Neuroscience News: How Our Brain Stabilizes Vision Amid Constant Eye Movement. Comment: Fascinated. There are impacts due to a lazy eye not diagnosed; or for that matter the impact of TBI. Vision is far beyond what we think it involves.

How Our Brain Stabilizes Vision Amid Constant Eye Movement

Neuroscience News Logo

How Our Brain Stabilizes Vision Amid Constant Eye Movement

FeaturedNeuroscienceVisual Neuroscience

·November 7, 2024

Summary: A new study reveals how the brain compensates for rapid eye movements, maintaining a stable visual perception despite dynamic visual input. Researchers found that this stability mechanism breaks down for non-rigid motion like rotating vortices, leading to visual instability.

Eye-tracking tests showed that rapid eye movements, or saccades, couldn’t track these complex motions, challenging established visual processing models. This discovery underscores that smooth and rapid eye movements follow different neural pathways.

These findings can refine cognitive and neurodegenerative disorder research. The study offers a fresh view on vision stability and the brain’s motion perception processes.

Key Facts:

  • For non-rigid objects, like rotating vortices, the brain’s usual visual stability mechanism fails, resulting in visual disruptions.
  • Smooth and rapid eye movements are processed in separate neural pathways, challenging the assumption they react similarly to motion signals.
  • The new visual stimulus concept may advance research in neurodegenerative diseases by revealing breakdowns in visual compensation mechanisms.

Source: University of Munster

The visual perception of optical stimuli demands high performance from the brain.

Every second, the eyes absorb more than ten million pieces of information and transmit them to the brain via thousands of nerve fibres. This leads us to perceive the world as stable, even though we are constantly moving our eyes.

This shows an eye.
Vision science has long assumed that rapid and smooth eye movements respond to identical motion signals. Credit: Neuroscience News

Experts suspect that this is made possible by a special compensation mechanism of the visual system, which has been studied for a long time but is still not understood.

A research team led by psychologist Prof Markus Lappe from the University of Münster has investigated how this stable perception of the world arises from a highly dynamic visual input signal on the retina.

They focussed on the motion perception of non-rigid objects such as fire or water, which is virtually unexplored.

The researchers found that, contrary to previous assumptions, smooth eye movements (smooth pursuit) cannot be performed for all types of visual motion.

In addition, they were able to demonstrate for the first time that the compensation mechanism for rapid eye movements (saccades) is overridden when we see certain types of non-rigid movements.

As a result, visual stability is lost. The results of the study have been published in the journal ‘Science Advances’.

‘Our results show a clear separation of the two systems. They are functionally distinct and run along different neuronal pathways,’ explains Markus Lappe.

In the study, the scientists presented a newly discovered visual motion illusion that leads to a disruption of spatial perception. In order to test the new stimulus concept, fifteen subjects had to follow a simulated rotating vortex with their eyes as it moved across a field of dots.

‘Normally this is an easy task, and the eyes remain fixed on the object. Thus, they move continuously at the speed of the object. However, the vortex could not be followed, so the eyes remained static for a period of time,’ explains PhD student Krischan Alexander Koerfer.

A phase of rapid eye movement occurred approximately every 400 milliseconds, which brought the vortex back to the centre of the retina. Each time the subjects made such an eye movement, the vortex seemed to jump forward.

‘The usual compensatory mechanism for rapid eye movements failed when the vortex moved. Although the resulting movement was clearly perceived, the eye could not follow it. This is a previously unknown combination.’

Methodology:

The research team examined the relationship between the presented physical stimuli and the corresponding perception, such as perceived jumps, while precisely measuring the eye position and eye movements synchronously using high-speed infrared cameras, so-called ‘eye trackers’.

In this process, the eyes are illuminated with infrared light and the reflections on the cornea and pupil are filmed and analysed. The reflections allow the exact position and movement of the eyes to be determined.

https://30822ef973006bdb169594060241a6e6.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-40/html/container.html

The new findings from basic research are particularly useful for cognitive and brain research.

‘The fact that for the first time a movement is presented in which the compensation mechanism fails means that old models can be tested and new ones developed,’ says Markus Lappe.

In the long term, the new stimulus concept can also be used to diagnose and research neurodegenerative diseases.

About this visual neuroscience research news

Author: Kathrin Kottke
Source: University of Munster
Contact: Kathrin Kottke – University of Munster
Image: The image is credited to Neuroscience News

Original Research: Open access.
Inability to pursue nonrigid motion produces instability of spatial perception” by Markus Lappe et al. Science Advances

https://30822ef973006bdb169594060241a6e6.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-40/html/container.html


Abstract

Inability to pursue nonrigid motion produces instability of spatial perception

Vision generates a stable representation of space by combining retinal input with internal predictions about the visual consequences of eye movements. We report a type of nonrigid motion that disrupts the connection between eye movements and perception, causing visual instability.

This motion is accurately perceived during fixation, but it cannot be pursued. Catch-up saccades are accurately directed to the moving target but the motion stimulus appears to jump in space with each saccade.

Our results reveal four major findings about perception and the visuomotor system: (i) Pursuit fails for certain types of motion; (ii) pursuit and catch-up saccades are independently controlled; (iii) prediction of saccade consequences is independent from saccade control; and (iv) the visual stability of moving objects relies on similar motion mechanisms as pursuit.

Join our Newsletter

 I agree to have my personal information transferred to AWeber for Neuroscience Newsletter ( more information )

Sign up to receive our recent neuroscience headlines and summaries sent to your email once a day, totally free.

We hate spam and only use your email to contact you about newsletters. You can cancel your subscription any time.

Tags

brain researcheye movementneurobiologyNeuroscienceUniversity of Münstervisionvisual neuroscience

ShareTweetShareShareSubmitEmail

Neuroscience News

Neuroscience News posts science research news from labs, universities, hospitals and news departments around the world. Science articles cover neuroscience, psychology, AI, robotics, neurology, brain cancer, mental health, machine learning, autism, Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, brain research, depression and other sciences.

Unknown's avatar

About michelleclarke2015

Life event that changes all: Horse riding accident in Zimbabwe in 1993, a fractured skull et al including bipolar anxiety, chronic fatigue …. co-morbidities (Nietzche 'He who has the reason why can deal with any how' details my health history from 1993 to date). 17th 2017 August operation for breast cancer (no indications just an appointment came from BreastCheck through the Post). Trinity College Dublin Business Economics and Social Studies (but no degree) 1997-2003; UCD 1997/1998 night classes) essays, projects, writings. Trinity Horizon Programme 1997/98 (Centre for Women Studies Trinity College Dublin/St. Patrick's Foundation (Professor McKeon) EU Horizon funded: research study of 15 women (I was one of this group and it became the cornerstone of my journey to now 2017) over 9 mth period diagnosed with depression and their reintegration into society, with special emphasis on work, arts, further education; Notes from time at Trinity Horizon Project 1997/98; Articles written for Irishhealth.com 2003/2004; St Patricks Foundation monthly lecture notes for a specific period in time; Selection of Poetry including poems written by people I know; Quotations 1998-2017; other writings mainly with theme of social justice under the heading Citizen Journalism Ireland. Letters written to friends about life in Zimbabwe; Family history including Michael Comyn KC, my grandfather, my grandmother's family, the O'Donnellan ffrench Blake-Forsters; Moral wrong: An acrimonious divorce but the real injustice was the Catholic Church granting an annulment – you can read it and make your own judgment, I have mine. Topics I have written about include annual Brain Awareness week, Mashonaland Irish Associataion in Zimbabwe, Suicide (a life sentence to those left behind); Nostalgia: Tara Hill, Co. Meath.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment