NVIDIA’s market cap is bigger than Germany’s GDP. Only the US and China surpass it.
A bit crazy for a company?

NVIDIA’s market cap is bigger than Germany’s GDP. Only the US and China surpass it.
A bit crazy for a company?


Stanford University Press, 2022
394 pages
By
Linda F. Burghardt – January 23, 2023
In the aftermath of the Holocaust, survivors of all ages, abilities, nationalities, and ethnicities had to somehow come to terms with the enormous trauma they had suffered before they could fully rebuild their lives. But for a small and determined group of young men and women, that first step toward healing was revenge.
Nakam is the chilling true story of the fifty men and women who joined together as a sort of underground army to avenge the six million Jews murdered by the Nazis.
The year was 1945. A small paramilitary group of Holocaust survivors, many of whom had fought in partisan militias in the forests of Ukraine and Lithuania, simply could not return to everyday life as if nothing had happened — as if the social order had not been breached to the highest degree. They had little faith in the Nuremberg trials to bring about justice, for they considered every citizen of Germany equally complicit in the crimes, and thus equally deserving of punishment. So they devised a plan to poison and kill six million Germans.
Their leader, Abba Kovner, was a charismatic poet and resistance fighter. He, like them, was a Holocaust survivor with a burning desire for revenge on Germany. He became a messianic figure; and while he was smart, driven, and courageous, he could not operate in a vacuum. He had to navigate the forces around him, including the more moderate Yishuv — the administrators of Israel — and the Haganah, the Zionist military leaders.
The group of avengers, called Nakam (Hebrew for “vengeance”), had to solve a serious ethical dilemma before they could fulfill their mission. Should they dedicate themselves to rescuing survivors, forging a path toward health, safety, and the construction of a political homeland? Or should they focus on the past and retaliate, sacrificing everything?
Dina Porat is an Israeli historian, a professor emeritus of Modern Jewish History at Tel Aviv University, and the former chief historian at Yad Vashem. Her writing is scholarly yet accessible, tender yet bold. It draws on hitherto unstudied archival sources and in-depth interviews with the surviving avengers themselves. Translated by Mark L. Levinson as part of the prestigious Stanford Studies in Jewish History and Culture series, Nakam delivers new insights about war, trauma, healing, and the ethics of revenge.
Linda F. Burghardt is a New York-based journalist and author who has contributed commentary, breaking news, and features to major newspapers across the U.S., in addition to having three non-fiction books published. She writes frequently on Jewish topics and is now serving as Scholar-in-Residence at the Holocaust Memorial & Tolerance Center of Nassau County.
JBC Newsletter
Get the latest reviews in your inbox each week!

Jewish literature inspires,
·
The United States is getting sucked into a conflict in the Middle East, central banks are desperately trying to keep inflation under control and the world is facing an energy shock that may cripple the global economy. There are lots of ways the world looks very similar to the early 1970s. And yet, it is now clear that there is also one significant difference between now and then. Whereas half a century ago, the oil cartel OPEC was rising in power, with Tuesday’s shock decision by the United Arab Emirates to quit the group, it is clear that it is falling apart. In reality, the US is taking back control of the fossil fuel industry – and that is of huge geopolitical significance.

Matthew Lynn Article | http://spectator.com/article/us-back-charge-oil-industry-uae-opec
As of April 2026, a series of AI-generated, “Lego-style” propaganda videos created by pro-Iranian groups have gone viral, targeting American political figures with animated, hip-hop-style diss tracks. These videos are designed to look like they were produced by The Lego Group but are actually part of a sophisticated digital “meme war”. Fortune +4
These videos are being used to push a narrative that Iran is resisting American pressure, utilizing pop culture to gain viral traction. Fortune +1
Trump just decided how this war ends, and it’s not how anyone expected… Trump has reportedly told his aides to prepare for an extended U.S. blockade of the Strait of Hormuz. The president apparently sees both available off-ramps, pulling out of the conflict entirely or resuming combat operations, as carrying significantly more risk than maintaining the current naval blockade indefinitely. This follows separate reporting that the intelligence community was directed to assess the risks of declaring unilateral victory and pulling back from the conflict. Both data points point in the same direction.
Trump is choosing to settle into the standoff rather than force a resolution either way. The logic is brutal but coherent. Resuming bombing burns through more JASSM-ER missiles the Pentagon can’t replace for years, risks more American casualties, drives oil even higher heading into midterms, and almost certainly fails to extract the nuclear concession Iran refuses to make.
Walking away with no deal hands Iran a clean political victory and tells every adversary that American military pressure can be outwaited. Maintaining the blockade keeps the pressure on Tehran, slowly degrades the Iranian economy, and preserves Trump’s leverage for whenever a real diplomatic opening emerges.
But there’s a real cost to “indefinite blockade” as a strategy. American gas prices already at $4.18 don’t ease while the Strait stays effectively closed. Fertilizer prices stay 90% above pre-war levels. Global supply chains stay fractured. The Iran war might be morphing into a permanent low-intensity confrontation, with the U.S. Navy enforcing a blockade in perpetuity while Iran keeps boarding ships, deploying cyber attacks, and waiting for the political pressure on Trump to crack first. Source: WSJ

Jensen Huang just told you who is winning the most important race on Earth. For fifty years, America held an unchallenged monopoly on the future. We built the transistor. We launched the internet. We wrote the source code for the modern world. Then the man who builds the physical backbone of every AI system on the planet read the score out loud. Huang: “50% of the world’s AI researchers are Chinese.” Half the minds building what comes next are not ours.
Huang: “70% of last year’s AI patents are published by China.” Seven out of every ten blueprints for the next era are being written in Mandarin. Huang: “Nine out of the ten top science and technology schools in the world are now in China.” The talent pipeline did not slow down. It reversed direction. Huang: “We used to lead most of them; now they lead most of them. This has completely flipped in the last half to a decade.”
Fifty years of American intellectual supremacy. Inverted in less than ten. This is not a rivalry between OpenAI and DeepSeek. This is not a stock ticker or a quarterly earnings call. This is the largest transfer of civilizational power in the modern era. And it is happening while the West drafts safety frameworks and fills out compliance paperwork. Huang: “They have a large population of highly qualified students. They work incredibly hard. This is a country with an enormous might.” China does not treat AI like a product category. They treat it as the single variable that decides who writes the rules for the next century.
The West keeps asking what AI should be allowed to do. China keeps asking how fast they can build it. That gap is not philosophical. It is existential. This is not a left fight. This is not a right fight. This is a survival fight. And right now, America is not fighting it like one. The nation that controls the talent controls the research. The nation that controls the research controls the models. The nation that controls the models does not ask permission. It sets the terms. History never remembers the civilization with the better safety committee. It remembers the one that refused to stop building.
The UAE leaving OPEC is a major blow to the cartel’s pricing power. Here’s what it actually means. – The UAE is OPEC’s second-largest producer and can now pump freely with no output restrictions – Good for consumers in the short term: more supply, downward pressure on prices – Less clear for U.S. producers: cheaper oil globally means lower profits for Big Oil – The U.S. is energy independent but still imports roughly a third of its oil, including heavier crudes from the Middle East that American light crude can’t replace – The world was already oversupplied before the Iran war, so it’s unclear if long-term demand supports UAE’s extra production – The bigger picture: the Iran war is permanently reshaping global energy supply chains and the UAE exit may not be the last domino to fall Source: CNN Picture:
