Futurism: Trump Admin Says It’s Not Bailing Out the AI Industry Regardless of How Hard It Crashes

Futurism Logo

Artificial IntelligenceEthics

No Bailouts

Trump Admin Says It’s Not Bailing Out the AI Industry Regardless of How Hard It Crashes

“If one fails, others will take its place.”

By Victor Tangermann

Published Nov 7, 2025 11:11 AM EST

President Donald Trump's "AI czar" David Sacks announced that there will be "no federal bailout for AI" — freaking out investors further.
Kayla Bartkowski/Getty Images/Futurism

During the Wall Street Journal‘s Tech Live conference on Wednesday, OpenAI chief financial officer Sarah Friar hinted at the possibility that the government could “backstop the guarantee that allows the financing to happen” as the AI industry continues to take on even more debt.

Friar regretted her comment almost immediately, clarifying in a subsequent post on LinkedIn that “OpenAI is not seeking a government backstop for our infrastructure commitments.”

The suggestion clearly caused immense chagrin to OpenAI’s leadership; even CEO Sam Altman emerged to put out the fire, tweeting that “we do not have or want government guarantees for OpenAI data centers.”

Yet the damage was already done, exacerbating an already testy stock market. Ongoing fears over an AI bubble triggered a major tech selloff earlier this week — and reassurances by president Donald Trump’s “AI czar” David Sacks that there will be “no federal bailout for AI” haven’t helped.

Shares of AI chipmaker Nvidia are continuing their tumble, sliding nearly four percent in early trading on Friday. The company’s shares are down over 13 percent so far this week; AI software giant Palantir was hit even harder, currently down over 16 percent so far this week.

And if the AI bubble really does burst — a calamity that some experts worry could take the entire US economy with it — the Trump administration is saying that the government wouldn’t intervene. That’s despite the White House being extremely amenable to the industry’s needs, with the president going as far announcing a $500 billion AI infrastructure initiative, dubbed Stargate, earlier this year.

In a tweet, Sacks clarified that competition would sort out any such eventuality, arguing that the US “has at least five major frontier model companies. If one fails, others will take its place.”

At the same time, Sacks said that “we do want to make permitting and power generation easier” in a followup. “The goal is rapid infrastructure buildout without increasing residential rates for electricity.”

Altman, Friar, and Sacks’ coordinated efforts to extinguish the fire that the CFO’s “backstop” comments ignited highlight an AI industry in a precarious state.

Even before Friar’s comments on Wednesday, investors had become concerned that AI industry stalwarts, like Nvidia and Palantir, may be grossly overvalued, with analysts predicting a correction following months of soaring valuations.

What the situation looks like for OpenAI, which, according to Friar, isn’t looking to go public any time soon, remains far more murky.

In his latest tweet, Altman argued that “we expect to end this year above $20 billion in annualized revenue run rate and grow to hundreds of billion by 2030.” That’s despite “looking at commitments of about $1.4 trillion over the next 8 years.”

In other words, OpenAI would have to massively grow its current revenue — just to afford soaring debt payments in the coming years without any government assistance.

More on OpenAI: OpenAI’s Browser Avoids Large Part of the Web Like the Plague

Victor Tangermann

Senior Editor

I’m a senior editor at Futurism, where I edit and write about NASA and the private space sector, as well as topics ranging from SETI and artificial intelligence to tech and medical policy.

Unknown's avatar

About michelleclarke2015

Life event that changes all: Horse riding accident in Zimbabwe in 1993, a fractured skull et al including bipolar anxiety, chronic fatigue …. co-morbidities (Nietzche 'He who has the reason why can deal with any how' details my health history from 1993 to date). 17th 2017 August operation for breast cancer (no indications just an appointment came from BreastCheck through the Post). Trinity College Dublin Business Economics and Social Studies (but no degree) 1997-2003; UCD 1997/1998 night classes) essays, projects, writings. Trinity Horizon Programme 1997/98 (Centre for Women Studies Trinity College Dublin/St. Patrick's Foundation (Professor McKeon) EU Horizon funded: research study of 15 women (I was one of this group and it became the cornerstone of my journey to now 2017) over 9 mth period diagnosed with depression and their reintegration into society, with special emphasis on work, arts, further education; Notes from time at Trinity Horizon Project 1997/98; Articles written for Irishhealth.com 2003/2004; St Patricks Foundation monthly lecture notes for a specific period in time; Selection of Poetry including poems written by people I know; Quotations 1998-2017; other writings mainly with theme of social justice under the heading Citizen Journalism Ireland. Letters written to friends about life in Zimbabwe; Family history including Michael Comyn KC, my grandfather, my grandmother's family, the O'Donnellan ffrench Blake-Forsters; Moral wrong: An acrimonious divorce but the real injustice was the Catholic Church granting an annulment – you can read it and make your own judgment, I have mine. Topics I have written about include annual Brain Awareness week, Mashonaland Irish Associataion in Zimbabwe, Suicide (a life sentence to those left behind); Nostalgia: Tara Hill, Co. Meath.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment