| Welcome back. OpenAI is making moves into AI music generation, positioning itself to compete directly with established players like Suno, a three-year-old startup that has already captured significant market share with its AI-powered music generator. OpenAI has been working with Juilliard students to annotate musical scores and develop the capability to generate music from text and audio prompts, similar to what Suno already offers its subscribers. |
| IN TODAY’S NEWSLETTER |
| 1. Thousands call for superintelligence guardrails |
| 2. Defense AI heats up |
| 3. Snack giant Mondelez joins AI ad hype |
| GOVERNANCE Thousands call for superintelligence guardrails ![]() As tech leaders continue their frenzied pursuit of creating AI that’s better than us, some are calling to pump the brakes on development. The Future of Life Institute, a nonprofit dedicated to preventing “extreme large-scale risks” posed by technology, launched a petition on Wednesday dedicated to putting guardrails on the development of superintelligence, or AI that outperforms humans in every conceivable task. The petition, dubbed the “Statement on Superintelligence,” states that the development of superintelligence should be prohibited before there are calls for “broad scientific consensus” on how to do so safely and controllably. The petition has gained rapid momentum since its debut, with more than 45,000 signatures and counting. Its signatories include: Leading AI experts Geoffrey Hinton and Yoshua Bengio;Executives such as Virgin Group founder Sir Richard Branson and Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak; Political figures spanning the aisle, including former President of Ireland Mary Robinson, Duke and Duchess of Sussex Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, and former Trump Administration strategist Steve Bannon;And a host of entertainment industry figures, including Kate Bush, Grimes, Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Will.I.am. “This statement was really conceived as a way to demonstrate the overwhelming and bipartisan majority of people who are extremely concerned about the current trajectory of advanced AI development,” Ben Cumming, communications director at the Future of Life Institute, told The Deep View. Polling by the organization released last week found that 73% of U.S. adults want robust AI regulation, and 64% believe superintelligence shouldn’t be developed until it’s proven safe. Though AI leaders claim that the development of powerful AI and superintelligence will lead to a waterfall of breakthroughs that evolve humanity as a whole, the risks are numerous, said Cumming. The tech’s possibilities could upend the economic landscape, supercharge disinformation, and muddy culture with the mass production of slop, he said. And while the petition calls for stricter guardrails, it’s hotly debated whether it will even be possible to control this tech at all, Cumming added. “The rule in the world has been that the smarter species control the stupid ones, and we’d be making ourselves the stupider ones in that scenario,” he said. Reaching Superintelligence would be a natural consequence of AGI, or AI that’s capable of matching human capabilities in every domain. The pursuit of this has led to a “frantic competition,” Cumming noted, where you’re either in the race or watching from the sidelines, safety and risk be damned. The problem, however, is that being in the race at all is incredibly costly – hence why tech firms are pouring billions into compute. This has already concentrated incredible power in the hands of a select few, leading to a divide between the haves and the have-nots. That divide may only worsen over time as we inch towards increasingly powerful models. |
-
Archives
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
-
Meta

Reaching Superintelligence would be a natural consequence of AGI, or AI that’s capable of matching human capabilities in every domain. The pursuit of this has led to a “frantic competition,” Cumming noted, where you’re either in the race or watching from the sidelines, safety and risk be damned. The problem, however, is that being in the race at all is incredibly costly – hence why tech firms are pouring billions into compute. This has already concentrated incredible power in the hands of a select few, leading to a divide between the haves and the have-nots. That divide may only worsen over time as we inch towards increasingly powerful models.