| Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill” passes House, threatens state AI laws |
Source: Kendall Hoopes |
| In Washington, D.C., the U.S. House of Representatives has passed President Trump’s federal budget bill that includes a controversial 10-year bar on any U.S. state or city from regulating AI, with the legislation now moving to the U.S. Senate for consideration. The bill passed by the narrowest possible margin — 215-214 — with all Democrats and two Republicans voting against it. |
| What’s at stake: Buried 291 pages into the 1,116-page bill, Section 43201(c) describes a 10-year moratorium on state-level enforcement of “any law or regulation regulating artificial intelligence models, artificial intelligence systems, or automated decision systems”. The federal ban would immediately nullify more than 20 California AI laws passed just last year and freeze about 30 new bills currently under consideration in Sacramento. California’s upcoming transparency law requiring generative AI developers to document their training data would be impossible to enforce. Laws banning AI deepfakes and requiring disclosure when patients interact with AI instead of humans would be swept aside. Even pending bills forcing insurance companies to report AI-driven coverage denials would be dead on arrival. |
| The arguments: Supporters, including Rep. Brett Guthrie (R-Ky.), argue that differing laws in 50 states would create an impossible regulatory patchwork. Rep. Jay Obernolte (R-Calif.) called it “nonsensical” to invest in a national AI strategy while allowing “1,000 different pending bills in state legislatures” to become law simultaneously. |
| They point to historical precedent: the Internet Tax Freedom Act of 1998, which blocked new state internet taxes for ten years to nurture the fledgling e-commerce sector. “The results were extraordinary,” said Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), suggesting AI needs similar breathing room. |
| The pushback: California Attorney General Rob Bonta joined a bipartisan coalition of 40 attorneys general urging Congress to drop the idea, calling broad preemption “irresponsible” and warning it would “deprive consumers of reasonable protections” in the absence of federal rules. |
| The California Privacy Protection Agency cautioned that the moratorium “could rob millions of Americans of rights they already enjoy,” including privacy safeguards voters enshrined in 2020. Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) blasted the moratorium as “a giant gift to Big Tech,” saying it enables deepfakes and permits unchecked profiling of citizens. |
| The measure passed a House committee on party lines but faces scrutiny in the Senate, where rules against unrelated policy riders could derail it. |
![]() |
| History shows that smart regulation often drives innovation, not stifles it. Aviation boomed under FAA safety standards because people trusted planes were safe. Pharmaceuticals advanced after stricter drug approval rules weeded out dangerous snake oil. Banking regulations restored trust after the Great Depression, enabling decades of financial innovation. |
| Without guardrails, we risk AI disasters that could set the field back years. Imagine autonomous vehicles rushed to market causing fatal accidents, or AI medical tools misdiagnosing patients. Nothing kills innovation faster than customers losing trust. |
| California Sen. Scott Wiener called it “a horrible provision to override all state regulation of AI for ten years,” noting “California would no longer be able to ban or regulate deepfake revenge porn, which could also include fake kiddie porn”. |
| A ten-year federal pre-emption would concentrate every dispute over algorithmic accountability in Washington, handing Congress a tight deadline to craft national guardrails. Done well, it could deliver uniform clarity; done late, it risks a regulatory vacuum where deep-fakes, opaque health bots, and biased decision systems roam unchecked. |
| The narrow House passage and growing Senate opposition suggest this provision may not survive — but the fact that it got this far is very interesting. |
-
Archives
- October 2026
- September 2026
- August 2026
- July 2026
- June 2026
- May 2026
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
-
Meta
Source: Kendall Hoopes
Source: Iman Al-dabbagh, Fortune












