Chay Bowes on X: Denmark has a dark past in Greenland, a past it would rather you didn’t talk about, child abduction, forced sterilisation, forced Labour and exploitation.

Chay Bowes

@BowesChay

Denmark has a dark past in Greenland, a past it would rather you didn’t talk about, child abduction, forced sterilisation, forced Labour and exploitation. Denmark’s possession of Greenland, whose actual name is Kalaallit Nunaat, began as a mission to reclaim land from “lost” Norsemen but evolved into centuries of systemic cultural erasure and economic exploitation of the Indigenous Inuit.

In 1721, Danish missionary Hans Egede arrived to “save” Norse descendants from paganism. Finding only Inuit, he instead forcibly converted them to Lutheranism, denouncing traditional shamans and rituals. Denmark then established a state trade monopoly in 1776, treating the island as a profitable hub for whale blubber and minerals while keeping the indigenous Inuit isolated and dependent. In 1953, Denmark formally annexed Greenland as a “county” to avoid UN decolonization requirements, this led to a period of brutal social engineering.

This era also saw the sinister “Little Danes” experiment, where the state abducted Inuit children and relocated them to Denmark to be molded into a Danish-speaking elite, causing lifelong trauma. Simultaneously, thousands of Inuit were forcibly moved from ancestral hunting grounds into concrete apartment blocks to centralize labor for Danish controlled factories, devastating traditional kinship networks.

Between 1966 and 1970, Danish authorities further violated Indigenous rights by secretly fitting over 4,500 Inuit women and girls, some as young as 12 with IUDs without consent to curb the population.

While Greenland gained Home Rule in 1979 and Self-Government in 2009, the legacy of Danish control persists. As of today, Greenland remains a territory under the “Danish Crown” with some International bodies continimg to pressure Denmark to address its colonial legacy of racial discrimination and provide justice for the victims of the “Spiral Case” and forced child removals. So as the Danes shout about “US Imperialism” bear in mind how they came to control this region far from Danish shores, and how brutally they exploited it’s people for the “Crown”

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

X BREAKING: President Trump announces he is making EVERY new AI Data Center get its own power from the tech company instead of raising Americans’ electricity bills

Eric Daugherty

@EricLDaugh

BREAKING: President Trump announces he is making EVERY new AI Data Center get its own power from the tech company instead of raising Americans’ electricity bills. A president FOR THE PEOPLE! “I never want Americans to pay higher Electricity bills because of Data Centers. Therefore, my Administration is working with major American Technology Companies to secure their commitment to the American People, and we will have much to announce in the coming weeks.”

“First up is Microsoft, who my team has been working with, and which will make major changes beginning this week to ensure that Americans don’t “pick up the tab” for their POWER consumption, in the form of paying higher Utility bills. We are the “HOTTEST” Country in the World, and Number One in AI.

Data Centers are key to that boom, and keeping Americans FREE and SECURE but, the big Technology Companies who build them must “pay their own way.”

Thank you, and congratulations to Microsoft.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

GZERO: Maduro is gone Now comes to hard part

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Scientific American: A new study in macaques identifies a brain circuit that acts like a “brake” on motivation

or 90 days

January 9, 2026

2 min readAdd Us On Google

Why Your Brain Puts Off Doing Unpleasant Tasks

A new study in macaques identifies a brain circuit that acts like a “brake” on motivation

By Jackie Flynn Mogensen edited by Claire Cameron

Black and white image of a man with his head on a desk surrounded with papers
(Photo by Lambert/Getty Images)

Mind & Brain

Join Our Community of Science Lovers! Sign Up for Our Free Daily Newsletter

No one likes to do something they find unpleasant. Who among us hasn’t put off icky things such as a tedious work assignment, a fridge deep clean or a difficult conversation? The reason why someone just can’t seem to get started isn’t a mere failure of willpower: it is rooted in neurobiology.

In a new paper published in Current Biology, researchers describe a circuit in the brains of macaque monkeys that appears to function as a “motivation brake,” a finding that could offer clues to why people hesitate in making certain decisions.

“We were able to causally link a specific brain pathway to a ‘brake’ on motivation when individuals face unpleasant tasks in daily life,” says Ken-ichi Amemori, an associate professor at the Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Biology at Kyoto University and a co-author of the study.

In the study, researchers presented macaques with tasks: the monkeys would either get a reward at the end of the task or a reward plus a puff of air on their face. As one might expect, the monkeys took longer to do the task when it meant getting the uncomfortable puff of air.

Then, using a technique called chemogenetics, whereby scientists can use drugs to control specific brain cells, the researchers suppressed a circuit between two brain regions called the ventral striatum and the ventral pallidum—both are known to be involved in motivation.

Once the circuit’s activity was tamped down, the monkeys were less hesitant to act on the task even if they knew the air puff was coming. In other words, the “brake” appeared to have been eased off.

“We hope that understanding this neural mechanism will help advance our understanding of motivation in stressful modern societies,” Amemori says.

He and his team hope the findings could one day inform treatments for psychiatric conditions that involve motivation such as schizophrenia and depression. He also notes, however, that interventions designed to weaken the “brake” should be approached with caution in case they might instead promote the opposite—unsafe risk-taking.

Rights & Permissions

Jackie Flynn Mogensen is a breaking news reporter at Scientific American. Before joining SciAm, she was a science reporter at Mother Jones, where she received a National Academies Eric and Wendy Schmidt Award for Excellence in Science Communications in 2024. Mogensen holds a master’s degree in environmental communication and a bachelor’s degree in earth sciences from Stanford University. She is based in New York City.

More by Jackie Flynn Mogensen

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Elon Musk. What if medical school becomes pointless. If you attend an Opthalmologist now when in fact the laser can do the work, change is rolling out fast

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Elon Musk talks to Ted Cruz. The bare facts of how Doge tackled the waste and fraud in government computers in the U.S.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Leopoldo Lopez, 7 years in prison, Venezuela, of the stolen elections by Maduro. For perspective please take the time to watch this TedTalk

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

NGO’s, Charities. Is it time for Root and Branch investigations, similar to the US?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Drop first-world peoples ANYWHERE …. THEY JUST BUILD A FIRST WORLD CULTURE … Boers and South Africa

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Deep Mind: Meta goes nuclear to power AI supercluster

 
 ENERGY Meta goes nuclear to power AI supercluster

Nuclear power is staging a comeback in the U.S. — largely due to the voracious energy demands of AI — and Meta just became one of the largest corporate buyers of nuclear power in U.S. history. 

On Friday, the company announced that it had signed three deals with nuclear companies to onboard 6.6 GW of power by 2035. This energy boost is particularly needed for Meta’s AI factories, including its AI supercluster, “Prometheus,” which is scheduled to come online later in 2026 in New Albany, Ohio. 

One of Meta’s three deals is with Vistra to increase power production at existing plants in Pennsylvania and Ohio that will help power Prometheus. The other two deals are with Oklo and TerraPower to create “safer, advanced nuclear reactors” and accelerate the development of next-gen nuclear technologies. 

Bill Gates is a key investor in TerraPower. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman is a lead investor in Oklo and stepped down as chairman of the board of directors in 2025 so the company could sign up more AI customers that compete with OpenAI.

For context, Meta already runs 30 data centers worldwide. But an AI factory typically needs at least 5-10x the power of a traditional data center. There are several reasons why: GPUs demand significantly more power than CPUs, AI training and workloads typically have higher utilization, they run 24/7 unlike traditional data centers that support more peaks during working hours, and they need additional cooling. 

A traditional data center uses 100 MW or less of power, while AI factories are now scaling up to 1 GW or more. That’s enough energy to power about 800,000 homes, roughly the equivalent of the entire city of San Francisco or the state of New Mexico. And Meta has even larger ambitions with its Hyperion supercluster in Louisiana that will start at 2 GW of power, scale up to 5 GW over time, and be nearly the same size as Manhattan.

That’s why Zuckerberg needs to onboard enough energy to power these behemoths.
One of the key advantages Google has over OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, and other AI competitors is that it already has the compute and the energy to scale up in the years ahead. That’s why we’re seeing Meta, OpenAI, and the rest of the industry scrambling to sign deals for AI factories and power plants as quickly as possible. They believe their AI growth and ambitions will hit a wall without it. Zuckerberg has stated his intention that “Meta Superintelligence Labs will have industry-leading levels of compute and by far the greatest compute per researcher.” My biggest question is: what happens when there’s a technology breakthrough that makes AI 100x more efficient, so it doesn’t need as much power?  
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment