Donald Hoffman, MIT professor and cognitive scientist, challenges the idea that space and time are fundamental… Comment: TBI underlying part of what is not highlighted is the disconnection with space and time

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Promathean Action:

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Grok 4 AI: Michael Comyn Kings Inns – Victoria Prize 1898. March 2026. Recommend Grokipedia search Michael Comyn

See new posts

King’s Inns Victoria Prize awarded to Michael Comyn late 1800 early 1900 do you have any details?

Thought for 1m 3s

Michael Comyn (1871–1952), an Irish barrister, judge, and later Fianna Fáil Senator, was awarded the Victoria Prize at the Honorable Society of King’s Inns in 1898. dib.ie +2 He had been admitted as a student there in Hilary Term 1896.

canisgallicus.com The prize, established by the Education Committee in 1888, was specifically the third prize of £10 in value, as decided at the Council of Benchers meeting on June 1, 1898, during Trinity Term.

canisgallicus.com At the time, Comyn was working as a civil servant and studying law part-time, but a job transfer to Yorkshire left him one lecture short of the requirements to sit for the bar exams.

en.wikipedia.org Winning the Victoria Prize, which recognized excellence in legal examinations, provided the financial support needed to complete his studies despite this shortfall. dib.ie +1 He was subsequently called to the Irish bar in Michaelmas Term 1898 and went on to build a successful legal career, including taking King’s Counsel in 1914. en.wikipedia.org +1

canisgallicus.com asked further question.

Yes, the excerpt you provided from James Comyn’s book Their Friends at Court (1973) accurately describes Michael Comyn’s resourceful approach to overcoming attendance shortcomings in his final year at King’s Inns. By winning the Victoria Prize, he addressed the issue of being one lecture short for the final examination. Additionally, his success in the honours examination allowed him to be excused from two full terms, facilitating his call to the Irish Bar in Michaelmas Term 1898. canisgallicus.com +1 Records from King’s Inns confirm he was awarded the Victoria Prize that year (third place, valued at £10), though they do not explicitly detail the honours exam component, which aligns with the personal anecdote in the book.

Details on other Victoria Prize winners

History of King’s Inns

Michael Comyn received the prize because he could not attend final lecture so they awarded what Prize or Concession to allow him to qualify

Thought for 41s

Michael Comyn, while studying at King’s Inns, was transferred to Yorkshire in his final year, which caused him to miss required lectures and left him one short of the attendance needed to sit for the bar examinations. en.wikipedia.org +1 To address this shortfall, he reviewed the regulations and discovered that winning the Victoria Prize would “cure the defect” of the missed lectures, allowing him to qualify and sit the exams despite the attendance issue.

canisgallicus.com He entered and won the Victoria Prize (valued at £10), which provided this concession and enabled him to complete his studies. en.wikipedia.org +1 Additionally, he sat for and succeeded in an honours examination, which excused him from two whole terms as a further accommodation.

canisgallicus.com He was subsequently called to the Irish bar in Michaelmas Term 1898.

en.wikipedia.org

2 web pages

Details on Victoria Prize history

Other King’s Inns concessions

Make response more concise

Is there a list of people

Thought for 1m 19s

Yes, there is an archival record of Victoria Prize recipients at the King’s Inns Library in Dublin (reference L/8/5), which documents the names of winners in legal examinations from 1888 to 1931.

irishmanuscripts.ie Similar records, including newspaper clippings and annotations on prize winners from the 1920s, are held in the Hugh Kennedy Papers at University College Dublin Archives.

ucd.ie These are physical or archival collections, not digitized or publicly available online, so accessing them would require contacting the respective institutions (e.g., via the Irish Manuscripts Commission’s database for guidance on King’s Inns records).

irishmanuscripts.ie No comprehensive public list of all recipients appears to exist online based on available sources. However, individual winners are mentioned in historical biographies, legal histories, and institutional records. The Victoria Prize, established in 1888, was awarded for excellence in legal examinations at King’s Inns and often had multiple tiers (e.g., first, second, third place, with values like £10 for third).

canisgallicus.com Here are some known recipients:

RecipientYearDetails
Michael Comyn1898Third prize (£10); allowed him to qualify despite missing a lecture. canisgallicus.com
Thomas Kettle~1906Victoria Prize winner; called to the Bar in Easter Term 1906. greatwar.ie
Frances Christian Kyle1921First Victoria Prize; one of the first women called to the Irish Bar. dib.ie
Nora Durkan~1948Second Victoria Prize; called to the Bar in 1948. lawlibrary.ie
Ita Heslin~1951Third Victoria Prize; called to the Bar in 1951. lawlibrary.ie

This is not exhaustive, as the prize continued beyond 1931 (e.g., into the 1940s and 1950s based on known cases), and further research in archives could reveal more names. If you’re interested in a specific period or additional details, the King’s Inns website or library might provide leads on requesting records.

kingsinns.ie

7 web pages

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Neuroscience News: AI Uncovers Hidden Stress Damage in the Body. “The findings show that larger adrenal volume is linked to higher stress, greater allostatic load, and increased risk of heart failure and mortality. Because millions of CT scans are already performed each year, this approach could transform early stress detection and prevention without requiring new tests or radiation.”

AI Uncovers Hidden Stress Damage in the Body

FeaturedNeurosciencePsychology

·November 26, 2025

Summary: Researchers developed an AI tool that detects chronic stress by measuring adrenal gland volume on routine chest CT scans. This biomarker aligns with cortisol levels, stress questionnaires, and future cardiovascular outcomes, offering the first imaging-based method to quantify stress load in the body.

The findings show that larger adrenal volume is linked to higher stress, greater allostatic load, and increased risk of heart failure and mortality. Because millions of CT scans are already performed each year, this approach could transform early stress detection and prevention without requiring new tests or radiation.

Key Facts

  • AI Stress Biomarker: Adrenal gland volume measured from CT scans reflects long-term chronic stress more reliably than momentary cortisol tests.
  • Risk Prediction: Higher adrenal volume is linked to elevated cortisol, increased allostatic load, and greater risk of future heart failure.
  • Clinical Potential: This biomarker can be extracted from routine imaging, offering a scalable tool for early stress-related disease prevention.

Source: RSNA

Using a deep learning AI model, researchers identified the first-of-its-kind biomarker of chronic stress detectable through routine imaging, according to research being presented next week at the annual meeting of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA).

Chronic stress can affect both physical and psychological well-being, causing a variety of problems including anxiety, insomnia, muscle pain, high blood pressure and a weakened immune system, according to the American Psychological Association. Research shows that chronic stress can contribute to the development of major illnesses, such as heart disease, depression and obesity.

The study’s lead author, Elena Ghotbi, M.D., a postdoctoral research fellow at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore, Maryland, developed and trained a deep learning model to measure adrenal gland volume on existing CT scans.

Each year, tens of millions of chest CT scans are performed in the United States alone.

“Our approach leverages widely available imaging data and opens the door to large-scale evaluations of the biological impact of chronic stress across a range of conditions using existing chest CT scans,” Dr. Ghotbi said.

“This AI-driven biomarker has the potential to enhance cardiovascular risk stratification and guide preventive care without additional testing or radiation.”

Senior author Shadpour Demehri, M.D., professor of radiology at Johns Hopkins, said chronic stress is a prevalent condition or complaint that many adults deal with on a daily basis.

“For the first time, we can ‘see’ the long-term burden of stress inside the body, using a scan that patients already get every day in hospitals across the country. Until now, we haven’t had a way to measure and quantify the cumulative effects of chronic stress, other than questionnaires, surrogate serum markers like chronic inflammation, and cortisol measurement, which is very cumbersome to obtain.” Dr. Demehri said.

Unlike single cortisol measurements, which provide a momentary snapshot of stress levels, adrenal volume acts like a biological barometer of chronic stress.

In the study, the researchers obtained data on 2,842 participants (mean age 69.3; 51% women) from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, a comprehensive study combining chest CT scans, validated stress questionnaires, cortisol measures and markers of allostatic load—the cumulative physiological and psychological effects of chronic stress on the body. This rare integration of imaging, biochemical and psychosocial data made it the optimal, and likely only, cohort for developing an imaging biomarker of chronic stress.

The researchers retrospectively applied their deep learning model to the CT scans to segment and calculate the volume of the adrenal glands. Adrenal Volume Index (AVI) was defined as volume (cm³) divided by height² (m²). Salivary cortisol was collected eight times per day over two days. Allostatic load was based on body mass index, creatinine, hemoglobin, albumin, glucose, white blood count, heart rate and blood pressure.

Statistical associations were assessed between AVI and cortisol, allostatic load, and psychosocial stress measures, including depression and perceived stress questionnaires. The researchers found that AI-derived AVI correlated with validated stress questionnaires, circulating cortisol levels and future adverse cardiovascular outcomes.

Higher AVI was associated with greater cortisol, peak cortisol and allostatic load. Participants with high perceived stress had higher AVI compared to those with low stress. AVI was also associated with a higher left ventricular mass index. Each 1 cm³/m² increase in AVI was linked to greater risk of heart failure and mortality.

“With up to 10-year follow-up data on our participants, we were able to correlate AI-derived AVI with clinically meaningful and relevant outcomes,” Dr. Ghotbi said.

“This is the very first imaging marker of chronic stress that has been validated and shown to have an independent impact on a cardiovascular outcome, namely, heart failure.”

“For over three decades, we’ve known that chronic stress can wear down the body across multiple systems,” said Teresa E. Seeman, Ph.D., study co-author and professor of epidemiology at UCLA and a pioneering researcher in stress and health.

“What makes this work so exciting is that it links a routinely obtained imaging feature, adrenal volume, with validated biological and psychological measures of stress and shows that it independently predicts a major clinical outcome. It’s a true step forward in operationalizing the cumulative impact of stress on health.”

Dr. Demehri said that by linking an easily measurable imaging feature with multiple validated indicators of stress and downstream disease, this research introduces an entirely new, practical way to quantify chronic stress.

“The key significance of this work is that this biomarker is obtainable from CTs that are performed widely in United States for various reasons,” Dr. Demehri said. “Secondly, it is a physiologically sound measure of adrenal volume, which is part of the chronic stress physiologic cascade.”

The researchers said the imaging biomarker could be used in a variety of diseases that are associated with chronic stress in middle-aged and older adults.

Other co-authors are Roham Hadidchi, Seyedhouman Seyedekrami, Quincy A. Hathaway, M.D., Ph.D., Michael Bancks, Nikhil Subhas, Matthew J. Budoff, M.D., David A. Bluemke, M.D., Ph.D., R. Graham Barr and Joao A.C. Lima, M.D.

Key Questions Answered:

Q: What did researchers discover about chronic stress?

A: They identified the first imaging-based biomarker of chronic stress using adrenal gland volume measured by AI.

Q: Why is adrenal volume important?

A: It reflects long-term physiological stress, correlating with cortisol, allostatic load, and future cardiovascular risk.

Q: What makes this method different from cortisol tests?

A: Cortisol fluctuates throughout the day; adrenal volume offers a stable, cumulative indicator of long-term stress burden.

Editorial Notes:

  • This article was edited by a Neuroscience News editor.
  • Journal paper reviewed in full.
  • Additional context added by our staff.

About this AI and stress research news

Author: Linda Brooks
Source: RSNA
Contact: Linda Brooks – RSNA
Image: The image is credited to Neuroscience News

Original Research: The findings will be presented at the 111th Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA).

Join our Newsletter

 I agree to have my personal information transferred to AWeber for Neuroscience Newsletter ( more information )

Sign up to receive our recent neuroscience headlines and summaries sent to your email once a day, totally free.

We hate spam and only use your email to contact you about newsletters. You can cancel y

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

GZERO ask ian: Trump threatens regime change in Venezuela

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Neuralink implants … action and hope for future

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Futurism: New App Lets Users Bet on Deadly Conflicts in Real Time

New App Lets Users Bet on Deadly Conflicts in Real Time

“The only way to monitor the situation.”

By Joe Wilkins

Published Dec 2, 2025 1:08 PM EST

A new platform called Polyglobe is helping gamblers visualize real-time geopolitical conflicts to bet on through Polymarket.
@pizzintwatch via X (Screenshot)

Thanks to the rise of cryptocurrency, it’s never been easier to place inscrutable bets with shady grey-market bookies. The kingpin presiding over this dubious corner of the gaming industry is currently Polymarket, a crypto platform which lets users place bets on the outcomes of weather catastrophes, political elections, and economic crises.

Aided in large part by Trump administration deregulations, Polymarket has become the go-to for bettors eager to cash in on geopolitical strife. As Forbes recently reported, the platform has stimulated over $2 billion in trading volume in 2025 from lines on “major events,” with questions like “will Russia capture all of Pokrovsk before 2026?” generating over $2.7 million in trades.

But with so many global conflicts these days, it can be tough to keep track of all the minute-to-minute action. Will Israel strike Lebanon on December 5? Will India strike Pakistan by March 31st? Who knows!

Luckily, some enterprising developers have come up with a solution to help gamblers keep up with the ever-changing nature of global conflicts. It’s called PolyGlobe, an app designed to visualize Polymarket bets on a real-world map. With PolyGlobe, users can scroll its digital map for geomarkers — along the front lines of the Ukraine-Russia war, for example — that contain direct links to the Polymarket dashboard for that given conflict.

Beyond visualizing bets, the app also aggregates “real-time OSINT [open source intelligence]” data from tweets by the “most credible sources of OSINT reporting on X,” the development team told Futurism. There’s no strict criteria for selecting sources, but a quick look at the feed shows a small number of anonymous, amateur media accounts like “Conflict_Radar” and “Osint613” make up the bulk of them.

PolyGlobe is the work of the team behind the Pentagon Pizza Watch project, which tracks pizza deliveries near the US pentagon as a possible sign of clandestine NatSec activity. In an email, PolyGlobe’s creators stated they’re official partnered with Polymarket through its Builder’s Program.

In a post on X-formerly-Twitter announcing the launch of a live Ukraine war map, the team behind PolyGlobe showed off a robust interface complete with directions of attack and color-coordinated control zones, alongside real-time price charts for relevant bets. The graphs look exactly like a stock chart — tracking the market’s financial appetite for deadly conflict and streamlining the process of betting on it.

“Now, when you hover a market, we draw the exact area of operation it resolves on and spell out the rule in plain English,” PolyGlobe declares. “No more rule debates, no more guessing what actually settles. The only way to monitor the situation.” (That feature now seems to be in limbo following backlash from the developer group DeepState, which created the Ukraine frontline map.)

According to PolyGlobe’s website, the app was designed for “traders, analysts, and journalists who need to see the financial impact of geopolitical events as they unfold, in real-time.” The Pentagon Pizza Watch team doesn’t profit from Polymarket bets directly, they told Futurism. For now, they’re primarily funded through “creator fees” via their proprietary cryptocurrency, but that could change.

“We’re exploring other monetization routes such as data licensing and enabling trading on the site,” the creators said.

But beyond the obvious ethical dilemma of gambling on whether people live or die, there are other major issues with using betting odds to predict how political struggles — let alone armed conflict — will resolve.

To ask PolymarketPolyGlobe and their supporters about it, prediction markets seem like a democratic way to gauge the probability of certain events by tapping into the wisdom of the crowd. But in practice, prediction markets are plagued with biases. In the first round of wagers after a bookmaker sets the opening odds, for example, a professional gambler can easily skew the odds simply by betting a huge amount of money, creating a distorted consensus from the jump.

There’s also the psychological angle to consider. According to a 2023 study on sports betting, structural bias in prediction markets is possible in large part due to the guarantee that people will place irrational bets, following phenomena like the gambler’s fallacy or the near-miss effect. When it comes down to it, gambling on war and politics is, at best, hardly any different from putting it all on black.

A recent case in point came during elections in the Netherlands this October. Prior to the elections, the Polymarket odds were skewed 95 percent in favor of the victory of the far-right Party for Freedom over the liberal party, Democrats 66. The first exit poll of the election decimated millions of dollars in confident bets, however, when it showed D66 far overperforming expectations, almost immediately securing victory.

Within minutes, D66’s odds of victory had gone from 5 percent to 100 percent. When all was said and done, over $32 million had changed hands, with $1.2 million coming from open interest positions against D66. (A significant number of those bets came from accounts with names like WhiteLivesMatter, which just about says it all.)

The moral here is that betting markets are, at best, poor predictors of geopolitical outcomes. At worst, they represent a profound evil: not just a gambling market built directly on pain and destruction, but a new frontier for corruption on a global scale. It’s a casino where the house always wins, and every spin of the wheel ends in tragedy.

More on gambling: Gannett Is Using AI to Pump Brainrot Gambling Content Into Newspapers Across the Country

Joe Wilkins

Correspondent

I’m a tech and transit correspondent for Futurism, where my beat includes transportation, infrastructure, and the role of emerging technologies in governance, surveillance, and labor.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Futurism: Kids Who Got Cell Phones Early…

Something Grim Is Happening to Kids Who Got Cell Phones Early

“When you give your kid a phone, you need to think of it as something that is significant for the kid’s health.”

By Frank Landymore

Published Dec 2, 2025 2:14 PM EST

New research found that smartphone usage in children led to higher risk of poorer mental health across several categories.
Illustration by Tag Hartman-Simkins / Futurism. Source: Getty Images

Giving a young kid a smartphone may be a big mistake.

New research conducted by scientists from UC Berkeley and Columbia University found that children 12 years old and younger who received one of these devices were at a higher risk of depression, obesity, and sleep deprivation.

The alarming findings, published as a study in the journal Pediatrics, were based on an analysis of over 10,000 children who participated in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study between 2018 and 2020, which is purportedly the largest long-term study of brain development and child health in the US. And while they don’t strictly establish causation, the broad correlation they show underscores a larger and ever-growing body of research exploring the deleterious cognitive effects that devices like smartphones and tablets can have adolescents, ranging from their impact on their education to social skills.

“When you give your kid a phone, you need to think of it as something that is significant for the kid’s health — and behave accordingly,” lead author Ran Barzilay, a child and adolescent psychiatrist at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, told The New York Times.

In the study, about two-thirds of the participants used a smartphone. The median age they received them at was 11 years old, and their development was compared to a cohort of roughly 3,800 children in the study who never received a smartphone before turning 12.

Not only did the researchers find that children who owned a smartphone by age 12 were at a greater risk of depression, obesity, and poor sleep, but they also showed that the younger a child was when they first received a smartphone, the higher those risks became for obesity and poor sleep in particular. The earlier a kid is hooked on a smartphone, in other words, the worse their physical and mental health outcomes are likely to be.

Trying to identify the “right” age to give a youth a smartphone, however, may be missing the point. The researchers also found that a group of children who had never owned a smartphone before turning 12, but were then given one, showed a higher risk of poorer mental health and sleep by the time they were 13, compared to another group who stayed phoneless.

“We didn’t even look at what the kids did on the phone,” Barzilay told CBS News. “We basically asked one simple question: does the mere factor of having one’s own smartphone at this age range have anything to do with health outcomes?”

That is both a strength and a drawback to the study. It’s likely that it’s not just a quality inherent to the smartphones that are causing problems, but the apps they give access to, like social media sites, whose myriad risks to children are well documented. YouTube, TikTok, and streaming services like Netflix could supply an endless amount of entertainment to keep a child well up past their bedtime, too. Then there’s addictive mobile games designed to both murder your attention span and drain your wallet. At this moment, we’re also plunging headlong into a world of AI chatbots and companions, which many children are turning to act as a close friend.

A lot of questions are unanswered, but these latest findings are echoed by a bevy of other research. A 2025 study of over 100,000 children, for example, found that those who received smartphones before the age of 13 experienced more suicidal thoughts, a lower perception of self-worth, and detachment from reality. Similarly, the study also found that every year before 13 that a child received a smartphone was associated with a greater likelihood of poorer mental health and well-being.

Society is still grappling with how these devices have transformed interpersonal relationships and taken over teenage and preteen attention spans. Many schools are opting to take the safe route by banning smartphones entirely. In follow-up research, Barzilay hopes to explore more specific features of smartphone usage to determine their link to mental health outcomes.

“It’s critical for young people to have time away from their phones to engage in physical activity, which can protect against obesity and enhance mental health over time,” Barzilay said in a statement about the work.

More on mental health: Here’s an Interesting Theory About Why Kids’ Test Results Have Fallen to Their Lowest Point in Two Decades

Frank Landymore

Contributing Writer

I’m a tech and science correspondent for Futurism, where I’m particularly interested in astrophysics, the business and ethics of artificial intelligence and automation, and the environment.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Watch “The Hidden Fear Behind Perfectionism: Carl Jung’s Insight on Power” on YouTube

Attachments area

Preview YouTube video The Hidden Fear Behind Perfectionism: Carl Jung’s Insight on PowerPreview YouTube video The Hidden Fear Behind Perfectionism: Carl Jung’s Insight on Power

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Sudan has offered Russia a naval base…

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment