New US open model takes on China’s top AI![]() China and Europe have typically led the charge on open models. Now, another US company is joining the fray with a significant entrant into the race. On Wednesday, Thinking Labs, the AI startup founded by ex-OpenAI CTO Mira Murati, launched its first model: Inkling. The model sets itself apart from leading AI labs in the US in a very important way: it is open-weight, allowing customers to customize it directly to their needs through fine-tuning and training. To suit that purpose, the model was built to perform across a wide range of areas. Or, as Thinking Machines describes it, it’s a “generalist model” that can reason about text, images, and audio rather than being proficient in just one domain. This can be observed in benchmark performance, which isn’t best-in-class but is consistent across specialties, as seen in the image below. Other model features include:Parameters: Mixture-of-Experts transformer model with 975 billion total parameters, 41 billion active. Context window: Up to one million tokens Pretrained: On 45 trillion tokens of text, images, audio and video, allowing it to be proficient across all three. Lightweight counterpart: Inkling-Small, a lighter-weight model with 12 billion active parameters. Fine-tuning: To make customization accessible, the company says it is making Inkling available on Tinker, the company’s training API platform. Cost-efficiency: Inkling’s “controllable thinking effort” allows users to customize the cost/performance curve.Until now, most open-source models have been developed in other countries, with China leading the way. These models are good for the ecosystem because they allow people and organizations to more deeply specialize the models, adjust their behavior, run them locally, and even save money. Though, as Thomas Randall, Research Director at Info-Tech Research Group, told The Deep View, they may not be for everyone. “If organizations have use cases where cost control, sovereignty, fine-tuning, deployment flexibility, or domain-specific performance matter, then open-source models are relevant,” said Randall. “For the highest-risk or most complex work (e.g., legal, medical, cyber, or regulated decisions), closed frontier model providers are preferable because of safety tooling, support models, auditability, and more mature deployment ecosystems.” Still, for the US to compete in the open-weights model space, it has a lot left to do, despite recent entrants from not only Thinking Machines but Nvidia, Google and OpenAI. A closer look at benchmark performance shows that many of China’s leading labs, which have also taken a generalist approach with their open-weight models, have outperformed Inkling on benchmarks. That includes GLM 5.2, DeepSeek V4 Pro, and Kimi K2.6. Kimi K3 also just released on Thursday, and it’s Kimi’s most capable model to date, with 2.8 trillion parameters. Competition is the lifeblood of any industry. This is especially true for the state of AI we are in now, where enterprises and AI builders are prioritizing cost, and open-weight models provide a tangible solution while applying pressure on the leading labs to be more cost-conscious. Just this month, OpenAI and Meta have both released new models, each highlighting their cost efficiency. Still, it is important to keep in mind the broader backdrop, including the rising costs of finite resources such as data centers and energy. Open-weight models still need the same compute power, even if they cost less than proprietary models. |
| LINKS |
-
Archives
- August 2026
- July 2026
- June 2026
- May 2026
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
-
Meta


Competition is the lifeblood of any industry. This is especially true for the state of AI we are in now, where enterprises and AI builders are prioritizing cost, and open-weight models provide a tangible solution while applying pressure on the leading labs to be more cost-conscious. Just this month, OpenAI and Meta have both released new models, each highlighting their cost efficiency. Still, it is important to keep in mind the broader backdrop, including the rising costs of finite resources such as data centers and energy. Open-weight models still need the same compute power, even if they cost less than proprietary models.