| The Rattled Generation |
![]() |
| Illustration: Aïda Amer/Axios. Stock: Getty Images |
| This column, which got a sneak peek over the weekend in Jim’s C-Suite newsletter, is our long look at America’s two-decade road to today’s mood. Tomorrow, we’ll unfurl Jim’s idea to help CEOs and other leaders navigate this moment. Click here to watch a “Behind the Curtain” video of Jim and me discussing how we got here — and what’s next. We’re living through the most disorienting societal moment since World War II. Almost nobody in a position of power is explaining why, or what to do about it. This is so much bigger than politics. It touches our jobs, our companies, our communities and our realities. Why it matters: By most objective measures, it’s an extraordinary time to be alive. Americans are wealthier, safer and longer-lived than at any earlier point in history. U.S. total wealth has soared. Violent crime sank to a 20-year low and is still falling. Life expectancy just hit 79 years — the highest in American history. The country produces more energy than ever after four straight record years. And yet: University of Michigan consumer sentiment just hit its lowest reading in a half-century. Gallup finds most people think things will only get worse. Trust in every major institution — government, media, organized religion, higher education, science — is at or near record lows, both Gallup and the Edelman Trust Barometer find. The gap between reality and feeling is the story of our era. A three-part shock helps tell it: Social media’s rise. The chaos of COVID. The rise of AI, political extremism and information bubbles in the aftermath of both. This produced a perpetually Rattled Generation, one too unsteady and uncertain to believe things are truly good or getting better. That’s new for a typically optimistic, can-do society. It’s hard to see this changing anytime soon for one big reason: For the first time, no one — even us, sometimes — knows what to believe or who to trust. Our brains are now constantly calculating: Is this AI? Is it a bot? Can I trust this, share this or act on it? Only by making sense of how we got here can we begin to fix it: Shock 1: The Social Era We trace the inflection to 2007, the year we helped launch Politico. The same month, Apple unleashed the iPhone. Twitter was a growing infant. Facebook crossed 50 million users. In roughly 18 months, the infrastructure for an algorithmically amplified social life fell into place. Suddenly, anyone, anywhere, anytime could say anything on a public platform for free at scale and watch as others engage or enrage. What followed wasn’t a coincidence. Anxiety, loneliness and institutional distrust rose in near-perfect parallel with smartphone penetration and screen time. It’s a correlation so consistent across age groups, income levels and democracies that we strain to call it anything but causation. The institutions made it easy. Church sex abuse scandals. Media blunders. The 2008–09 financial crisis and its unpunished architects. Iraq WMD claims. Academic failures. Epstein. Each, on its own, would have been a generational wound. Together, they landed one after another on people already disoriented by the speed of technological change. Citizens trusted institutions until those institutions failed them over and over, in public and up close. Once broken, that trust never reset. The result: People didn’t abandon community. They migrated it, both closer to home and closer to their screens. Local leaders. Their own employer. People they know in person. Their phone. Shock 2: COVID Just as the country was trying to get its footing after the social media gut punch, COVID hit. Its effects went beyond a public health crisis, building an isolation and distrust machine by severing the in-person bonds holding people together. Churches closed. Local businesses shuttered. Offices emptied. Youth sports stopped. The very refuges people retreated to after their trust in big institutions collapsed were gone overnight. For millions of people, COVID stripped away the coping mechanisms they’d built to survive the first decade of digital disruption. It produced in our young people what psychologist Jonathan Haidt called the Anxious Generation. But the problems were hardly contained to one age group. They hit everyone.And we never really recovered. We got vaccines and reopenings. We did not get a restoration of the social fabric. Loneliness was classified by the U.S. surgeon general as a public health epidemic. The share of Americans who said they had no close friends quadrupled from 1990 to 2021. Young men, in particular, have retreated from nearly every traditional institution — civic, religious, educational, relational. Column continues below. |
2. Shock 3: The aftermath |
![]() |
| Illustration: Sarah Grillo/Axios |
| As if social media and COVID weren’t enough, everyone got smacked with three once-in-a-generation tectonic changes — all at once, and all worse since COVID. Politics grew more omnipresent and mean. Terminally online politicians played to terminally online audiences, with algorithms egging everyone on. The rest got stuck in this feedback loop, which makes people seem nuttier and more hateful than most are. AI exploded across screens and work. Everything started moving faster everywhere — how and what you learn, how you work and how you get and share information. All have changed, and keep changing. Our species isn’t wired to evolve at this velocity. People flocked to smaller and smaller information bubbles based on their age, politics and jobs. Suddenly, we had infinite “realities” instead of a shared one. Now, two people sitting next to each other on a plane likely get their “news” on platforms the other person has never visited and trust people the other person never heard of. Same plane. Adjacent seats. Two different worlds. Short of hiding in the woods without the internet, all of this was unavoidable for all of us, all the time. The result of this 20-year daisy chain of events: a public with less hope, less trust, fewer friends and fewer people to look up to for help. What comes next: This is hard to read, much less make sense of. But it also provides a basis to think through where we go from here. It might not be the reality we want, but it’s the one we’ve got. You only change it by reverse-engineering it to spot the glitches and patterns and cures. We clearly need to restore trust in some binding leaders and institutions, lift competent people above the noisy ones, ease people through the AI transformation, find more common ground and common truth, and shift attention to what works, not just what sucks. The bottom line: The repair won’t come from politicians or media or brighter economic data. It’ll come from government, religious institutions, communities, schools, parents, and business repairing the small threads that weave a complicated country together. We’ll end on the happy note we flicked at up top: We’re actually in exponentially better shape than people think, and than our rival nations. America’s advantages are clear and real. We just need people to see this clearly again, and build back and up from there. Watch/share our video … Share this column.Tell us about your experience: jim@axios.com, mike@axios.com. If you’re a CEO or on a CEO’s team: Ask to join Jim’s new weekly Axios C-Suite newsletter. |
-
Archives
- June 2026
- May 2026
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
-
Meta

Column continues below.
Shock 3: The aftermath
If you’re a CEO or on a CEO’s team: