See new posts

Michael Comyn KC. Inquests at the time of the Civil War. 17 minute read

The Kerry Landmine Massacres and the Resumption Irish Academic Press | Merrion Press from The Irish Civil War: Law, Execution and Atrocityby Irish Academic Press | Merrion Press

Next Article 2 A State in Chaos 2

A State in Chaos but palatable to the Irish electorate. It was a heavy burden.

19 Not all of the ministers were weighed down by responsibility. Eoin MacNeill was writing what would become his most famous monograph on ancient Irish legal history: Franchise or Law. A big man with gold spectacles and a heavy grey beard, buried in Brehon law tracts, he occasionally waved away requests to go down to his office.

In the long evenings, ministers and their wives gathered in the main lounge, but the women became a source of friction and they were soon evicted, while the men smoked, talked, read newspapers or played endless games of bridge that MacNeill often won. The only senior figure absent was Mulcahy, the new commander in chief. Mulcahy kept long hours at GHQ Portobello and spent the rest of the time at his home next door and did not often attend cabinet meetings.

Kevin O’Higgins distrusted the army and also General Mulcahy in equal measure. O’Higgins was right about the National Army – it was malleable, riven by cliques and honeycombed with IRB members who were now without their leader (Collins). O’Higgins’ suspicions of General Mulcahy would prove to be entirely misplaced: the general, dark, wiry and a little intense, was driven by his work and, for the time being, was oblivious to the suspicions of his colleague. It was still the war that dominated events. The casualties in the fighting grew on both sides and the National Army lost some of their best men – shot down in ambush or occasionally shot in the street or leaving church.

20 In the streets of Dublin, anti-Treaty fighters threw grenades and planted mines with a singular lack of regard for civilian casualties. In the face of all this, the government began to formulate the execution policy and while this was developing a new trend became apparent. There began a covert campaign of the kidnap and murder of men suspected or believed to be involved in the anti-Treaty cause. A review of inquests in the Dublin area alone shows that during the civil war thirteen suspected anti-Treaty men were kidnapped from their homes orworkplaces and shot dead.

21 There were ten other cases where the evidence showed that prisoners were shot after surrender or while in custody.

22 These killings, never publicly disavowed by any government minister until the war was all but won, became part of the process by which victory was achieved.One of the responses by the anti-Treaty side was a concerted legal challenge to the killing of prisoners. This could not be effected through the Dáil as it had been adjourned and when it finally reconvened it was boycotted by the anti-Treaty deputies. The press was heavily censored and so the focus of the challenge became the inquest system, which began with the inquest into the death of Cathal Brugha, who was shot down at the end of the Four Courts siege. He had already surrendered some said, but the coroner declined to allow witnesses to be brought to court.

23 A few weeks later, Harry Boland, another anti-Treaty deputy was killed.

24 Here again, the coroner refused to allow evidence to be called to show Boland had been killed after capture.A series of inquests into the deaths of anti-Treaty fighters killed in custody followed. Usually there was no one left to tell the tale to the inquest jury, but in a handful of cases there was evidence of state involvement. The Yellow Lanes affair concerned the kidnap and shooting of two unarmed youths in broad daylight. One of the killers wore a National Army uniform and the case caused profound embarrassment to the government. Another inquest concerned Patrick Mannion, who was shot dead near Mount Street Bridge by a National Army patrol, but the evidence at the inquest showed that he was unarmed and in custody when he was shot. The jury returned a verdict of ‘wilful murder by National Army soldiers’.

25 Journalists had their notebooks confiscated by plain-clothes men after the hearing and The Irish Times published a short report recording the verdict of ‘wilful murder by men in uniform’ and said little else.In response to a letter of protest written by Count Plunkett, The Irish Times conceded the report had been ‘summarised byorder of the government censor’.

26 President Cosgrave told the Dáil the next day that the censor had intervened because the evidence was untrue and there the matter rested. What was done in Dublin was more easily done in isolated districts. Anti-Treaty prisoners in the custody of the National Army became particularly vulnerable. Three prisoners were killed in Kerry, six in Sligo, three in Cork and one each in Limerick, Tipperary and Mayo.

27 It is likely that there were many more, but usually there was no one left to recount what took place apart from the national soldiers who had fired the fatal shots.One prisoner was Tim Kennefick from Coachford.

28 He was one of the many anti-Treaty fighters captured in early September as the National Army swarmed around Cork. The inquest jury viewed the body in the usual way and heard evidence that Kennefick was captured, badly beaten, shot in the head and dumped in a ditch. The inquest jury returned a verdict of ‘wilful murder by National Army troops’. This cut no ice with the government. In the Dáil, General Mulcahy stated that ‘the inquest was held under the auspices of Irregulars armed to the teeth, and before a jury that was apparently selected by Irregulars’. He announced that ‘no action has been taken to bring the so-called guilty troops to justice’.

29 The local commander, Major General Dalton, issued a proclamation in Cork prohibiting further inquests without written permission.

30 Another prisoner killed in custody was Jerry Buckley, after an ambush on the road from Macroom to Kerry. A National Army convoy stopped to defuse the landmine in the road and thought they had made it safe, but this was a ‘trip mine’ and the detonation mortally wounded Commandant Tom Keogh and killed six of his men.

31 Tom Keogh had been a long-time member of Collins’ Squad during the War of Independence. In the aftermath of the explosion, a group of Dublin officers also from Collins’ old Squad went looking for revenge. There had been extensive fighting around Macroom that day, but only a single man had been captured: 41-year-old Jerry Buckley, a no-rank prisoner.

32 Buckley was seized, shot and tossed into the crater made by the explosion. The local National Army commander wrote to General Emmet Dalton at HQ: ‘The shooting of a prisoner here in the operations has caused considerable contempt among the garrison here … They have paraded before me and gave me to understand that they would not go out on the hills anymore.’ The incident, he told his commander, had resonated for fifteen miles in every direction and brought the National Army into disrepute with local people. Dalton wrote to Commander in Chief Mulcahy about the killing:This shooting was the work of the Squad. Now I personally approve of the action, but the men I have in my command are of such a temperament that they can look at seven of their companions being blown to atoms by a murderous trick without feeling annoyed, but an enemy is found with a rifle and ammn. They will mutiny if he is shot. On this account I think it would be better if you kept the ‘squad’ out of my area.It may be taken that General Mulcahy understood all of the nuances; he did not ask questions but replied: ‘You are at perfect liberty to return here any officer you think well of so returning …’

33 Afterwards, Dalton returned all the officers responsible to Dublin.

34 No questions were asked by General Mulcahy about the identity of the killers or the steps taken to enforce discipline within the National Army.That same week another letter arrived at National Army headquarters, sent by David Robinson, then a staff officer on the anti-Treaty side.

35 Robinson, from Wicklow, was an ex-British Army tank officer who had been much decorated during the Great War where he had lost an eye and almost his legs. Tall and lanky, ‘Dead Eye’ had taken part in the War of Independence and went with the anti-Treaty side after the split. He was still hanging onto an old-fashioned sense of decency and expecting others to do the same. He wrote to his counterpart in the National Army headquarters asking him to raise the question of the killing of prisoners: ‘I cannot believe that Mulcahy would tolerate it for a moment.’

36 Robinson also raised a concern about another prisoner, ‘a boy called Murphy’, who had been killed after capture.The ‘boy called Murphy’ was 17-year-old Bartholemew Murphy from Castleisland. The National Army later maintained that Murphy had been a prisoner on an army lorry and was fatally wounded in an anti-Treaty ambush at Brennan’s Glen. He was in fact a prisoner of the National Army at their makeshift barracks at the Great Southern Hotel in Killarney, where he had been in custody for some days and had been used to clear barricades laid in the road. The day of his death there was an ambush at Brennan’s Glen, where a Dublin Guard convoy lost three men. Afterwards, there was a commotion at the barracks and Murphy was picked on because he was from that area and was thought to know who might be responsible. He was thrown down the steps by an officer and shot to death with a revolver.

37 The allegations were specific, detailed and contemporaneous, and having regard to what is now known about the activities of the Dublin Guard there is no reason to doubt that this young man was put to death in custody. David Robinson wrote: ‘The number of bullet wounds alone would make you suspicious.’None of this came out at the inquest, which was held the next day under the County Coroner William O’Sullivan and a jury. The local National Army commander, Brigadier Paddy O’Daly, gave evidence in uniform: a man of compact build and of slightly more than average height, he had a curiously cherubic appearance. He looked across the room at the mother of the dead youth: Julia Murphy, a widow with two children who ran a dressmakers shop on the Main Street in Castleisland.

38 O’Daly related that her son had been killed while on a National Army lorry when the lorry had been ambushed and two soldiers were killed and nine others were wounded: ‘under no circumstances do we permit our political prisoners to be ill-treated’. O’Daly looked across the court to the bereaved mother: ‘I sympathise with you … I really do.’

39 It may have been difficult for her to express a contrary view or to call witnesses. The Coroner’s Court had been convened at army headquarters at the Great Southern Hotel in Killarney, the very place where her son had been killed. It became a pattern in Kerry. The Dublin Guard killed prisoners and Brigadier O’Daly would go to the inquest to cover up for his men or limit the fallout.

40 David Robinson also raised the killing of another prisoner, Jack Galvin, who had been captured by National Army forces in an attack on Killorglin. It seems he was suspected of having killed a National Army Officer, Captain Burke, who had been a friend of the colonel of the First Westerns. At least one National Army officer recognised the threat to Galvin and placed him at the centre of a group of prisoners clearing trees. Galvin was unfit to work because of a broken arm and soon became separated from the prisoners and was found shot dead soon after. David Robinson finished his request with a comment that resonates through the ages: ‘You may imagine what the result will be if this goes on.’ The killing of Jack Galvin raised a bit of a storm among National Army troops and the colonel of the Kerry 1st Brigade wrote to General Mulcahy and threatened to resign unless a full inquiry took place to vindicate ‘the honour’ of the National Army. He added that if these incidents were allowed to continue, ‘We would soon find ourselves in arms against a hostile population.’The General Officer Commanding (GOC) in Kerry was W.R.E. Murphy. A photo of the time shows a tall scrawny officer with a small moustache. He was from Wexford, but like many of his generation, he had served with distinction in the British Army during the Great War and went back to his old career as a school teacher until he was recruited to the National Army. W.R.E. Murphy alsowrote to Mulcahy about Galvin’s death but advised against any inquiry: ‘This scoundrel shot capt Burke. Signed a form and got out and took up arms again. He was the terror of the countryside.’ Therefore, the GOC wrote: ‘I will not sacrifice any officer or man of the 1st Western Division (a splendid lot of troops).’

41 There was no army inquiry into the death of Galvin or Bertie Murphy, and their deaths became part of a pattern that was already taking shape. Sean Moriarty from Tralee was killed the month before. He had been removed from his home late at night by armed men. He and another man, Healy, were taken to waste ground outside Tralee where they were questioned about their involvement in attacks on National Army troops. Moriarty was shot dead and although Healy was riddled with bullets, he recovered consciousness and crawled off to get help. He later told the full story at the inquest into the death of his companion.

42 Some historians have described these events as part of ‘a ruthless counter insurgency campaign’.

43 It is hardly an accurate description. Even in the extreme circumstances that existed, the law provided no special dispensation for soldiers or policemen.There was one last organised effort to hold the government to account for killing suspects in custody. It was the inquest into the killing of three teenagers who had been posting anti-Treaty leaflets. The leaflets laid the blame for the recent spate of killings on CID officers attached to Oriel House and army intelligence and, in turn, incited the murder of those officers. These young men were picked up by National Army men late one night and the following morning the bodies of two were found dumped by the roadside near the village of Red Cow. The bodies were still warm and it seemed they had been killed around dawn. The trajectory of the bullet wounds suggested they had been shot while lying down. The third had run for his life and was discovered in the quarry, lying in a clump of nettles riddled with bullets.Witnesses soon came forward identifying Charles Dalton, a National Army officer, as having arrested the youths the nightbefore. Dalton lived a few streets away from where the young men were picked up. He was, on the surface, every inch an officer: a photo shows a singularly handsome young man in uniform, but that was not the full story. During the War of Independence, Dalton had been part of Collins’ Squad and shooting opponents in cold blood had been part of their work.

44 In the run-up to the civil war, most of the Squad joined the new National Army. Dalton became part of the intelligence team that had grown up around Oriel House and Wellington barracks: the leafleting campaign had been directed against Dalton and that group of men.

The Red Cow inquest took place in the reading room at the Carnegie Library in Clondalkin, where tables were hurriedly pushed together for the lawyers and the coroner. The lawyers crammed in on one side of the table, the jury on the other, with the witnesses nearly in touching distance of both. The rest of this windowless, low-ceilinged room was packed with bereaved relatives and National Army men in an atmosphere that heaved with grief and anger. The provisional government instructed John Byrne, a tall, thin, austere advocate who had great experience of defending hopeless cases. The killings had attracted nationwide publicity and there was no mechanism to dispense with inquest juries as was done in Cork. The evidence could not be suppressed as it was in the cases of Brugha or Boland, or censored as in the Mannion inquest, or explained away as in the case of the Yellow Lanes killings. It was going to come out in all its tawdry detail, but Byrne would play a subtle game distancing himself and the government from the accused officer and letting the other lawyers fight it out.

Michael Comyn, KC, again appeared for the families. He was joined by two barristers representing the anti-Treaty GHQ. They squeezed in around the tables alongside their main opponent, Tim Healy, KC, who acted for the accused officer. Healy, a small, pugnacious, west Cork man, hated Michael Comyn and took every opportunity to let him know.This was a case that was followed in the press by anyone who could read and raised issues that no one could ignore. Over the previous few months, Dublin had been assailed by ambushes; National Army soldiers shot in the back, at home or in the street. Landmines had been detonated and grenades hurled with little care for civilian life and there had been many casualties.The anti-Treaty faction now came to court to litigate the circumstances in which three of their own had been killed. All of this tended to obscure two important points: that these youths had been killed in the custody of the National Army and that it was part of a pattern which the state did not oppose or condemn, at least in public.

At the outset, the old coroner protested that he could not allow the anti-Treaty side to be represented, but it was pointed out to him that pending the creation of the Irish Free State, the provisional government had no legal status either. The duty of the coroner was to inquire into the cause of death and not allow the lawyers to pursue a political agenda, but like most coroners, he was not a lawyer, just a local doctor who carried out the occasional inquest after a car crash or a fatal accident at a farm. Out of his depth and intimidated, the coroner lost control of the lawyers, who began to fight it out for a verdict that would give comfort for their cause.

45 Tim Healy called witnesses to prove that Dalton had carried out four arrests that night and taken the prisoners to Wellington barracks, but none of this established a watertight alibi and just confirmed Dalton was on duty and in the vicinity looking for anti-Treaty suspects. The evidence showed that much later that night the young men were driven from the barracks by intelligence officers to a quiet spot and murdered. But which officers were involved? All at Wellington barracks and Oriel House remained silent.

Michael Comyn argued that this was murder, whether by Dalton or his colleagues, but the inquest did not go well for Comyn. During the inquest his home was raided by the National Army and he was briefly placed under arrest, and when he was at the inquest, Tim Healy, KC, was always ready with some withering put down. Comyn was heckled by a hostile gallery and questioned by exasperated jurors: ‘Why is this taking so long?’ one asked. It was not the function of the inquest jury to say whether Dalton was guilty or not, but it was part of their duty to send a suspect for trial before the criminal courts if there was a case to answer. The jury declined to indict him and perhaps that should not be surprising: Dublin was a small city and his reputation was well known.

The jury did not even condemn the murders as was the custom at the time. The colourless verdicts simply recounted that the young men had died of ‘gunshot wounds inflicted by person or persons unknown’. Counsels’ closing speeches in the Red Cow inquest received the widest publicity, and the failure of the jury to condemn the murders probably owed much to the advocacy of Tim Healy, KC. It was an open secret that he would soon be appointed governor general of the new Free State. His voice, in a very real sense, was that of the new establishment in Ireland and he delivered his closing remarks just before the official executions began. He argued that the inquest evidence could be ignored and that the rule of law could be abandoned. He asserted the war had been started by the anti-Treaty faction and as he put it: ‘What man can place bounds on the march of extermination?’

Michael Comyn KC and Inquests During the Irish Civil War: The Kerry Landmine Massacres and Beyond

During the Irish Civil War (1922–1923), inquests became a critical, albeit limited, mechanism for challenging the escalating violence, particularly the extrajudicial killings of anti-Treaty prisoners by National Army forces. Michael Comyn KC, a prominent barrister, played a significant role in representing the families of victims at these inquests, seeking accountability in a chaotic and polarized environment. The passage provided, drawn from The Irish Civil War: Law, Execution and Atrocity (Irish Academic Press | Merrion Press), highlights the Kerry Landmine Massacres and other incidents, illustrating the systemic issues surrounding prisoner killings and the challenges faced by legal efforts to address them. Below is an analysis of Comyn’s role, the inquest system, and the broader context of these events, tailored to a 17-minute read.

The Irish Civil War Context

The Irish Civil War erupted after the Anglo-Irish Treaty of 1921, splitting the republican movement into pro-Treaty (National Army) and anti-Treaty (Irregulars) factions. The conflict was marked by brutal violence, including ambushes, landmines, and reprisal killings, with civilians often caught in the crossfire. The provisional government, led by figures like William Cosgrave and Kevin O’Higgins, faced immense pressure to establish authority while combating anti-Treaty resistance. The National Army, described as “malleable, riven by cliques, and honeycombed with IRB members,” was prone to indiscipline, particularly among units like the Dublin Guard and intelligence squads inherited from Michael Collins’ War of Independence operations.

Amid this chaos, the government developed an execution policy to deter anti-Treaty activity, but a darker trend emerged: covert kidnappings and murders of suspected Irregulars. These acts, often unacknowledged by the government until the war’s end, became a grim feature of the conflict, particularly in areas like Kerry, Cork, and Dublin.

The Role of Inquests

Inquests, typically routine inquiries into unnatural deaths, became a battleground for truth during the Civil War. With the Dáil adjourned, the press censored, and anti-Treaty deputies boycotting proceedings, the coroner’s court was one of the few remaining avenues for challenging state violence. However, the system was flawed:

• Coroner Limitations: Most coroners were not legally trained, often local doctors ill-equipped to handle politically charged cases.
• Government Interference: Censorship and intimidation suppressed evidence, as seen in the confiscation of journalists’ notebooks and abbreviated press reports.
• Military Influence: Inquests were sometimes held in National Army barracks, undermining impartiality.

Despite these obstacles, inquests offered a platform for families and anti-Treaty advocates to demand accountability, often led by legal figures like Michael Comyn KC.

Michael Comyn KC: A Legal Advocate in Crisis

Michael Comyn KC was a seasoned barrister known for his tenacity in defending republican causes. During the Civil War, he represented families of anti-Treaty fighters killed in custody, navigating hostile environments to expose state-sanctioned violence. His involvement in high-profile inquests, such as the Red Cow killings, underscored his commitment to upholding the rule of law amid wartime excesses.

Comyn faced significant challenges:

• Personal Risks: During the Red Cow inquest, his home was raided by the National Army, and he was briefly arrested, signaling the government’s distrust of his advocacy.
• Hostile Opposition: He clashed with formidable opponents like Tim Healy KC, a pro-Treaty barrister with establishment ties, who used his influence to sway proceedings.
• Public and Juror Bias: Inquests were held in polarized communities, where fear of retribution or sympathy for the National Army often influenced verdicts.

Despite these hurdles, Comyn’s efforts ensured that some cases, like the Red Cow inquest, gained public attention, exposing the pattern of extrajudicial killings.

Key Inquests and the Kerry Landmine Massacres

The passage details several inquests that highlight the brutality of the Civil War and the struggle for accountability, with a focus on Kerry, where the Dublin Guard and other National Army units were implicated in prisoner killings.

1. Cathal Brugha and Harry Boland Inquests

• Cathal Brugha: Killed during the Four Courts siege in July 1922, Brugha was allegedly shot after surrendering. The coroner refused to allow witnesses to testify, stifling inquiry into his death.
• Harry Boland: An anti-Treaty deputy killed in August 1922, Boland’s inquest similarly blocked evidence suggesting he was executed post-capture. These early cases set a precedent for suppressing inconvenient truths.

2. Yellow Lanes and Patrick Mannion

• Yellow Lanes Affair: Two unarmed youths were kidnapped and shot in Dublin, one by a man in a National Army uniform. The public nature of the killings embarrassed the government, but no accountability followed.
• Patrick Mannion: Shot near Mount Street Bridge, Mannion was unarmed and in custody. The inquest jury’s verdict of “wilful murder by National Army soldiers” was censored, with The Irish Times forced to publish a sanitized report after government intervention.

3. Tim Kennefick (Cork)

In September 1922, Kennefick was captured in Cork, beaten, shot, and dumped in a ditch. The inquest jury returned a verdict of “wilful murder by National Army troops,” but General Mulcahy dismissed the findings, claiming the inquest was coerced by armed Irregulars. Major General Emmet Dalton banned further inquests in Cork without permission, effectively silencing legal challenges.

4. Jerry Buckley and the Kerry Landmine Massacre

The Kerry Landmine Massacre, referenced in the passage, stemmed from an anti-Treaty ambush near Macroom involving a “trip mine” that killed Commandant Tom Keogh and six National Army soldiers. In retaliation, Jerry Buckley, a 41-year-old prisoner, was executed and thrown into the explosion crater. The incident, carried out by members of Collins’ former Squad, sparked outrage among local National Army troops, who protested to their commander. General Dalton privately approved of the killing but sent the responsible officers back to Dublin to avoid further unrest. No inquiry was held, reflecting the government’s tacit acceptance of such acts.

5. Bartholemew Murphy (Kerry)

Seventeen-year-old Bartholemew Murphy was killed in Killarney after an ambush at Brennan’s Glen. Despite National Army claims that he died in crossfire, evidence suggests he was executed at the Great Southern Hotel barracks. Brigadier Paddy O’Daly, a Dublin Guard commander, testified at the inquest, denying mistreatment and offering hollow sympathy to Murphy’s mother. The inquest, held at the barracks, was heavily controlled, preventing the truth from emerging.

6. Jack Galvin (Kerry)

Galvin, suspected of killing a National Army officer, was shot while in custody in Killorglin. Despite protests from National Army officers and a threatened resignation from the Kerry 1st Brigade colonel, General W.R.E. Murphy refused an inquiry, defending Galvin’s killer and dismissing him as a “scoundrel.” This case underscored the impunity enjoyed by National Army units.

7. Sean Moriarty and Healy (Tralee)

Moriarty was abducted from his home, questioned, and shot dead, while Healy survived to testify at the inquest. The case exposed the targeted nature of these killings, yet no prosecutions followed.

8. Red Cow Inquest (Dublin)

The Red Cow inquest, one of the most publicized, concerned three teenagers killed for posting anti-Treaty leaflets. Evidence pointed to National Army officer Charles Dalton, a former member of Collins’ Squad, but the jury returned a vague verdict of death by “gunshot wounds inflicted by person or persons unknown.” Comyn’s advocacy was hampered by Healy’s aggressive tactics, juror bias, and the government’s efforts to shield Dalton. Tim Healy’s closing argument, justifying the killings as a response to anti-Treaty violence, reflected the provisional government’s willingness to overlook atrocities.

The Kerry Landmine Massacres: A Closer Look

The Kerry Landmine Massacres, as described, refer to a series of reprisal killings following anti-Treaty ambushes, particularly the Macroom landmine incident. These events were part of a broader pattern in Kerry, where the Dublin Guard, under commanders like Paddy O’Daly, operated with near-total impunity. The region was a hotspot for anti-Treaty resistance, and landmines were a favored tactic, often causing significant National Army casualties. In response, prisoners like Jerry Buckley, Bartholemew Murphy, and Jack Galvin were executed, often in brutal circumstances.

The inquests into these deaths were marred by:

• Intimidation: Holding inquiries at military barracks, as in Murphy’s case, deterred witnesses.
• Cover-Ups: O’Daly and other officers provided misleading testimony, while Mulcahy and Dalton dismissed incriminating verdicts.
• Local Impact: The killings alienated communities, as seen in the Macroom commander’s report of “contempt” among his garrison and disrepute among locals.

David Robinson’s letter to National Army HQ, pleading for an end to prisoner killings, highlights the moral outrage felt by some on both sides. His reference to “a boy called Murphy” and Jack Galvin underscores the personal toll of these atrocities, yet his appeals went unheeded.

Comyn’s Legacy and the Failure of Accountability

Michael Comyn KC’s efforts to use inquests as a tool for justice were largely frustrated by the provisional government’s priorities and the realities of wartime. The government’s failure to condemn extrajudicial killings, coupled with censorship and military interference, ensured that most inquests ended in vague verdicts or outright suppression. The Red Cow inquest, despite its publicity, failed to indict Charles Dalton, reflecting the broader impunity enjoyed by National Army officers.

The passage suggests that these killings were not merely rogue acts but part of a “process by which victory was achieved.” The government’s execution policy, formalized later in the war, overshadowed these covert murders, but inquests like those led by Comyn exposed the moral and legal costs of the conflict. His persistence, despite personal risks and professional setbacks, preserved a record of these atrocities, contributing to historical understanding of the Civil War’s darker chapters.

Broader Implications

The inquests of the Irish Civil War reveal a state struggling to balance authority and legitimacy. The provisional government’s reliance on former IRA units, like Collins’ Squad, brought experienced but undisciplined fighters into the National Army, fostering a culture of reprisal. The failure to investigate or prosecute killings, as seen in Mulcahy’s refusal to question Dalton’s actions, eroded public trust, particularly in areas like Kerry.

The anti-Treaty side, while guilty of its own atrocities, used inquests to highlight state violence, though their boycott of the Dáil and reliance on censored media limited their impact. The clash between Comyn and Healy at the Red Cow inquest symbolized the broader ideological divide: Comyn’s defense of legal principles versus Healy’s pragmatic justification of wartime excesses.

Conclusion

Michael Comyn KC’s role in Civil War inquests, particularly those tied to the Kerry Landmine Massacres, represents a courageous but often futile stand against extrajudicial violence. The inquests into the deaths of Cathal Brugha, Harry Boland, Tim Kennefick, Jerry Buckley, Bartholemew Murphy, Jack Galvin, and the Red Cow teenagers exposed a pattern of prisoner killings by National Army forces, often covered up by commanders like Paddy O’Daly and Emmet Dalton. Despite Comyn’s efforts, government censorship, biased juries, and the chaos of war prevented accountability. These events, documented in The Irish Civil War: Law, Execution and Atrocity, underscore the fragility of the rule of law in times of conflict and the enduring importance of legal advocates like Comyn in challenging state excesses.

The clash between Comyn and Healy at the Red Cow inquest symbolized the broader ideological divide: Comyn’s defense of legal principles versus Healy’s pragmatic justification of wartime excesses.

Are there any other accounts of Michael Comyn Inquests at time of civil war. I think he was on the Munster circuit at that time. Michelle Clarke granddaughter of Michael Comyn KC asks Grok3 AI.

The clash between Michael Comyn KC and Tim Healy KC at the Red Cow inquest indeed encapsulated the ideological divide of the Irish Civil War (1922–1923): Comyn’s commitment to legal accountability versus Healy’s defense of pragmatic, often brutal, wartime measures.