Cognitive Superposition: Human Multitasking Meets AI (John Nosta @JohnNosta)

John Nosta (@JohnNosta) posted at 7:31 pm on Tue, Nov 05, 2024:
🧠Cognitive Superposition: Human Multitasking Meets AI

⚡️Large language models transcend human task-switching with parallel multitasking.

Conversation

John Nosta

@JohnNosta

Cognitive Superposition: Human Multitasking Meets AI Large language models transcend human task-switching with parallel multitasking.

@PsychToday

https://t.co/tDtDuqXcQV
(https://x.com/JohnNosta/status/1853882751239283131?t=RuxsjPpl9HY8Kt-1tjGw0g&s=03

Post

Reply

See new posts

Conversation

John Nosta

@JohnNosta

Subscribe

@PsychToday

Post

Reply

See new posts

Conversation

John Nosta

@JohnNosta

Subscribe

🧠Cognitive Superposition: Human Multitasking Meets AI ⚡️Large language models transcend human task-switching with parallel multitasking. Imagine a mind that can juggle multiple tasks seamlessly, solving complex math problems while translating languages—all at once and without missing a beat. Today, it’s becoming clear that artificial intelligence (AI)—especially large language models (LLMs)—has developed an impressive ability to handle multiple distinct tasks at once, a phenomenon detailed in a recent study with a rather fitting title, “Everything Everywhere All at Once: LLMs Can In-Context Learn Multiple Tasks in Superposition.” Researchers reveal that LLMs can engage in what they call “superposition,” allowing them to tackle multiple tasks concurrently. For example, when provided a prompt containing both arithmetic and translation exercises, the model doesn’t need to choose; it processes both in a single response. This capacity creates a kind of parallel cognitive state, where two distinct tasks coexist and function independently. But can our human brain do the same? The answer isn’t straightforward, but exploring it sheds light on the fascinating contrasts and parallels between human and machine intelligence in the context of cognitive multitasking. ⚡️Superposition in AI: A New Kind of Cognitive Multitasking Superposition in LLMs represents a unique form of cognitive flexibility. Unlike the human brain, which typically switches between tasks rather than holding them in parallel, these AI models can perform multiple tasks in one inference. This phenomenon arises from the model’s architecture: transformers, a powerful structure in AI, hold patterns of information in “layers,” allowing them to work on different contexts or objectives simultaneously. Imagine asking an LLM to analyze both the structure and the meaning of a sentence. Instead of breaking down the tasks in sequence, the model holds each in a shared “cognitive space,” drawing from each layer to deliver an integrated response. Larger models, like GPT-4, show enhanced capacity in task superposition, scaling their ability to handle complex, multilayered instructions without the risk of cognitive overload. This task superposition suggests that AI might one day take on intricate, multifaceted roles without explicit training, a development with substantial implications for real-world applications like healthcare, law, and creative industries. But, to understand the broader implications, it’s important to compare it to how the human brain manages multiple tasks. ⚡️The Human Brain’s Approach to Multitasking: Soft Superposition While the human brain doesn’t hold multiple complex tasks in a literal “superposition” like AI, it does exhibit a unique form of multitasking through mechanisms such as cognitive fluidity, background processing, and distributed attention. These mechanisms allow us to manage multiple streams of information without the direct, simultaneous execution that we see in LLMs. 🧠Cognitive fluidity: Cognitive fluidity refers to our brain’s ability to rapidly switch between different thoughts or tasks. Imagine working on a creative project while answering emails. While you may appear to multitask, the brain actually shifts back and forth between tasks, relying on memory and focus to blend both in a seamless experience. It’s more of a juggling act than true parallel processing. 🧠Working memory and cognitive load: Our working memory serves as a kind of mental workspace, holding a limited number of items in focus. This mechanism is critical for problem-solving, allowing us to process ideas, concepts, and information in real time. Unlike an AI, however, our brain’s working memory capacity is limited, typically capped at about three to five items. The more we try to focus on simultaneously, the more cognitive load we experience, often leading to diminished efficiency and accuracy. 🧠Default mode network and task switching: Unlike the AI model’s superposition, the human brain has a default mode network that operates in the background, holding ideas, concerns, and potential solutions without active focus. This network is why solutions to complex problems often come to us in relaxed moments, such as during a walk or in the shower. It’s not true superposition, but it’s our brain’s way of “parking” tasks, waiting for the right moment to bring them into active thought. 🧠Synesthetic and layered thinking: In unique cases like synesthesia or creative flow, the brain blends different senses or ideas into a single experience. For instance, someone with synesthesia may “see” colors when hearing music, hinting at a form of mental superposition where distinct cognitive layers overlap. Creative flow states offer a similar effect, where multiple thoughts and inspirations synthesize without conscious effort. ⚡️AI Superposition and Human Cognition This comparison opens intriguing possibilities in how we think about intelligence itself. AI’s superposition capabilities highlight a structured, explicit multitasking that could redefine “thought efficiency” in industries from healthcare to creative production. It suggests a future in which machines can handle layered tasks seamlessly, with fewer human inputs. Imagine an AI in healthcare that can simultaneously interpret medical scans, analyze a patient’s history, and draft a personalized treatment plan in a single step—no task switching, no compromise in quality. But while AI excels in structural multitasking, human cognition offers something distinctly adaptive. Our “soft superposition” allows us to blend experience, intuition, and emotion into complex decisions. We’re not constrained to narrow, literal interpretations. Even our limitations—the need to pause, reflect, and sometimes fail—bring a depth that shapes our thoughts and decisions with nuance. ⚡️Reexamining Intelligence The existence of superposition in AI forces us to reexamine what intelligence means. Is intelligence the ability to execute tasks in parallel with precision or does it lie in the ability to integrate tasks meaningfully over time, as humans do? Philosophically, AI’s task superposition raises questions about consciousness, self-awareness, and identity. If an AI can hold multiple tasks simultaneously and build on each experience, is it evolving toward a more complex form of thought? Perhaps AI’s structured superposition complements the human brain’s adaptive multitasking. As AI models continue to advance, we may see them as cognitive mirrors, helping us understand our own cognitive processes better. In this sense, AI superposition not only enhances productivity but also reveals what makes our own minds unique: a complexity born of experience, intuition, and the often unpredictable pathways of human thought. https://psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/the-digital-self/202411/cognitive-superposition-human-multitasking-meets-ai… #AI #LLMs

@PsychToday

https://psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/the-digital-self/202411/cognitive-superposition-human-multitasking-meets-ai… #AI #LLMs

Unknown's avatar

About michelleclarke2015

Life event that changes all: Horse riding accident in Zimbabwe in 1993, a fractured skull et al including bipolar anxiety, chronic fatigue …. co-morbidities (Nietzche 'He who has the reason why can deal with any how' details my health history from 1993 to date). 17th 2017 August operation for breast cancer (no indications just an appointment came from BreastCheck through the Post). Trinity College Dublin Business Economics and Social Studies (but no degree) 1997-2003; UCD 1997/1998 night classes) essays, projects, writings. Trinity Horizon Programme 1997/98 (Centre for Women Studies Trinity College Dublin/St. Patrick's Foundation (Professor McKeon) EU Horizon funded: research study of 15 women (I was one of this group and it became the cornerstone of my journey to now 2017) over 9 mth period diagnosed with depression and their reintegration into society, with special emphasis on work, arts, further education; Notes from time at Trinity Horizon Project 1997/98; Articles written for Irishhealth.com 2003/2004; St Patricks Foundation monthly lecture notes for a specific period in time; Selection of Poetry including poems written by people I know; Quotations 1998-2017; other writings mainly with theme of social justice under the heading Citizen Journalism Ireland. Letters written to friends about life in Zimbabwe; Family history including Michael Comyn KC, my grandfather, my grandmother's family, the O'Donnellan ffrench Blake-Forsters; Moral wrong: An acrimonious divorce but the real injustice was the Catholic Church granting an annulment – you can read it and make your own judgment, I have mine. Topics I have written about include annual Brain Awareness week, Mashonaland Irish Associataion in Zimbabwe, Suicide (a life sentence to those left behind); Nostalgia: Tara Hill, Co. Meath.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment