1. The surveillance state goes AI |
| 2. U.S. authorities are hiding trackers in AI chip shipments to catch smugglers |
| 3. Google drops $9b on Oklahoma for AI infrastructure |
GOVERNMENT The surveillance state goes AI The LAPD’s interest in GeoSpy, an AI tool that can pinpoint photo locations in seconds, might sound like science fiction, but it’s just the latest example of how AI has quietly become the backbone of American law enforcement and intelligence operations.GeoSpy can analyze soil, architecture and other visual features to determine exactly where a photo was taken, sometimes down to specific addresses. Internal emails show an LAPD Robbery-Homicide division official expressing interest in the $5,000-per-year tool, which provides 350 searches annually. GeoSpy represents just one piece of a much larger transformation accelerating across federal, state and local agencies. At the highest levels of government, AI adoption has reached a fever pitch.The CIA has developed its own large language model called Osiris, which runs on unclassified data and helps analysts write summaries and conduct queries. The NSA has integrated AI into signals intelligence missions, using machine learning for speaker identification, translation of over 90 languages, and pattern detection in massive datasets. Local law enforcement has embraced similar capabilities through companies like Palantir, whose Gotham platform has been used for predictive policing in cities including Los Angeles, New Orleans and Chicago. Facial recognition has exploded across law enforcement where Clearview AI has scraped billions of photos from social media and partnered with over 3,100 federal and local agencies — far more than the FBI’s own database of 640 million photos. The Biden administration tried to rein in AI use with a March 2024 policy requiring federal agencies to conduct impact assessments before deploying “rights-impacting” AI technologies. Intelligence agencies like the CIA and NSA are largely exempt, and the policy doesn’t cover state and local police, and we’ve documented concerns about AI report writing. The Trump administration appears poised to accelerate AI adoption. Palantir’s stock has soared on expectations of expanded government contracts, particularly for immigration enforcement, where the company’s software can “predict movements and patterns” of individuals using tax records, employment data, and family information. If algorithms can instantly geolocate photos, predict future crimes and assign risk scores to individuals, the presumption of innocence begins to erode. These systems are being deployed rapidly with minimal public debate and little understanding of their long-term implications. What started with basic facial recognition has evolved into comprehensive digital monitoring that would have been unimaginable a decade ago. Democracy requires transparent institutions, not algorithmic black boxes making life-altering decisions about who deserves scrutiny. |
-
Archives
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
-
Meta
The
If algorithms can instantly geolocate photos, predict future crimes and assign risk scores to individuals, the presumption of innocence begins to erode. These systems are being deployed rapidly with minimal public debate and little understanding of their long-term implications. What started with basic facial recognition has evolved into comprehensive digital monitoring that would have been unimaginable a decade ago. Democracy requires transparent institutions, not algorithmic black boxes making life-altering decisions about who deserves scrutiny.