The Dáil Courts (also known as Republican Courts or Sinn Féin Courts) were a parallel judicial system established by Irish republicans during the Irish War of Independence (1919–1921). They were set up by the First Dáil Éireann in June 1919 as an alternative to British courts, aiming to assert Irish sovereignty and handle civil disputes (e.g., property, contracts, and land issues) as well as minor criminal matters in areas under republican control. The courts operated secretly or semi-publicly to evade British authorities, relying on community support and IRA enforcement for legitimacy, since they lacked formal coercive powers. Their structure included:

• Parish Courts for minor local disputes.
• District Courts for more serious cases and appeals.
• A Supreme Court for major cases and final appeals.
• Arbitration Courts for informal resolutions, particularly agrarian conflicts.

Judges were often local volunteers, including lawyers, clergy, and community leaders appointed by the Dáil or Sinn Féin. Despite challenges like limited resources and British raids, the courts handled thousands of cases and gained significant public support in nationalist regions, symbolizing resistance to colonial rule. They ceased operations after the Anglo-Irish Treaty of 1921, amid the transition to the Irish Free State.

2 sources

The Winding-Up Commission was established in 1922 under the Irish Free State government to manage the dissolution of the Dáil Courts and resolve outstanding cases during the turbulent shift to the new state’s legal system. Its primary functions included reviewing unresolved civil disputes, adjudicating or transferring cases to Free State courts, and addressing legal ambiguities from the revolutionary period. The commission faced hurdles such as incomplete records from the Dáil Courts, political tensions between pro- and anti-Treaty factions, and reconciling republican legal principles with the British-influenced Free State framework. It played a key role in stabilizing justice during the Irish Civil War (1922–1923) and legitimizing the legacy of the Dáil Courts. Barristers like Michael Comyn and John A. Costello, who had participated in the Dáil Courts, were involved in its work.

The Dáil Éireann Courts (Winding-Up) Act of 1923 formalized aspects of this process, ensuring no prejudice to ongoing legal matters like bankruptcy cases.

Michael Comyn KC (1871–1952) was an Irish barrister, nationalist, and King’s Counsel (appointed in 1914) who played a significant role in the revolutionary legal landscape. A member of the Old Munster Circuit since 1900, he was a staunch republican who defended IRA prisoners in British courts and challenged colonial authority. During the War of Independence, he participated in the Dáil Courts, appearing in higher-tier cases and lending professional credibility despite the Bar Council’s 1920 ban on such involvement, which deemed it professional misconduct. Post-Treaty, he served on the Winding-Up Commission, reviewing and advising on unresolved cases to ensure fair transitions. Comyn later became the first Fianna Fáil senator in 1928, a Circuit Court judge in the Free State, and legal adviser to Éamon de Valera. Notably, he defended Erskine Childers during the Civil War (though the appeal was ongoing at Childers’ execution) and successfully appealed to the House of Lords to save 38 men from death sentences, leading to commutations and their release after independence. His efforts highlighted the intersection of British and republican legal systems.

Sir David Foxton (born 1965) is a current British High Court judge (appointed in 2020, specializing in commercial and financial cases) and a legal historian. He authored the book Revolutionary Lawyers: Sinn Féin and Crown Courts in Ireland and Britain, 1916–1923 (Four Courts Press, 2008), which examines how Irish republicans, including lawyers like Michael Comyn KC, strategically used British courts during the independence struggle while operating parallel systems like the Dáil Courts. The book discusses Comyn’s dual roles, his defense of republicans, and the broader tensions between Sinn Féin tactics and Crown authority. Foxton’s work frames figures like Comyn as “revolutionary lawyers” bridging legal worlds, and it includes historical details such as Comyn’s House of Lords case. While Foxton’s judicial career is modern and UK-focused, his scholarship directly connects to Irish revolutionary history, including the Dáil Courts’ context.

Sean Enright is a UK judge (barrister called to the Bar in 1982 at Middle Temple and 1993 at the Four Courts), coroner, and historian specializing in Irish revolutionary legal history. He has authored several books, including After the Rising: Soldiers, Lawyers and Trials of the Irish Revolution (2016), The Trial of Civilians by Military Courts: Ireland 1921 (Merrion Press, 2012), and The Irish Civil War: Law, Execution and Atrocity (2019). These works explore the legal and military dimensions of the period, including the Dáil Courts’ operations, the Winding-Up Commission’s role in transitioning cases, and figures like Michael Comyn KC in the context of trials, executions, and republican justice. Enright’s writings provide detailed analysis of how revolutionary courts challenged British authority and influenced post-independence law, often referencing the broader framework involving Comyn’s activities.

These elements are interconnected through Irish revolutionary history: Comyn was a key participant in the Dáil Courts and Winding-Up Commission, while Foxton and Enright are contemporary judges whose historical books document and analyze this era, frequently citing Comyn’s contributions and the courts’ significance in the fight for independence.