The First Dáil (Irish: An Chéad Dáil) was Dáil Éireann as it convened from 1919 to 1921. It was the first meeting of the unicameral parliament of the revolutionary Irish Republic. In the December 1918 election to the Parliament of the United Kingdom, the Irish republican party Sinn Féin won a landslide victory in Ireland. In line with their manifesto, its MPs refused to take their seats, and on 21 January 1919 they founded a separate parliament in Dublin called Dáil Éireann (“Assembly of Ireland”).[3] They declared Irish independence, ratifying the Proclamation of the Irish Republic that had been issued in the 1916 Easter Rising, and adopted a provisional constitution. Its first meeting happened on the same day as one of the first engagements of what became the Irish War of Independence. Although the Dáil had not authorised any armed action, it became a “symbol of popular resistance and a source of legitimacy for fighting men in the guerrilla war that developed”.

[4] The Dáil was outlawed by the Dublin Castle administration in September 1919, and thereafter it met in secret. The First Dáil met 21 times and its main business was establishing the Irish Republic.

[3] It created the beginnings of an independent Irish government and state apparatus. Following the May 1921 elections, the First Dáil was succeeded by the Second Dáil of 1921–1922. What part did de Valera and Michael Comyn play?

Thought for 1m 1s

Éamon de Valera played a central role in the First Dáil as its President (Príomh Aire) from April 1919 onward, succeeding the temporary president Cathal Brugha. He led the revolutionary government, ratified the declaration of Irish independence, and oversaw the establishment of key republican institutions during the Irish War of Independence. De Valera was absent for much of 1919–1920 while fundraising and seeking recognition in the United States, but he returned in late 1920 and continued to guide Dáil policy, including granting him authority in 1921 to declare war if needed (though he did not exercise it). en.wikipedia.org +2 Michael Comyn, a prominent barrister and King’s Counsel, was not a member of the First Dáil itself but contributed to its broader apparatus by defying the Irish Bar Council’s prohibition against participating in the republican judicial system. He represented defendants in the Dáil Courts—the alternative court system established by the First Dáil in 1920 to administer justice independently of British authorities during the War of Independence. Comyn also defended republican prisoners in British military courts and advised Sinn Féin leaders on legal matters throughout the period. canisgallicus.com +2

6 web pages

Explain Dáil Courts in detail

Role of Michael Collins

Thought for 42s

Introduction to the Dáil Courts

The Dáil Courts, also known as Republican Courts or Sinn Féin Courts, were a parallel judicial system established by Irish republicans during the Irish War of Independence (1919–1921). They served as the judicial branch of the self-declared Irish Republic, proclaimed by the First Dáil Éireann in January 1919. These courts aimed to undermine British authority by providing an alternative mechanism for administering justice, asserting Irish sovereignty, and handling civil and criminal disputes independently of the British legal system. They emerged from grassroots arbitration efforts and evolved into a formal structure that operated across much of Ireland, filling the vacuum left by the collapsing British courts. en.wikipedia.org +2

Historical Context and Establishment

The origins of the Dáil Courts trace back to pre-independence ideas, such as Arthur Griffith’s 1904 proposal for Sinn Féin arbitration courts, inspired by historical precedents like Hungarian parallel courts during their struggle against Austria. In the wake of Sinn Féin’s landslide victory in the December 1918 UK general election, where elected MPs boycotted Westminster and formed the First Dáil, the need for alternative institutions became pressing. Spontaneous arbitration courts arose in 1918–1919, particularly in response to agrarian unrest in western Ireland, including cattle drives, land seizures, and disputes fueled by wartime food price hikes and suspended land reforms. rte.ie +1

These early courts were voluntary and focused on land disputes to prevent escalation that could harm the nationalist cause. The First Dáil formalized them in June 1919 by authorizing National Arbitration Courts, initially under the Department of Agriculture. By May 1920, as the War of Independence intensified, the Dáil’s Ministry for Home Affairs, led by Austin Stack, transformed them into a comprehensive judicial system with coercive powers. A key decree on 29 June 1920 established the full Dáil Courts structure, applying laws in force as of 21 January 1919 (the Dáil’s first sitting), plus Dáil decrees, while excluding British laws seen as religiously or politically biased. The first court under direct Dáil control convened in Ballinrobe, County Mayo, in May 1920, handling a land seizure case. By June 1920, they operated in most counties, supported by the Irish Republican Army (IRA) for enforcement. en.wikipedia.org +2

Structure and Organization

The Dáil Courts were organized in a hierarchical structure mirroring aspects of the British system but adapted for revolutionary conditions. They included:

• Parish Courts: The lowest tier, operating at the local level (one per Roman Catholic parish, totaling around 900). These handled minor civil claims (up to £10) and petty criminal offenses like rowdyism, larceny, breaches of licensing laws, property damage, and assaults. Judges were elected by local groups, including Sinn Féin branches, IRA units, Cumann na mBan (women’s auxiliary), trade unions, farmers’ organizations, and clergy. This egalitarian approach allowed women and young men to serve as judges, unlike British restrictions. en.wikipedia.org +2
• District Courts (or Constituency Courts): Mid-level courts (about 77 in total, one per parliamentary constituency), dealing with appeals from Parish Courts, civil claims from £10 to £100, land titles over £100, and more serious criminal matters. Special sessions with a Circuit Judge addressed larger cases. en.wikipedia.org +2
• Circuit Courts: Four circuits with unlimited jurisdiction for serious civil and criminal cases. en.wikipedia.org
• Supreme Court: The apex court, serving as both a first-instance and appellate body for all matters, with unlimited jurisdiction. It was headed by figures like Conor Maguire as Republican Chief Justice. en.wikipedia.org +1

Special land courts addressed agrarian disputes. Courts were informal, without wigs or gowns, and often held in makeshift venues like halls, farms, barns, outhouses, or shops. Legal sources included Brehon laws (ancient Irish codes), the Code Napoléon, Roman law, and commentaries, though British textbooks were not binding. Clergy often participated, but an amendment to exclude them ex-officio was defeated. en.wikipedia.org +2

Operation and Functioning

The courts operated by boycotting and supplanting British institutions, with the IRA and Irish Republican Police (IRP) enforcing verdicts through intimidation, courthouse burnings, and juror absences. They handled a wide range of cases, including land disputes (e.g., seizures of estates), petty crimes, industrial strikes, bank robberies, and assaults. Punishments emphasized restitution: returning stolen property, repairing damage, fines, damages, forced labor, or exile from Ireland. Without prisons or funds, creative solutions were used, such as detaining offenders on islands (e.g., Lough Corrib in Galway) or stranding them at sea. en.wikipedia.org +2 Decisions were based on common sense, neighborliness, and upholding property rights, often conservative in nature—e.g., halting land redistribution by landless farmers and ruling against high-interest moneylenders only in extreme cases. During the July 1921 Truce, suppressed courts resurfaced, handling increased business. Serious offenses like treason were managed by IRA court-martials, not Dáil Courts. The system persuaded many that an independent Ireland could protect rights, boosting legitimacy for the republican cause. en.wikipedia.org +2Key Figures

Prominent individuals included Austin Stack (Minister for Home Affairs, oversaw formalization), Kevin O’Shiel (led land arbitration), Art O’Connor (Minister for Agriculture), Diarmuid Crowley (Supreme Justice post-Truce, defied abolition), Cahir Davitt and James Creed Meredith (judges who later served in Free State courts), Conor Maguire (Chief Justice), and Terence MacSwiney (arrested while presiding). Barristers like Michael Comyn participated by representing defendants, defying professional bans. en.wikipedia.org +2.

Challenges and Suppression

Challenges included British repression from mid-1920, with arrests (e.g., MacSwiney, who died on hunger strike) and raids driving courts underground, reducing activity by two-thirds by early 1921. Enforcement relied on reluctant IRA volunteers, leading to delays and unexecuted verdicts. Internal issues arose, such as IRA commanders resisting Dáil authority, abuses like forum-shopping, corruption, and subversion by radicals like Peadar O’Donnell favoring land redistribution. Agrarian agitators ignored rulings, and lack of prisons complicated incarceration.

Post-Anglo-Irish Treaty (December 1921), dual systems caused tensions; the Provisional Government suspended them on 11 July 1922 and abolished them on 25 July amid Civil War, after conflicts like Crowley’s habeas corpus defiance. en.wikipedia.org +2Legacy

The Dáil Courts were a revolutionary achievement, symbolizing grassroots innovation and the counter-state’s viability, but were abolished as anti-Treaty symbols during the Civil War. The Dáil Éireann Courts (Winding Up) Act 1923 validated many decrees and resolved over 5,000 cases via a commission led by Meredith. The Courts of Justice Act 1924 established modern Irish courts, incorporating both British and Dáil veterans. They highlighted tensions between nationalism and social reform, influencing cultural depictions like Seán Keating’s painting A Republican Court, 1921 and Ken Loach’s film The Wind That Shakes the Barley. Ultimately, they demonstrated the limits of revolutionary change, as Ireland retained much of the British legal framework post-independence. en.wikipedia.org +2

3 web pages

Explore key cases handled

Arthur Griffith’s influence

Add more vivid examples

Thought for 1m 0s

Key Cases Handled by the Dáil Courts

The Dáil Courts, operating from 1919 to 1922 during the Irish War of Independence and into the early Irish Civil War, primarily dealt with civil disputes, land issues, petty crimes, and industrial matters. They aimed to supplant British judicial authority, enforce republican law, and maintain social order amid revolutionary upheaval. While thousands of cases were processed across parish, district, and supreme levels, detailed records of specific cases are sparse due to the clandestine nature of the courts and subsequent destruction of documents (e.g., during the 1922 bombardment of the Four Courts). Below, I explore notable examples drawn from historical accounts, grouped by category for clarity. These cases illustrate the courts’ conservative approach—often upholding property rights and prioritizing national unity over radical reform—while highlighting enforcement challenges, internal tensions, and their role in legitimizing the Irish Republic.

Land and Agrarian Disputes

Land cases were the most common, arising from post-World War I agitation, including cattle drives, estate seizures, and demands for redistribution. The courts often ruled in favor of landowners to prevent class divisions that could undermine the independence struggle.

• Ballinrobe Land Seizure Case (May 1920, Ballinrobe, Co. Mayo): This was the first case under direct Dáil control, involving the forcible occupation of an estate by landless laborers and small farmers amid widespread agrarian unrest in western Ireland. Claimants sought partition, arguing necessity, but failed to prove “sheer necessity,” feasibility, or compensation ability. The court, presided over by Kevin O’Shiel (a barrister and Dáil land arbitrator), ruled against them. When ignored, an IRA unit enforced the decision by detaining the claimants on an island in Lough Corrib until compliance. Women then occupied the land, showing ongoing resistance. Significance: It set a precedent for strict evidentiary standards in land claims, prioritizing national cohesion over social reform, and demonstrated the courts’ reliance on IRA enforcement due to lacking prisons. This case reassured larger farmers of republican stability, as reported favorably in the pro-unionist Irish Times. rte.ie +1
• Clare Land Dispute Case (June 1920, Co. Clare): Following a Dáil ruling on contested land (likely favoring the landowner), two men refused to rebuild a demolished wall, leading to their three-week detention on a coastal island. When the Royal Irish Constabulary (RIC) attempted a rescue by boat, the detainees rejected British authority, declaring themselves “citizens of the Irish Republic” and repelling the RIC with stones. Outcome: The judgment was upheld through detention, reinforcing Dáil sovereignty. Significance: Highlighted rural dwellers’ selective support for Dáil institutions—embracing political independence but prioritizing land needs—while illustrating conflicts with British forces and the courts’ role in fostering republican identity. rte.ie
• Land Occupation Dispute on Lough Corrib Island (ca. 1920, Co. Galway): Similar to Ballinrobe, this involved tenants occupying poor-quality farmland. The court deemed it unsuitable for division and ordered evacuation. Non-compliance led to IRA enforcement: tenants were rowed to an island on Lough Corrib and stranded until they agreed. Significance: Exemplified creative, non-carceral punishments and the courts’ conservative stance on property, curbing unrest that threatened nationalist unity. theirishstory.com

Civil and Tenant Disputes

These cases often mirrored British petty sessions but used pledges of honor instead of oaths, emphasizing arbitration.

• Landlord and Tenant Dispute in Ballinrobe (May 1920, Co. Mayo): A civil disagreement between a landlord and tenant, heard in a Sinn Féin Arbitration Court (pre-formal Dáil structure). Presided by Kevin O’Shiel, evidence was taken formally. Outcome not detailed, but it proceeded with standard procedures. Significance: Marked early barrister involvement in alternative courts, drawing parliamentary scrutiny and underscoring the shift from British systems. ruthcannon.com
• Multiple Cases in Ballinasloe (Late May 1920, Co. Galway): A large session handling various civil disputes, with eight to ten solicitors arguing and a High Court barrister presiding. All cases resolved, depleting the official Assizes docket. Significance: Prompted House of Commons questions on lawyer participation, highlighting professional divisions and the courts’ growing scale in supplanting British justice. ruthcannon.com
• Appeals and Cases Before Mayo Assizes (Early July 1920, Castlebar, Co. Mayo): Numerous appeals and civil matters (including potential compensation claims) were cleared the day before official Assizes, attended by many lawyers. Nearly all resolved, leaving the British court empty. Significance: Demonstrated the Dáil Courts’ efficiency in emptying official dockets across Ireland, contributing to the collapse of British judicial presence. ruthcannon.com
• Civil Cases in Ballina (November 1920, Co. Mayo): Important civil disputes presided by Diarmuid Crowley (barrister and judge). Outcomes not specified, but the session led to Crowley’s arrest. Significance: Illustrated risks to participants and tensions with Bar Council bans on involvement, yet showed barristers’ commitment to republican courts. ruthcannon.com
• Prosperous Village Cases (September 1920, Co. Kildare): A session heard multiple petty disputes: (1) Trespass and injured mare—neighbor ordered to mend fence and pay £5 compensation; (2) Publican open after hours—adjourned; (3) Elderly woman vs. son and daughter-in-law for mistreatment—adjourned with warning. Significance: Showed the courts’ handling of everyday issues, undermining local RIC and British petty sessions while promoting community resolution. prosperousheritage.com

Criminal and Petty Offenses

Punishments focused on restitution, fines, or exile, enforced by IRA without prisons.

• Theft of £15,000 in Millstreet (ca. 1920, Co. Cork): A gang robbery treated as petty crime. IRA arrested the thieves, deported them from Ireland, and returned the money. Significance: Highlighted non-traditional enforcement and the courts’ success in restoring order in rural areas where British courts failed. theirishstory.com
• Petty Criminal Punishments in County Cavan (ca. 1920-1921): Series of thefts and minor offenses; criminals arrested and ordered to work, pay compensation, or withdraw suits against Sinn Féin. Enforced by local IRA. Significance: Built grassroots support, with egalitarian judging (e.g., by women or priests) gaining popularity over RIC. theirishstory.com

Industrial and Labor DisputesCourts mediated to prevent strikes from fracturing republican unity.

• Creamery Strike Arbitration (September 1920, Cork City): Striking workers (many IRA members) vs. management; workers refused initial arbitration, prompting IRA milk escorts. ITGWU-IRA negotiations led to acceptance of Dáil ruling. Significance: Revealed class-nationalist tensions, with courts prioritizing unity; extended jurisdiction beyond land to labor. theirishstory.com

Post-Truce and Civil War-Era Cases

As tensions escalated, courts asserted independence against the emerging Free State.

• Habeas Corpus Appeal for George Plunkett (July 1922, Supreme Court): Petition by Count Joseph Plunkett for his son’s release (anti-Treaty IRA member detained without charges). Justice Diarmuid Crowley ordered Minister Richard Mulcahy and the prison governor to justify or release. Provisional Government abolished the courts the next day; Crowley declared it illegal and ordered arrests, leading to his imprisonment. Significance: Symbolized the courts’ end amid Civil War divisions, asserting judicial autonomy and habeas corpus, prompting resignations like George Gavan Duffy’s. theirishstory.com

Broader Legacy and Impacts

The Dáil Courts processed over 5,000 cases post-abolition via a 1923-1924 winding-up commission, validating many judgments and influencing the 1924 Courts of Justice Act, which established modern Irish courts with personnel from both systems. theirishstory.com +1 They set precedents for egalitarian procedures, adherence to pre-1919 law, and alternative punishments, but were criticized for conservatism (e.g., halting land redistribution).

en.wikipedia.org Challenges included British repression (e.g., arrests like Terence MacSwiney’s in 1920), IRA reluctance, and internal subversions (e.g., by Peadar O’Donnell in Donegal).

en.wikipedia.org Ultimately, they proved the viability of a republican counter-state, though suppressed as anti-Treaty symbols, leaving a legacy in Irish legal history depicted in works like Ken Loach’s The Wind That Shakes the Barley.

en.wikipedia.org

6 web pages

Explore IRA enforcement methods

Sinn Féin Arbitration Courts

Add inline citations

Explore IRA enforcement methods

Thought for 1m 3s

Introduction to IRA Enforcement of Dáil Courts

During the Irish War of Independence (1919–1921), the Dáil Courts operated as a parallel judicial system to assert Irish republican sovereignty and undermine British authority. Lacking formal prisons, police, or state infrastructure, the courts relied heavily on the Irish Republican Army (IRA)—also known as the Volunteers—and the Irish Republican Police (IRP) for enforcement. The IRP, established in mid-1920 under Dáil authority, handled day-to-day policing, while the IRA provided coercive muscle, especially in contested areas. Enforcement methods were improvised, drawing from agrarian traditions and guerrilla tactics, and emphasized restitution over retribution to maintain community support. These approaches evolved from voluntary compliance in early stages to forced implementation amid escalating conflict, but faced significant challenges like internal reluctance and British repression. Post-Truce (July 1921), enforcement briefly strengthened before fracturing during the Irish Civil War (1922–1923), leading to the courts’ abolition. theirishstory.com +2Key

Enforcement Methods

IRA enforcement prioritized non-lethal, community-oriented tactics to uphold verdicts, often blending intimidation with practical restitution. Methods escalated based on defiance severity, aiming to induce compliance through fear, economic pressure, or physical isolation rather than widespread violence. Treason or spying fell under IRA court-martials, not Dáil Courts, and could result in execution. en.wikipedia.org +1

• Detention and Isolation: Without prisons, the IRA used temporary detention in remote or makeshift locations. Offenders might be stranded on islands or held in barns until compliance. Forced labor was common, requiring criminals to work for victims or communities as restitution. theirishstory.com
• Exile and Deportation: For serious crimes like theft or persistent non-compliance, individuals were banished from Ireland or specific regions, often escorted out by IRA units to prevent return. theirishstory.com +1
• Intimidation and Threats: Non-violent coercion included anonymous letters, public notices, or late-night visits by masked IRA members demanding pledges of obedience. This drew from pre-revolutionary agrarian tactics, such as those used by the United Irish League. liverpooluniversitypress.manifoldapp.org
• Economic and Social Sanctions (Boycotts): Boycotts isolated non-compliant individuals economically and socially, prohibiting trade, services, or community interactions. Fines, property seizures, or restitution (e.g., returning stolen goods or repairing damage) were enforced to compensate victims. liverpooluniversitypress.manifoldapp.org +1
• Physical Coercion and Violence: When milder methods failed, enforcement involved beatings, property destruction (e.g., arson), or mock executions. Lethal force was rare for court verdicts but used in broader compliance efforts, such as punishing informers or those aiding British forces. liverpooluniversitypress.manifoldapp.org

The IRP, often comprising IRA volunteers, issued warrants and maintained order in depleted RIC areas like Clare and Mayo, blending policing with judicial enforcement.

publications.ut-capitole.fr

Specific Examples of Enforcement in Cases

Enforcement was applied across civil, criminal, and agrarian disputes, with the IRA stepping in when voluntary adherence failed. Here are notable cases illustrating methods:

These cases show enforcement’s focus on land (common due to agrarian agitation) and petty crimes, with methods tailored to avoid alienating supporters. theirishstory.com +1

Challenges and Limitations

Enforcement was hampered by logistical, internal, and external factors:

• IRA Reluctance and Distractions: Many IRA members saw court duties as secondary to guerrilla warfare, leading to delays or refusals (e.g., Galbally officers). Personal ties, like in strikes involving comrades, bred hesitation. theirishstory.com +1
• Abuses and Inconsistencies: Corruption, forum-shopping (litigants exploiting dual systems), and subversions (e.g., O’Donnell’s radical interventions) eroded legitimacy. Improvised methods risked harshness, alienating communities. theirishstory.com +1
• British Repression: From mid-1920, raids and arrests (e.g., judges like Crowley sentenced to hard labor) drove courts underground, reducing enforcement by two-thirds by early 1921. Crown forces killed attendees and burned courthouses. theirishstory.com
• Resource Constraints: No funds for incarceration or dedicated police led to reliance on volunteers, causing inefficiencies and regional variations (e.g., stronger in rural west than urban areas). en.wikipedia.org +1

Post-Truce dual jurisdiction caused mutual arrests between IRA/IRP and RIC, exacerbating chaos. theirishstory.com

Evolution and Legacy

Enforcement began informally in 1918–1919 with spontaneous arbitration, formalized in mid-1920 under Dáil decrees, and peaked during summer 1920 with IRA-led boycotts of British courts (e.g., juror intimidation causing assize failures). British crackdowns forced adaptation to clandestine operations. The 1921 Truce enabled resurgence, with IRA enforcing in anti-Treaty strongholds, but Treaty divisions split forces—pro-Treaty IRA aligned with the Provisional Government, leading to the courts’ suspension (July 11, 1922) and abolition (July 25, 1922) after defying government orders. theirishstory.com +1The 1923–1924 Winding-Up Commission validated many verdicts, influencing the Irish Free State’s Courts of Justice Act 1924, which incorporated Dáil personnel. Enforcement methods highlighted the revolution’s grassroots ingenuity but also its limits, blending Common Law with Brehon traditions for a hybrid system. They demonstrated civilian compliance could be achieved through targeted sanctions, though restrained compared to British reprisals, and left a legacy in depictions like Ken Loach’s The Wind That Shakes the Barley. publications.ut-capitole.fr +1

4 web pages

Explore IRP formation details

Compare with British RIC tactics

Add more inline citations

Munster circuit and Michael Comyn KC what was their involvement

Thought for 1m 41s

The Munster Circuit: Overview and Structure

The Munster Circuit was one of the traditional regional divisions of the Irish Bar under the British legal system, established to organize barristers’ practice across provincial courts. It encompassed the province of Munster, covering counties such as Clare, Cork, Kerry, Limerick, Tipperary, and Waterford. Barristers on the circuit traveled to assizes, quarter sessions, and county courts in these areas to handle civil and criminal cases, often involving land disputes, property matters, and local litigation prevalent in rural Ireland. This system dated back to the 19th century and required barristers to build practices through connections and persistence, as it was competitive and regionally focused. The circuit operated within the broader British judicial framework until the revolutionary changes of the Irish War of Independence (1919–1921), when parallel republican institutions like the Dáil Courts began to supplant it in nationalist-controlled areas. en.wikipedia.org +2 During the independence struggle, the Munster Circuit’s relevance diminished as litigants increasingly boycotted British courts in favor of the Dáil Courts, leading to empty dockets and symbolic failures (e.g., unattended assizes guarded by military forces). Post-1922 Anglo-Irish Treaty, the circuit system transitioned into the Irish Free State’s judicial structure, with some barristers like those from Munster incorporating into new circuit courts under the Courts of Justice Act 1924. militaryarchives.ie +1

Michael Comyn KC: Background and Legal Career on the Munster Circuit

Michael Comyn KC (1871–1952), born in Ballyvaughan, County Clare, to a nationalist tenant farmer family evicted during the Land War, was a prominent Irish barrister and republican sympathizer. After working as an excise officer in the British Civil Service while studying law at University College Dublin and King’s Inns, he was called to the Irish Bar in 1898. In 1900, he joined the Munster Circuit, where he built a successful practice despite lacking initial connections or a legal family background—he described the profession as “particularly hazardous” for outsiders. Starting with quarter sessions in Clare, he handled a range of civil and criminal cases typical of the circuit, including land and property disputes. His skill and persistence led to his appointment as King’s Counsel (KC) in June 1914, elevating him to senior status and allowing him to take on more complex briefs. en.wikipedia.org +2 Comyn was highly regarded on the Munster Circuit for his popularity and humane approach, often described as “the most popular and most humane of all the circuit judges” in later reflections. His circuit work positioned him as a respected figure in Munster’s legal community, which later lent credibility to his nationalist activities. He maintained ties to the region, with family connections (e.g., his brother James Comyn KC also practiced there) and personal reflections on cultural differences between eastern and western Ireland, attributing them to historical emigration patterns. canisgallicus.com +3

Involvement in the Dáil Courts and Connection to Munster

While Comyn’s primary career was on the British-administered Munster Circuit, his nationalist sympathies led him to defy the Irish Bar Council’s June 1920 resolution, which deemed participation in the revolutionary Dáil Courts (also called Republican or Sinn Féin Courts) as professional misconduct. He appeared as counsel in these parallel courts, which were established by the First Dáil in 1919–1920 to assert Irish sovereignty and handle disputes independently of British authority. The Dáil Courts mirrored aspects of the British system but were hierarchical: parish courts (local, minor claims), district courts (per parliamentary constituency, mid-level appeals and claims up to £100), circuit courts (four regional circuits with unlimited jurisdiction for serious cases), and a supreme court. The four circuits roughly aligned with Ireland’s provinces, including one covering Munster (encompassing southern counties like Clare, Cork, Kerry, Limerick, and Tipperary), where judges like Cahir Davitt held clandestine or semi-public sittings amid British repression. canisgallicus.com +4 Comyn’s involvement in the Dáil Courts began around mid-1920, aligning with their formalization under Dáil decree, and continued into the post-Truce period (July 1921 onward). As a senior KC, he likely handled higher-tier cases in district or circuit courts, focusing on civil matters such as property, contracts, and equity suits. Specific examples from Munster include:

• Limerick Sittings (October 1921): Comyn appeared among counsel from Limerick, Cork, and Tipperary in circuit sessions disposing of civil cases like rent arrears and damages claims.
• Tralee Fishery Rights Case (April 1922, Kerry): In a major equity suit before Judge Cahir Davitt, Comyn (assisted by Thomas O’Donnell) represented defendant fishermen against plaintiffs Power and Dodd over tidal fishery rights in the River Laune estuary. The case, tracing titles to the Earls of Desmond and requiring proof under Magna Carta, lasted a week; Davitt ruled for the plaintiffs, granting an injunction, which was upheld on appeal to the Supreme Court in June 1922. militaryarchives.ie +2

His participation lent legitimacy to the Dáil Courts, especially in Munster where agrarian disputes were rife, and demonstrated the overlap between traditional circuit barristers and revolutionary justice. Comyn’s dual role—practicing in British courts while supporting republican ones—highlighted tensions between professional duty and nationalism, as explored in historical analyses like David Foxton’s Revolutionary Lawyers (2008). canisgallicus.com +1

Broader Involvement in Irish Independence and Legacy

Beyond the Dáil Courts, Comyn defended republican prisoners in British military tribunals during the War of Independence, including the landmark Re. Clifford and O’Sullivan (1921) before the House of Lords, challenging martial law death sentences for 42 men (all commuted). During the Civil War (1922–1923), he sided with anti-Treaty forces, defending Erskine Childers (executed despite an appeal) and serving as legal adviser to the Republican Government. Post-war, he contributed to the Dáil Courts Winding-Up Commission (1923–1924), resolving over 5,000 outstanding cases and validating judgments for integration into the Free State system. He later advised Éamon de Valera on Fianna Fáil’s formation, founded The Irish Press, and served as a Senator (1928–1936) before becoming a Circuit Court judge on the Eastern Circuit (1936–1946). en.wikipedia.org +4Comyn’s shift from the Munster Circuit to revolutionary activities exemplified how established barristers bolstered the independence movement, though specific Dáil Court cases beyond Munster examples are sparsely documented due to the courts’ clandestine nature and record destruction during the Civil War. canisgallicus.com +1

9 web pages

Details on Tralee fishery case

Cahir Davitt’s judicial role

more concise summary

Bar Council forbade barristers involvement in Dail courts, was this effective. Did many break the rule and if so was it publicised?

Thought for 1m 0s

Effectiveness of the Irish Bar Council’s Prohibition

The Irish Bar Council passed a resolution on June 24, 1920, declaring it professional misconduct for barristers to appear before the Sinn Féin Arbitration Courts (precursors to the formalized Dáil Courts), with violators to be reported to the Benchers for sanctions. This ban aimed to prevent barristers from legitimizing the revolutionary republican judicial system established during the Irish War of Independence (1919–1921). However, the prohibition was largely ineffective. It faced immediate backlash from within the legal profession, including public criticisms that it was ultra vires (beyond the Bar Council’s authority) and inconsistent with past tolerances, such as barristers’ involvement in Ulster’s anti-Home Rule activities in 1913. A large meeting of about 70 barristers on November 5, 1920, in the Law Library effectively nullified the resolution by adjourning indefinitely amid support for defiance, arguing that only the Benchers of King’s Inns had jurisdiction over such matters. By mid-1920, British Crown courts were already collapsing across much of Ireland, with dockets emptying as litigants turned to Dáil Courts, further undermining the ban’s practical impact. No widespread enforcement or sanctions are documented, and the Dáil Courts continued to operate successfully until their abolition in July 1922, processing thousands of cases and incorporating professional barristers without significant professional repercussions during the period. ruthcannon.com +2

Number of Barristers Who Broke the Rule

While exact numbers are not precisely quantified in historical records—due to the clandestine nature of the Dáil Courts and incomplete archives—several prominent barristers defied the ban, and evidence suggests participation was not isolated but involved enough professionals to lend credibility and functionality to the republican system. At least a dozen are named across sources, primarily appearing in higher-tier courts (district, circuit, or supreme levels) handling civil disputes like property, equity, and land cases. Notable defiers include:

• Michael Comyn KC: Actively represented defendants in Dáil Courts from mid-1920 onward, including civil cases in Limerick sittings (October 1921) and the high-profile Power and Dodd v. Fishermen fishery rights dispute (Tralee, April 1922; appealed to the Supreme Court in June 1922). He also helped establish early Sinn Féin courts, such as in Ballinrobe, Mayo (May 1920), and later served on the Dáil Courts Winding-Up Commission (1923–1924). canisgallicus.com +1
• John A. Costello: Appeared in Sinn Féin courts (post-July 1921 Truce) and before the winding-up commission; later reflected in a 1970s interview that he was found guilty of professional misconduct but shared it with “eminent company.” canisgallicus.com
• Diarmuid Crowley: Served as a barrister and Circuit Court judge in the Dáil Courts; presided over sessions in Ballina (November 1920) and was arrested by British forces shortly after, highlighting the risks involved. ruthcannon.com +2
• Kevin O’Shiel BL: Presided over early landlord-tenant disputes in Ballinrobe, Mayo (May 1920), and contributed to land arbitration efforts. ruthcannon.com +2
• Cahir Davitt: Acted as a Circuit Judge and on the Dáil Supreme Court; presided over cases like Power and Dodd, significantly contributing to the courts’ success and the shutdown of British court business. canisgallicus.com +1
• James Creed Meredith: Served as President of the Dáil Supreme Court, handling appeals including equity suits and the Power and Dodd affirmation. canisgallicus.com
• Others: Art O’Connor (presided in Ballinrobe); Patrick Lynch KC and C.A. Maguire (collaborated in republican defenses, though not exclusively in Dáil Courts); James Comyn (Michael’s brother, attended Limerick sittings); an unnamed High Court barrister presided in Ballinasloe, Galway (late May 1920), with eight to ten solicitors present. Tim Healy KC indirectly supported defiance through public criticisms. canisgallicus.com +2

These barristers’ involvement was crucial in higher courts, where professional expertise was needed for complex cases, though lower parish courts often used lay judges.

Publicity Surrounding the Defiance

The defiance was indeed publicized, both contemporaneously and in later historical accounts, reflecting professional divisions and the revolutionary context. Key examples include:

• Newspaper Coverage: Letters criticizing the ban appeared in the Irish Independent (Maurice Healy KC, June 28, 1920) and The Freeman’s Journal (Serjeant McSweeney KC, July 3, 1920). The Londonderry Sentinel dismissed the resolution as unnecessary. Positive reports on Dáil Courts, such as the Ballinrobe session in the pro-unionist Irish Times, highlighted barrister participation. Arrests like Diarmuid Crowley’s were covered in outlets like the Manchester Evening News (November 1920), describing him as a “sound lawyer and fearless advocate.” ruthcannon.com +2
• Parliamentary Attention: A House of Commons question in May 1920 inquired about actions against lawyers in Sinn Féin courts; Attorney General Denis Henry KC deferred to professional bodies, indicating no Crown intervention. ruthcannon.com
• Professional Meetings: The July 7, 1920, Leinster Circuit resolution and November 5, 1920, Law Library meeting received internal publicity, amplifying defiance among barristers. ruthcannon.com +1
• Historical Records: Post-independence, defiance was documented in Bureau of Military History Witness Statements (e.g., Cahir Davitt’s WS 993, 1954), Mary Kotsonouris’s books Retreat from Revolution: The Dáil Courts, 1920–24 (1994, 2020 centenary edition) and The Winding Up of the Dáil Courts, 1922–1925 (2004), and academic sources like the Dictionary of Irish Biography. These brought overlooked details to light, including through archived winding-up commission records. canisgallicus.com +1

Overall, while not a mass movement, the publicized defiance by key figures helped legitimize the Dáil Courts, contributing to their role in establishing a republican counter-state amid British repression. canisgallicus.com +1

Michael Comyn KC (1871–1952), a prominent Irish barrister and republican sympathizer, played a significant role in the establishment and operation of the Dáil Courts (also known as Republican or Sinn Féin Courts) during the Irish War of Independence. He was instrumental in setting up one of the earliest such courts in Ballinrobe, County Mayo, in May 1920 (though some sources date the initial Sinn Féin court activities there to 1919). canisgallicus.com +1 This court was established alongside Commandant P.R. Hughes of the South Mayo IRA Brigade, who handled enforcement duties. The Ballinrobe court initially focused on resolving agrarian disputes, such as cattle drives and land seizures, which were prevalent in the region amid rising tensions. By formalizing these proceedings under Dáil decrees, Comyn aimed to lend legitimacy to the republican judicial system, redirect class-based agitation toward the national independence movement, and provide an alternative to British courts. The operations were clandestine to evade British raids, and the court later expanded to handle civil and minor criminal matters, setting a precedent for similar setups in other parts of South Mayo. canisgallicus.com +1Comyn’s participation defied a June 1920 resolution by the Irish Bar Council, which prohibited barristers from appearing in the Dáil Courts and deemed such involvement professional misconduct.

canisgallicus.com Despite this, he continued to practice in higher-tier Dáil Courts from mid-1920 onward, specializing in civil disputes involving property, equity, and land issues.

en.wikipedia.org His anti-Treaty stance during the Irish Civil War drew scrutiny from the Provisional Government; in August 1922, Chief Justice Hugh Kennedy corresponded with President William T. Cosgrave about potential actions against Comyn and fellow barrister Diarmuid Crowley for supporting republican judicial activities in opposition to the Free State authorities.

canisgallicus.com Post-Civil War, Comyn appeared before the Dáil Courts Winding-Up Commission (1923–1925) to resolve outstanding cases and later transitioned into the Free State judiciary, serving as a Circuit Court judge from 1936 until his retirement. en.wikipedia.org +1Specific Cases Involving ComynWhile direct records of individual Ballinrobe cases are sparse due to the secretive nature of the courts and incomplete archives, Comyn’s broader involvement included several notable proceedings that illustrate similar themes of civil and republican defense work:

• Power and Dodd v. Fishermen (1922): A civil property dispute over exclusive salmon fishing rights in the tidal estuary of the River Laune, County Kerry. Comyn represented the defendants (local fishermen from Killorglin asserting public rights) in the Dáil Circuit Court during Tralee sittings (adjourned from March and heard over a week in early April 1922). The plaintiffs, represented by Henry D. Conner KC and Barney Roche, claimed historical title tracing back to the Earls of Desmond. Judge Cahir Davitt upheld the plaintiffs’ exclusivity based on possession since before Magna Carta (1215) and granted an injunction. Comyn’s clients appealed to the Dáil Supreme Court (judges including James Creed Meredith, Arthur Clery, and Diarmuid Crowley), which affirmed the decision on June 14, 1922, shortly before the courts’ abolition amid the Civil War. Enforcement relied on IRA Volunteers, highlighting the blend of common law precedents with revolutionary ideals. canisgallicus.com
• Limerick Sittings (October 1921): During the post-Truce period, Comyn handled multiple civil cases in the Dáil Courts in Limerick, including rent arrears, breach of promise, and equity suits. These appearances contributed to the courts’ professionalism and demonstrated his commitment to the republican system. canisgallicus.com
• Clifford and O’Sullivan (1921): Comyn represented two IRA volunteers sentenced to death by a British military court for possessing explosives. He argued for a writ of prohibition in the Chancery Court in Dublin, claiming the military court lacked jurisdiction under the Restoration of Order in Ireland Act. canisgallicus.com
• Defense of Erskine Childers (1922): During the Civil War, Comyn defended Childers before a Free State Military Court on charges of illegal arms possession. Childers was convicted and executed before an appeal could proceed. en.wikipedia.org +1
• Inquests for Cathal Brugha and Harry Boland (1922): Comyn participated in republican-led inquests following their deaths during the Civil War, further aligning with anti-Treaty efforts. en.wikipedia.org +1

These cases reflect patterns similar to potential Ballinrobe disputes: agrarian and property conflicts resolved through republican mechanisms, often enforced by the IRA, and blending traditional legal principles with nationalist goals. For deeper research, consult sources like Mary Kotsonouris’s Retreat from Revolution: The Dáil Courts, 1920–24, the National Archives’ Hugh Kennedy papers, or the Bureau of Military History witness statements.

canisgallicus.com