Axios: What Zuck’s manifesto really means

What Zuck’s manifesto really means
 
Illustration of a hand and a cell phone surrounded by abstract shapes and the Meta logo.
Illustration: Maura Losch/Axios
 
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, the latest tech mogul to unfurl a long AI manifesto, reveals — and defends — Meta’s we’re-behind-and-need-to-catch-up strategy.

Every principle in his 6,500 words happens to be Meta’s business plan: Distribute widely (the company has over 3 billion monthly active users), unleash open source AI (it’s behind at the frontier), distillation is fine and legal (it does it) and don’t delay releases (it’s catching up).

Zuckerberg argues that the most common concerns are overblown and fail to account for all the positives it can achieve. In his vision of AI, the biggest risk instead is that one government or entity has too much power over the technology, Axios’ Ina Fried writes.

“One of the ways to achieve both individual empowerment and checks and balances is to make sure you put the technology in everybody’s hands,” Zuckerberg told me in an interview ahead of the manifesto’s release.“It’s definitely a different view than what you’re hearing from a lot of other people in the tech industry right now.”He wrote that he wants to ensure the U.S. and other democracies lead, and ultimately make sure “humanity maintains control over superintelligence so it serves rather than endangers us.”

🛰️ The big picture: Even as the world confronts AI that is breaking out of sandboxes, comparing notes on message boards and creating new viruses, Zuckerberg portrays it instead as an analog to other disruptive technical innovations.

“Humanity has witnessed many transformative advances,” he writes in the manifesto, which he previewed in a Wall Street Journal op-ed last month. “Each time there is fear that people will be left behind. But each time humanity has come out with more people sharing greater prosperity, health, and freedom.

⚠️ Threat level: Zuckerberg contrasts this vision with one in which only some people, some businesses or some countries have access to the most powerful AI, suggesting that would represent a far more dangerous outcome.

“I’m personally more worried about centralization than I am about any of the specific risks others are talking about,” he told me.

👀 Playing politics: Without naming his rival, Zuckerberg joined the anti-Anthropic pile-on. “I do not understand why anyone who believes that AI will eliminate most jobs and much of humanity’s relevance would rush to build that future,” he writes.

Zuckerberg’s plan for Meta is that “everyone will have free or affordable access to these tools,” with the paid versions using a “dynamic auction mechanism” to get the compute they need at the lowest possible price. “This will ensure the benefits of superintelligence are distributed widely.”

🔎 Between the lines: Zuckerberg also said Meta will resume releasing some open-source AI models, now that Meta Superintelligence Labs is up and running, as Axios reported in April.

Meta says it’s opening the weights of a new model, Muse Glimmer, billed as “one of the highest-performing models of its size,” and will open the weights for a version of the foundational model Muse Spark 1.2 in coming weeks.

Preempting federal mandates, Zuckerberg added that Meta’s independent board will have the power to approve model-release safety criteria and review whether releases meet those standards.

💰 Local spending: Hoping to tamp down data-center backlash, Zuckerberg also announced Meta is launching the Future is for Everyone Fund “to support each community we work in directly.” The fund, seeded with $1 billion for U.S. communities where Meta owns and operates data centers, will benefit teachers, first responders, and energy and water infrastructure.

The bottom line: The manifesto represents Zuckerberg’s clearest effort yet to weigh in on AI’s future, both as a matter of policy and technology.

Watch a Zuckerberg video … Read Zuckerberg’s essay … Meta’s research blog … Glimmer model weights.

Unknown's avatar

About michelleclarke2015

Life event that changes all: Horse riding accident in Zimbabwe in 1993, a fractured skull et al including bipolar anxiety, chronic fatigue …. co-morbidities (Nietzche 'He who has the reason why can deal with any how' details my health history from 1993 to date). 17th 2017 August operation for breast cancer (no indications just an appointment came from BreastCheck through the Post). Trinity College Dublin Business Economics and Social Studies (but no degree) 1997-2003; UCD 1997/1998 night classes) essays, projects, writings. Trinity Horizon Programme 1997/98 (Centre for Women Studies Trinity College Dublin/St. Patrick's Foundation (Professor McKeon) EU Horizon funded: research study of 15 women (I was one of this group and it became the cornerstone of my journey to now 2017) over 9 mth period diagnosed with depression and their reintegration into society, with special emphasis on work, arts, further education; Notes from time at Trinity Horizon Project 1997/98; Articles written for Irishhealth.com 2003/2004; St Patricks Foundation monthly lecture notes for a specific period in time; Selection of Poetry including poems written by people I know; Quotations 1998-2017; other writings mainly with theme of social justice under the heading Citizen Journalism Ireland. Letters written to friends about life in Zimbabwe; Family history including Michael Comyn KC, my grandfather, my grandmother's family, the O'Donnellan ffrench Blake-Forsters; Moral wrong: An acrimonious divorce but the real injustice was the Catholic Church granting an annulment – you can read it and make your own judgment, I have mine. Topics I have written about include annual Brain Awareness week, Mashonaland Irish Associataion in Zimbabwe, Suicide (a life sentence to those left behind); Nostalgia: Tara Hill, Co. Meath.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment