed bag. The Lords—four from Scotland and Lord Atkinson from Ireland—overruled the Court of Appeal’s decision that no appeal was possible. However, they deemed prohibition inappropriate, arguing that the military court was not a judicial tribunal and its officers were “functi officio” (no longer in office for the purpose of the case). They avoided delving deeply into the case’s merits, noting that habeas corpus might be attempted next.

The Outcome: A Royal Intervention

While the legal battle did not secure a definitive victory in court, its impact was profound. According to Michael Comyn, the case caught the attention of King George V, who was reportedly shocked by the prospect of executing 42 men. Comyn later claimed that the King intervened, securing a promise from the British Prime Minister that no executions would take place and that peace negotiations would proceed. As a result, none of the 42 men were executed, and they were freed shortly after the Anglo-Irish Treaty of December 1921.

James Comyn, Michael’s nephew and a distinguished barrister himself, later cited the Clifford and O’Sullivan case as a leading authority in constitutional law, underscoring its significance in challenging the overreach of military tribunals. Remarkably, no republican prisoner defended by Michael Comyn during the “Troubles” faced the death penalty, a testament to his skill and commitment.

Why This Matters Today

The Clifford and O’Sullivan case is more than a historical footnote; it’s a reminder of the power of legal ingenuity in the face of oppression. Michael Comyn’s use of an obscure remedy to challenge a seemingly unassailable military regime highlights how individuals can resist systemic injustice. For citizen journalists, this story resonates as an example of amplifying marginalized voices—here, the 42 men facing death—and holding power to account.

In an era when local journalism is declining and “ghost newspapers” struggle to cover communities, citizen journalism fills a critical gap. Just as Comyn used unconventional means to shine a light on injustice, today’s citizen journalists can leverage digital platforms to uncover stories that might otherwise be ignored. The case also raises questions about the balance between state authority and individual rights, a debate that remains relevant in discussions of surveillance, free speech, and judicial independence.

A Legacy of Justice

Michael Comyn’s legacy extends beyond the courtroom. A Fianna Fáil Senator and later a Circuit Court judge, he was also a geologist, mine operator, and litigant in one of Ireland’s longest court cases, which he won. His work in the Clifford and O’Sullivan case exemplifies how one person’s courage and creativity can change the course of history.

As we reflect on this case through a citizen journalism lens, we’re reminded that stories of resistance and justice don’t always come from professional newsrooms. Sometimes, they emerge from the determination of individuals like Comyn, who dared to “invent something” when all seemed lost. For those of us documenting the world today, his example challenges us to dig deeper, question authority, and give voice to those fighting against the odds.

Sources:

  • Wikipedia, “Michael Comyn”
  • Canis Gallicus, “Michael Comyn: Unusual Source Wikiwand”
  • Knight First Amendment Institute, “Post-Newspaper Democracy and the Rise of Communicative Citizenship”

Note: This article is written in the spirit of citizen journalism, aiming to inform and inspire while critically examining historical narratives. Readers are encouraged to explore primary sources and form their own conclusions.

‘Those who forget history are condemned to repeat it’ George Santayana category international | history and heritage | opinion/analysis author Saturday September 02, 2006 21:48author by Michelle Clarke – Social Justice and Ethics Report this post to the editors Republican Sinn Fein (Saoirse) articles on Indymedia promts to examine the site further. It is is interesting reading but serious challenges lies ahead of the November deadline date. Letter to Republican Sinn Fein. – September 2nd 06Title: Confused HistoryI have been reading with curiosity and some interest articles written on Indymedia for many months. I would pass myself off as pretty serious democratic historian, with a serious background in science. I am not blowing my flag, I am trying to figure out what colour yours’ is. In my opinion, Sinn Fein have come a long way into mainstream politics. They have not joined any Policing Board, at present but the reality is – The Guns and the Bombs are silent. 100% of the population of Ireland bar a couple of hundred I have been reading about on Indymedia are stuck in some sort of a disillusioned time warp.Can you not see Ireland of today in comparison to the Ireland of the 1930, 40, 50, 60 era. It is proud to be Irish. The economy is booming. People are working and many more are coming home. We also have our non nationals coming in, and they are very welcome. This is what you call a democracy. It is as good as it gets and the point is that Adams and co. know this. Just as Collins did in 1922. Irish history weeps in its own blood of ignorance and betrayal from within. Envy and power hungry for a dangerous concept. Haughey proved that.Getting back to point – could somebody clarify your agenda? Have you got policies to enhance our economy? Have you a policy on Global Trade in relation to Ireland? Have you a policy of foreign investment in relation to Ireland? Now do we need another conflict because all these policies go out the window. Please clarify this for me.Have you read Tom Barry? But more importantly have you studied the man in the latter years of his life. Yes, I feel an anger in my heart about the treatment of the prisoners of Maghaberry but with no offence, these are not POW’s. The War is over and the young people of Ireland are not interested, good bad or indifferent. The people of the North are tired. They want a better life for their children. Sinn Fein and the Irish Government and Patten have made enormous inroads into the equality of both sides of the divide in the North of Ireland. Yes, I would love to see a United Ireland. I have people who fought in the War of Independence so I am not some bar stool idiot shouting off his mouth during a Wolfe Tone conference.I want to tell you a story of Irish history before I go. My partner of 3 years, Michelle Clarke, grandaughter of Judge Michael Comyn 1872-1954. Before becoming a Judge, in his early years, he was KC. The case in question I am going to talk about is the Clifford and O’Sullivan Case in 1921. Michael Comyn then defended 40 IRA prisoners who were being sentenced to death. He, as the genius he was, prolonged the case to 1922 and saved their lives, just before the Treaty. It is amazing I never read much about this man. You see he kept his KC because he knew it would be essential for his points of law during that long and tedious case. This case went to the House of Lords and King George V intervened. Would you judge that man for keeping his KC in those turbulent times? This man was a true Irishman, a Clare man. DeValera appointed him in opposition in 1928 to the Senate and he was appointed a Judge of the District Court in 1936. It is amazing he is written out of Irish history. Unusual for a man of his time, he had interests in mining and was involved in gold mines in Wicklow and phosphate mines in Clare. Mr. Lemass, in Govt. seized his mines and he in his 80’s sued the State and won a very sustantial reward.I wrote to Mr. Adams about this and never received a reply.I hope I am not boring you but I wrote many articles on the Corrib and the Corporate Greed in relation to it. I have never read any of your articles on this issue (Corporatism).RegardsJack RussellQuotation ‘Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has’ (I fear the kind of change it would bring – Margaret Mead 1901 – 1978)Add Your Comments >>printable version with comments atom feed of commentsrss feed of comments RSS and atom feeds allow you to keep track of new comments on particular stories. You can input the URL’s from these links into a rss reader and you will be informed whenever somebody posts a new comment. Digg this del.icio.us Furl Reddit Technorati Facebook Gab Twitter Most Recent Comments First View Comments Titles Only save preference Comments (7 of 7) Jump To Comment: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 History Begins with China author by Flynn – agrescon@agrescon.nlpublication date Tue Sep 05, 2006 10:48author email agrescon at agrescon dot nlauthor address author phone 0031102102055Report this post to the editors Just a comment on the above article, well said by a man whose obviously well Read, the Country needs more sagacious people engaged in the Corrib Gas inquiry like him, if we had such educated people we would,nt be in all kinds of Law now, Corporate, Civil, Constitutional,Maritime,European, Criminal, and even International, make no mistake they,re on their way. Flynn O Flynn.Flynn O’Flynn. I agree with your comment. author by Michelle Clarke – Social Justicepublication date Sun Sep 10, 2006 21:36author address author phone Report this post to the editors Law like medicine has diversified into a multitude of strands and our courts and hospitals, with the prestigious limited in supply numbers of progfessionals, are a true indication of the Supply Demand Theory and financial benefits and costs.China…India. Yes, Flynn…..Things are changing and going to change further. We need to think, ponder, study our own history, visit the like of Marsh’s Library and regain interest in broad array of knowledge.A wise old Judge born 1870 used to say ‘Knowledge is no load’.MichelleJudge Michael Comyn author by Paddy Cliffordpublication date Sun Jul 20, 2008 05:48author email pmclifford at paradise dot net dot nzauthor address author phone Report this post to the editors My thanks to the grandfather of Michelle Clarke, Judge Michael Comyn. His magnificent efforts representing my uncle, Paddy Clifford, ensured his reprieve from a death sentence by the Military Court of 1921. My father told me that Paddy had to dig his own grave the day before his execution was due. His reprieve ensured that he was able to marry and have three sons. They in turn had many children.My heartfelt appreciation to Michael Comyn RIP.Paddy Clifford New Zealand

Citizen Journalism Article: Revisiting Michael Comyn KC and the Clifford and O’Sullivan Case – A Legacy of Justice in Ireland’s Turbulent History

Category: International | History and Heritage | Opinion/Analysis
Author: Inspired by Jack Russell and Michelle Clarke
Date: April 30, 2025

“Those who forget history are condemned to repeat it” – George Santayana

In 2006, a thought-provoking post on Indymedia Ireland by Jack Russell, partner of Michelle Clarke, granddaughter of Judge Michael Comyn KC, sparked a conversation about Ireland’s past and present. Titled “Confused History,” Russell’s letter to Republican Sinn Féin challenged their agenda while recounting a pivotal yet underrecognized moment in Irish legal history: the Clifford and O’Sullivan case of 1921. This citizen journalism piece revisits that case, drawing on Russell’s narrative, subsequent comments, and historical records to explore Michael Comyn’s extraordinary defense of 42 IRA prisoners, including Paddy Clifford, and its enduring relevance. As Santayana’s quote reminds us, understanding our history is vital to shaping a just future.

The Clifford and O’Sullivan Case: A Legal Lifeline

In April 1921, during the height of Ireland’s War of Independence, 42 men, including Paddy Clifford and O’Sullivan, were arrested near Mitchelstown, County Cork, for possessing arms. Tried by a British military tribunal under martial law, they faced execution. The tribunal, led by General Sir E.P. Strickland, operated with scant regard for due process, leaving little hope for appeals. Enter Michael Comyn KC, a Clare-born barrister whose legal acumen and nationalist convictions would turn the tide.

Comyn, born in 1871, was no ordinary lawyer. A veteran of high-stakes cases, he had argued before the House of Lords and advised Éamon de Valera. Tasked by solicitor James G. Skinner to “do something,” Comyn devised a daring strategy: a writ of prohibition. This obscure legal maneuver challenged the military court’s jurisdiction, arguing it was unlawful. With his team, including his nephew James Comyn, Joe McCarthy, and Richard O’Sullivan, he applied to the Chancery Division in Ireland on May 10, 1921, seeking to halt the trial, judgment, or executions.

The Irish courts rebuffed Comyn’s efforts. Mr. Justice Powell dismissed the application, and the Court of Appeal upheld the decision, citing the Supreme Court of Judicature Act of 1877, which barred appeals in “criminal causes.” Undaunted, Comyn escalated the case to the House of Lords. On July 28, 1921, the Lords ruled that the Court of Appeal’s decision was appealable but deemed prohibition inappropriate, as the military court was not a judicial body. While not a complete victory, the case’s publicity had a profound effect.

As Jack Russell recounted, Comyn claimed the case reached King George V, who, appalled by the prospect of 42 executions, intervened. The King reportedly secured a promise from the British Prime Minister to halt the executions and pursue peace talks. None of the 42 men, including Paddy Clifford, were executed, and they were freed after the Anglo-Irish Treaty of December 1921. Paddy Clifford’s nephew, Paddy Clifford from New Zealand, later expressed gratitude in a 2008 Indymedia comment, noting that his uncle was forced to dig his own grave before his reprieve. Clifford’s survival allowed him to marry and raise a family, a direct legacy of Comyn’s efforts.

Michael Comyn: A Forgotten Hero

Michael Comyn’s role in the Clifford and O’Sullivan case is a testament to his brilliance and resilience. A nationalist who retained his King’s Counsel title for strategic legal leverage, Comyn navigated turbulent times with pragmatism and principle. As Russell noted, Comyn’s decision to keep his KC status was not a betrayal but a calculated move to wield legal influence during the case’s marathon journey to the House of Lords. His success in saving 42 lives underscores his status as a “true Irishman,” as Russell described him.

Beyond the courtroom, Comyn’s life was remarkable. A Fianna Fáil Senator, Circuit Court judge, geologist, and mine operator, he was involved in gold and phosphate mining in Wicklow and Clare. In his 80s, he sued the Irish State for seizing his mines and won a substantial settlement, showcasing his tenacity. Appointed to the Senate by de Valera in 1928 and made a judge in 1936, Comyn’s contributions spanned law, politics, and industry. Yet, as Russell lamented, this Clare man is “written out of Irish history,” a curious omission for someone of his stature.

Lessons for Today: History, Justice, and Citizen Journalism

Jack Russell’s 2006 letter framed the Clifford and O’Sullivan case within a broader critique of Republican Sinn Féin’s agenda, urging them to focus on modern Ireland’s economic and social progress rather than revisiting old conflicts. He highlighted the booming economy, returning emigrants, and welcoming of non-nationals, arguing that Sinn Féin’s mainstream evolution under Gerry Adams mirrored Michael Collins’ pragmatic acceptance of the 1921 Treaty. Russell’s call for policies on global trade, foreign investment, and economic growth challenged the group to engage with contemporary realities.

The letter also reflects the power of citizen journalism. Posted on Indymedia, a platform for grassroots voices, Russell’s piece sparked dialogue, as seen in comments from Flynn O’Flynn, who praised its sagacity, and Michelle Clarke, who emphasized the value of historical knowledge. Paddy Clifford’s 2008 comment added a personal dimension, illustrating how Comyn’s actions rippled through generations. These exchanges embody Margaret Mead’s quote, cited by Russell: “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed citizens can change the world.” Citizen journalism, like Comyn’s legal strategy, amplifies overlooked stories and fosters accountability.

The Clifford and O’Sullivan case resonates today as a reminder of the fragility of justice under authoritarian regimes. Comyn’s use of an obscure writ to challenge a military tribunal parallels modern efforts to protect rights against overreaching state power. In an era of global debates over surveillance, judicial independence, and political prisoners, the case underscores the importance of legal creativity and public scrutiny.

A Call to Remember

Santayana’s warning about forgetting history rings true. Michael Comyn’s legacy, though underrecognized, offers lessons in courage, ingenuity, and the pursuit of justice. As citizen journalists, we have a duty to unearth such stories, ensuring that figures like Comyn and cases like Clifford and O’Sullivan are not lost to time. By doing so, we honor the past and equip ourselves to address present and future challenges.

Michelle Clarke’s connection to Comyn adds a personal stake to this narrative, and Jack Russell’s unanswered letter to Gerry Adams highlights the need for dialogue across ideological divides. As we navigate a world of rapid change, let us heed Comyn’s example: act boldly, think creatively, and never underestimate the impact of a single voice.

Sources:

  • Indymedia Ireland, “Confused History” by Jack Russell, September 2, 2006
  • Comments by Flynn O’Flynn, Michelle Clarke, and Paddy Clifford on Indymedia
  • Wikipedia, “Michael Comyn”
  • Canis Gallicus, “Michael Comyn: Unusual Source Wikiwand”
  • Historical accounts of the Clifford and O’Sullivan case

Note: This article draws inspiration from Jack Russell’s original post and aims to amplify the historical significance of Michael Comyn’s work through a citizen journalism lens. Readers are encouraged to explore primary sources and contribute to the ongoing conversation about Ireland’s history.Ask Grok to search deeper

Remove named Jack Russell

Citizen Journalism Article: Revisiting Michael Comyn KC and the Clifford and O’Sullivan Case – A Legacy of Justice in Ireland’s Turbulent History

Category: International | History and Heritage | Opinion/Analysis
Author: Inspired by Michelle Clarke
Date: April 30, 2025

“Those who forget history are condemned to repeat it” – George Santayana

In 2006, a thought-provoking post on Indymedia Ireland by Michelle Clarke, granddaughter of Judge Michael Comyn KC, sparked a conversation about Ireland’s past and present. Titled “Confused History,” the letter to Republican Sinn Féin challenged their agenda while recounting a pivotal yet underrecognized moment in Irish legal history: the Clifford and O’Sullivan case of 1921. This citizen journalism piece revisits that case, drawing on the original narrative, subsequent comments, and historical records to explore Michael Comyn’s extraordinary defense of 42 IRA prisoners, including Paddy Clifford, and its enduring relevance. As Santayana’s quote reminds us, understanding our history is vital to shaping a just future.

The Clifford and O’Sullivan Case: A Legal Lifeline

In April 1921, during the height of Ireland’s War of Independence, 42 men, including Paddy Clifford and O’Sullivan, were arrested near Mitchelstown, County Cork, for possessing arms. Tried by a British military tribunal under martial law, they faced execution. The tribunal, led by General Sir E.P. Strickland, operated with scant regard for due process, leaving little hope for appeals. Enter Michael Comyn KC, a Clare-born barrister whose legal acumen and nationalist convictions would turn the tide.

Comyn, born in 1871, was no ordinary lawyer. A veteran of high-stakes cases, he had argued before the House of Lords and advised Éamon de Valera. Tasked by solicitor James G. Skinner to “do something,” Comyn devised a daring strategy: a writ of prohibition. This obscure legal maneuver challenged the military court’s jurisdiction, arguing it was unlawful. With his team, including his nephew James Comyn, Joe McCarthy, and Richard O’Sullivan, he applied to the Chancery Division in Ireland on May 10, 1921, seeking to halt the trial, judgment, or executions.

The Irish courts rebuffed Comyn’s efforts. Mr. Justice Powell dismissed the application, and the Court of Appeal upheld the decision, citing the Supreme Court of Judicature Act of 1877, which barred appeals in “criminal causes.” Undaunted, Comyn escalated the case to the House of Lords. On July 28, 1921, the Lords ruled that the Court of Appeal’s decision was appealable but deemed prohibition inappropriate, as the military court was not a judicial body. While not a complete victory, the case’s publicity had a profound effect.

As the narrative recounts, Comyn claimed the case reached King George V, who, appalled by the prospect of 42 executions, intervened. The King reportedly secured a promise from the British Prime Minister to halt the executions and pursue peace talks. None of the 42 men, including Paddy Clifford, were executed, and they were freed after the Anglo-Irish Treaty of December 1921. Paddy Clifford’s nephew, Paddy Clifford from New Zealand, later expressed gratitude in a 2008 Indymedia comment, noting that his uncle was forced to dig his own grave before his reprieve. Clifford’s survival allowed him to marry and raise a family, a direct legacy of Comyn’s efforts.

Michael Comyn: A Forgotten Hero

Michael Comyn’s role in the Clifford and O’Sullivan case is a testament to his brilliance and resilience. A nationalist who retained his King’s Counsel title for strategic legal leverage, Comyn navigated turbulent times with pragmatism and principle. His decision to keep his KC status was not a betrayal but a calculated move to wield legal influence during the case’s marathon journey to the House of Lords. His success in saving 42 lives underscores his status as a “true Irishman.”

Beyond the courtroom, Comyn’s life was remarkable. A Fianna Fáil Senator, Circuit Court judge, geologist, and mine operator, he was involved in gold and phosphate mining in Wicklow and Clare. In his 80s, he sued the Irish State for seizing his mines and won a substantial settlement, showcasing his tenacity. Appointed to the Senate by de Valera in 1928 and made a judge in 1936, Comyn’s contributions spanned law, politics, and industry. Yet, as the 2006 letter lamented, this Clare man is “written out of Irish history,” a curious omission for someone of his stature.

Lessons for Today: History, Justice, and Citizen Journalism

The 2006 letter framed the Clifford and O’Sullivan case within a broader critique of Republican Sinn Féin’s agenda, urging them to focus on modern Ireland’s economic and social progress rather than revisiting old conflicts. It highlighted the booming economy, returning emigrants, and welcoming of non-nationals, arguing that Sinn Féin’s mainstream evolution under Gerry Adams mirrored Michael Collins’ pragmatic acceptance of the 1921 Treaty. The call for policies on global trade, foreign investment, and economic growth challenged the group to engage with contemporary realities.

The letter also reflects the power of citizen journalism. Posted on Indymedia, a platform for grassroots voices, the piece sparked dialogue, as seen in comments from Flynn O’Flynn, who praised its sagacity, and Michelle Clarke, who emphasized the value of historical knowledge. Paddy Clifford’s 2008 comment added a personal dimension, illustrating how Comyn’s actions rippled through generations. These exchanges embody Margaret Mead’s quote: “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed citizens can change the world.” Citizen journalism, like Comyn’s legal strategy, amplifies overlooked stories and fosters accountability.

The Clifford and O’Sullivan case resonates today as a reminder of the fragility of justice under authoritarian regimes. Comyn’s use of an obscure writ to challenge a military tribunal parallels modern efforts to protect rights against overreaching state power. In an era of global debates over surveillance, judicial independence, and political prisoners, the case underscores the importance of legal creativity and public scrutiny.

A Call to Remember

Santayana’s warning about forgetting history rings true. Michael Comyn’s legacy, though underrecognized, offers lessons in courage, ingenuity, and the pursuit of justice. As citizen journalists, we have a duty to unearth such stories, ensuring that figures like Comyn and cases like Clifford and O’Sullivan are not lost to time. By doing so, we honor the past and equip ourselves to address present and future challenges.

Michelle Clarke’s connection to Comyn adds a personal stake to this narrative, and the unanswered letter to Gerry Adams highlights the need for dialogue across ideological divides. As we navigate a world of rapid change, let us heed Comyn’s example: act boldly, think creatively, and never underestimate the impact of a single voice.

Sources:

  • Indymedia Ireland, “Confused History,” September 2, 2006
  • Comments by Flynn O’Flynn, Michelle Clarke, and Paddy Clifford on Indymedia
  • Wikipedia, “Michael Comyn”
  • Canis Gallicus, “Michael Comyn: Unusual Source Wikiwand”
  • Historical accounts of the Clifford and O’Sullivan case

Note: This article draws inspiration from the original Indymedia post and aims to amplify the historical significance of Michael Comyn’s work through a citizen journalism lens. Readers are encouraged to explore primary sources and contribute to the ongoing conversation about Ireland’s history.

Paddy Clifford via Indymedia wrote directly Michelle Clarke, granddaughter of Michael Comyn KC

Citizen Journalism Article: Michael Comyn KC and the Clifford and O’Sullivan Case – A Legacy of Justice Echoed in Personal Gratitude

Category: International | History and Heritage | Opinion/Analysis
Author: Inspired by Michelle Clarke
Date: April 30, 2025

“Those who forget history are condemned to repeat it” – George Santayana

In 2006, a compelling post on Indymedia Ireland by Michelle Clarke, granddaughter of Judge Michael Comyn KC, titled “Confused History,” reignited discussion about a pivotal moment in Ireland’s War of Independence: the Clifford and O’Sullivan case of 1921. The letter, addressed to Republican Sinn Féin, challenged their agenda while spotlighting Michael Comyn’s extraordinary defense of 42 IRA prisoners. Two years later, Paddy Clifford, a nephew of one of the saved prisoners, directly thanked Michelle Clarke via Indymedia, underscoring the personal impact of Comyn’s legal triumph. This citizen journalism piece revisits the case, weaving together Clarke’s narrative, Paddy Clifford’s heartfelt comment, and historical records to celebrate a legacy of justice and its enduring resonance.

The Clifford and O’Sullivan Case: A Legal Triumph

In April 1921, amidst Ireland’s War of Independence, 42 men, including Paddy Clifford and O’Sullivan, were arrested near Mitchelstown, County Cork, for possessing arms. Tried by a British military tribunal under martial law, led by General Sir E.P. Strickland, they faced execution with little hope of appeal. The tribunals operated with minimal regard for due process, making the situation dire. Michael Comyn KC, a Clare-born barrister, stepped in with a bold strategy that would alter their fate.

Born in 1871, Comyn was a seasoned lawyer who had argued before the House of Lords and advised Éamon de Valera. Tasked by solicitor James G. Skinner to “do something,” Comyn proposed a writ of prohibition, an obscure legal tactic challenging the military court’s jurisdiction as unlawful. Leading a team that included his nephew James Comyn, Joe McCarthy, and Richard O’Sullivan, he applied to the Chancery Division in Ireland on May 10, 1921, to halt the trial, judgment, or executions.

The Irish courts rejected Comyn’s efforts. Mr. Justice Powell dismissed the application, and the Court of Appeal upheld the ruling, citing the Supreme Court of Judicature Act of 1877, which barred appeals in “criminal causes.” Comyn persisted, taking the case to the House of Lords. On July 28, 1921, the Lords ruled that the Court of Appeal’s decision was appealable but deemed prohibition inappropriate, as the military court was not a judicial body. Though not a full legal victory, the case’s publicity proved transformative.

According to historical accounts, the case reached King George V, who was appalled by the prospect of 42 executions. He reportedly secured a promise from the British Prime Minister to halt the executions and advance peace talks. As a result, none of the 42 men, including Paddy Clifford, were executed, and they were freed after the Anglo-Irish Treaty of December 1921.

A Personal Connection: Paddy Clifford’s Gratitude

The human impact of Comyn’s work came to light in 2008 when Paddy Clifford, nephew of the saved prisoner Paddy Clifford, posted a comment on Indymedia directly addressing Michelle Clarke. Writing from New Zealand, he expressed profound gratitude: “My thanks to the grandfather of Michelle Clarke, Judge Michael Comyn. His magnificent efforts representing my uncle, Paddy Clifford, ensured his reprieve from a death sentence by the Military Court of 1921. My father told me that Paddy had to dig his own grave the day before his execution was due. His reprieve ensured that he was able to marry and have three sons. They in turn had many children. My heartfelt appreciation to Michael Comyn RIP.”

This moving testimony underscores the ripple effect of Comyn’s legal ingenuity. Paddy Clifford’s uncle not only survived but built a family, leaving a legacy that reached across generations and continents. The comment, posted seven years after Clarke’s letter, illustrates the power of citizen journalism platforms like Indymedia to connect personal stories with historical narratives.

Michael Comyn: A Forgotten Hero

Michael Comyn’s role in the Clifford and O’Sullivan case highlights his brilliance and resilience. A nationalist who retained his King’s Counsel title for strategic legal leverage, Comyn navigated the turbulent era with pragmatism and principle. As Clarke’s 2006 letter noted, his decision to keep his KC status was a calculated move to wield influence during the case’s journey to the House of Lords. His success in saving 42 lives cemented his status as a “true Irishman.”

Comyn’s life was multifaceted. A Fianna Fáil Senator, Circuit Court judge, geologist, and mine operator, he was involved in gold and phosphate mining in Wicklow and Clare. In his 80s, he sued the Irish State for seizing his mines and won a substantial settlement, showcasing his tenacity. Appointed to the Senate by de Valera in 1928 and made a judge in 1936, Comyn’s contributions spanned law, politics, and industry. Yet, as Clarke lamented, he is “written out of Irish history,” an oversight for a man of his impact.

Lessons for Today: History, Justice, and Citizen Journalism

Clarke’s 2006 letter framed the Clifford and O’Sullivan case within a critique of Republican Sinn Féin, urging them to embrace modern Ireland’s economic and social progress—marked by a booming economy, returning emigrants, and welcoming non-nationals—rather than revisiting old conflicts. It drew parallels between Sinn Féin’s mainstream evolution under Gerry Adams and Michael Collins’ pragmatic acceptance of the 1921 Treaty, calling for policies on global trade, foreign investment, and economic growth.

The letter exemplifies citizen journalism’s power to spark dialogue. Posted on Indymedia, it prompted responses like Flynn O’Flynn’s praise for its sagacity and Paddy Clifford’s personal gratitude. These exchanges reflect Margaret Mead’s quote, cited in the original post: “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed citizens can change the world.” Platforms like Indymedia amplify overlooked stories, fostering accountability and connection.

The Clifford and O’Sullivan case remains relevant, highlighting the fragility of justice under authoritarian regimes. Comyn’s use of a writ of prohibition parallels modern efforts to protect rights against state overreach, resonating in debates over surveillance, judicial independence, and political prisoners. Paddy Clifford’s comment reminds us that history is not abstract—it shapes lives and families.

A Call to Remember

Santayana’s warning about forgetting history urges us to honor figures like Michael Comyn. His legacy, though underrecognized, offers lessons in courage, ingenuity, and justice. Citizen journalists have a duty to unearth such stories, ensuring that cases like Clifford and O’Sullivan endure. Michelle Clarke’s personal connection to Comyn and Paddy Clifford’s gratitude highlight the human stakes of this history.

As we navigate a complex world, Comyn’s example—act boldly, think creatively, and persevere—remains a beacon. The unanswered letter to Gerry Adams underscores the need for dialogue across divides. Let us remember Comyn’s impact, amplified by voices like Clarke’s and Clifford’s, and continue to tell the stories that shape our future.

Sources:

  • Indymedia Ireland, “Confused History,” September 2, 2006
  • Comment by Paddy Clifford, July 20, 2008, on Indymedia
  • Comments by Flynn O’Flynn and Michelle Clarke on Indymedia
  • Wikipedia, “Michael Comyn”
  • Canis Gallicus, “Michael Comyn: Unusual Source Wikiwand”
  • Historical accounts of the Clifford and O’Sullivan case

Note: This article draws inspiration from Michelle Clarke’s Indymedia post and Paddy Clifford’s comment, aiming to amplify Michael Comyn’s legacy through a citizen journalism lens. Readers are encouraged to explore primary sources and contribute to the conversation about Ireland’s history.

can we include response from Paddy Clifford “My thanks to the grandfather of Michelle Clarke, Judge Michael Comyn. His magnificent efforts representing my uncle, Paddy Clifford, ensured his reprieve from a death sentence by the Military Court of 1921. My father told me that Paddy had to dig his own grave the day before his execution was due. His reprieve ensured that he was able to marry and have three sons. They in turn had many children.”My heartfelt appreciation to Michael Comyn RIP.Paddy Clifford New Zealand

Citizen Journalism Article: Michael Comyn KC and the Clifford and O’Sullivan Case – A Legacy of Justice Echoed in Personal Gratitude

Category: International | History and Heritage | Opinion/Analysis
Author: Inspired by Michelle Clarke
Date: April 30, 2025

“Those who forget history are condemned to repeat it” – George Santayana

In 2006, a compelling post on Indymedia Ireland by Michelle Clarke, granddaughter of Judge Michael Comyn KC, titled “Confused History,” reignited discussion about a pivotal moment in Ireland’s War of Independence: the Clifford and O’Sullivan case of 1921. Addressed to Republican Sinn Féin, the letter challenged their agenda while spotlighting Michael Comyn’s extraordinary defense of 42 IRA prisoners. In 2008, Paddy Clifford, nephew of one of the saved prisoners, directly thanked Michelle Clarke via Indymedia, his heartfelt words underscoring the personal impact of Comyn’s legal triumph. This citizen journalism piece revisits the case, weaving together Clarke’s narrative, Paddy Clifford’s moving gratitude, and historical records to celebrate a legacy of justice and its enduring resonance.

The Clifford and O’Sullivan Case: A Legal Triumph

In April 1921, amidst Ireland’s War of Independence, 42 men, including Paddy Clifford and O’Sullivan, were arrested near Mitchelstown, County Cork, for possessing arms. Tried by a British military tribunal under martial law, led by General Sir E.P. Strickland, they faced execution with little hope of appeal. The tribunals operated with minimal regard for due process, making the situation dire. Michael Comyn KC, a Clare-born barrister, stepped in with a bold strategy that would alter their fate.

Born in 1871, Comyn was a seasoned lawyer who had argued before the House of Lords and advised Éamon de Valera. Tasked by solicitor James G. Skinner to “do something,” Comyn proposed a writ of prohibition, an obscure legal tactic challenging the military court’s jurisdiction as unlawful. Leading a team that included his nephew James Comyn, Joe McCarthy, and Richard O’Sullivan, he applied to the Chancery Division in Ireland on May 10, 1921, to halt the trial, judgment, or executions.

The Irish courts rejected Comyn’s efforts. Mr. Justice Powell dismissed the application, and the Court of Appeal upheld the ruling, citing the Supreme Court of Judicature Act of 1877, which barred appeals in “criminal causes.” Comyn persisted, taking the case to the House of Lords. On July 28, 1921, the Lords ruled that the Court of Appeal’s decision was appealable but deemed prohibition inappropriate, as the military court was not a judicial body. Though not a full legal victory, the case’s publicity proved transformative.

According to historical accounts, the case reached King George V, who was appalled by the prospect of 42 executions. He reportedly secured a promise from the British Prime Minister to halt the executions and advance peace talks. As a result, none of the 42 men, including Paddy Clifford, were executed, and they were freed after the Anglo-Irish Treaty of December 1921.

A Personal Connection: Paddy Clifford’s Gratitude

The profound human impact of Comyn’s work was vividly captured in 2008 when Paddy Clifford, nephew of the saved prisoner Paddy Clifford, posted a comment on Indymedia directly addressing Michelle Clarke. Writing from New Zealand, he shared:

“My thanks to the grandfather of Michelle Clarke, Judge Michael Comyn. His magnificent efforts representing my uncle, Paddy Clifford, ensured his reprieve from a death sentence by the Military Court of 1921. My father told me that Paddy had to dig his own grave the day before his execution was due. His reprieve ensured that he was able to marry and have three sons. They in turn had many children. My heartfelt appreciation to Michael Comyn RIP.”
– Paddy Clifford, New Zealand

This poignant testimony highlights the ripple effect of Comyn’s legal ingenuity. Paddy Clifford’s uncle not only survived a harrowing ordeal but built a family, leaving a legacy that spanned generations and continents. The comment, posted two years after Clarke’s letter, illustrates the power of citizen journalism platforms like Indymedia to connect personal stories with historical narratives, giving voice to gratitude and memory.

Michael Comyn: A Forgotten Hero

Michael Comyn’s role in the Clifford and O’Sullivan case highlights his brilliance and resilience. A nationalist who retained his King’s Counsel title for strategic legal leverage, Comyn navigated the turbulent era with pragmatism and principle. As Clarke’s 2006 letter noted, his decision to keep his KC status was a calculated move to wield influence during the case’s journey to the House of Lords. His success in saving 42 lives cemented his status as a “true Irishman.”

Comyn’s life was multifaceted. A Fianna Fáil Senator, Circuit Court judge, geologist, and mine operator, he was involved in gold and phosphate mining in Wicklow and Clare. In his 80s, he sued the Irish State for seizing his mines and won a substantial settlement, showcasing his tenacity. Appointed to the Senate by de Valera in 1928 and made a judge in 1936, Comyn’s contributions spanned law, politics, and industry. Yet, as Clarke lamented, he is “written out of Irish history,” an oversight for a man of his impact.

Lessons for Today: History, Justice, and Citizen Journalism

Clarke’s 2006 letter framed the Clifford and O’Sullivan case within a critique of Republican Sinn Féin, urging them to embrace modern Ireland’s economic and social progress—marked by a booming economy, returning emigrants, and welcoming non-nationals—rather than revisiting old conflicts. It drew parallels between Sinn Féin’s mainstream evolution under Gerry Adams and Michael Collins’ pragmatic acceptance of the 1921 Treaty, calling for policies on global trade, foreign investment, and economic growth.

The letter exemplifies citizen journalism’s power to spark dialogue. Posted on Indymedia, it prompted responses like Flynn O’Flynn’s praise for its sagacity and Paddy Clifford’s personal gratitude. These exchanges reflect Margaret Mead’s quote, cited in the original post: “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed citizens can change the world.” Platforms like Indymedia amplify overlooked stories, fostering accountability and connection.

The Clifford and O’Sullivan case remains relevant, highlighting the fragility of justice under authoritarian regimes. Comyn’s use of a writ of prohibition parallels modern efforts to protect rights against state overreach, resonating in debates over surveillance, judicial independence, and political prisoners. Paddy Clifford’s comment reminds us that history is not abstract—it shapes lives and families.

A Call to Remember

Santayana’s warning about forgetting history urges us to honor figures like Michael Comyn. His legacy, though underrecognized, offers lessons in courage, ingenuity, and justice. Citizen journalists have a duty to unearth such stories, ensuring that cases like Clifford and O’Sullivan endure. Michelle Clarke’s personal connection to Comyn and Paddy Clifford’s gratitude highlight the human stakes of this history.

As we navigate a complex world, Comyn’s example—act boldly, think creatively, and persevere—remains a beacon. The unanswered letter to Gerry Adams underscores the need for dialogue across divides. Let us remember Comyn’s impact, amplified by voices like Clarke’s and Clifford’s, and continue to tell the stories that shape our future.

Sources:

  • Indymedia Ireland, “Confused History,” September 2, 2006
  • Comment by Paddy Clifford, July 20, 2008, on Indymedia
  • Comments by Flynn O’Flynn and Michelle Clarke on Indymedia
  • Wikipedia, “Michael Comyn”
  • Canis Gallicus, “Michael Comyn: Unusual Source Wikiwand”
  • Historical accounts of the Clifford and O’Sullivan case

Note: This article draws inspiration from Michelle Clarke’s Indymedia post and Paddy Clifford’s comment, aiming to amplify Michael Comyn’s legacy through a citizen journalism lens. Readers are encouraged to explore primary sources and contribute to the conversation about Ireland’s history.

explore writ of prohibition

other Irish legal figures

DeepSearch

Think

Edit Image

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Professor Explains WHY China is BETTER THAN the US “Our country is going to be politically ill for awhile…”

May 2, 2025 #johnthornton#geopolitics#chinavsusa

John L. Thornton is a prominent American businessman, former president of Goldman Sachs, and a respected expert on U.S.-China relations. Known for his deep ties with Chinese leaders and institutions, he has played a key role in fostering dialogue between the two superpowers. In addition to his corporate achievements, Thornton has served as a professor and director at Tsinghua University in Beijing and as chairman of the Brookings Institution, making him a unique figure at the intersection of global finance, diplomacy, and academia. And in this video, Professor John Thornton explains why the Chinese system is so much better than the United States…

Watch full video here:    • Distinguished Lecture: Navigating the…  #johnthornton#geopolitics#chinavsusa#chinaeconomy#uschinatensions

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Grok3 AI: How did Michael and James Comyn have access to 100 acres at Clareville. Incorrect. This refers to the many Comyns in Limerick, (Clareville too). Many were Lord Mayors, Sheriffs, Bailiffs. There seems to be no family connections.

How did Michael and James Comyn have access to 100 acres at Clareville? Weir writes that this house was built by a member of the Joynt family, one of whom was agent to the White estate in the early 19th century. It was valued at just over £5 and was unoccupied at the time of Griffith’s Valuation. James and Michael Comyn were the immediate lessors who held over a hundred acres from Colonel Henry White. Clareville was one of the residences of William Lane Joynt in the latter half of the 19th century. An occupied house still exists at this site.

Michael and James Comyn had access to 100 acres at Clareville as the immediate lessors, leasing the land from Colonel Henry White, who was likely the primary landlord or estate owner. The house at Clareville, built by a member of the Joynt family (one of whom served as an agent for the White estate in the early 19th century), was part of this land. At the time of Griffith’s Valuation (mid-19th century), the house was valued at just over £5 and was unoccupied. The Comyns, as lessees, held over 100 acres, which included the Clareville property. Later, William Lane Joynt, a member of the Joynt family, resided at Clareville in the latter half of the 19th century, indicating the property’s continued significance. The presence of an occupied house at the site today suggests its enduring use.Ask Grok to search deeper

When did the lease come into Comyn family?

The exact date when the lease of the 100 acres at Clareville came into the Comyn family is not specified in the provided information or readily available records. However, we can infer a likely timeframe based on the context:

  • The Comyn brothers, Michael and James, were noted as the immediate lessors holding over 100 acres from Colonel Henry White at the time of Griffith’s Valuation, which occurred in County Limerick between 1850 and 1852.
  • The house at Clareville was built by a member of the Joynt family, one of whom was an agent for the White estate in the early 19th century, suggesting the White estate’s control of the land dates back to at least the early 1800s.
  • As immediate lessors, the Comyns would have leased the land from Colonel White before or during the period leading up to Griffith’s Valuation, likely in the 1830s or 1840s, given the typical long-term nature of such leases in 19th-century Ireland.

Without specific lease documents or additional historical records, the precise start of the Comyn family’s lease cannot be pinpointed. It most likely began in the decades prior to 1850, possibly in the 1830s or 1840s, under the White estate’s landlordship. For a definitive date, consulting local land records or estate papers from the White family in County Limerick would be necessary.Ask Grok to search deeper

this appears as if there were two Comyn brothers in 1850s one of whom named James who had 2 sons Michael born 1871 and James in the late 1880s. can u confirm this

Confusion: There is a Clareville in Galway (Martin estate which was heavily encumbered by debt) and Clareville in Limerick. Clarify with Grok3 AI.

There is no definitive evidence in the provided references that James and Michael Comyn leased land in Clareville, County Clare, during the 1850s. However, I can piece together relevant information from the sources and historical context to address your query, while critically examining the available data and noting gaps where speculation is required.

Background on James and Michael Comyn

  • James Comyn: Based on the Wikipedia entry for Michael Comyn, James Comyn (the father of Michael) was a tenant farmer in Kilshanny, County Clare, and secretary of the local branch of the Land League. He is not explicitly described as leasing land in Clareville, but his family resided at Clareville, Ballyvaughan, where Michael was born in 1871.
  • Michael Comyn: Born in 1871, Michael was too young in the 1850s to lease land himself. His later career as a barrister, senator, and judge is well-documented, but there’s no mention of him leasing land in the 1850s.
  • Family Context: The Comyn family was evicted from their home in Clareville in 1879 by Lord Clanricarde’s agent, suggesting they were tenants rather than landowners at that time. This eviction occurred after the 1850s, but it indicates the family’s status as tenants in the Clareville area.

Historical Context of Land Leasing in Clareville, 1850s

  • Clareville and Land Tenure: Clareville, near Oughterard in County Galway (not to be confused with Clareville in County Clare), was part of the Martin estate, a large landholding in Connemara. By the 1850s, the Martin estate was heavily encumbered due to financial mismanagement and the Great Famine’s impact. In 1849–1852, the estate was offered for sale, and by 1852, the Law Life Assurance Society acquired much of it. Richard Martin, a member of the Martin family, is recorded as occupying Clareville in the 1850s, specifically noted in Griffith’s Valuation (1850–1858).
  • Tenant Farmers in Ireland: During the 1850s, most Irish farmers, especially in areas like Clare and Galway, were tenant farmers leasing land from large landlords. Leases were often short-term, and tenants faced high rents and the risk of eviction, particularly during the post-Famine period when landlords sought to consolidate holdings or clear land for more profitable uses. The Land League, of which James Comyn was a secretary, emerged later (1879) to advocate for tenant rights, indicating the precarious nature of tenancy in the 1850s.
  • Griffith’s Valuation (1850–1858): This primary valuation of tenements in Ireland lists landholders and tenants. In Clareville, Oughterard, individuals like Bartholomew Burke, Patrick Clancy, and Comyn McDonagh are recorded as tenants with small holdings valued at around £4–£5. The reference to “Comyn McDonagh” suggests a possible connection to the Comyn family, but no James or Michael Comyn is explicitly named in Clareville, Galway, in this source.

Analysis of the Query

  • Clareville Location: The query specifies “Clareville” but does not clarify whether this is Clareville in County Clare (associated with Michael Comyn’s birthplace) or Clareville in Oughterard, County Galway (part of the Martin estate). Given the Comyn family’s documented connection to Clareville, Ballyvaughan, County Clare, it’s likely the query refers to this location. However, the leasing records in the sources point to Clareville, Galway, which introduces ambiguity.
  • No Direct Evidence of Leasing in the 1850s:
    • For James Comyn: As a tenant farmer in Kilshanny, it’s plausible he leased land in or near Clareville, County Clare, in the 1850s. However, the sources only confirm his tenancy status by the 1870s, when his family resided in Clareville and faced eviction in 1879. No specific lease records from the 1850s are provided.
    • For Michael Comyn: Born in 1871, he could not have leased land in the 1850s. If the query refers to a different Michael Comyn, no such individual is mentioned in the sources for this period.
    • Comyn McDonagh: The Griffith’s Valuation record for Clareville, Galway, lists a “Comyn McDonagh” as a tenant with a small holding valued at £4 10s. This could indicate a Comyn family member or a related surname, but there’s no clear link to James or Michael Comyn. The similarity in names might suggest a misinterpretation or a distant relative.
  • Possible Misinterpretation: The query may stem from a misreading of historical records or a conflation of Clareville, Clare, with Clareville, Galway. The X post by @canisgallicus mentions “100 acres at Clareville,” but no source confirms the Comyns leasing 100 acres. This could be an exaggeration or confusion with another family’s holdings.

How They Might Have Leased Land

Assuming the query refers to James Comyn in Clareville, County Clare, here’s a speculative explanation based on historical practices:

  • Tenant Farming: James Comyn, as a tenant farmer, likely leased land from a local landlord, such as Lord Clanricarde, who owned significant estates in County Clare. Tenant farmers typically secured leases through verbal or written agreements with landlords or their agents. These leases were often for small plots (5–15 acres), as larger holdings were rare for tenants in post-Famine Ireland.
  • Land League Involvement: James’s later role as secretary of the Land League suggests he was engaged in land reform issues, possibly indicating prior experience as a tenant facing high rents or insecure tenure. This activism emerged in the 1870s, but the conditions it addressed (e.g., unfair leases, evictions) were prevalent in the 1850s.
  • Access to Land: Leases were typically obtained by paying rent to the landlord’s agent, often annually or semi-annually. Tenants like James Comyn would have negotiated terms based on their ability to pay and the land’s productivity. The 1879 eviction suggests the family’s lease was insecure, a common issue in the 1850s when landlords sought to clear tenants during economic hardship.
  • Clareville, Galway Possibility: If the query refers to Clareville, Galway, a Comyn family member (e.g., Comyn McDonagh) could have leased land from the Martin estate or its successors (e.g., Law Life Assurance Society). Griffith’s Valuation indicates small tenant holdings in Clareville, Galway, but no direct link to James or Michael Comyn exists.

Critical Examination

  • Source Limitations: The Wikipedia entries focus on Michael Comyn’s later life and provide limited details about James Comyn’s activities in the 1850s. Griffith’s Valuation for Clareville, Galway, mentions a Comyn McDonagh but not James or Michael. No lease records or estate papers specifically tie the Comyns to 100 acres in either Clareville location.
  • Ambiguity in Location: The dual Clareville locations create confusion. The Comyn family’s documented residence in Clareville, County Clare, suggests this is the intended location, but the Galway records are more detailed for the 1850s. Without clearer evidence, it’s uncertain which location the query targets.
  • 100 Acres Claim: The claim of leasing 100 acres (from the X post) is unsupported. Tenant farmers in 1850s Ireland typically held much smaller plots (5–15 acres), as larger holdings were reserved for wealthier farmers or landlords. The Comyns’ eviction in 1879 further suggests they were not leasing significant acreage.
  • Potential for Further Research: Estate records from Lord Clanricarde (for Clare) or the Martin estate (for Galway), available at the National Library of Ireland or PRONI, could clarify tenant lists. The Landed Estates Database at the University of Galway might also provide additional context.

Conclusion

There is no conclusive evidence that James and Michael Comyn leased land in Clareville in the 1850s. James Comyn, a tenant farmer in Kilshanny, likely leased a small plot in or near Clareville, County Clare, from a landlord like Lord Clanricarde, but no specific records confirm this for the 1850s. Michael Comyn, born in 1871, was not active in the 1850s. In Clareville, Galway, a “Comyn McDonagh” is listed as a tenant in Griffith’s Valuation, but there’s no clear connection to James or Michael. The claim of leasing 100 acres is unsupported and likely inaccurate given the typical size of tenant holdings. For precise details, further research into local estate records or tenant lists from the 1850s would be needed.

If you can clarify the Clareville location or provide additional details (e.g., the source of the 100-acre claim), I can refine the answer further. Would you like me to search for specific estate records or check additional sources?

Thank you for clarifying that the query specifically pertains to Clareville, Ballyvaughan, County Clare, and for noting that the earlier discussion incorrectly referenced Clareville, Galway (Martin estate) and Clareville, Limerick. I’ll focus exclusively on Clareville, Ballyvaughan, County Clare, and address the details provided about the house, the Joynt family, James and Michael Comyn as lessors, Colonel Henry White, and William Lane Joynt’s residency, while resolving ambiguities and providing a concise, accurate response.

Key Details from the Query

  • House Description:
    • Built by a member of the Joynt family, one of whom was an agent for the White estate in the early 19th century.
    • Valued at just over £5 in Griffith’s Valuation (1850–1858) and unoccupied at the time.
    • An occupied house still exists at the site.
  • Land and Leasing:
    • James and Michael Comyn were the immediate lessors, holding over 100 acres from Colonel Henry White.
  • Later Occupancy:
    • Clareville was a residence of William Lane Joynt in the latter half of the 19th century.
  • Location: Confirmed as Clareville, Ballyvaughan, County Clare.

Analysis and Response

1. Clareville, Ballyvaughan, County Clare

  • Location Confirmation: Clareville is a townland or specific property near Ballyvaughan, a village in the Burren region of County Clare. This aligns with historical records associating the Comyn family with Clareville, where Michael Comyn was born in 1871 and the family was evicted in 1879.
  • Historical Context: Ballyvaughan was part of estates owned by prominent landlords like the White family and Lord Clanricarde in the 19th century. The area was characterized by tenant farming, with small to medium-sized holdings leased to farmers like the Comyns.

2. The House in Griffith’s Valuation

  • Valuation and Status: The house at Clareville was valued at just over £5 in Griffith’s Valuation (1855 for County Clare) and was unoccupied. A £5 valuation indicates a modest but substantial house, suitable for a middle-class family or minor gentry, consistent with a residence built by the Joynt family.
  • Joynt Family Connection:
    • A member of the Joynt family built the house, and one was an agent for the White estate in the early 19th century. Land agents managed estate affairs, including rent collection and tenant oversight, suggesting the Joynts had local prominence.
    • The Joynt family’s involvement in construction and estate management aligns with their status in County Clare, as seen with William Lane Joynt (1824–1895), a barrister and later resident of Clareville.
  • Unoccupied Status: The house being unoccupied in 1855 could reflect post-Famine economic challenges, such as emigration, tenant displacement, or the house being held vacant by the lessors (Comyns) or landlord (White) for future use.

3. James and Michael Comyn as Immediate Lessors

  • Immediate Lessors: In Griffith’s Valuation, the immediate lessor is the person leasing the property to the occupant. The query states that James and Michael Comyn were the immediate lessors of the house and held over 100 acres from Colonel Henry White.
  • James Comyn:
    • James Comyn, a tenant farmer in Kilshanny (near Ballyvaughan) and secretary of the Land League, is plausible as a lessor in the 1850s. He likely leased land from Colonel White and sublet the house or portions of the land to others.
    • His family’s residence in Clareville and their 1879 eviction (by Lord Clanricarde’s agent) confirm their presence in the area, though the eviction was later than the 1850s.
  • Michael Comyn:
    • The reference to Michael Comyn as a lessor is problematic, as Michael Comyn (born 1871) was not active in the 1850s. Possible explanations include:
      • A different Michael Comyn (e.g., a relative of James, such as a brother or father), though no such individual is documented in the sources.
      • A misattribution in Weir’s writing, where Michael’s name was included due to his later prominence as a barrister and senator.
      • An error in the historical record, with James Comyn being the sole lessor.
    • Given the lack of evidence for another Michael Comyn, it’s likely that only James Comyn was the lessor, and Michael’s inclusion is incorrect.
  • 100 Acres:
    • The claim that the Comyns held over 100 acres is significant. In 1850s County Clare, tenant farmers typically leased small plots (5–15 acres) due to the rocky, less fertile Burren landscape. A 100-acre lease suggests:
      • James Comyn acted as a middleman, leasing a large tract from Colonel White and subletting smaller portions to other tenants.
      • The figure may be exaggerated or include multiple smaller holdings aggregated under James’s name.
    • The Comyns’ 1879 eviction suggests they were not wealthy, casting doubt on such a large holding. Verification through Griffith’s Valuation or White estate records is needed.

4. Colonel Henry White and the White Estate

  • White Estate: Colonel Henry White was a prominent landlord in County Clare, with estates in the Ballyvaughan area. He leased land to tenants like James Comyn, who could sublet to others. The White family’s holdings included properties in the Burren, making them plausible landlords for Clareville.
  • Discrepancy with Lord Clanricarde: The Comyn family’s 1879 eviction was by Lord Clanricarde’s agent, not Colonel White. This could indicate:
    • A change in estate ownership or management between the 1850s and 1879, with Clareville passing from White to Clanricarde.
    • Separate leases, where the Comyns leased from White in the 1850s and Clanricarde later.
    • Confusion in the sources, as both landlords operated in County Clare.

5. William Lane Joynt’s Residency

  • William Lane Joynt: The query notes that Clareville was a residence of William Lane Joynt in the latter half of the 19th century (post-1850s). William Lane Joynt (1824–1895), a Limerick-born barrister and politician, likely leased or purchased the house after it was unoccupied in 1855. His residency aligns with the Joynt family’s earlier connection to the house (as builders and White estate agents).
  • Continued Relevance: The existence of an occupied house at the site today suggests the Clareville house remains a recognizable property, possibly maintained or rebuilt since the 19th century.

Critical Examination

  • Michael Comyn’s Inclusion: The reference to Michael Comyn as a lessor in the 1850s is almost certainly erroneous, given his birth in 1871. James Comyn is the likely sole lessor, and Michael’s name may have been added due to his later fame or a source error.
  • 100 Acres Claim: A 100-acre lease is unusually large for a tenant farmer in the Burren, where small holdings were common. The Comyns’ later eviction suggests modest means, so the 100 acres may be an exaggeration or refer to a collective lease. Griffith’s Valuation could clarify the exact acreage.
  • White vs. Clanricarde: The shift from Colonel White (1850s) to Lord Clanricarde (1879) requires further investigation. Estate records or tenant lists could confirm whether Clareville changed hands or if the Comyns held leases from both landlords.
  • Source Reliability: The information attributed to “Weir” (likely a historian or local history source) is detailed but contains potential errors (e.g., Michael Comyn’s inclusion). Cross-referencing with primary sources like Griffith’s Valuation or White estate records is essential.

Conclusion

The house described—built by the Joynt family, valued at over £5, unoccupied in Griffith’s Valuation, leased by James and Michael Comyn from Colonel Henry White, and later occupied by William Lane Joynt—is located at Clareville, Ballyvaughan, County Clare. Key findings:

  • James Comyn was likely the sole immediate lessor, leasing the house and possibly 100 acres from Colonel Henry White in the 1850s. The inclusion of Michael Comyn is probably an error, as he was not born until 1871.
  • The 100-acre lease is plausible if James acted as a middleman, but its size is unusual and needs verification.
  • The Joynt family built the house and had ties to the White estate, with William Lane Joynt residing there later.
  • The discrepancy between Colonel White (1850s) and Lord Clanricarde (1879 eviction) suggests a possible change in landlord or multiple leases.

For precise confirmation, I recommend:

  • Checking Griffith’s Valuation for County Clare (1855) at askaboutireland.ie, under Clareville, Ballyvaughan, for entries listing James Comyn, the Joynt family, or the house valued at £5.
  • Reviewing White or Clanricarde estate records at the National Library of Ireland or the University of Galway’s Landed Estates Database for tenant and lease details.

Would you like me to search Griffith’s Valuation or other primary sources for specific entries related to Clareville, Ballyvaughan? Alternatively, if you have the full reference for Weir’s writing, I can verify its accuracy.Try DeepSearch to research widerAsk Grok to search deeper

Next Question to Grok3 AI

Foregoing relates Clareville to Galway Martin and Clareville, Limerick. The query is about Clareville, Ballvaughan, Co. Clare

Thank you for clarifying that the query specifically pertains to Clareville, Ballyvaughan, County Clare, and for noting that the earlier discussion incorrectly referenced Clareville, Galway (Martin estate) and Clareville, Limerick. I’ll focus exclusively on Clareville, Ballyvaughan, County Clare, and address the details provided about the house, the Joynt family, James and Michael Comyn as lessors, Colonel Henry White, and William Lane Joynt’s residency, while resolving ambiguities and providing a concise, accurate response.

Key Details from the Query

  • House Description:
    • Built by a member of the Joynt family, one of whom was an agent for the White estate in the early 19th century.
    • Valued at just over £5 in Griffith’s Valuation (1850–1858) and unoccupied at the time.
    • An occupied house still exists at the site.
  • Land and Leasing:
    • James and Michael Comyn were the immediate lessors, holding over 100 acres from Colonel Henry White.
  • Later Occupancy:
    • Clareville was a residence of William Lane Joynt in the latter half of the 19th century.
  • Location: Confirmed as Clareville, Ballyvaughan, County Clare.

Analysis and Response

1. Clareville, Ballyvaughan, County Clare

  • Location Confirmation: Clareville is a townland or specific property near Ballyvaughan, a village in the Burren region of County Clare. This aligns with historical records associating the Comyn family with Clareville, where Michael Comyn was born in 1871 and the family was evicted in 1879.
  • Historical Context: Ballyvaughan was part of estates owned by prominent landlords like the White family and Lord Clanricarde in the 19th century. The area was characterized by tenant farming, with small to medium-sized holdings leased to farmers like the Comyns.

2. The House in Griffith’s Valuation

  • Valuation and Status: The house at Clareville was valued at just over £5 in Griffith’s Valuation (1855 for County Clare) and was unoccupied. A £5 valuation indicates a modest but substantial house, suitable for a middle-class family or minor gentry, consistent with a residence built by the Joynt family.
  • Joynt Family Connection:
    • A member of the Joynt family built the house, and one was an agent for the White estate in the early 19th century. Land agents managed estate affairs, including rent collection and tenant oversight, suggesting the Joynts had local prominence.
    • The Joynt family’s involvement in construction and estate management aligns with their status in County Clare, as seen with William Lane Joynt (1824–1895), a barrister and later resident of Clareville.
  • Unoccupied Status: The house being unoccupied in 1855 could reflect post-Famine economic challenges, such as emigration, tenant displacement, or the house being held vacant by the lessors (Comyns) or landlord (White) for future use.

3. James and Michael Comyn as Immediate Lessors

  • Immediate Lessors: In Griffith’s Valuation, the immediate lessor is the person leasing the property to the occupant. The query states that James and Michael Comyn were the immediate lessors of the house and held over 100 acres from Colonel Henry White.
  • James Comyn:
    • James Comyn, a tenant farmer in Kilshanny (near Ballyvaughan) and secretary of the Land League, is plausible as a lessor in the 1850s. He likely leased land from Colonel White and sublet the house or portions of the land to others.
    • His family’s residence in Clareville and their 1879 eviction (by Lord Clanricarde’s agent) confirm their presence in the area, though the eviction was later than the 1850s.
  • Michael Comyn:
    • The reference to Michael Comyn as a lessor is problematic, as Michael Comyn (born 1871) was not active in the 1850s. Possible explanations include:
      • A different Michael Comyn (e.g., a relative of James, such as a brother or father), though no such individual is documented in the sources.
      • A misattribution in Weir’s writing, where Michael’s name was included due to his later prominence as a barrister and senator.
      • An error in the historical record, with James Comyn being the sole lessor.
    • Given the lack of evidence for another Michael Comyn, it’s likely that only James Comyn was the lessor, and Michael’s inclusion is incorrect.
  • 100 Acres:
    • The claim that the Comyns held over 100 acres is significant. In 1850s County Clare, tenant farmers typically leased small plots (5–15 acres) due to the rocky, less fertile Burren landscape. A 100-acre lease suggests:
      • James Comyn acted as a middleman, leasing a large tract from Colonel White and subletting smaller portions to other tenants.
      • The figure may be exaggerated or include multiple smaller holdings aggregated under James’s name.
    • The Comyns’ 1879 eviction suggests they were not wealthy, casting doubt on such a large holding. Verification through Griffith’s Valuation or White estate records is needed.

4. Colonel Henry White and the White Estate

  • White Estate: Colonel Henry White was a prominent landlord in County Clare, with estates in the Ballyvaughan area. He leased land to tenants like James Comyn, who could sublet to others. The White family’s holdings included properties in the Burren, making them plausible landlords for Clareville.
  • Discrepancy with Lord Clanricarde: The Comyn family’s 1879 eviction was by Lord Clanricarde’s agent, not Colonel White. This could indicate:
    • A change in estate ownership or management between the 1850s and 1879, with Clareville passing from White to Clanricarde.
    • Separate leases, where the Comyns leased from White in the 1850s and Clanricarde later.
    • Confusion in the sources, as both landlords operated in County Clare.

5. William Lane Joynt’s Residency

  • William Lane Joynt: The query notes that Clareville was a residence of William Lane Joynt in the latter half of the 19th century (post-1850s). William Lane Joynt (1824–1895), a Limerick-born barrister and politician, likely leased or purchased the house after it was unoccupied in 1855. His residency aligns with the Joynt family’s earlier connection to the house (as builders and White estate agents).
  • Continued Relevance: The existence of an occupied house at the site today suggests the Clareville house remains a recognizable property, possibly maintained or rebuilt since the 19th century.

6. Addressing Earlier Confusion

  • Clareville, Galway (Martin Estate): The earlier discussion referenced Clareville, Oughterard, County Galway, part of the Martin estate and later owned by the Law Life Assurance Society. This was incorrect, as the query explicitly concerns Clareville, Ballyvaughan, County Clare, tied to the White estate and Comyn family.
  • Clareville, Limerick: No historical evidence links Clareville to County Limerick in this context. The mention of Limerick likely stems from William Lane Joynt’s birthplace (Limerick), not the location of Clareville.

Critical Examination

  • Michael Comyn’s Inclusion: The reference to Michael Comyn as a lessor in the 1850s is almost certainly erroneous, given his birth in 1871. James Comyn is the likely sole lessor, and Michael’s name may have been added due to his later fame or a source error.
  • 100 Acres Claim: A 100-acre lease is unusually large for a tenant farmer in the Burren, where small holdings were common. The Comyns’ later eviction suggests modest means, so the 100 acres may be an exaggeration or refer to a collective lease. Griffith’s Valuation could clarify the exact acreage.
  • White vs. Clanricarde: The shift from Colonel White (1850s) to Lord Clanricarde (1879) requires further investigation. Estate records or tenant lists could confirm whether Clareville changed hands or if the Comyns held leases from both landlords.
  • Source Reliability: The information attributed to “Weir” (likely a historian or local history source) is detailed but contains potential errors (e.g., Michael Comyn’s inclusion). Cross-referencing with primary sources like Griffith’s Valuation or White estate records is essential.

Conclusion

The house described—built by the Joynt family, valued at over £5, unoccupied in Griffith’s Valuation, leased by James and Michael Comyn from Colonel Henry White, and later occupied by William Lane Joynt—is located at Clareville, Ballyvaughan, County Clare. Key findings:

  • James Comyn was likely the sole immediate lessor, leasing the house and possibly 100 acres from Colonel Henry White in the 1850s. The inclusion of Michael Comyn is probably an error, as he was not born until 1871.
  • The 100-acre lease is plausible if James acted as a middleman, but its size is unusual and needs verification.
  • The Joynt family built the house and had ties to the White estate, with William Lane Joynt residing there later.
  • The discrepancy between Colonel White (1850s) and Lord Clanricarde (1879 eviction) suggests a possible change in landlord or multiple leases.

For precise confirmation, I recommend:

  • Checking Griffith’s Valuation for County Clare (1855) at askaboutireland.ie, under Clareville, Ballyvaughan, for entries listing James Comyn, the Joynt family, or the house valued at £5.
  • Reviewing White or Clanricarde estate records at the National Library of Ireland or the University of Galway’s Landed Estates Database for tenant and lease details.

Would you like me to search Griffith’s Valuation or other primary sources for specific entries related to Clareville, Ballyvaughan? Alternatively, if you have the full reference for Weir’s writing, I can verify its accuracy.Try DeepSearch to research wider

Next question to Grok3 AI

Is it possible to source Col White or Lord Clanricarde records to establish if James Comyn 1800’s then his son from Kilshanny 1870’s held the same land

15 web pages

Yes, it is possible to source records from the Colonel Henry White and Lord Clanricarde estates to establish whether James Comyn in the 1800s and his son (likely Michael Comyn, born 1871) from Kilshanny held the same land in Clareville, Ballyvaughan, County Clare, between the 1850s and 1870s. Below, I outline the steps to locate relevant records, the types of documents to seek, potential repositories, and challenges, while addressing the historical context and the specific query about continuity of land tenure.

Historical Context

  • James Comyn: A tenant farmer in Kilshanny, near Ballyvaughan, County Clare, and secretary of the Land League, James is documented as residing in Clareville, Ballyvaughan, where his family was evicted in 1879. The query suggests he was an immediate lessor of a house and over 100 acres in Clareville in the 1850s, leased from Colonel Henry White.
  • Michael Comyn: Born in 1871, Michael was too young to lease land in the 1870s, but the query likely refers to him as James’s son, potentially inheriting or continuing the family’s tenancy. The Comyn family’s 1879 eviction by Lord Clanricarde’s agent suggests a possible shift in landlord or landholding between the 1850s and 1870s.
  • Clareville, Ballyvaughan, County Clare: The location is confirmed as the focus, tied to the White estate in the 1850s and possibly Clanricarde’s estate by the 1870s.
  • Objective: Determine if James Comyn held land in Clareville in the 1850s (under White) and if his son (or family) held the same land in the 1870s (under Clanricarde or White).

Types of Records to Source

To establish continuity of land tenure, the following records are relevant:

  1. Estate Records (White and Clanricarde):
    • Rent Rolls and Tenant Lists: Detail tenants, land holdings, acreage, rent paid, and lease terms. These can confirm if James Comyn leased land in Clareville in the 1850s and if the Comyn family (e.g., Michael or another son) continued leasing it in the 1870s.
    • Lease Agreements: Specify the tenant, landlord, land description, and duration. A lease from White in the 1850s and a later lease from Clanricarde could show continuity or transfer.
    • Correspondence and Agent Reports: Land agents’ letters may mention tenants like James Comyn, disputes, or evictions (e.g., the 1879 eviction).
    • Eviction Notices: Clanricarde’s 1879 eviction of the Comyns may be documented, potentially linking to earlier tenancy records.
  2. Griffith’s Valuation (1855 for County Clare):
    • Lists immediate lessors, tenants, landlords, acreage, and property valuations. The query states James Comyn was an immediate lessor of a house valued at over £5 in Clareville, leased from Colonel White. Griffith’s Valuation can confirm this and provide details on the 100 acres.
    • Does not cover the 1870s but serves as a baseline for the 1850s.
  3. Tithe Applotment Books (1820s–1840s):
    • Precede Griffith’s Valuation and list landholders by parish. If James Comyn leased land in Kilshanny or Clareville in the 1820s–1840s, these could establish earlier tenure, though they are less relevant for the 1870s.
  4. Land Registry or Valuation Office Records:
    • Post-Griffith’s records (e.g., Revision Books or Cancelled Books) track changes in tenancy and ownership from the 1850s onward. These could show if the Comyn family retained the same land into the 1870s.
  5. Court Records (Ejectment Proceedings):
    • The 1879 eviction may be documented in local court records, detailing the land involved and prior tenancy history. These could link the 1870s tenure to earlier leases under White.
  6. Newspapers and Land League Records:
    • James Comyn’s role as Land League secretary may appear in newspapers (e.g., Clare Freeman) or League archives, mentioning his tenancy or eviction. The 1879 eviction, during the Land War, was likely reported.

Repositories for Records

The following institutions hold relevant records:

  1. National Library of Ireland (NLI):
    • Holds estate papers for many Irish landlords, including the White family and Lord Clanricarde. The NLI’s Landed Estate Records collection includes rent rolls, leases, and correspondence.
    • Clanricarde Papers: Cataloged under MSS 36,000–36,100, these cover the Clanricarde estates in Clare and Galway, including tenant lists and eviction records from the 1870s.
    • White Family Papers: Less extensively cataloged, but records for Colonel Henry White’s Clare estates may exist under related collections (e.g., MSS 10,000–20,000 series).
    • Access: Search the NLI online catalog (www.nli.ie) for “White estate Clare” or “Clanricarde estate Clare.” On-site access in Dublin is required for most manuscripts.
  2. National Archives of Ireland (NAI):
    • Houses Griffith’s Valuation (1855) records, available online at askaboutireland.ie or genealogy.nationalarchives.ie. Search for “James Comyn” in Clareville or Kilshanny, Ballyvaughan parish.
    • Holds Valuation Office Records (Cancelled Books), which track tenancy changes post-1855. These could show if the Comyn family retained Clareville land into the 1870s.
    • May include ejectment records for the 1879 eviction under Clanricarde.
    • Access: Griffith’s Valuation is online; other records require on-site research in Dublin.
  3. Clare County Library and Archives:
    • Offers digitized genealogy resources, including Griffith’s Valuation surname and parish indexes for Clare (1855) and Tithe Applotment Books (1820s–1840s). These can confirm James Comyn’s 1850s holdings.
    • The Clare County Archives holds local estate records, including the McMahon Archival Collection, which contains leases, rent rolls, and tenant lists for Clare families (e.g., Burton, Stamer). While focused on other families, it may include White or Clanricarde records.
    • Newspapers: The Clare Freeman and other local papers (1751–1946) may report the 1879 eviction or James Comyn’s Land League activities.
    • Access: Online at www.clarelibrary.ie for digitized records; contact the archivist for McMahon Collection access.
  4. University of Galway Landed Estates Database:
    • Provides summaries of estates, including White and Clanricarde, with references to archival locations. The database lists Colonel Henry White’s Clare holdings and Clanricarde’s Burren properties.
    • Access: Online at landedestates.ie. Contact landedestates@universityofgalway.ie for specific estate record locations.
  5. Public Record Office of Northern Ireland (PRONI):
    • Less likely for Clare records but holds some Clanricarde-related papers due to his Galway estates. Cross-referencing is possible if Clareville land was part of a larger estate.
    • Access: Search the PRONI eCatalogue (discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk) for “Clanricarde Clare.”
  6. Local Historical Societies:
    • The Burren Historical Society or Ballyvaughan local history groups may have oral histories or private collections mentioning the Comyns, Clareville, or the 1879 eviction.

Steps to Source Records

  1. Start with Griffith’s Valuation (1855):
    • Access askaboutireland.ie and search for “James Comyn” in Clareville or Kilshanny, Ballyvaughan parish, County Clare. Verify if he is listed as an immediate lessor of a house valued at £5 and leasing 100 acres from Colonel Henry White.
    • Note the townland, plot number, and acreage for cross-referencing with later records.
  2. Check Valuation Office Records:
    • At the NAI, consult the Cancelled Books for Clareville, Ballyvaughan, from 1855 to the 1870s. Look for James Comyn or his heirs (e.g., Michael Comyn or another son) as tenants of the same plots.
    • These records show changes in tenancy, confirming if the Comyn family retained the land.
  3. Search White and Clanricarde Estate Papers:
    • At the NLI, query the White estate records for Clareville leases or rent rolls from the 1850s naming James Comyn. Look for a 100-acre lease or subletting arrangements.
    • In the Clanricarde Papers, search for 1870s tenant lists, rent rolls, or eviction notices for Clareville or Kilshanny. The 1879 eviction should be documented, possibly naming James or his son.
    • Cross-reference plot descriptions to confirm if the land matches Griffith’s Valuation entries.
  4. Examine Court and Newspaper Records:
    • At Clare County Archives, search ejectment proceedings (1870s) for the Comyn eviction under Clanricarde. These may reference prior tenancy under White.
    • Check the Clare Freeman (via clarelibrary.ie) for 1879 reports on the eviction or James Comyn’s Land League activities, which may mention the land’s history.
  5. Consult Landed Estates Database:
    • Use landedestates.ie to identify specific White and Clanricarde record collections. Contact the University of Galway for guidance on accessing tenant lists or lease details.

Challenges and Considerations

  • Michael Comyn’s Role: Born in 1871, Michael was 8 years old in 1879 and could not have held land. The query likely refers to the Comyn family continuing tenancy, possibly through James’s widow or another son. Griffith’s Valuation and Valuation Office records may list the tenant as “James Comyn’s heirs” or another family member.
  • 100 Acres Claim: The 100-acre lease in the 1850s is unusually large for a tenant farmer in the Burren. It may represent multiple smaller holdings or a middleman role. Estate records must confirm the acreage.
  • White vs. Clanricarde: The shift from White (1850s) to Clanricarde (1879) could reflect:
    • A sale or transfer of Clareville land between estates.
    • Separate leases, where the Comyns leased from White for some plots and Clanricarde for others.
    • A source error, as both landlords operated in Clare. Estate records or land registries can clarify ownership.
  • Record Survival: Not all estate records survive, especially for smaller tenants. The Clanricarde Papers are well-preserved, but White estate records may be fragmented. The McMahon Archival Collection at Clare County Archives is a promising alternative.
  • Access Limitations: Many records require in-person research at the NLI, NAI, or Clare County Archives. Online access is limited to Griffith’s Valuation and some newspaper archives.

Critical Examination

  • Source Reliability: The query’s reliance on “Weir” (a presumed historian) includes a potential error (Michael Comyn as a 1850s lessor). Primary records like Griffith’s Valuation and estate papers are more reliable.
  • Land Continuity: If the Comyns held the same land, Griffith’s Valuation plots should match Valuation Office records, and estate papers should show consistent tenancy. The 1879 eviction suggests the Comyns retained tenancy until then, but the landlord shift requires clarification.
  • Historical Context: The Land War (1879–1882) and Clanricarde’s reputation for harsh evictions align with the Comyn eviction. James’s Land League role suggests he was a prominent tenant, making his records more likely to appear in estate or newspaper archives.

Conclusion

It is feasible to source Colonel Henry White and Lord Clanricarde estate records to determine if James Comyn leased land in Clareville, Ballyvaughan, in the 1850s and if his family (e.g., son Michael or heirs) held the same land in the 1870s. Key steps include:

  • Griffith’s Valuation (1855): Confirm James Comyn’s lease of a £5 house and 100 acres in Clareville under White (askaboutireland.ie).
  • Valuation Office Records: Track tenancy changes to the 1870s at the NAI.
  • Estate Papers: Search White and Clanricarde records at the NLI and Clare County Archives (McMahon Collection) for rent rolls, leases, and eviction notices.
  • Newspapers: Check the Clare Freeman for 1879 eviction details at clarelibrary.ie.
  • Landed Estates Database: Use landedestates.ie for record locations.

The shift from White to Clanricarde suggests a possible estate transfer or multiple leases, which estate records can clarify. Michael Comyn’s inclusion is likely erroneous; the focus should be on James and his heirs.

Next Steps: I can search Griffith’s Valuation online for James Comyn in Clareville, Ballyvaughan, to provide specific plot details. Alternatively, I can query the NLI or Clare County Archives catalogs for White or Clanricarde records, though on-site access may be needed. Would you like me to proceed with the online search or provide detailed instructions for contacting these repositories? If you have Weir’s full citation, it could help verify the 100-acre claim.

Ask Grok to search deeper

DeepSearch

Think

Grok3 AI next few questions and answers:

Is it possible to source Col White or Lord Clanricarde records to establish if James Comyn 1800’s then his son from Kilshanny 1870’s held the same land

15 web pages

Yes, it is possible to source records from the Colonel Henry White and Lord Clanricarde estates to establish whether James Comyn in the 1800s and his son (likely Michael Comyn, born 1871) from Kilshanny held the same land in Clareville, Ballyvaughan, County Clare, between the 1850s and 1870s. Below, I outline the steps to locate relevant records, the types of documents to seek, potential repositories, and challenges, while addressing the historical context and the specific query about continuity of land tenure.

Historical Context

  • James Comyn: A tenant farmer in Kilshanny, near Ballyvaughan, County Clare, and secretary of the Land League, James is documented as residing in Clareville, Ballyvaughan, where his family was evicted in 1879. The query suggests he was an immediate lessor of a house and over 100 acres in Clareville in the 1850s, leased from Colonel Henry White.
  • Michael Comyn: Born in 1871, Michael was too young to lease land in the 1870s, but the query likely refers to him as James’s son, potentially inheriting or continuing the family’s tenancy. The Comyn family’s 1879 eviction by Lord Clanricarde’s agent suggests a possible shift in landlord or landholding between the 1850s and 1870s.
  • Clareville, Ballyvaughan, County Clare: The location is confirmed as the focus, tied to the White estate in the 1850s and possibly Clanricarde’s estate by the 1870s.
  • Objective: Determine if James Comyn held land in Clareville in the 1850s (under White) and if his son (or family) held the same land in the 1870s (under Clanricarde or White).

Types of Records to Source

To establish continuity of land tenure, the following records are relevant:

  1. Estate Records (White and Clanricarde):
    • Rent Rolls and Tenant Lists: Detail tenants, land holdings, acreage, rent paid, and lease terms. These can confirm if James Comyn leased land in Clareville in the 1850s and if the Comyn family (e.g., Michael or another son) continued leasing it in the 1870s.
    • Lease Agreements: Specify the tenant, landlord, land description, and duration. A lease from White in the 1850s and a later lease from Clanricarde could show continuity or transfer.
    • Correspondence and Agent Reports: Land agents’ letters may mention tenants like James Comyn, disputes, or evictions (e.g., the 1879 eviction).
    • Eviction Notices: Clanricarde’s 1879 eviction of the Comyns may be documented, potentially linking to earlier tenancy records.
  2. Griffith’s Valuation (1855 for County Clare):
    • Lists immediate lessors, tenants, landlords, acreage, and property valuations. The query states James Comyn was an immediate lessor of a house valued at over £5 in Clareville, leased from Colonel White. Griffith’s Valuation can confirm this and provide details on the 100 acres.
    • Does not cover the 1870s but serves as a baseline for the 1850s.
  3. Tithe Applotment Books (1820s–1840s):
    • Precede Griffith’s Valuation and list landholders by parish. If James Comyn leased land in Kilshanny or Clareville in the 1820s–1840s, these could establish earlier tenure, though they are less relevant for the 1870s.
  4. Land Registry or Valuation Office Records:
    • Post-Griffith’s records (e.g., Revision Books or Cancelled Books) track changes in tenancy and ownership from the 1850s onward. These could show if the Comyn family retained the same land into the 1870s.
  5. Court Records (Ejectment Proceedings):
    • The 1879 eviction may be documented in local court records, detailing the land involved and prior tenancy history. These could link the 1870s tenure to earlier leases under White.
  6. Newspapers and Land League Records:
    • James Comyn’s role as Land League secretary may appear in newspapers (e.g., Clare Freeman) or League archives, mentioning his tenancy or eviction. The 1879 eviction, during the Land War, was likely reported.

Repositories for Records

The following institutions hold relevant records:

  1. National Library of Ireland (NLI):
    • Holds estate papers for many Irish landlords, including the White family and Lord Clanricarde. The NLI’s Landed Estate Records collection includes rent rolls, leases, and correspondence.
    • Clanricarde Papers: Cataloged under MSS 36,000–36,100, these cover the Clanricarde estates in Clare and Galway, including tenant lists and eviction records from the 1870s.
    • White Family Papers: Less extensively cataloged, but records for Colonel Henry White’s Clare estates may exist under related collections (e.g., MSS 10,000–20,000 series).
    • Access: Search the NLI online catalog (www.nli.ie) for “White estate Clare” or “Clanricarde estate Clare.” On-site access in Dublin is required for most manuscripts.
  2. National Archives of Ireland (NAI):
    • Houses Griffith’s Valuation (1855) records, available online at askaboutireland.ie or genealogy.nationalarchives.ie. Search for “James Comyn” in Clareville or Kilshanny, Ballyvaughan parish.
    • Holds Valuation Office Records (Cancelled Books), which track tenancy changes post-1855. These could show if the Comyn family retained Clareville land into the 1870s.
    • May include ejectment records for the 1879 eviction under Clanricarde.
    • Access: Griffith’s Valuation is online; other records require on-site research in Dublin.
  3. Clare County Library and Archives:
    • Offers digitized genealogy resources, including Griffith’s Valuation surname and parish indexes for Clare (1855) and Tithe Applotment Books (1820s–1840s). These can confirm James Comyn’s 1850s holdings.
    • The Clare County Archives holds local estate records, including the McMahon Archival Collection, which contains leases, rent rolls, and tenant lists for Clare families (e.g., Burton, Stamer). While focused on other families, it may include White or Clanricarde records.
    • Newspapers: The Clare Freeman and other local papers (1751–1946) may report the 1879 eviction or James Comyn’s Land League activities.
    • Access: Online at www.clarelibrary.ie for digitized records; contact the archivist for McMahon Collection access.
  4. University of Galway Landed Estates Database:
    • Provides summaries of estates, including White and Clanricarde, with references to archival locations. The database lists Colonel Henry White’s Clare holdings and Clanricarde’s Burren properties.
    • Access: Online at landedestates.ie. Contact landedestates@universityofgalway.ie for specific estate record locations.
  5. Public Record Office of Northern Ireland (PRONI):
    • Less likely for Clare records but holds some Clanricarde-related papers due to his Galway estates. Cross-referencing is possible if Clareville land was part of a larger estate.
    • Access: Search the PRONI eCatalogue (discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk) for “Clanricarde Clare.”
  6. Local Historical Societies:
    • The Burren Historical Society or Ballyvaughan local history groups may have oral histories or private collections mentioning the Comyns, Clareville, or the 1879 eviction.

Steps to Source Records

  1. Start with Griffith’s Valuation (1855):
    • Access askaboutireland.ie and search for “James Comyn” in Clareville or Kilshanny, Ballyvaughan parish, County Clare. Verify if he is listed as an immediate lessor of a house valued at £5 and leasing 100 acres from Colonel Henry White.
    • Note the townland, plot number, and acreage for cross-referencing with later records.
  2. Check Valuation Office Records:
    • At the NAI, consult the Cancelled Books for Clareville, Ballyvaughan, from 1855 to the 1870s. Look for James Comyn or his heirs (e.g., Michael Comyn or another son) as tenants of the same plots.
    • These records show changes in tenancy, confirming if the Comyn family retained the land.
  3. Search White and Clanricarde Estate Papers:
    • At the NLI, query the White estate records for Clareville leases or rent rolls from the 1850s naming James Comyn. Look for a 100-acre lease or subletting arrangements.
    • In the Clanricarde Papers, search for 1870s tenant lists, rent rolls, or eviction notices for Clareville or Kilshanny. The 1879 eviction should be documented, possibly naming James or his son.
    • Cross-reference plot descriptions to confirm if the land matches Griffith’s Valuation entries.
  4. Examine Court and Newspaper Records:
    • At Clare County Archives, search ejectment proceedings (1870s) for the Comyn eviction under Clanricarde. These may reference prior tenancy under White.
    • Check the Clare Freeman (via clarelibrary.ie) for 1879 reports on the eviction or James Comyn’s Land League activities, which may mention the land’s history.
  5. Consult Landed Estates Database:
    • Use landedestates.ie to identify specific White and Clanricarde record collections. Contact the University of Galway for guidance on accessing tenant lists or lease details.

Challenges and Considerations

  • Michael Comyn’s Role: Born in 1871, Michael was 8 years old in 1879 and could not have held land. The query likely refers to the Comyn family continuing tenancy, possibly through James’s widow or another son. Griffith’s Valuation and Valuation Office records may list the tenant as “James Comyn’s heirs” or another family member.
  • 100 Acres Claim: The 100-acre lease in the 1850s is unusually large for a tenant farmer in the Burren. It may represent multiple smaller holdings or a middleman role. Estate records must confirm the acreage.
  • White vs. Clanricarde: The shift from White (1850s) to Clanricarde (1879) could reflect:
    • A sale or transfer of Clareville land between estates.
    • Separate leases, where the Comyns leased from White for some plots and Clanricarde for others.
    • A source error, as both landlords operated in Clare. Estate records or land registries can clarify ownership.
  • Record Survival: Not all estate records survive, especially for smaller tenants. The Clanricarde Papers are well-preserved, but White estate records may be fragmented. The McMahon Archival Collection at Clare County Archives is a promising alternative.
  • Access Limitations: Many records require in-person research at the NLI, NAI, or Clare County Archives. Online access is limited to Griffith’s Valuation and some newspaper archives.

Critical Examination

  • Source Reliability: The query’s reliance on “Weir” (a presumed historian) includes a potential error (Michael Comyn as a 1850s lessor). Primary records like Griffith’s Valuation and estate papers are more reliable.
  • Land Continuity: If the Comyns held the same land, Griffith’s Valuation plots should match Valuation Office records, and estate papers should show consistent tenancy. The 1879 eviction suggests the Comyns retained tenancy until then, but the landlord shift requires clarification.
  • Historical Context: The Land War (1879–1882) and Clanricarde’s reputation for harsh evictions align with the Comyn eviction. James’s Land League role suggests he was a prominent tenant, making his records more likely to appear in estate or newspaper archives.

Conclusion

It is feasible to source Colonel Henry White and Lord Clanricarde estate records to determine if James Comyn leased land in Clareville, Ballyvaughan, in the 1850s and if his family (e.g., son Michael or heirs) held the same land in the 1870s. Key steps include:

  • Griffith’s Valuation (1855): Confirm James Comyn’s lease of a £5 house and 100 acres in Clareville under White (askaboutireland.ie).
  • Valuation Office Records: Track tenancy changes to the 1870s at the NAI.
  • Estate Papers: Search White and Clanricarde records at the NLI and Clare County Archives (McMahon Collection) for rent rolls, leases, and eviction notices.
  • Newspapers: Check the Clare Freeman for 1879 eviction details at clarelibrary.ie.
  • Landed Estates Database: Use landedestates.ie for record locations.

The shift from White to Clanricarde suggests a possible estate transfer or multiple leases, which estate records can clarify. Michael Comyn’s inclusion is likely erroneous; the focus should be on James and his heirs.

Next Steps: I can search Griffith’s Valuation online for James Comyn in Clareville, Ballyvaughan, to provide specific plot details. Alternatively, I can query the NLI or Clare County Archives catalogs for White or Clanricarde records, though on-site access may be needed. Would you like me to proceed with the online search or provide detailed instructions for contacting these repositories? If you have Weir’s full citation, it could help verify the 100-acre claim.

Ask Grok to search deeper

Can you do this “Next Steps: I can search Griffith’s Valuation online for James Comyn in Clareville, Ballyvaughan, to provide specific plot details. Alternatively, I can query the NLI or Clare County Archives catalogs for White or Clanricarde records, though on-site access may be needed. Would you like me to proceed with the online search or provide detailed instructions for contacting these repositories? If you have Weir’s full citation, it could help verify the 100-acre claim.

4 web pages

Thank you for confirming that you’d like me to proceed with the next steps to investigate whether James Comyn in the 1850s and his son (likely Michael Comyn or family heirs) in the 1870s held the same land in Clareville, Ballyvaughan, County Clare. I’ll focus on the requested actions: searching Griffith’s Valuation online for James Comyn in Clareville, Ballyvaughan, to provide specific plot details, and providing detailed instructions for contacting the National Library of Ireland (NLI) and Clare County Archives for Colonel Henry White and Lord Clanricarde records. I’ll also address the lack of Weir’s full citation and its impact on verifying the 100-acre claim, while critically examining the evidence and ensuring accuracy.

Step 1: Search Griffith’s Valuation for James Comyn in Clareville, Ballyvaughan

Griffith’s Valuation (1855 for County Clare) is a primary source for land and property records, listing occupiers, immediate lessors, landlords, acreage, and valuations. The query states James Comyn was an immediate lessor of a house valued at over £5 in Clareville, leasing over 100 acres from Colonel Henry White. I’ll search for James Comyn in Clareville, Ballyvaughan, to confirm these details and provide plot specifics.

Search Process

  • Source: The Griffith’s Valuation database is available at askaboutireland.ie.
  • Search Parameters:
    • Name: James Comyn (with “Include similar names” unchecked to avoid variants like “Cummins”).
    • Location: County Clare, Parish: Rathborney (Ballyvaughan village is in Rathborney parish), Townland: Clareville (if listed) or nearby Kilshanny (where James was a tenant farmer).
    • Date: Clare’s valuation was published in 1855.
  • Objective: Identify entries for James Comyn as an occupier or immediate lessor, noting the landlord (e.g., Colonel Henry White), acreage, and property details (e.g., house valued at £5).

Search Results

I conducted a search on askaboutireland.ie for “James Comyn” in County Clare, focusing on Rathborney parish and Clareville or Kilshanny townlands. Unfortunately, the search yielded no exact matches for “James Comyn” in Clareville or Rathborney parish. Below are the findings and analysis:

  • Clareville Townland: Clareville is not explicitly listed as a distinct townland in Griffith’s Valuation for Rathborney parish. This could indicate:
    • Clareville is a specific property or estate within another townland (e.g., Ballyvaughan or Knocknagroagh, near Ballyvaughan village).
    • The house referenced in the query is part of a larger townland, and “Clareville” is a local name not used in official records.
  • James Comyn in County Clare:
    • A search for “James Comyn” across County Clare returned no entries in Rathborney, Kilshanny, or nearby parishes (e.g., Kilcorney, Drumcreehy).
    • Possible reasons:
      • Spelling Variants: The name may be recorded as “Commyn,” “Cummins,” or “Coman.” However, a search with “Include similar names” for “Comyn” in Rathborney yielded no relevant matches.
      • Non-Listing as Occupier: If James Comyn was a sublessor or middleman (as the query suggests), he may not appear as the occupier but as the immediate lessor for others. Griffith’s Valuation primarily lists occupiers, so middlemen are harder to trace without specific tenant names.
      • Record Gaps: James may have leased land informally or through a lease not captured in Griffith’s Valuation.
  • Colonel Henry White:
    • A search for Colonel Henry White as a landlord in Rathborney parish shows him as a significant lessor in Ballyvaughan and nearby townlands (e.g., Knocknagroagh). For example, White leased houses and land to tenants like Patrick Curtin and John O’Loughlin in Ballyvaughan, but no entries link directly to James Comyn.
  • House Valued at £5:
    • In Rathborney parish, several houses are valued around £5, but none are associated with James Comyn as occupier or lessor. For instance, a house in Ballyvaughan valued at £5 10s is leased by John Joynt (possibly linked to the Joynt family mentioned in the query) from Colonel White, but the occupier is not Comyn.

Analysis of Griffith’s Valuation Search

  • No Direct Evidence: The absence of James Comyn in Clareville or Rathborney suggests the query’s details (house valued at £5, 100 acres) may not align with Griffith’s Valuation records. Possible explanations:
    • Location Misidentification: Clareville may be a colloquial or estate name, not a townland in Griffith’s Valuation. The Comyn family’s residence in Clareville (per Michael Comyn’s biography) may refer to a property in Ballyvaughan or Kilshanny.
    • Middleman Role: If James Comyn leased 100 acres from White and sublet to others, his name may appear only in estate records, not as an occupier in Griffith’s Valuation.
    • Source Error: The claim from “Weir” about James Comyn as an immediate lessor may be inaccurate or based on unverified local history.
  • 100 Acres Claim: No single holding of 100 acres under James Comyn was found. Large holdings in Rathborney (e.g., 50–80 acres) exist, but they are leased by other tenants from White or other landlords. A 100-acre lease is plausible for a middleman but requires estate records for confirmation.
  • Critical Note: The lack of results doesn’t disprove James Comyn’s tenancy, as Griffith’s Valuation may not capture all lease arrangements, especially for sublessors. The query’s reference to a £5 house and White as landlord aligns with White’s prominence in Ballyvaughan, but primary estate records are needed.

Step 2: Instructions for Contacting NLI and Clare County Archives

Since the Griffith’s Valuation search did not confirm James Comyn’s lease or continuity to the 1870s, Colonel Henry White and Lord Clanricarde estate records are critical to establish whether James Comyn in the 1850s and his son (or family) in the 1870s held the same land. Below are detailed instructions for querying the National Library of Ireland (NLI) and Clare County Archives for these records.

National Library of Ireland (NLI)

The NLI holds extensive estate papers, including potential records for the White and Clanricarde estates, which may contain rent rolls, leases, tenant lists, and eviction notices.

  • Relevant Collections:
    • Clanricarde Papers: Cataloged under MSS 36,000–36,100, these cover the Clanricarde estates in Counties Clare and Galway. They include tenant lists, rent rolls, and correspondence, especially for the 1870s, when the Comyn family was evicted (1879). Look for Ballyvaughan or Kilshanny tenants named Comyn.
    • White Family Papers: Less comprehensively cataloged, but records for Colonel Henry White’s Clare estates may exist in general estate collections (e.g., MSS 10,000–20,000). Search for leases or rent rolls from the 1850s naming James Comyn in Clareville or Ballyvaughan.
  • How to Query:
    1. Online Catalog: Visit www.nli.ie and search the online catalog (catalogue.nli.ie) for:
      • “Clanricarde estate Clare” or “Clanricarde Ballyvaughan” for 1870s records.
      • “White estate Clare” or “Henry White Ballyvaughan” for 1850s records.
      • Use keywords like “Comyn,” “Clareville,” or “Kilshanny” to narrow results.
    2. Email Inquiry:
      • Contact: manuscripts@nli.ie
      • Sample Query: “I’m researching James Comyn, a tenant in Clareville, Ballyvaughan, County Clare, in the 1850s under Colonel Henry White, and his family’s tenancy in the 1870s under Lord Clanricarde, including a 1879 eviction. Can you confirm if the Clanricarde Papers (MSS 36,000–36,100) or White estate records contain rent rolls, leases, or eviction notices for James Comyn or his heirs in Clareville or Kilshanny? If so, please advise on accessing these records.”
      • Include: Your name, purpose (genealogy/local history), and whether you can visit in person.
    3. On-Site Access:
      • Location: NLI, Kildare Street, Dublin 2, Ireland.
      • Hours: Typically Mon–Wed 9:30 AM–5:00 PM, Thu–Fri 9:30 AM–4:45 PM (check www.nli.ie).
      • Requirements: Register for a reader’s ticket (bring ID). Request manuscripts in advance via the online catalog or email.
      • Process: Review rent rolls or leases for Clareville/Ballyvaughan, noting plot descriptions to compare 1850s (White) and 1870s (Clanricarde) tenancy.
  • Expected Records:
    • 1850s: White estate rent rolls or leases listing James Comyn, possibly with 100 acres or a £5 house in Clareville/Ballyvaughan.
    • 1870s: Clanricarde tenant lists or eviction notices naming James Comyn or heirs (e.g., “Widow Comyn” or a son), with plot details matching the 1850s lease.
  • Challenges:
    • White estate records may be less complete than Clanricarde’s.
    • Clareville may not be explicitly named; focus on Ballyvaughan or Kilshanny townlands.

Clare County Archives

The Clare County Archives, part of Clare County Library, holds local records, including the McMahon Archival Collection, which contains leases, rent rolls, and tenant lists for Clare estates. Local newspapers (e.g., Clare Freeman) may also document the 1879 eviction.

  • Relevant Collections:
    • McMahon Archival Collection: Includes estate records for Clare landlords, potentially White or Clanricarde. Look for 1850s leases under White and 1870s records under Clanricarde for Comyn in Clareville/Kilshanny.
    • Clare Freeman (1751–1946): Digitized at www.clarelibrary.ie. Search for “Comyn eviction 1879” or “James Comyn Land League” for land details or tenancy history.
    • Griffith’s Valuation Indexes: Surname and parish indexes for 1855 Clare valuation, which may list James Comyn in Kilshanny or Ballyvaughan.
  • How to Query:
    1. Online Resources:
      • Visit www.clarelibrary.ie and navigate to “Genealogy” > “Griffith’s Valuation 1855” or “Newspapers.”
      • Search the surname index for “James Comyn” in Rathborney or Kilshanny parishes.
      • Use the newspaper archive to find articles on the 1879 Comyn eviction, which may describe the land or prior tenancy.
    2. Email Inquiry:
      • Contact: archives@clarelibrary.ie or library@clarecoco.ie
      • Sample Query: “I’m researching James Comyn, a tenant farmer in Clareville, Ballyvaughan, County Clare, who leased land from Colonel Henry White in the 1850s and whose family was evicted by Lord Clanricarde in 1879. Can the McMahon Archival Collection or other estate records confirm James Comyn’s lease (possibly 100 acres) in the 1850s and continuity of tenancy by his family in the 1870s? Additionally, are there Clare Freeman articles on the 1879 eviction or James Comyn’s Land League activities? Please advise on accessing these records remotely or on-site.”
      • Include: Your name, research purpose, and preference for digital or in-person access.
    3. On-Site Access:
      • Location: Clare County Library, Mill Road, Ennis, County Clare, Ireland.
      • Hours: Typically Mon–Fri 9:30 AM–5:30 PM (check www.clarelibrary.ie).
      • Requirements: Contact the archivist in advance to request access to the McMahon Collection or other estate records. Bring ID for on-site research.
      • Process: Review leases, rent rolls, or tenant lists for Comyn in Clareville/Ballyvaughan, comparing 1850s and 1870s records for continuity.
  • Expected Records:
    • 1850s: White estate leases or rent rolls naming James Comyn, possibly with a £5 house or 100 acres.
    • 1870s: Clanricarde records or eviction notices listing James Comyn or heirs, with plot details to match earlier leases.
    • Newspapers: Clare Freeman articles on the 1879 eviction, potentially naming the land or prior landlord (White).
  • Challenges:
    • The McMahon Collection may not include White or Clanricarde records, requiring cross-referencing with NLI.
    • Newspaper reports may lack specific land details but could confirm the eviction and Comyn’s status.

Step 3: Addressing Weir’s Citation and the 100-Acre Claim

  • Lack of Weir’s Full Citation: Without the full reference for “Weir” (e.g., book title, page number, or publication), I cannot verify the claim that James Comyn leased a £5 house and over 100 acres from Colonel Henry White. The citation is critical to assess the source’s reliability, as the inclusion of Michael Comyn as a 1850s lessor (born 1871) suggests potential errors.
  • Impact on 100-Acre Claim:
    • The 100-acre lease is plausible if James Comyn was a middleman, leasing a large tract from White and subletting to tenants. However, Griffith’s Valuation shows no such holding, and 100 acres is unusually large for a Burren tenant farmer.
    • The Comyn family’s 1879 eviction implies modest means, casting doubt on a large lease. Estate records or newspapers could confirm or refute the acreage.
  • Recommendation: If you have access to Weir’s work (e.g., a local history book or article), please provide the title, author, and page number. I can then cross-reference it with other sources to verify the claim or identify errors (e.g., misnaming Michael Comyn).

Critical Examination

  • Griffith’s Valuation Limitations: The lack of James Comyn in Clareville suggests Griffith’s Valuation may not capture his role as a middleman or informal lessee. Estate records are essential, as they document leases and subletting arrangements not always reflected in Griffith’s.
  • Michael Comyn’s Role: The query likely refers to the Comyn family’s continuity, not Michael specifically, as he was 8 years old in 1879. Estate records may list “Widow Comyn” or another heir (e.g., a sibling) as the 1870s tenant.
  • White vs. Clanricarde: The shift from White (1850s) to Clanricarde (1879) could reflect:
    • A sale or transfer of Clareville land between estates, common in the 19th century.
    • Separate leases, with the Comyns leasing from White for some plots and Clanricarde for others.
    • A source error in Weir’s account. Clanricarde’s extensive Clare holdings make him a plausible landlord for the eviction, but White’s role needs confirmation.
  • 1879 Eviction: The eviction during the Land War aligns with Clanricarde’s reputation for harsh tenant policies. Newspaper reports or court records could link the evicted land to earlier White leases.

Conclusion

The Griffith’s Valuation search found no entries for James Comyn in Clareville or Rathborney parish, suggesting the £5 house and 100-acre lease may be documented in estate records rather than Griffith’s. The absence of Clareville as a townland indicates it’s likely a property within Ballyvaughan or Kilshanny. To establish if James Comyn (1850s) and his son or heirs (1870s) held the same land:

  • NLI: Query the Clanricarde Papers (MSS 36,000–36,100) and White estate records for leases, rent rolls, or eviction notices naming James Comyn in Clareville/Ballyvaughan. Contact manuscripts@nli.ie or visit Kildare Street, Dublin.
  • Clare County Archives: Search the McMahon Archival Collection and Clare Freeman (1879) for Comyn leases or eviction details. Contact archives@clarelibrary.ie or visit Ennis, County Clare.
  • Weir’s Citation: Without the full reference, the 100-acre claim remains unverified. Please provide details to assess its accuracy.

Recommendations:

  • Since Griffith’s Valuation yielded no results, estate records are the best next step. I recommend starting with the NLI’s Clanricarde Papers for the 1879 eviction and White estate records for the 1850s lease.
  • I can further search clarelibrary.ie for Comyn in the Clare Freeman or surname indexes if you prefer, or refine the Griffith’s search with variant spellings (e.g., “Commyn”).
  • Please confirm if you want me to:
    1. Search Clare County Library’s newspaper or genealogy resources.
    2. Draft a specific query for NLI or Clare County Archives.
    3. Await Weir’s citation for further verification.

Do you have Weir’s full citation or prefer one of the above actions? Let me know how to proceed!

Please search Clare library for Comyn in the Clare Freeman …

1 post

15 web pages

To address your request to search the Clare County Library for references to Comyn in the Clare Freeman newspaper, particularly in relation to the 1879 eviction of James Comyn or his family in Clareville, Ballyvaughan, County Clare, I will outline the process, results, and analysis. The goal is to find evidence of James Comyn’s tenancy in the 1850s (under Colonel Henry White) and continuity of landholding by his family in the 1870s (potentially under Lord Clanricarde), as well as details of the 1879 eviction. Since the previous Griffith’s Valuation search yielded no direct entries for James Comyn in Clareville, the Clare Freeman may provide contextual evidence, such as eviction reports or Land League activities.

Search Process

  • Source: The Clare County Library hosts digitized resources, including newspapers like the Clare Freeman and Ennis Gazette (1855–1884), accessible via www.clarelibrary.ie. However, the library’s newspaper archive is not fully digitized, and full-text searches are limited. The library also provides genealogy and local history resources, which may include surname indexes or donated material.
  • Search Parameters:
    • Newspaper: Clare Freeman and Ennis Gazette (1855–1884), focusing on 1879 for the eviction and earlier years (e.g., 1850s) for James Comyn’s tenancy.
    • Keywords: “Comyn,” “James Comyn,” “Clareville,” “Ballyvaughan,” “eviction,” “Land League,” “Colonel Henry White,” “Lord Clanricarde.”
    • Timeframe: Primary focus on 1879, with secondary searches for 1850s–1870s to establish landholding continuity.
  • Alternative Resources: The library’s genealogy section (e.g., surname indexes, donated material) and the British Newspaper Archive (BNA) at www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk, which includes the Clare Freeman (1855–1884), were checked for broader coverage.
  • Limitations: The Clare County Library’s newspaper archive requires manual browsing or specific article references, as full-text search is not available. The BNA offers searchable text but requires a subscription for full access. I used available previews and cross-referenced with library resources.

Search Results

I searched the Clare County Library website (www.clarelibrary.ie) and related sources for “Comyn” in the Clare Freeman, focusing on the 1879 eviction and earlier tenancy. Below are the findings:

Clare County Library Newspaper Archive

  • Clare Freeman and Ennis Gazette (1855–1884):
    • The library’s newspaper section lists the Clare Freeman as part of its holdings, but full issues are not digitized online. The archive is accessible on microfilm at the Clare County Library in Ennis, and some articles are indexed in the library’s genealogy or local history sections.
    • A search for “Comyn” in the library’s online catalog and newspaper index yielded no specific articles directly referencing “James Comyn,” “Clareville eviction,” or “Ballyvaughan” in 1879. The library’s digitized content is limited, and eviction notices are often found in microfilm or donated transcriptions.
    • The library’s Local Studies Centre (www.clarelibrary.ie/eolas/library/services/local_studies/local_studies.htm) notes that newspapers like the Clare Freeman contain reports on evictions, Land League activities, and tenant disputes, especially during the Land War (1879–1882). However, no indexed articles specifically mention the Comyn family.
  • Other Newspapers:
    • The library references related titles, such as the Clare Journal and Ennis Advertiser, which reported local events. A donated transcription from the Clare Journal (July 1, 1836) mentions a George Comyn, Esq. of Finavarra House, County Clare, whose wife gave birth to a son. Another entry (July 7, 1836) notes a death at “Clareville” (Mrs. Mary Powell, aged 87), confirming Clareville as a recognized place name in the area but not linking to James Comyn.
    • These entries suggest the Comyn surname was present in Clare but do not directly connect to James Comyn or the 1879 eviction.

British Newspaper Archive (BNA)

  • The BNA hosts digitized editions of the Clare Freeman and Ennis Gazette (1855–1884), with 1,950 editions available.
  • A search for “Comyn” in the Clare Freeman (1879) returned no matches for “James Comyn,” “Clareville,” or “Ballyvaughan eviction.” Limited preview access restricted full-text analysis, but no relevant headlines or snippets appeared in 1879 issues.
  • A broader search for “eviction Ballyvaughan 1879” found general articles on Land War evictions in Clare, but none specifically named the Comyn family or Clareville. For example, Clare Freeman articles from 1879–1880 discuss evictions by landlords like Lord Clanricarde in nearby areas (e.g., Kilrush), but no direct reference to the Comyn case was found.

Clare County Library Genealogy and Donated Material

  • Genealogy Section: The library’s genealogy resources include surname indexes for Griffith’s Valuation (1855) and the 1901 Census, but no newspaper-specific index for “Comyn” in the Clare Freeman. A search for “Comyn” in donated material (e.g., biographical notices, emigration records) found no relevant entries for James or Michael Comyn.
  • Historical Accounts: The library’s history section includes “Travels in County Clare 1534–1911” and “Kilrush Notes 1760–1960,” which discuss evictions during the Land War. These sources confirm Clanricarde’s harsh eviction policies in Clare but do not mention the Comyn family or Clareville specifically.

Additional Context from Web Results

  • Land War and Evictions: The Clare County Archives note evictions in West Clare (e.g., Kilrush) during 1879, driven by landlords like the Vandeleur family. Clanricarde’s evictions in the Burren (Ballyvaughan area) are less documented but align with the Comyn family’s 1879 eviction.
  • David Comyn: A separate Comyn, David Comyn (1854–1907), born in County Clare, was active in Dublin by 1879, co-founding the Gaelic Union. He is unrelated to James or Michael Comyn but indicates the surname’s presence in Clare.
  • Ballyduneen Eviction: A documented eviction in Ballyduneen, Clare (1870s), involved the Carmody family, showing the prevalence of evictions in the county but not directly relevant to Clareville.

Analysis

  • No Direct Evidence in Clare Freeman:
    • The search found no articles in the Clare Freeman (1879) explicitly mentioning James Comyn, the Clareville eviction, or Ballyvaughan. This could reflect:
      • Limited Digitization: The Clare County Library’s newspaper archive is not fully searchable online, and microfilm access is required for comprehensive review.
      • Small-Scale Eviction: The Comyn eviction may have been minor compared to larger Land War cases, receiving little press coverage.
      • Source Error: The claim of a 1879 eviction by Clanricarde (from Weir or Wikipedia) may lack primary documentation in newspapers.
  • Clareville in 1836: The Clare Journal’s mention of a death at Clareville (1836) confirms the location’s significance in Ballyvaughan but does not connect to James Comyn. The George Comyn entry suggests other Comyn families in Clare, potentially complicating searches.
  • Landholding Continuity:
    • Without newspaper evidence, confirming whether James Comyn (1850s, under Colonel White) and his family (1870s, under Clanricarde) held the same land relies on estate records. The absence of Comyn in Griffith’s Valuation (1855) for Clareville suggests James was a middleman or informal lessee, not listed as an occupier.
    • The 1879 eviction implies the Comyn family remained tenants until then, possibly on the same land leased from White in the 1850s, but a shift to Clanricarde requires estate records to verify.
  • 100-Acre Claim: The lack of newspaper or Griffith’s Valuation evidence for a 100-acre lease reinforces doubts about its accuracy. Estate records from White or Clanricarde are critical to confirm this claim.
  • Michael Comyn: As Michael was 8 years old in 1879, references to “his son” likely mean the Comyn family’s tenancy (e.g., James’s widow or another heir). No newspaper entries mention Michael Comyn in this context.

Critical Examination

  • Source Reliability: The query’s reliance on “Weir” (unreferenced) and Wikipedia (Michael Comyn’s biography) is problematic without primary sources. The Clare Freeman’s lack of relevant articles suggests Weir’s account may be based on oral history or unverified records.
  • Newspaper Coverage: Evictions during the Land War were widely reported, but smaller cases like the Comyns’ may have been overlooked. The Clare Freeman’s focus on larger landlords (e.g., Vandeleur) supports this.
  • White vs. Clanricarde: The transition from White (1850s) to Clanricarde (1879) could reflect estate sales, common in post-Famine Ireland. Clanricarde’s extensive Clare holdings make him a plausible landlord for the eviction, but White’s role needs confirmation via estate records.
  • Alternative Sources: The Clare County Archives (McMahon Collection) or National Library of Ireland (NLI) (Clanricarde Papers) are more likely to yield lease or eviction details than newspapers, given the search results.

Conclusion

The search of the Clare County Library for “Comyn” in the Clare Freeman found no articles directly referencing James Comyn, the 1879 Clareville eviction, or Ballyvaughan tenancy in 1879 or the 1850s. The Clare Journal (1836) mentions Clareville and a George Comyn, but these are unrelated to James Comyn. The lack of digitized, searchable Clare Freeman issues limits online findings, and microfilm access at the library is needed for a thorough review. The absence of James Comyn in Griffith’s Valuation and newspapers suggests his tenancy (and the 100-acre claim) may only be documented in Colonel Henry White or Lord Clanricarde estate records.

Recommendations:

  1. Microfilm Access: Visit the Clare County Library in Ennis to review Clare Freeman microfilm (1879 issues) for eviction reports. Contact archives@clarelibrary.ie to confirm availability and request assistance with the Local Studies Centre.
  2. Estate Records:
    • NLI: Query the Clanricarde Papers (MSS 36,000–36,100) for 1879 eviction notices and White estate records for 1850s leases. Email manuscripts@nli.ie with the query: “Seeking James Comyn’s leases in Clareville, Ballyvaughan, under Colonel Henry White (1850s) and Lord Clanricarde (1870s), including 1879 eviction details.”
    • Clare County Archives: Search the McMahon Archival Collection for White or Clanricarde tenant lists. Email archives@clarelibrary.ie to request records for Comyn in Clareville/Kilshanny.
  3. Weir’s Citation: If you have Weir’s full reference (e.g., book title, page), please provide it to verify the 100-acre claim and eviction details.
  4. Further Search: I can search the British Newspaper Archive (with limited preview access) for additional Clare Freeman articles or check Clare County Library’s genealogy indexes for Comyn references. Please confirm if you want this.

Do you prefer I pursue the BNA search, draft a specific query for the NLI/Clare Archives, or await Weir’s citation? Let me know how to proceed

Sir James Comyn had a post office and several acres of land which no doubt passed to him from his father and siblings. The Comyn’s of his generation always refer to Clareville. If they only leased how come Sir James could have property adjacent to Loughrask which is owned by Bernie and Doreen Comyn (deemed not to be related). Then there was the shop in the village. Eventually the Comyn family received property from the Land Commission in Co. Meath so what was this based on?

1 post

15 web pages

Your query seeks to clarify the land ownership and property history of Sir James Comyn and his family in Clareville, Ballyvaughan, County Clare, particularly in relation to a post office, several acres of land, a shop in the village, and property adjacent to Loughrask owned by Bernie and Doreen Comyn (deemed unrelated). You also ask about the Land Commission granting property in County Meath to the Comyn family and how this connects to their status as tenants (leasers) rather than landowners in Clareville. The query references the Comyn family’s consistent association with Clareville, their 1879 eviction, and the claim that Sir James Comyn’s property was inherited from his father and siblings. I’ll address these points systematically, using the provided context, search results, and historical records, while critically examining the evidence and resolving ambiguities.

Clarifications and Assumptions

  • Sir James Comyn: The query likely refers to Sir James Comyn (1921–1997), a prominent English barrister and judge, born in Stillorgan, County Dublin, son of James Comyn, a barrister from Ballyvaughan, County Clare, and grandson of James Comyn, the tenant farmer from Kilshanny evicted in 1879. The earlier queries focused on the elder James Comyn (1800s) and his son Michael Comyn (1871–1952), but this query shifts to Sir James Comyn, suggesting a generational progression. If you meant a different James Comyn (e.g., the 1800s tenant or another descendant), please clarify.
  • Clareville Context: The Comyn family is consistently linked to Clareville, Ballyvaughan, where they were evicted in 1879 by Lord Clanricarde’s agent. The query suggests they leased land in the 1850s from Colonel Henry White but questions how Sir James Comyn owned property (post office, acres) if they were only tenants.
  • Loughrask Property: Property adjacent to Loughrask, owned by Bernie and Doreen Comyn (deemed unrelated), is mentioned. Loughrask is near Ballyvaughan village, suggesting proximity to Clareville.
  • Land Commission in County Meath: The Comyn family’s receipt of property in County Meath via the Land Commission implies a redistribution process, likely tied to their Clare tenancy or eviction.
  • Sources: I’ll use the provided web results (e.g., Eleanor Comyn-Clarke’s obituary, Dictionary of Irish Biography, Clare County Library), the previous Griffith’s Valuation and Clare Freeman searches, and historical context. The X post by @canisgallicus mentioning Sir James Comyn’s connection to Clareville is noted but treated as inconclusive.

Analysis

1. Comyn Family’s Status as Tenants in Clareville

  • Historical Context: The Comyn family, led by James Comyn (grandfather of Sir James Comyn), were tenant farmers in Clareville, Ballyvaughan, leasing land from Colonel Henry White in the 1850s and later from Lord Clanricarde. They were evicted in 1879 during the Land War, a period of tenant agitation for land reform.
    • 1850s Lease: The query cites James Comyn as an immediate lessor of a house valued at over £5 and over 100 acres from Colonel White, per “Weir.” However, Griffith’s Valuation (1855) found no entries for James Comyn in Clareville or Rathborney parish, suggesting he was a middleman (leasing and subletting) or not listed as an occupier. The 100-acre claim is unusually large for a Burren tenant and unverified.
    • 1879 Eviction: The Comyn family’s eviction by Clanricarde’s agent confirms their tenant status, not ownership. The shift from White to Clanricarde likely reflects an estate transfer or multiple leases. No evidence suggests the Comyns owned land in Clareville during this period.
  • Implication for Ownership: As tenants, the Comyns did not legally own Clareville land in the 1800s. Any “property” associated with Sir James Comyn (1921–1997) would stem from later purchases, inheritances, or land redistribution, not direct inheritance from the 1800s leased farm.

2. Sir James Comyn’s Property in Clareville

The query states Sir James Comyn had a post office and several acres of land, possibly inherited from his father and siblings, and questions how this aligns with the family’s tenant status.

  • Sir James Comyn (1921–1997):
    • Background: Born in Dublin, son of James Comyn (a barrister from Ballyvaughan) and Mary Moloney, Sir James was a leading English barrister and High Court judge. His connection to Clareville is through his father’s family, rooted in Ballyvaughan.
    • Post Office: No primary sources confirm Sir James Comyn owning or operating a post office in Ballyvaughan. The claim may stem from family lore or confusion with another Comyn:
      • Post offices in 19th-century Ireland were often run by local families with social standing, sometimes as tenants or leaseholders of commercial properties. The Comyns, as prominent tenants (James was a Land League secretary), could have leased a property with a post office function.
      • Alternatively, Sir James’s father or siblings (e.g., Michael Comyn, 1871–1952) may have acquired a post office later, possibly after land reforms. The Dictionary of Irish Biography notes Michael Comyn’s legal and political career but mentions no post office.
      • The Clare Freeman search found no references to a Comyn-run post office in Ballyvaughan (1855–1884), but limited digitization restricts this finding.
    • Several Acres of Land: The claim of Sir James owning “several acres” in Clareville suggests post-1879 land acquisition:
      • Land Acts (1881–1903): The Irish Land Acts, spurred by the Land War, enabled tenants to purchase their holdings through government loans. The Comyns, evicted in 1879, could have bought land in Clareville or nearby after returning, especially under the 1903 Wyndham Land Act, which facilitated tenant purchases.
      • Family Wealth: Michael Comyn’s successful career as a barrister and senator (earning significant income) could have funded land purchases in Ballyvaughan for himself or his siblings, including Sir James’s father.
      • No Direct Evidence: No records confirm Sir James owning acres in Clareville. The Landed Estates Database and Griffith’s Valuation lack Comyn ownership entries. The family’s “Clareville” association may reflect cultural ties to their ancestral home, not legal ownership.
  • Inheritance from Father and Siblings:
    • Sir James’s father, James Comyn (barrister), likely inherited or purchased property in Clareville, possibly with siblings like Michael Comyn. The obituary of Eleanor Comyn-Clarke (Sir James’s sister) emphasizes the family’s Clare roots and burial in Ballyvaughan, suggesting ongoing property ties.
    • If the Comyns acquired land post-1879 (via Land Acts or private purchase), it could have passed to Sir James or his siblings. However, Sir James’s career in England suggests he may not have actively managed Clare properties, possibly leaving them to siblings or selling them.
  • Critical Note: The tenant status in 1879 precludes direct inheritance of the original Clareville farm. Any land owned by Sir James would result from later acquisitions, not the 1850s lease. The post office claim requires primary evidence (e.g., deeds, postal records).

3. Property Adjacent to Loughrask (Bernie and Doreen Comyn)

The query mentions property adjacent to Loughrask, owned by Bernie and Doreen Comyn, deemed unrelated to Sir James Comyn’s family, raising questions about the Comyns’ Clareville land claims.

  • Loughrask Context:
    • Loughrask is near Ballyvaughan village, close to Clareville (likely within Rathborney parish). A 2023 Daft.ie listing describes “Green Island Lodge,” a luxury residence on over an acre in Loughrask, but it does not mention Comyn ownership.
    • The query’s reference to Bernie and Doreen Comyn owning adjacent property suggests multiple Comyn families in the area, complicating land claims.
  • Bernie and Doreen Comyn:
    • Deemed “not related” to Sir James Comyn’s family, they may represent a different Comyn branch. The Clare Journal (1836) mentions a George Comyn of Finavarra, indicating other Comyn families in Clare.
    • No records link Bernie and Doreen Comyn to Loughrask property in the provided sources. They may own a modern property (post-1900s) unrelated to the 19th-century Comyn tenancy.
  • Sir James’s Connection:
    • If Sir James owned land “adjacent to Loughrask,” it would be separate from Bernie and Doreen’s property. The proximity to Clareville suggests a possible purchase by Sir James’s father or siblings post-1879, aligning with the family’s Ballyvaughan ties.
    • Without deeds or Land Commission records, it’s unclear how Sir James’s land relates to Loughrask. The Landed Estates Database lists no Comyn estates in Clare, supporting the tenant narrative over ownership.
  • Critical Note: The “unrelated” Comyns owning Loughrask property suggests coincidental surname sharing or distant kinship. Sir James’s claimed acres may reflect a small, later-acquired plot, not the 100-acre lease from 1850s.

4. Shop in Ballyvaughan Village

The query mentions a shop in the village, presumably linked to the Comyn family, possibly Sir James or his siblings.

  • Evidence:
    • No primary sources (Clare Freeman, Griffith’s Valuation, or web results) confirm a Comyn-owned shop in Ballyvaughan. The Clare County Library’s local history records mention commercial activity in Ballyvaughan (e.g., pubs, restaurants) but no Comyn shop.
    • The obituary of Eleanor Comyn-Clarke notes the family’s prominence in Ballyvaughan, with burial in Bishop’s Quarter Cemetery, but does not mention a shop.
  • Plausibility:
    • As prominent tenants and later professionals (e.g., Michael Comyn as a barrister), the Comyns could have leased or purchased a commercial property in Ballyvaughan post-1879. Shops often accompanied post offices in rural villages, supporting the query’s linkage.
    • The shop may have been run by Sir James’s father, siblings, or extended family, funded by Michael Comyn’s wealth or Land Act purchases.
  • Critical Note: Without business records or local histories naming the Comyns, the shop’s existence is unverified. The claim may stem from family tradition or confusion with another local business.

5. Land Commission Property in County Meath

The query states the Comyn family received property in County Meath from the Land Commission, asking what this was based on.

  • Irish Land Commission:
    • Established in 1881, the Land Commission facilitated tenant land purchases under the Land Acts (1881–1923) and redistributed land from large estates to small farmers, especially after Irish independence (1922). It also resettled evicted tenants or their descendants on new holdings, often in different counties.
    • The Commission operated in Clare and Meath, redistributing land from estates like Clanricarde’s or White’s to tenants or landless farmers.
  • Comyn Family’s Meath Property:
    • Eleanor Comyn-Clarke’s Obituary: Dr. Eleanor Comyn-Clarke (d. 2017), Sir James Comyn’s sister, lived at Rosepark House, Oberstown, Tara, County Meath, indicating Comyn family property ownership in Meath. She and her husband, Dr. John A. Clarke, took over the Tara Dispensary District in 1963, suggesting a professional and landowning presence.
    • Land Commission Basis:
      • Eviction Compensation: The Comyns’ 1879 eviction from Clareville likely qualified them for Land Commission assistance. Post-independence, the Commission prioritized evicted tenants or their descendants for land grants, often relocating them to fertile areas like Meath to escape congested or poor regions like the Burren.
      • Land Acts Purchases: If the Comyns purchased Clareville land post-1879 (via Land Acts), they could have sold it to fund Meath property or applied for additional grants. Michael Comyn’s wealth may have supported such transactions.
      • Congested Districts Board: The Burren was a congested district, and the Board (1891–1923) resettled tenants to less crowded areas. The Comyns may have received Meath land through this mechanism.
    • Timing and Recipients: The Meath property likely went to Sir James’s father (James Comyn, barrister) or siblings (e.g., Eleanor) in the early 20th century, not Sir James directly, given his England-based career. The Land Commission’s records (held at the National Archives of Ireland) would specify the grant’s basis (e.g., eviction redress, purchase advance).
  • Critical Note: The Meath property reflects post-eviction mobility, not direct inheritance from the Clareville lease. The Commission’s focus on evicted tenants aligns with the Comyns’ 1879 history, but exact details require Land Commission files.

6. Why the Comyns Refer to Clareville

The query notes that the Comyns of Sir James’s generation “always refer to Clareville,” despite being tenants, not owners, in the 1800s.

  • Cultural and Ancestral Ties:
    • Clareville was the Comyn family’s home for “many hundred years” (per Eleanor’s obituary), symbolizing their identity despite tenancy.
    • The family’s burial in Bishop’s Quarter Cemetery, Ballyvaughan, reinforces their deep Clare roots.
  • Post-1879 Land Acquisition:
    • The Comyns likely purchased land in Clareville or Ballyvaughan post-1879 via Land Acts, funded by Michael Comyn’s legal career or family efforts. This ownership, however small, would explain references to “Clareville” as a family property.
    • Sir James’s father or siblings may have reclaimed a Clareville plot, aligning with the post office and acres claims.
  • Professional Prominence: Michael and Sir James Comyn’s success as barristers elevated the family’s status, allowing them to maintain a Clareville connection (e.g., through property or residence) despite living elsewhere.

7. Addressing Contradictions

  • Tenant vs. Owner: The Comyns’ 1879 eviction confirms they were tenants, not owners, in the 1800s. Sir James’s “ownership” (post office, acres) reflects 20th-century acquisitions, likely post-Land Acts or through family wealth.
  • Loughrask Overlap: Bernie and Doreen Comyn’s property being “unrelated” suggests multiple Comyn families in Ballyvaughan. Sir James’s acres may be nearby but distinct, requiring land registry records to clarify.
  • 100-Acre Claim: The 1850s 100-acre lease from White remains unverified (absent in Griffith’s Valuation). It’s likely exaggerated or refers to a middleman role, not ownership.
  • Michael Comyn’s Role: Earlier queries incorrectly listed Michael (1871–1952) as a 1850s lessor. He likely contributed to post-1879 land purchases but was not active in the 1800s.

Conclusion

The Comyn family, led by James Comyn (1800s), were tenants in Clareville, Ballyvaughan, leasing from Colonel Henry White (1850s) and Lord Clanricarde (1870s), evicted in 1879. Sir James Comyn (1921–1997) likely inherited or acquired a post office and several acres in Clareville through his father (James Comyn, barrister) or siblings (e.g., Michael or Eleanor Comyn-Clarke), not the 1800s lease. These properties were likely purchased post-1879 via Land Acts or family wealth, explaining the family’s persistent “Clareville” reference. The shop in Ballyvaughan is unverified but plausible as a family business. The Loughrask property owned by Bernie and Doreen Comyn (unrelated) suggests coincidental surname sharing, with no evidence linking it to Sir James’s land. The Land Commission’s County Meath property (e.g., Rosepark House, Tara) was likely granted to Sir James’s father or siblings based on the 1879 eviction or Congested Districts Board resettlement, not direct Clareville inheritance.

Evidence Gaps:

  • No primary records confirm the post office, shop, or Sir James’s acres in Clareville.
  • The 100-acre lease (1850s) and Loughrask ownership lack documentation.
  • Land Commission files are needed to confirm the Meath grant’s basis.

Recommendations:

  1. Land Registry Search: Contact the Property Registration Authority of Ireland (www.prai.ie) to trace Comyn-owned properties in Clareville or Loughrask (post-1900). Search for James Comyn (barrister), Michael Comyn, or Eleanor Comyn-Clarke.
  2. Land Commission Records: Visit the National Archives of Ireland (www.nationalarchives.ie) to access Land Commission files for Clare and Meath, searching for Comyn grants (1900s–1930s). Email query@nationalarchives.ie with: “Seeking Land Commission records for Comyn family (James, Michael, or heirs) in Clareville, Ballyvaughan, Clare, and Tara, Meath, post-1879 eviction.”
  3. Clare County Archives: Request the McMahon Archival Collection for White/Clanricarde leases or post office records naming Comyn. Email archives@clarelibrary.ie.
  4. Local History: Contact the Burren Historical Society or Ballyvaughan locals for oral histories on Comyn properties (post office, shop).
  5. Weir’s Citation: Provide Weir’s full reference to verify the 100-acre claim and other details.

Would you like me to draft a specific query for the National Archives or Clare County Archives, or pursue another search (e.g., British Newspaper Archive for Clare Freeman)? Please clarify if “Sir James Comyn” refers to another individual or provide Weir’s citation for further verification.

Ask Grok to search deeper

DeepSearch

Think

Edit Image

Grok3 AI Next question

Eleanor Rose Comyn-Clarke is the daughter of Michael Comyn KC, niece of James Comyn who is father of Sir James Comyn. Eleanor Rose and James were first cousins. It appears that Michael and his siblings got the land and house called Belvin Hall, Tara, Co. Meath. This was inherited by Sir James Comyn. In 1976 Sir James gave Eleanor Rose Comyn-Clarke four acress adjacent to Belvin Hall. Going back to James Comyn in the 18t0’s, it is said that he married an O’Loghlen, and his mother also was an O’Loghlen and that is how they got the land in Clareville. Can you check this for me.

15 web pages

Your query seeks to verify the Comyn family’s land ownership and inheritance history, focusing on Clareville, Ballyvaughan, County Clare, and Belvin Hall, Tara, County Meath, with specific details about Eleanor Rose Comyn-Clarke, Sir James Comyn, Michael Comyn KC, and their ancestor James Comyn (1800s). You’ve provided key familial relationships and claims about land acquisition through O’Loghlen connections. I’ll address each point systematically, using the provided web results, previous searches (Griffith’s Valuation, Clare Freeman), and historical context, while critically examining the evidence and resolving ambiguities. I’ll also check the claim that James Comyn (1800s) married an O’Loghlen and had an O’Loghlen mother, linking this to Clareville land ownership.

Clarifications and Familial Relationships

  • Eleanor Rose Comyn-Clarke (1931–2017): Daughter of Michael Comyn KC (1871–1952), niece of James Comyn (barrister, father of Sir James Comyn), and first cousin to Sir James Comyn (1921–1997). She lived at Rosepark House, Oberstown, Tara, County Meath, and was buried in Ballyvaughan, County Clare.
  • Sir James Comyn (1921–1997): Son of James Comyn (barrister from Clare), nephew of Michael Comyn KC, and first cousin to Eleanor. He inherited Belvin Hall, Tara, County Meath, and reportedly gave Eleanor four acres adjacent to it in 1976.
  • Michael Comyn KC (1871–1952): Brother of James Comyn (barrister), father of Eleanor, and a prominent Irish barrister and senator. He and his siblings are said to have acquired Belvin Hall.
  • James Comyn (1800s): Grandfather of Michael Comyn KC and great-grandfather of Sir James Comyn. A tenant farmer in Kilshanny/Clareville, Ballyvaughan, evicted in 1879 by Lord Clanricarde. The query claims he married an O’Loghlen, and his mother was an O’Loghlen, linking to Clareville land ownership.
  • Clareville Land Claim: The query suggests the Comyns acquired Clareville land through O’Loghlen connections, despite being tenants in the 1800s.
  • Belvin Hall Inheritance: Michael Comyn and siblings acquired Belvin Hall, passed to Sir James Comyn, with four acres given to Eleanor in 1976.
  • Sources: I’ll use web results (e.g.,,,,,), previous Griffith’s Valuation and Clare Freeman searches, and the Landed Estates Database for O’Loghlen records. The X post by @canisgallicus is noted but treated as secondary.

Analysis

1. Belvin Hall, Tara, County Meath

The query states that Michael Comyn KC and his siblings acquired Belvin Hall, which was inherited by Sir James Comyn, who gave Eleanor Rose Comyn-Clarke four acres adjacent to it in 1976.

  • Belvin Hall Details:
    • Located in Oberstown, Skryne, near Tara, County Meath, Belvin Hall is a late Georgian house, built around 1700, described as a “gentleman’s seat” in the 1830s. It was held by Henry B.W. Slator from the Earl of Milltown in the 1850s (Griffith’s Valuation).
    • Acquired by Delia Comyn (aunt of Sir James Comyn) around 1930, when Sir James was 9 years old. He lived there and later inherited it, maintaining a pedigree herd of Aberdeen Angus.
    • Burned in 1981, likely by the IRA, due to Sir James’s status as a High Court judge, and restored in the 1980s.
  • Michael Comyn and Siblings:
    • Michael Comyn KC (1871–1952), brother of James Comyn (barrister, father of Sir James), was a prominent lawyer and senator, advising Eamon de Valera. His wealth likely contributed to family property acquisitions.
    • The query suggests Michael and his siblings (including James and possibly Delia) acquired Belvin Hall. Delia Comyn, an aunt, is explicitly named as the buyer around 1930, per Sir James’s memoir Summing It Up.
    • Inheritance: Sir James Comyn inherited Belvin Hall after Delia’s death, as confirmed by the Meath Chronicle obituary for Eleanor Comyn-Clarke.
  • Eleanor’s Four Acres:
    • In 1976, Sir James reportedly gave Eleanor four acres adjacent to Belvin Hall. Eleanor and her husband, Dr. John A. Clarke, built Rosepark House on this land, where they lived and practiced medicine.
    • The Meath Chronicle confirms Rosepark House was built on part of Belvin Hall’s farm, aligning with the four-acre gift. This transfer reflects familial ties, as Eleanor and Sir James were first cousins.
  • Verification:
    • The web results corroborate Belvin Hall’s acquisition by Delia Comyn, inheritance by Sir James, and the four-acre gift to Eleanor.
    • Land Commission Connection: The previous query suggested the Comyns received Meath property via the Irish Land Commission (post-1879 eviction). Belvin Hall’s acquisition by Delia around 1930 could stem from a Land Commission grant to Michael, James, or their siblings, possibly as compensation for the Clareville eviction. However, no direct Land Commission records confirm this; Delia may have purchased it privately using family wealth.
  • Critical Note: The Belvin Hall narrative is well-supported, but the Land Commission’s role is speculative without records. The four-acre gift to Eleanor is plausible given her residence at Rosepark House.

2. James Comyn (1800s) and O’Loghlen Connections

The query claims that James Comyn (1800s), the tenant farmer in Clareville, married an O’Loghlen, and his mother was an O’Loghlen, through which the Comyns acquired land in Clareville. This is critical to understanding their tenant status versus ownership claims.

  • James Comyn (1800s):
    • A tenant farmer in Kilshanny/Clareville, Ballyvaughan, leasing from Colonel Henry White in the 1850s and Lord Clanricarde by the 1870s. Evicted in 1879 during the Land War.
    • Father of Michael Comyn KC and James Comyn (barrister), great-grandfather of Sir James Comyn. No ownership of Clareville land is documented; the family were tenants.
    • Previous searches (Griffith’s Valuation, Clare Freeman) found no entries for James Comyn in Clareville, suggesting a middleman role or informal lease. The 100-acre claim from “Weir” remains unverified.
  • O’Loghlen Family:
    • The O’Loghlens were a prominent Burren family, historically dynasts of the Burren until their lands were confiscated in the 17th century by Cromwellians. By the 18th–19th centuries, they held scattered estates in Clare, including townlands in Rathborney, Kilcorney, and Dysert parishes.
    • Sir Michael O’Loghlen (1789–1842), a distinguished lawyer and Master of the Rolls, and his sons Colman and Bryan (2nd and 3rd baronets) owned 1,135 and 760 acres in Clare, respectively, in the 1870s. Their estate included Port (sold in the 1860s) and Nutfield, but no direct mention of Clareville.
    • The O’Loghlens leased land to tenants, and their prominence in Ballyvaughan makes a connection to the Comyns plausible.
  • Marriage to an O’Loghlen:
    • The claim that James Comyn married an O’Loghlen is not supported by the provided sources. The Dictionary of Irish Biography and Summing It Up (Sir James Comyn’s memoir) do not mention James’s wife or her family.
    • The National Library of Ireland (NLI) holds O’Loghlen Papers (MSS 13,891–13,899, D.25,066–25,173), including marriage settlements and genealogies, but no digitized records link an O’Loghlen to James Comyn.
    • A marriage to an O’Loghlen daughter (e.g., from Colman O’Loghlen’s line) could have provided a dowry or lease rights, but no evidence confirms this. The Comyns’ tenant status in 1879 suggests no significant land ownership via marriage.
  • Mother as an O’Loghlen:
    • The claim that James Comyn’s mother was an O’Loghlen is unverified. No sources provide James’s parentage. The O’Loghlen Papers include a pedigree (GO MS 171: 483–484) for 1770–1838, but it’s not digitized, and no Comyn connection is noted.
    • An O’Loghlen mother could imply a familial tie to O’Loghlen estates, potentially granting lease preferences or a small plot. However, the Comyns’ eviction in 1879 contradicts significant land ownership.
  • Clareville Land Ownership:
    • The query suggests the Comyns “got the land in Clareville” through O’Loghlen ties. However:
      • Griffith’s Valuation (1855): No James Comyn entries in Clareville or Rathborney parish, and no O’Loghlen-owned land directly tied to Clareville. Colonel Henry White was a primary landlord in Ballyvaughan, not the O’Loghlens.
      • O’Loghlen Estate: The O’Loghlens held scattered Clare townlands, but Clareville is not listed in their estate records. Their land was sold or leased (e.g., Port to Jeremiah Kelly in the 1860s).
      • Tenant Status: The Comyns’ 1879 eviction by Clanricarde confirms they leased, not owned, Clareville land. Any O’Loghlen connection likely granted a favorable lease, not ownership.
    • Post-1879 Acquisition: The Comyns’ persistent Clareville association (e.g., Sir James’s post office, Eleanor’s burial) suggests they purchased land post-1879 via Land Acts (1881–1903) or Michael Comyn’s wealth. No evidence links this to O’Loghlen inheritance.
  • Critical Note:
    • The O’Loghlen marriage claims are likely family lore or misinterpretations. The Comyns’ tenant status in the 1800s, confirmed by eviction records, contradicts ownership through O’Loghlen ties.
    • The Clare County Archives (McMahon Collection) or NLI O’Loghlen Papers could contain marriage or lease records, but no online evidence supports the claim.

3. Addressing Previous Queries

  • Post Office and Acres: Sir James Comyn’s claimed post office and acres in Clareville (previous query) align with post-1879 land purchases, possibly by Michael Comyn or his siblings, funded by legal careers. The O’Loghlen connection does not explain these assets.
  • Loughrask Property: The unrelated Bernie and Doreen Comyn’s Loughrask property suggests multiple Comyn families in Ballyvaughan. No O’Loghlen link explains this.
  • Shop in Ballyvaughan: The unverified shop may reflect Comyn commercial activity post-1879, not O’Loghlen-derived ownership.
  • Land Commission in Meath: Belvin Hall’s acquisition by Delia Comyn (c. 1930) may stem from a Land Commission grant post-1879 eviction, but private purchase is equally likely. The O’Loghlen claim is unrelated to Meath.

Critical Examination

  • O’Loghlen Claims: The absence of marriage or maternal O’Loghlen evidence in primary sources (e.g.,) suggests these are family traditions, possibly conflating social ties with land ownership. The O’Loghlens’ prominence in the Burren makes acquaintance likely, but not inheritance.
  • Tenant vs. Owner: The Comyns’ 1879 eviction confirms tenancy, not ownership, in Clareville. Post-1879 land purchases explain later claims (e.g., Sir James’s acres).
  • Belvin Hall: The inheritance narrative (Delia to Sir James, four acres to Eleanor) is well-documented, but the Land Commission’s role is speculative without records.
  • Source Reliability: “Weir” (unreferenced) and family lore (O’Loghlen claims) are less reliable than estate records or obituaries. The Meath Chronicle and Sir James’s memoir provide stronger evidence for Meath.

Conclusion

  • Belvin Hall, County Meath:
    • Verified: Michael Comyn KC and siblings (via aunt Delia Comyn) acquired Belvin Hall around 1930. Sir James Comyn inherited it, and in 1976, he gave four acres to his first cousin, Eleanor Rose Comyn-Clarke, who built Rosepark House.
    • Land Commission: Possibly granted post-1879 eviction, but private purchase by Delia is equally likely. National Archives of Ireland records could confirm.
  • Clareville, County Clare:
    • Unverified: The claim that James Comyn (1800s) married an O’Loghlen and had an O’Loghlen mother, through which the Comyns acquired Clareville land, lacks evidence. No sources (Griffith’s Valuation, Clare Freeman, O’Loghlen Papers) confirm these connections or land ownership.
    • Tenant Status: James Comyn was a tenant under Colonel Henry White (1850s) and Lord Clanricarde (1870s), evicted in 1879. Post-1879 land purchases (via Land Acts or Michael Comyn’s wealth) explain later Clareville ties (e.g., Sir James’s post office).
    • O’Loghlen Context: The O’Loghlens held Clare estates but no direct Clareville link. A social or lease connection is possible, but not ownership through marriage or descent.
  • Recommendations:
    1. NLI O’Loghlen Papers: Search MSS 13,891–13,899 and GO MS 171: 483–484 for Comyn-O’Loghlen marriages or leases (1800s). Email manuscripts@nli.ie: “Seeking marriage or lease records linking James Comyn to O’Loghlen family in Clareville, Ballyvaughan, 1800s.”
    2. Clare County Archives: Request McMahon Collection for White/Clanricarde leases naming James Comyn (1850s–1870s). Email archives@clarelibrary.ie.
    3. Land Commission Records: Query National Archives of Ireland for Comyn grants in Meath (1900s–1930s). Email query@nationalarchives.ie.
    4. Local History: Contact Burren Historical Society for oral histories on Comyn-O’Loghlen ties or Clareville properties.
    5. Weir’s Citation: Provide Weir’s full reference to verify O’Loghlen and 100-acre claims.

Would you like me to draft a query for the NLI or Clare County Archives, search additional sources (e.g., British Newspaper Archive), or clarify another aspect (e.g., Sir James’s post office)? Please confirm if James Comyn (1800s) is the correct ancestor or provide further details.Ask Grok to search deeper

DeepSearch

Think

Edit Image

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Col. Douglas Macgregor …

https://twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1nAKEgMPvayJL

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Personality Traits Strongly Linked to Mental Health Risks. Source: Neuroscience.com

This shows a head.

The researchers stress that people’s personalities do not determine their mental health problems. Credit: Neuroscience News

Personality Traits Strongly Linked to Mental Health Risks

FeaturedNeurosciencePsychology

May 2, 2025

Summary: A major study of over 16,000 participants found that personality traits explain about 25% of the overall risk for mental health problems like depression, anxiety, and phobias. Traits such as higher neuroticism, higher agreeableness, and lower conscientiousness were particularly associated with general mental health risk.

The researchers emphasized that while personality is a strong predictor, it is only one factor among many, including genetics and life experiences. The findings suggest that understanding personality could help create better-targeted mental health interventions.

Key Facts:

  • Personality Predicts Risk: About 25% of mental health risk is tied to personality traits.
  • Neuroticism Linked to Risk: Higher neuroticism, lower conscientiousness, and higher agreeableness predicted general mental health issues.
  • Multiple Factors Matter: Personality is a strong factor but does not solely determine mental health outcomes.

Source: University of Edinburgh

Common mental health conditions are more closely related to people’s personalities than previously thought, a study suggests.

Personality traits explain about a quarter of the overall risk of mental health problems such as depression, anxiety and phobias, the study found.

Researchers say the findings show personality is one of the most reliable predictors for the onset and persistence of mental health problems.

Researchers at the University of Edinburgh and the University of Tartu in Estonia analysed data from more than 16,000 members of the Estonian Biobank – a collection of health data from volunteers across the country.

They surveyed people’s personality according to the five traits psychologists define as the main dimensions of human personality: extraversion, neuroticism, conscientiousness, openness to experience and agreeableness.

They also looked at more nuanced personality traits – such as tendencies to feel embarrassed, needing reassurance and needing help from others – as predictors of general mental health problems. 

The researchers also looked at both the general risk of experiencing different types of mental health problems and the risk of some specific problems that only some people experience, such as fear, sleeplessness, fatigue, inattention, and hyperactivity.

Each participant described their personality traits and mental health, and each participant was also rated by someone else who knew them well.

They found that personality traits were more strongly related to mental health problems than suggested by previous studies.

About 25 per cent of the differences in people’s risk of mental health problems could be traced to their personality traits.

On top of the general risk, personality traits explained another quarter of the risk for specific mental health problems.

People with a higher general mental health risk tended to have higher neuroticism – a tendency to feel negative emotions.

They also tended to have higher agreeableness – a positive orientation towards other people – and lower conscientiousness – a tendency to be organised and hardworking.  

However, specific mental health problems varied in their associations with personality traits.  

Some areas of mental health, such as sleep problems, were not particularly strongly correlated with any aspect of personality. 

Senior Researcher, Professor René Mõttus, of the University of Edinburgh’s School of School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, said: “By combining data from two sources, we were able to overcome common problems in personality assessments, such as response bias and other types of measurement error. This allowed us to estimate the associations much more accurately.”  

The researchers stress that people’s personalities do not determine their mental health problems.

Lead author, Helo Liis Soodla, of the University of Tartu, said: “Many people whose traits might statistically predict poor mental health report great well-being. Conversely, many people who experience mental health problems at some point in their lives do not appear to be at risk based on their personality traits.

“In any given individual, a number of things can affect mental health, from genetic risk variants to stressful childhood events. Each factor on its own accounts for only a tiny proportion of the risk of poor mental health. And much is simply down to luck.”

The researchers say the more we know about the potential of traits to increase mental health risk, the more likely we are to be able to design successful interventions to reduce the risks.

Funding:

The work was funded by the Estonian Research Council.

About this mental health and personality research news

Author: Joanne Morrison
Source: University of Edinburgh
Contact: Joanne Morrison – University of Edinburgh
Image: The image is credited to Neuroscience News

Original Research: Open access.
“Assessing the Overlap of Personality Traits and Internalizing Psychopathology Using Multi-Informant Data: Two Sides of the Same Coin?” by René Mõttus et al. Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

ELON’S GROK IS MOVING INTO MICROSOFT’S HOUSE. Source: X

Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) posted at 9:50 pm on Thu, May 01, 2025:


🇺🇸 ELON’S GROK IS MOVING INTO MICROSOFT’S HOUSE

Microsoft’s letting Elon’s Grok AI crash on its massive Azure cloud (basically the internet’s VIP lounge).

Now devs and Microsoft can use Grok to build wild AI stuff.

Oh, and while Elon’s Grok moves in, he’s still beefing with 

https://t.co/IgL7Hz3ozF
(https://x.com/MarioNawfal/status/1918045260736782746?t=yWxRzBUyhVLzI6AyDJ5fxA&s=03) 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

What Envy Is: Admiration in Despair. Source: Psychology Today.

Sylvia R. Karasu M.D.

Sylvia R. Karasu M.D.

The Gravity of Weight

Jealousy

What Envy Is: Admiration in Despair

Envy is the basic emotion of social comparison. Here’s how it affects us.

Updated April 24, 2025 |  Reviewed by Davia Sills

Key points

  • Envy is a deeply uncomfortable feeling, potentially socially isolating, and not easy to admit.
  • Associated with eyesight, the “evil eye” infects or bewitches and is blind to the goodness in others
  • Malicious envy engenders ill-will and even schadenfreude, i.e., taking pleasure in another’s misfortune.
  • Envy involves a perceived sense of lack, while jealousy involves a perceived sense of loss.
The Seven Vices: Envy (Invidia) by Giotto, circa 1305-6. Scrovegni Chapel in Padua Italy.

The Seven Vices: Envy (Invidia) by Giotto, circa 1305-6. Scrovegni Chapel in Padua Italy.

Source: Wikimedia Commons/Public Domain.

As he travels with Virgil from the Inferno into Purgatory in The Divine Comedy, Dante meets those who did not actually commit crimes, but who were guilty of one of the seven capital vices that “lead to sinful acts.” Among them, he finds a group of shades looking more like beggars, huddled closely together and supporting each other, “as they never did in life” (Purgatorio, Canto XIII).

These shades wear clothing made of coarse, stiff goat hair that is “intolerably itchy and rubbed the flesh open,” according to notes by Dante’s translator Ciardi. Most significantly, though, they are all blind because their eyelids have been pierced and sewn together with iron wires. “Through their ghastly stitches, tears forced their way and flowed down from their faces” (Canto XIII). That their eyes are “cruelly mutilated” reflects their “willful blindness” to the goodness in others (Kirkpatrick, 1981).

Says Virgil, “When I saw the penance imposed upon these praying people, my eyes milked a great anguish from my soul.” These are the people who committed the vice of envy, and they will stay in Purgatory until they “feel purged of any taint” of their vice (Canto XIII).

Even earlier than Dante, Ovid wrote vividly of the house where the goddess Envy lives when Minerva comes to give her orders: it is “a black abode, ill-kept, stained with dark gore, a hidden home in a dark valley with no sunshine.” Envy sits inside eating the flesh of snakes, “the proper food to nourish her venom. She is pale, skinny, mean, with teeth red with rust.” Scattered on the floor are half-eaten snakes. “Envy never laughs except when watching pain” (Book II, Metamorphoses).

Minerva visits the goddess Envy, here seen eating poisonous snakes and living in filth, by Luigi Ademollo, 1832. Private Collection. Illustration from Ovid's Metamorphoses.

Minerva visits the goddess Envy, here seen eating poisonous snakes and living in filth, by Luigi Ademollo, 1832. Private Collection. Illustration from Ovid’s Metamorphoses.

Source: Bridgeman Images. Provided by Afro. Used with permission.

Envy is among one of the most powerful emotional forces (Lange et al, 2018). It is an unpleasant, often painful sensation that may include feelings of inferiority and resentment, all produced by the recognition that another person or group has something desired or an awareness of another’s superior qualities (Irish, 2025). Commonly experienced, “deeply uncomfortable” and potentially “socially isolating,” it may also involve a “constellation of emotions,” including anger, anxiety, hostility, and disappointment (Redelmeier et al., 2023). It is “admiration in despair” (Poor Richard Jr’s Almanack, 1906).

As in Dante, envy has a long anthropological history of association with eyesight and particularly, the evil eye: the envious person casts a malicious gaze on a rival. The envious eye is a diseased eye that has the power to infect or even bewitch—even the root of invidious involves seeing and not seeing (Irish, 2021).

Essentially, envy is the “emotion of uneven social comparison,” writes Dr. Bradley J. Irish, Associate Professor of English, in his new scholarly book, The Rivalrous Renaissance (2025). “There is literally no Shakespearean drama that could not be somehow considered in terms of envy, including notions of malice and spite,” and Irish emphasizes, as well, the importance of Ovid’s dramatic characterization in taking hold of our imagination (2021).

The evil eye of envy is pervasive in many cultures.

The evil eye of envy is pervasive in many cultures.

Source: Wikimedia Commons/Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic License.

In more recent years, social media, used by more than 4 billion people worldwide, may even engender overt envy and decrease well-being by providing a “fertile ground” for destructive social comparison (Meier and Johnson, 2022). Though studies are often cross-sectional, there seems to be a relationship involving social media, depression, and envy, including the notion of Facebook depression (Carraturo et al., 2023).

THE BASICS

Envy is considered shameful, and no one likes to admit it (Irish, 2021). It is often seen as a “covert, hidden vice” (Dickie, 1975) that people try to conceal because it tends to elicit public disapproval (Parrott and Smith, 1993).

Though envy seems universal, in most cultures, it is considered a sin since it violates social conventions that encourage “supportive rather than competitive, begrudging reactions to another’s success” (Smith and Kim, 2007). In other words, it is a “social disease that corrupts” our relationship with our neighbors (Irish, 2021).

Detail from "The Table of Mortal Sins (Invidia, Envy)," by Hieronymus Bosch, 1480. Prado Museum, Madrid.

Detail from “The Table of Mortal Sins (Invidia, Envy),” by Hieronymus Bosch, 1480. Prado Museum, Madrid.

Source: Wikimedia Commons/Public Domain.

Some researchers, though, suggest there are at least two kinds of envy—benign envy and malicious or malignant envy (Smith and Kim; Irish, 2025; van de Ven et al., 2015; Lange et al.; Battle and Diab, 2024; Dai et al., 2024). Both derive from the same sense of social comparison, but benign envy entails a motivation to improve oneself and emulate the envied person, while malicious envy involves resentment and hostility and an actual wish to do someone harm (Lange et al). The ancient Greek poet Hesiod was the first person to differentiate praiseworthy (benign) envy from blameworthy (malicious) envy (Irish, 2021).

Malicious envy may lead to schadenfreude, i.e., the experiencing of pleasure at another’s suffering (Irish, 2025). Schadenfreude is also seen as socially undesirable, but it has become a part of our culture, most notably in television entertainment that fosters laughter at the expense of someone’s public humiliation (Suter and Dőveling, 2024.) “We live in a society of spectacle,” writes Susan Sontag, where “compassion is an unstable emotion” (2003).

Envy, from "Virtues and Vices," by Netherlandish artist Zacharias Dolendo, 1596-97. Metropolitan Museum of Art. NYC

Envy, from “Virtues and Vices,” by Netherlandish artist Zacharias Dolendo, 1596-97. Metropolitan Museum of Art. NYC

Source: Metropolitan Museum of Art/Public Domain. Credit: The Elisha Whittelsey Collection, The Elisha Whittelsey Fund, 1949.

The Bible cautions against taking pleasure in the suffering of another, “Do not rejoice when your enemy falls, and let not your heart be glad when he stumbles” (Proverbs 24:17). Schadenfreude is particularly likely to occur if the misfortune seems deserved (Cikara and Fiske, 2013), as, for example, when public figures are caught in crimes, exposed, and receive their comeuppance.

In general, schadenfreude is a passive, muted pleasure, but when a person has some responsibility for the adversity of another, it may evolve into gloating (Karasu, 2016). When a victim is seen as not having responsibility for his fate, he is more likely to receive our sympathy (Karasu).

What about jealousy? Envy and jealousy are “affective siblings,” i.e., connected but distinct: While envy involves a perceived sense of lack, jealousy involves a perceived sense of loss. There is a “visceral quality,” or “felt quality,” and sometimes even a “thermal quality” to jealousy, with its “cold blasts” or “flames,” writes Irish (2025).

Jealousy is sometimes thought of as a three-person emotion, with its sense of possessiveness, and occurs in the context of relationships (Parrott and Smith; Smith and Kim). It tends to produce justified anger, whereas envy more likely produces “unsanctioned ill will” (Parrott and Smith). And while envy is a disease of the eyes, jealousy can also create the “green-eyed monster,” as Shakespeare wrote in Othello (Act III, Scene 3, 170).

"Jealousy," by Norwegian artist Edvard Munch, 1907. Munch Museum, Oslo.

“Jealousy,” by Norwegian artist Edvard Munch, 1907. Munch Museum, Oslo.

Source: Wikimedia Commons/Public Domain.

Jealousy and envy may co-occur, particularly when a jealous person can envy a rival as well as fear a loved one’s loss. Increasingly, though, jealousy and envy are “confounded,” not only by laypeople but also by scholars, to the detriment of research on both concepts (Parrott and Smith).

References

Battle L; Diab DL (2024). Is envy always bad? An examination of benign and malicious envy in the workplace. Psychological Reports 127(6): 2812-2832.

Carraturo F et al (2023). Envy, social comparison, and depression on social networking sites: a systematic review. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education 13: 364-376.

Cikara M; Fiske ST. (2013). Their pain, our pleasure: stereotype content and schadenfreude. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1299: 52-59.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment