Neuroscience.com Eye Movements … so very important to know

Eye Movements Set the Speed Limit for What You Can See

FeaturedNeuroscienceVisual Neuroscience

·May 10, 2025

Summary: The speed of your eye movements, called saccades, determines how fast an object can move before it becomes invisible to you. Objects that mimic the speed and trajectory of saccades can essentially “vanish” from perception, showing that our own movements shape what we can and can’t see.

People with faster saccadic movements are able to perceive faster-moving stimuli, suggesting a link between motor and visual performance. The study highlights how perception isn’t just about what the eyes detect, but also about how the body moves, offering new insight into how our sensory and motor systems are intertwined.

Key Facts:

  • Saccade Speed Sets Limits: The faster your saccades, the faster an object must move to disappear from sight.
  • Personalized Perception: People with quicker eye movements can see faster-moving objects than others.
  • Motor-Sensory Link: The visual system filters out movement that mimics eye motion, preventing motion smear.

Source: TUM

If you quickly move a camera from object to object, the abrupt shift between the two points causes a motion smear that might give you nausea.

Our eyes, however, do movements like these two or three times per second. These rapid movements are called saccades, and although the visual stimulus during a saccade shifts abruptly across the retina, our brain seems to keep it under the hood: we never perceive the shift.

This shows an eye and moving tennis balls.
To show this, we used the body’s fastest and most frequent motions, i.e. the saccadic eye movements that people make more than a hundred thousand times a day. Credit: Neuroscience News

New research shows that the speed of our saccades predicts the speed limit in our vision when an object becomes too fast to see.

According to a study published in Nature Communications by researchers from the Cluster of Excellence Science of Intelligence (TU Berlin), visual stimuli ––think a chipmunk darting around or a tennis ball hit with full force–– become invisible when they move at a speed, duration, and distance similar to those of one of our saccades.

This suggests that the properties of the human visual system are best understood in the context of the movements of our eyes.

When does a moving stimulus become too fast to see? 

The limits of how fast an object can be before it becomes invisible to us is directly related to the speed of our own eye movements. Beyond a certain speed, a moving stimulus becomes too fast for us to see.

As a result, the speed of our eye movements across a specific distance can be used to predict at what speed a moving stimulus becomes invisible to us.

And since the speed of our eye movements changes from person to person, people who make particularly rapid eye movements can also see objects moving at higher speeds than people with slower eye movements.

This might mean that the best baseball batters, action video game players, or wildlife photographers are the ones with quicker eye movements. 

Our movements shape our perception

This result is exciting as it provides first evidence of the idea that our body movements fundamentally shape the abilities of our perceptual system. 

“What parts of the physical world we can sense depends fundamentally on how good our sensors are,” explains Martin Rolfs, the lead author of the study.

“For example, we don’t see infrared light because our eyes are not sensitive to it, and we fail to see flicker on our screens because they flicker at higher frequencies than our eyes can resolve.

“In this paper, however, we show that the limits of seeing are not just defined by these biophysical constraints but also by the actions and movements that impose changes on the sensory system.

“To show this, we used the body’s fastest and most frequent motions, i.e. the saccadic eye movements that people make more than a hundred thousand times a day.” 

A motion we don’t perceive

Much like a camera movement causes motion in a movie, saccades create movement patterns on the retina.

“But we never consciously perceive that motion,” says Rolfs.

“We have shown that stimuli that follow the same (very specific) movement patterns as saccades (while people are holding their eyes still) also become invisible. So we are basically suggesting that the kinematics of our actions (here, saccades) fundamentally constrain a sensory system’s access to the physical world around us.”

Rolfs explained that this is to be considered an intelligent trait of the visual system, because it remains sensitive to fast motion, but only up to speeds that result specifically from saccades, and these speeds are not seen consciously albeit available to the brain.

“In simple terms,the properties of a sensory system such as the human visual system are best understood in the context of the kinematics of actions that drive its input(in this case, rapid eye movements),” said Rolfs. 

A finely tuned machine

“Our visual system and motor system are finely tuned to each other, but this has long been ignored,” says Martin Rolfs.

“One of the issues is that the people who study motor control are not the same ones who study perception. They attend different conferences, they publish in different journals –– but they should be talking!”

This study suggests that our visual system can recognize when a stimulus moves in a way that is similar to our own eye movements, and then filters out the conscious perception of this movement.

This also introduces a new mechanism to explain why we do not see visual motion smear on the retina during eye movements as we would if we were using a camera.

About this visual neuroscience research news

Author: Solveig Steinhardt
Source: TUM
Contact: Solveig Steinhardt – TUM
Image: The image is credited to Neuroscience News

Original Research: Open access.
Lawful kinematics link eye movements to the limits of high-speed perception” by Martin Rolfs et al. Nature Communications


Abstract

Lawful kinematics link eye movements to the limits of high-speed perception

Perception requires active sampling of the environment. What part of the physical world can be perceived is limited by the sensory system’s biophysical setup, but might be further constrained by the kinematic bounds of the motor actions used to acquire sensory information.

Here, we tested this fundamental idea for humans’ fastest and most frequent behavior—saccadic eye movements—which entail incidental sensory consequences (i.e., swift retinal motion) that rarely reach awareness in natural vision.

Using high-speed video projection, we display rapidly moving stimuli that faithfully reproduce, or deviate from, saccades’ lawful relation of velocity, duration, and amplitude.

For each stimulus, observers perform perceptual tasks for which performance is contingent on consciously seeing the stimulus’ motion trajectory.

We uncover that visibility of the stimulus’ movement is well predicted by the specific kinematics of saccades and their sensorimotor contingencies, reflecting even variability between individual observers.

Computational modeling shows that spatiotemporal integration during early visual processing predicts this lawful relation in a tight range of biologically plausible parameters.

These results suggest that the visual system takes into account motor kinematics when omitting an action’s incidental sensory consequences, thereby preserving visual sensitivity to high-speed object motion.

Join our Newsletter

 I agree to have my personal information transferred to AWeber for Neuroscience Newsletter ( more information )

Sign up to receive our recent neuroscience headlines and summaries sent to your email once a day, totally free.

We hate spam and only use your email to contact you about newsletters. You can cancel your subscription any time.

Unknown's avatar

About michelleclarke2015

Life event that changes all: Horse riding accident in Zimbabwe in 1993, a fractured skull et al including bipolar anxiety, chronic fatigue …. co-morbidities (Nietzche 'He who has the reason why can deal with any how' details my health history from 1993 to date). 17th 2017 August operation for breast cancer (no indications just an appointment came from BreastCheck through the Post). Trinity College Dublin Business Economics and Social Studies (but no degree) 1997-2003; UCD 1997/1998 night classes) essays, projects, writings. Trinity Horizon Programme 1997/98 (Centre for Women Studies Trinity College Dublin/St. Patrick's Foundation (Professor McKeon) EU Horizon funded: research study of 15 women (I was one of this group and it became the cornerstone of my journey to now 2017) over 9 mth period diagnosed with depression and their reintegration into society, with special emphasis on work, arts, further education; Notes from time at Trinity Horizon Project 1997/98; Articles written for Irishhealth.com 2003/2004; St Patricks Foundation monthly lecture notes for a specific period in time; Selection of Poetry including poems written by people I know; Quotations 1998-2017; other writings mainly with theme of social justice under the heading Citizen Journalism Ireland. Letters written to friends about life in Zimbabwe; Family history including Michael Comyn KC, my grandfather, my grandmother's family, the O'Donnellan ffrench Blake-Forsters; Moral wrong: An acrimonious divorce but the real injustice was the Catholic Church granting an annulment – you can read it and make your own judgment, I have mine. Topics I have written about include annual Brain Awareness week, Mashonaland Irish Associataion in Zimbabwe, Suicide (a life sentence to those left behind); Nostalgia: Tara Hill, Co. Meath.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment