If the AI Bubble Pops, It Could Now Take the Entire Economy With It

Futurism Logo

Uncharted Territory

Aug 5, 12:09 PM EDTbyVictor Tangermann

If the AI Bubble Pops, It Could Now Take the Entire Economy With It

Too big to fail.

Artificial Intelligence/ Artificial Intelligence/ Economy/ Finance

Getty / Futurism

Image by Getty / Futurism

AI companies are pouring so much money into AI, experts are starting to warn that it may be propping up the entire US economy.

As investor Paul Kedrosky told the Wall Street Journal, spending on AI infrastructure has already eclipsed spending on telecom and internet infrastructure during the dot-com crisis over two decades ago, raising the specter of a massive bubble.

Kedrosky also floated the possibility that we haven’t really felt the effects of president Donald Trump’s tariffs due to the scale of current AI infrastructure spending, which may be acting as a “sort of private-sector stimulus program.”

Renaissance Macro Research head of economic research Neil Dutta also shared an astonishing statistic with the WSJ: that capital expenditures for AI have contributed more to the growth of the US economy so far this year than all of consumer spending combined.

It’s a baffling situation, and uncharted territory that could risk an even bigger rude awakening than the dot-com crash, potentially wiping out the US economy if the AI industry fails to deliver on the massive returns promised by its executive class.

For now, companies are riding a tsunami wave of AI hype, with insatiable investors pumping stocks to unprecedented heights. As tech journalist Brian Merchant pointed out in his newsletterBlood in the Machine, Apple was the first to hit a $1 trillion valuation in 2018. A whopping nine AI companies have since joined those sky-high ranks since then, with AI chipmaker Nvidia tripling its valuation to an astronomical $4 trillion in less than a single year.

Confoundingly, companies are far from proving there will be a meaningful return on investment after all is said and done. While chatbots have become incredibly popular, they remain extremely expensive to train, run and maintain, racking up massive utility bills for AI companies.

Microsoft followed Nvidia’s footsteps last week, hitting a market valuation of $4 trillion. The company reported booming sales in its Azure cloud computing business, revealing that it’s spending a record $30 billion in capital spending in a single fiscal quarter on AI, CNN reports.

That’s great for Microsoft, but it’s essentially selling computing power to other companies trying to make a profit off AI. If they can’t manage to do that at scale — a tough ask when users are already habituated to freemium offerings like OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Anthropic’s Claude — the whole house of cards could come crashing down.

Meanwhile, AI leadership are stumbling over themselves, offering talent astronomical billion-dollar contracts to poach them from competing firms.

As the WSJ points out, the White House appears completely disinterested in regulating the industry or enforcing antitrust. Therefore, the biggest threat may come in the form of international competition. China, in particular, has emerged as a viable contender in the AI race.

Where all of this investment will lead us remains a trillions-of-dollars question. As the entire US economy is being propped up by unprecedented spending on AI infrastructure, it’s worth considering what the aftermath of an AI crash might look like — and who would emerge as the winners and losers.

And is it even a bubble at all — or a “longer-term bull market,” as Wall Street firm Citi recently described it?

Unknown's avatar

About michelleclarke2015

Life event that changes all: Horse riding accident in Zimbabwe in 1993, a fractured skull et al including bipolar anxiety, chronic fatigue …. co-morbidities (Nietzche 'He who has the reason why can deal with any how' details my health history from 1993 to date). 17th 2017 August operation for breast cancer (no indications just an appointment came from BreastCheck through the Post). Trinity College Dublin Business Economics and Social Studies (but no degree) 1997-2003; UCD 1997/1998 night classes) essays, projects, writings. Trinity Horizon Programme 1997/98 (Centre for Women Studies Trinity College Dublin/St. Patrick's Foundation (Professor McKeon) EU Horizon funded: research study of 15 women (I was one of this group and it became the cornerstone of my journey to now 2017) over 9 mth period diagnosed with depression and their reintegration into society, with special emphasis on work, arts, further education; Notes from time at Trinity Horizon Project 1997/98; Articles written for Irishhealth.com 2003/2004; St Patricks Foundation monthly lecture notes for a specific period in time; Selection of Poetry including poems written by people I know; Quotations 1998-2017; other writings mainly with theme of social justice under the heading Citizen Journalism Ireland. Letters written to friends about life in Zimbabwe; Family history including Michael Comyn KC, my grandfather, my grandmother's family, the O'Donnellan ffrench Blake-Forsters; Moral wrong: An acrimonious divorce but the real injustice was the Catholic Church granting an annulment – you can read it and make your own judgment, I have mine. Topics I have written about include annual Brain Awareness week, Mashonaland Irish Associataion in Zimbabwe, Suicide (a life sentence to those left behind); Nostalgia: Tara Hill, Co. Meath.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment